Machine Learning Street Talk (MLST)

Eliezer Yudkowsky and Stephen Wolfram discuss artificial intelligence and its potential existen‐

tial risks. They traversed fundamental questions about AI safety, consciousness, computational irreducibility, and the nature of intelligence.

The discourse centered on Yudkowsky’s argument that advanced AI systems pose an existential threat to humanity, primarily due to the challenge of alignment and the potential for emergent goals that diverge from human values. Wolfram, while acknowledging potential risks, approached the topic from a his signature measured perspective, emphasizing the importance of understanding computational systems’ fundamental nature and questioning whether AI systems would necessarily develop the kind of goal‐directed behavior Yudkowsky fears.

***

MLST IS SPONSORED BY TUFA AI LABS!

The current winners of the ARC challenge, MindsAI are part of Tufa AI Labs. They are hiring ML engineers. Are you interested?! Please goto https://tufalabs.ai/

***

TOC:

1. Foundational AI Concepts and Risks

[00:00:01] 1.1 AI Optimization and System Capabilities Debate

[00:06:46] 1.2 Computational Irreducibility and Intelligence Limitations

[00:20:09] 1.3 Existential Risk and Species Succession

[00:23:28] 1.4 Consciousness and Value Preservation in AI Systems

2. Ethics and Philosophy in AI

[00:33:24] 2.1 Moral Value of Human Consciousness vs. Computation

[00:36:30] 2.2 Ethics and Moral Philosophy Debate

[00:39:58] 2.3 Existential Risks and Digital Immortality

[00:43:30] 2.4 Consciousness and Personal Identity in Brain Emulation

3. Truth and Logic in AI Systems

[00:54:39] 3.1 AI Persuasion Ethics and Truth

[01:01:48] 3.2 Mathematical Truth and Logic in AI Systems

[01:11:29] 3.3 Universal Truth vs Personal Interpretation in Ethics and Mathematics

[01:14:43] 3.4 Quantum Mechanics and Fundamental Reality Debate

4. AI Capabilities and Constraints

[01:21:21] 4.1 AI Perception and Physical Laws

[01:28:33] 4.2 AI Capabilities and Computational Constraints

[01:34:59] 4.3 AI Motivation and Anthropomorphization Debate

[01:38:09] 4.4 Prediction vs Agency in AI Systems

5. AI System Architecture and Behavior

[01:44:47] 5.1 Computational Irreducibility and Probabilistic Prediction

[01:48:10] 5.2 Teleological vs Mechanistic Explanations of AI Behavior

[02:09:41] 5.3 Machine Learning as Assembly of Computational Components

[02:29:52] 5.4 AI Safety and Predictability in Complex Systems

6. Goal Optimization and Alignment

[02:50:30] 6.1 Goal Specification and Optimization Challenges in AI Systems

[02:58:31] 6.2 Intelligence, Computation, and Goal-Directed Behavior

[03:02:18] 6.3 Optimization Goals and Human Existential Risk

[03:08:49] 6.4 Emergent Goals and AI Alignment Challenges

7. AI Evolution and Risk Assessment

[03:19:44] 7.1 Inner Optimization and Mesa-Optimization Theory

[03:34:00] 7.2 Dynamic AI Goals and Extinction Risk Debate

[03:56:05] 7.3 AI Risk and Biological System Analogies

[04:09:37] 7.4 Expert Risk Assessments and Optimism vs Reality

8. Future Implications and Economics

[04:13:01] 8.1 Economic and Proliferation Considerations

SHOWNOTES (transcription, references, summary, best quotes etc):

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3st8dts2ba7yob161dchd/EliezerWolfram.pdf?rlkey=b6va5j8upgqwl9s2muc924vtt&st=vemwqx7a&dl=0

Dr. Joscha Bach discusses advanced AI, consciousness, and cognitive modeling. He presents consciousness as a virtual property emerging from self-organizing software patterns, challenging panpsychism and materialism. Bach introduces "Cyberanima," reinterpreting animism through information processing, viewing spirits as self-organizing software agents.

He addresses limitations of current large language models and advocates for smaller, more efficient AI models capable of reasoning from first principles. Bach describes his work with Liquid AI on novel neural network architectures for improved expressiveness and efficiency.

The interview covers AI's societal implications, including regulation challenges and impact on innovation. Bach argues for balancing oversight with technological progress, warning against overly restrictive regulations.

Throughout, Bach frames consciousness, intelligence, and agency as emergent properties of complex information processing systems, proposing a computational framework for cognitive phenomena and reality.

