2021 Year in Review
01/18/22 • 72 min
In this Season 1 finale episode, fellow appellate attorney and former judicial clerk Jill Lipman Beck of Blank Rome joins host Corrie Woods to discuss the most impactful Supreme Court of Pennsylvania cases and issues of 2021.
You can help us Raise the Bar for Pennsylvania Appeals by following Woods Law Offices on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn, or leave a review on Apple Podcasts.
Thanks for listening!
In this Season 1 finale episode, fellow appellate attorney and former judicial clerk Jill Lipman Beck of Blank Rome joins host Corrie Woods to discuss the most impactful Supreme Court of Pennsylvania cases and issues of 2021.
You can help us Raise the Bar for Pennsylvania Appeals by following Woods Law Offices on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn, or leave a review on Apple Podcasts.
Thanks for listening!
Previous Episode
In Re: Amazon.com, Inc., Fulfillment Center Fair Labor Standards Act and Wage and Hour Litigation
Host Corrie Woods interviews fellow appellate attorney Pete Winebrake of Winebrake & Santillo to discuss In Re: Amazon.com, Inc., Fulfillment Center Fair Labor Standards Act and Wage and Hour Litigation (In Re: Amazon) in which SCOPA held that an employee's time spent on an employer's premises awaiting mandatory security screening constitutes time "worked" for purposes of Pennsylvania's Minimum Wage Act, and that the maxim de minimum non curat lex, or, the law does not care for trivialities, does not apply to time worked for purposes of that Act.
Show Notes:
- Justice Todd's Majority Opinion
- Justice Saylor's Dissenting Opinion
- Justice Mundy's Dissenting Opinion
- Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk
- In Re: Amazon Summary and Report
Read more about In Re: Amazon and all of SCOPA's cases on SCOPAblog.
You can help us Raise the Bar for Pennsylvania Appeals by following Woods Law Offices on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn, or leave a review on Apple Podcasts.
Thanks for listening!
Next Episode
Commonwealth v. Bradley
Host Corrie Woods interviews fellow appellate attorney Michael Wiseman of Wiseman & Schwartz to discuss Commonwealth v. Bradley, holding that petitioners pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act may assert claims of ineffective assistance of post-conviction counsel at the earliest available opportunity, including on direct appeal.
Show Notes:
- Justice Todd's Majority Opinion
- Justice Dougherty's Concurring Opinion
- Justice Wecht's Concurring Opinion
- Justice Mundy's Dissenting Opinion
- Shinn v. Ramirez summary
- Martinez v. Ryan Opinion Analysis
Read more about Bradley and all of SCOPA's cases on SCOPAblog.
You can help us Raise the Bar for Pennsylvania Appeals by following Woods Law Offices on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn, or leave a review on Apple Podcasts.
Thanks for listening!
If you like this episode you’ll love
Episode Comments
Generate a badge
Get a badge for your website that links back to this episode
<a href="https://goodpods.com/podcasts/the-standard-of-review-257447/2021-year-in-review-30176504"> <img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/goodpods-images-bucket/badges/generic-badge-1.svg" alt="listen to 2021 year in review on goodpods" style="width: 225px" /> </a>
Copy