The Standard of Review
Corrie Woods
All episodes
Best episodes
Seasons
Top 10 The Standard of Review Episodes
Goodpods has curated a list of the 10 best The Standard of Review episodes, ranked by the number of listens and likes each episode have garnered from our listeners. If you are listening to The Standard of Review for the first time, there's no better place to start than with one of these standout episodes. If you are a fan of the show, vote for your favorite The Standard of Review episode by adding your comments to the episode page.
In Re: Amazon.com, Inc., Fulfillment Center Fair Labor Standards Act and Wage and Hour Litigation
The Standard of Review
11/15/21 • 52 min
Host Corrie Woods interviews fellow appellate attorney Pete Winebrake of Winebrake & Santillo to discuss In Re: Amazon.com, Inc., Fulfillment Center Fair Labor Standards Act and Wage and Hour Litigation (In Re: Amazon) in which SCOPA held that an employee's time spent on an employer's premises awaiting mandatory security screening constitutes time "worked" for purposes of Pennsylvania's Minimum Wage Act, and that the maxim de minimum non curat lex, or, the law does not care for trivialities, does not apply to time worked for purposes of that Act.
Show Notes:
- Justice Todd's Majority Opinion
- Justice Saylor's Dissenting Opinion
- Justice Mundy's Dissenting Opinion
- Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk
- In Re: Amazon Summary and Report
Read more about In Re: Amazon and all of SCOPA's cases on SCOPAblog.
You can help us Raise the Bar for Pennsylvania Appeals by following Woods Law Offices on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn, or leave a review on Apple Podcasts.
Thanks for listening!
Commonwealth v. Peck
The Standard of Review
06/09/21 • 28 min
Host Corrie Woods interviews fellow appellate attorney Brian McNeil of the York County Office of the Public Defender to discuss his victory in Commonwealth v. Peck, where he doggedly appealed to SCOPA despite the lower courts' swift dismissal of his close reading of PA's Drug Delivery Resulting in Death statute (DDRD). Fortunately, SCOPA agreed with his arguments, thus saving his client 20-40 years from life behind bars.
Show Notes:
- Justice Donohue's Opinion
- Justice Wecht's Concurring Opinion
- Article from the York Daily Record
- Article: Pennsylvania Uses the Charge of "Drug Delivery Resulting in Death" More Than Any Other State
- The Appeal blog
Read more about Commonwealth v. Peck and all of SCOPA's cases on SCOPAblog.
You can help us Raise the Bar for Pennsylvania Appeals by following Woods Law Offices on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn, or leave a review on Apple Podcasts.
Thanks for listening!
Commonwealth v. Bradley
The Standard of Review
10/13/22 • 32 min
Host Corrie Woods interviews fellow appellate attorney Michael Wiseman of Wiseman & Schwartz to discuss Commonwealth v. Bradley, holding that petitioners pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act may assert claims of ineffective assistance of post-conviction counsel at the earliest available opportunity, including on direct appeal.
Show Notes:
- Justice Todd's Majority Opinion
- Justice Dougherty's Concurring Opinion
- Justice Wecht's Concurring Opinion
- Justice Mundy's Dissenting Opinion
- Shinn v. Ramirez summary
- Martinez v. Ryan Opinion Analysis
Read more about Bradley and all of SCOPA's cases on SCOPAblog.
You can help us Raise the Bar for Pennsylvania Appeals by following Woods Law Offices on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn, or leave a review on Apple Podcasts.
Thanks for listening!
2021 Year in Review
The Standard of Review
01/18/22 • 72 min
In this Season 1 finale episode, fellow appellate attorney and former judicial clerk Jill Lipman Beck of Blank Rome joins host Corrie Woods to discuss the most impactful Supreme Court of Pennsylvania cases and issues of 2021.
You can help us Raise the Bar for Pennsylvania Appeals by following Woods Law Offices on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn, or leave a review on Apple Podcasts.
Thanks for listening!
Commonwealth v. Shaw
The Standard of Review
10/10/21 • 26 min
Host Corrie Woods interviews fellow appellate attorney Teri B. Himebaugh to discuss Commonwealth v. Shaw, in which SCOPA held that petitioners pursuant to the PCRA may assert claims of ineffective assistance of their appellate counsel for the first time on appeal.
Show Notes:
- Chief Justice Saylor's Opinion
- Justice Mundy's Dissenting Opinion
- The Police Transparency Project
- Part 2 of The Philadelphia Inquirer's special report series, Losing Conviction
- Siphonaptera poem
Read more about Commonwealth v. Shaw and all of SCOPA's cases on SCOPAblog.
You can help us Raise the Bar for Pennsylvania Appeals by following Woods Law Offices on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn, or leave a review on Apple Podcasts.
Thanks for listening!