SPONSOR MESSAGE:

DO YOU WANT WORK ON ARC with the MindsAI team (current ARC winners)? MLST is sponsored by Tufa Labs: Focus: ARC, LLMs, test-time-compute, active inference, system2 reasoning, and more. Future plans: Expanding to complex environments like Warcraft 2 and Starcraft 2. Interested? Apply for an ML research position: benjamin@tufa.ai

TOC

[00:00:00] 1.1 Consciousness and Intelligence in AI Development

[00:07:44] 1.2 Agency, Intelligence, and Their Relationship to Physical Reality

[00:13:36] 1.3 Virtual Patterns and Causal Structures in Consciousness

[00:25:49] 1.4 Reinterpreting Concepts of God and Animism in Information Processing Terms

[00:32:50] 1.5 Animism and Evolution as Competition Between Software Agents

2. Self-Organizing Systems and Cognitive Models in AI

[00:37:59] 2.1 Consciousness as self-organizing software

[00:45:49] 2.2 Critique of panpsychism and alternative views on consciousness

[00:50:48] 2.3 Emergence of consciousness in complex systems

[00:52:50] 2.4 Neuronal motivation and the origins of consciousness

[00:56:47] 2.5 Coherence and Self-Organization in AI Systems

3. Advanced AI Architectures and Cognitive Processes

[00:57:50] 3.1 Second-Order Software and Complex Mental Processes

[01:01:05] 3.2 Collective Agency and Shared Values in AI

[01:05:40] 3.3 Limitations of Current AI Agents and LLMs

[01:06:40] 3.4 Liquid AI and Novel Neural Network Architectures

[01:10:06] 3.5 AI Model Efficiency and Future Directions

[01:19:00] 3.6 LLM Limitations and Internal State Representation

4. AI Regulation and Societal Impact

[01:31:23] 4.1 AI Regulation and Societal Impact

[01:49:50] 4.2 Open-Source AI and Industry Challenges

Refs in shownotes and MP3 metadata

Shownotes:

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/g28dosz19bzcfs5imrvbu/JoschaInterview.pdf?rlkey=s3y18jy192ktz6ogd7qtvry3d&st=10z7q7w9&dl=0

Support us! https://www.patreon.com/mlst MLST Discord: https://discord.gg/aNPkGUQtc5 Twitter: https://twitter.com/MLStreetTalk The first 10 mins of audio from Joscha isn't great, it improves after.

Transcript and longer summary: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TUJhlSVbrHf2vWoe6p7xL5tlTK_BGZ140QqqTudF8UI/edit?usp=sharing Dr. Joscha Bach argued that general intelligence emerges from civilization, not individuals. Given our biological constraints, humans cannot achieve a high level of general intelligence on our own. Bach believes AGI may become integrated into all parts of the world, including human minds and bodies. He thinks a future where humans and AGI harmoniously coexist is possible if we develop a shared purpose and incentive to align. However, Bach is uncertain about how AI progress will unfold or which scenarios are most likely. Bach argued that global control and regulation of AI is unrealistic. While regulation may address some concerns, it cannot stop continued progress in AI. He believes individuals determine their own values, so "human values" cannot be formally specified and aligned across humanity. For Bach, the possibility of building beneficial AGI is exciting but much work is still needed to ensure a positive outcome. Connor Leahy believes we have more control over the future than the default outcome might suggest. With sufficient time and effort, humanity could develop the technology and coordination to build a beneficial AGI. However, the default outcome likely leads to an undesirable scenario if we do not actively work to build a better future. Leahy thinks finding values and priorities most humans endorse could help align AI, even if individuals disagree on some values. Leahy argued a future where humans and AGI harmoniously coexist is ideal but will require substantial work to achieve. While regulation faces challenges, it remains worth exploring. Leahy believes limits to progress in AI exist but we are unlikely to reach them before humanity is at risk. He worries even modestly superhuman intelligence could disrupt the status quo if misaligned with human values and priorities. Overall, Bach and Leahy expressed optimism about the possibility of building beneficial AGI but believe we must address risks and challenges proactively. They agreed substantial uncertainty remains around how AI will progress and what scenarios are most plausible. But developing a shared purpose between humans and AI, improving coordination and control, and finding human values to help guide progress could all improve the odds of a beneficial outcome. With openness to new ideas and willingness to consider multiple perspectives, continued discussions like this one could help ensure the future of AI is one that benefits and inspires humanity. TOC: 00:00:00 - Introduction and Background 00:02:54 - Different Perspectives on AGI 00:13:59 - The Importance of AGI 00:23:24 - Existential Risks and the Future of Humanity 00:36:21 - Coherence and Coordination in Society 00:40:53 - Possibilities and Future of AGI 00:44:08 - Coherence and alignment 01:08:32 - The role of values in AI alignment 01:18:33 - The future of AGI and merging with AI 01:22:14 - The limits of AI alignment 01:23:06 - The scalability of intelligence 01:26:15 - Closing statements and future prospects

