51. VBT in History (1990s): The Empirically Supported Treatment Debate Rages On
Very Bad Therapy05/04/20 • 59 min
The American Psychological Association commissioned a task force in 1993 to determine how to scientifically evaluate psychotherapy treatments. A controversy immediately ensued. Carrie digs into the literature on the history and effectiveness of empirically supported treatments to figure out what this suggests about best clinical practices. Note: this is not an ad for CBT.
Pardon the slight background noise in Carrie’s audio; this is resolved after eight minutes.
Thank you for listening. Support the show by becoming a monthly subscriber on Patreon to receive access to bonus episodes or by making a one-time contribution via PayPal.
Show Notes:
- AAMFT Endorses Evidence Based Practice Consensus Statement
- Defining Empirically Supported Therapies
- History of American Psychological Association Task Force on Promotion and Dissemination of Psychological Procedures
- Psychological Treatments
- Responses to the Task Forces Reports
- Empirically Supported Treatments in Psychotherapy: Towards an Evidence-Based or Evidence-Biased Psychology in Clinical Settings?
- A Vote for Science in Clinical Psychology: The History of Section III of Division 12
- Task Force on Promotion and Dissemination of Psychological Procedures
- Characteristics of Empirically Supported Treatments
- Frontline: Innocence Lost – Little Rascals Abuse Scandal
- Very Bad Therapy: Website / Facebook / Tell Us Your Story
Explicit content warning
05/04/20 • 59 min
Generate a badge
Get a badge for your website that links back to this episode
<a href="https://goodpods.com/podcasts/very-bad-therapy-84735/51-vbt-in-history-1990s-the-empirically-supported-treatment-debate-rag-4534178"> <img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/goodpods-images-bucket/badges/generic-badge-1.svg" alt="listen to 51. vbt in history (1990s): the empirically supported treatment debate rages on on goodpods" style="width: 225px" /> </a>
Copy