Pittsburgh Logistics Sys., Inc. v. Beemac Trucking, LLC
The Standard of Review
09/13/21 • 21 min
Host Corrie Woods interviews fellow appellate attorneys Dan McLane and Tom Sanchez of Eckert Seamans to discuss Pittsburgh Logistics Sys., Inc. v. Beemac Trucking, LLC, a case in which the Court held unanimously that the Restatement test for no-hire/no-poach provisions ancillary to a services contract between two business entities governs in Pennsylvania and finding the subject no-hire/no-poach provision to be unenforceable.
Show Notes:
- Justice Mundy's Opinion
- United States Department of Justice's "No-Poach Approach"
- Bloomberg Law Summary
Read more about Pittsburgh Logistics Sys., Inc. v. Beemac Trucking, LLC and all of SCOPA's cases on SCOPAblog.
You can help us Raise the Bar for Pennsylvania Appeals by following Woods Law Offices on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn, or leave a review on Apple Podcasts.
Thanks for listening!
Wise v. Huntingdon Cnty. Housing Dev. Corp.
The Standard of Review
08/16/21 • 43 min
Host Corrie Woods interviews fellow appellate attorney Nathan Murawsky of Hamburg, Rubin, Mullin, Maxwell & Lupin, PC to discuss Wise v. Huntingdon Cnty. Housing Dev. Corp., a case involving statutory sovereign immunity, and an exception thereto for injuries resulting from dangerous conditions of the Commonwealth's real estate. In Wise, the Court at long last reassesses and rejects some of the more bizarre distinctions in this area of the law.
Show Notes:
Read more about Wise v. Huntingdon Cnty. Housing Dev. Corp. and all of SCOPA's cases on SCOPAblog.
You can help us Raise the Bar for Pennsylvania Appeals by following Woods Law Offices on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn, or leave a review on Apple Podcasts.
Thanks for listening!
Commonwealth v. Alexander
The Standard of Review
07/26/21 • 55 min
Host Corrie Woods interviews fellow appellate attorney Aaron Marcus of the Defender Association of Philadelphia to discuss Commonwealth v. Alexander, in which SCOPA held that the Pennsylvania Constitution provides motorists greater privacy rights than the federal Constitution, requiring any search of an automobile in Pennsylvania be supported not only by probable cause, as the federal Constitution requires, but also by exigent circumstances that make it impracticable to obtain a warrant.
Show Notes:
- Justice Donohue's Opinion
- Justice Baer's Concurring Opinion
- Chief Justice Saylor's Dissenting Opinion
- Justice Dougherty's Dissenting Opinion
- Justice Mundy's Dissenting Opinion
- "Precedent and Discretion" by William Baude
- "Book Examines the History and Contemporary Role of Philadelphia's Public Defenders"
Read more about Commonwealth v. Alexander and all of SCOPA's cases on SCOPAblog.
You can help us Raise the Bar for Pennsylvania Appeals by following Woods Law Offices on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn, or leave a review on Apple Podcasts.
Thanks for listening!
In Re: Canvass of Absentee and Mail-In Ballots of November 3, 2020 General Election
The Standard of Review
05/17/21 • 41 min
Host Corrie Woods interviews fellow appellate attorney Adam C. Bonin to discuss the recent developments in Pennsylvania election law, with a special emphasis on the series of cases related to the 2020 general election.
Show Notes:
Read more about In Re: Canvass of Absentee and Mail-In Ballots and all of SCOPA's cases on SCOPAblog.
You can help us Raise the Bar for Pennsylvania Appeals by following Woods Law Offices on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn, or leave a review on Apple Podcasts.
Thanks for listening!
Uniontown Newspapers, Inc. v. Pa. Dept. of Corr.
The Standard of Review
04/23/21 • 44 min
Host Corrie Woods interviews fellow appellate attorneys Charlie Kelly and Michael Joyce to discuss the impact of SCOPA's ruling in Uniontown Newspapers, Inc. v. Pa. Dept. of Corr., interpreting an issue of first impression regarding PA's Right to Know Law.
Show Notes:
Read more about Uniontown Newspapers and all of SCOPA's cases on SCOPAblog.
You can help us Raise the Bar for Pennsylvania Appeals by following Woods Law Offices on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn, or leave a review on Apple Podcasts.
Thanks for listening!
Show more best episodes
Show more best episodes
FAQ
How many episodes does The Standard of Review have?
The Standard of Review currently has 11 episodes available.
What topics does The Standard of Review cover?
The podcast is about News, Lawyer, Attorney, Supreme Court, Law, Podcasts and Government.
What is the most popular episode on The Standard of Review?
The episode title 'Commonwealth v. Bradley' is the most popular.
What is the average episode length on The Standard of Review?
The average episode length on The Standard of Review is 40 minutes.
How often are episodes of The Standard of Review released?
Episodes of The Standard of Review are typically released every 35 days, 19 hours.
When was the first episode of The Standard of Review?
The first episode of The Standard of Review was released on Mar 16, 2021.
Show more FAQ
Show more FAQ