François Chollet discusses the outcomes of the ARC-AGI (Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus) Prize competition in 2024, where accuracy rose from 33% to 55.5% on a private evaluation set.

SPONSOR MESSAGES:

***

CentML offers competitive pricing for GenAI model deployment, with flexible options to suit a wide range of models, from small to large-scale deployments.

https://centml.ai/pricing/

Tufa AI Labs is a brand new research lab in Zurich started by Benjamin Crouzier focussed on o-series style reasoning and AGI. Are you interested in working on reasoning, or getting involved in their events?

They are hosting an event in Zurich on January 9th with the ARChitects, join if you can.

Goto https://tufalabs.ai/

***

Read about the recent result on o3 with ARC here (Chollet knew about it at the time of the interview but wasn't allowed to say):

https://arcprize.org/blog/oai-o3-pub-breakthrough

TOC:

1. Introduction and Opening

[00:00:00] 1.1 Deep Learning vs. Symbolic Reasoning: François’s Long-Standing Hybrid View

[00:00:48] 1.2 “Why Do They Call You a Symbolist?” – Addressing Misconceptions

[00:01:31] 1.3 Defining Reasoning

3. ARC Competition 2024 Results and Evolution

[00:07:26] 3.1 ARC Prize 2024: Reflecting on the Narrative Shift Toward System 2

[00:10:29] 3.2 Comparing Private Leaderboard vs. Public Leaderboard Solutions

[00:13:17] 3.3 Two Winning Approaches: Deep Learning–Guided Program Synthesis and Test-Time Training

4. Transduction vs. Induction in ARC

[00:16:04] 4.1 Test-Time Training, Overfitting Concerns, and Developer-Aware Generalization

[00:19:35] 4.2 Gradient Descent Adaptation vs. Discrete Program Search

5. ARC-2 Development and Future Directions

[00:23:51] 5.1 Ensemble Methods, Benchmark Flaws, and the Need for ARC-2

[00:25:35] 5.2 Human-Level Performance Metrics and Private Test Sets

[00:29:44] 5.3 Task Diversity, Redundancy Issues, and Expanded Evaluation Methodology

6. Program Synthesis Approaches

[00:30:18] 6.1 Induction vs. Transduction

[00:32:11] 6.2 Challenges of Writing Algorithms for Perceptual vs. Algorithmic Tasks

[00:34:23] 6.3 Combining Induction and Transduction

[00:37:05] 6.4 Multi-View Insight and Overfitting Regulation

7. Latent Space and Graph-Based Synthesis

[00:38:17] 7.1 Clément Bonnet’s Latent Program Search Approach

[00:40:10] 7.2 Decoding to Symbolic Form and Local Discrete Search

[00:41:15] 7.3 Graph of Operators vs. Token-by-Token Code Generation

[00:45:50] 7.4 Iterative Program Graph Modifications and Reusable Functions

8. Compute Efficiency and Lifelong Learning

[00:48:05] 8.1 Symbolic Process for Architecture Generation

[00:50:33] 8.2 Logarithmic Relationship of Compute and Accuracy

[00:52:20] 8.3 Learning New Building Blocks for Future Tasks

9. AI Reasoning and Future Development

[00:53:15] 9.1 Consciousness as a Self-Consistency Mechanism in Iterative Reasoning

[00:56:30] 9.2 Reconciling Symbolic and Connectionist Views

[01:00:13] 9.3 System 2 Reasoning - Awareness and Consistency

[01:03:05] 9.4 Novel Problem Solving, Abstraction, and Reusability

10. Program Synthesis and Research Lab

[01:05:53] 10.1 François Leaving Google to Focus on Program Synthesis

[01:09:55] 10.2 Democratizing Programming and Natural Language Instruction

11. Frontier Models and O1 Architecture

[01:14:38] 11.1 Search-Based Chain of Thought vs. Standard Forward Pass

[01:16:55] 11.2 o1’s Natural Language Program Generation and Test-Time Compute Scaling

[01:19:35] 11.3 Logarithmic Gains with Deeper Search

12. ARC Evaluation and Human Intelligence

[01:22:55] 12.1 LLMs as Guessing Machines and Agent Reliability Issues

[01:25:02] 12.2 ARC-2 Human Testing and Correlation with g-Factor

[01:26:16] 12.3 Closing Remarks and Future Directions

SHOWNOTES PDF:

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ujaai0ewpdnsosc5mc30k/CholletNeurips.pdf?rlkey=s68dp432vefpj2z0dp5wmzqz6&st=hazphyx5&dl=0

Laura Ruis, a PhD student at University College London and researcher at Cohere, explains her groundbreaking research into how large language models (LLMs) perform reasoning tasks, the fundamental mechanisms underlying LLM reasoning capabilities, and whether these models primarily rely on retrieval or develop procedural knowledge.

SPONSOR MESSAGES:

***

CentML offers competitive pricing for GenAI model deployment, with flexible options to suit a wide range of models, from small to large-scale deployments.

https://centml.ai/pricing/

Tufa AI Labs is a brand new research lab in Zurich started by Benjamin Crouzier focussed on o-series style reasoning and AGI. Are you interested in working on reasoning, or getting involved in their events?

Goto https://tufalabs.ai/

***

TOC

1. LLM Foundations and Learning

1.1 Scale and Learning in Language Models [00:00:00]

1.2 Procedural Knowledge vs Fact Retrieval [00:03:40]

1.3 Influence Functions and Model Analysis [00:07:40]

1.4 Role of Code in LLM Reasoning [00:11:10]

1.5 Semantic Understanding and Physical Grounding [00:19:30]

2. Reasoning Architectures and Measurement

2.1 Measuring Understanding and Reasoning in Language Models [00:23:10]

2.2 Formal vs Approximate Reasoning and Model Creativity [00:26:40]

2.3 Symbolic vs Subsymbolic Computation Debate [00:34:10]

2.4 Neural Network Architectures and Tensor Product Representations [00:40:50]

3. AI Agency and Risk Assessment

3.1 Agency and Goal-Directed Behavior in Language Models [00:45:10]

3.2 Defining and Measuring Agency in AI Systems [00:49:50]

3.3 Core Knowledge Systems and Agency Detection [00:54:40]

3.4 Language Models as Agent Models and Simulator Theory [01:03:20]

3.5 AI Safety and Societal Control Mechanisms [01:07:10]

3.6 Evolution of AI Capabilities and Emergent Risks [01:14:20]

REFS:

[00:01:10] Procedural Knowledge in Pretraining & LLM Reasoning

Ruis et al., 2024

https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.12580

[00:03:50] EK-FAC Influence Functions in Large LMs

Grosse et al., 2023

https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.03296

[00:13:05] Surfaces and Essences: Analogy as the Core of Cognition

Hofstadter & Sander

https://www.amazon.com/Surfaces-Essences-Analogy-Fuel-Thinking/dp/0465018475

[00:13:45] Wittgenstein on Language Games

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/wittgenstein/

[00:14:30] Montague Semantics for Natural Language

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/montague-semantics/

[00:19:35] The Chinese Room Argument

David Cole

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/chinese-room/

[00:19:55] ARC: Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus

François Chollet

https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.01547

[00:24:20] Systematic Generalization in Neural Nets

Lake & Baroni, 2023

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06668-3

[00:27:40] Open-Endedness & Creativity in AI

Tim Rocktäschel

https://arxiv.org/html/2406.04268v1

[00:30:50] Fodor & Pylyshyn on Connectionism

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0010027788900315

[00:31:30] Tensor Product Representations

Smolensky, 1990

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/000437029090007M

[00:35:50] DreamCoder: Wake-Sleep Program Synthesis

Kevin Ellis et al.

https://courses.cs.washington.edu/courses/cse599j1/22sp/papers/dreamcoder.pdf

[00:36:30] Compositional Generalization Benchmarks

Ruis, Lake et al., 2022

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2202.10745

[00:40:30] RNNs & Tensor Products

McCoy et al., 2018

https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.08718

[00:46:10] Formal Causal Definition of Agency

Kenton et al.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2208.08345v2

[00:48:40] Agency in Language Models

Sumers et al.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.02427

[00:55:20] Heider & Simmel’s Moving Shapes Experiment

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-65532-0

[01:00:40] Language Models as Agent Models

Jacob Andreas, 2022

https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.01681

[01:13:35] Pragmatic Understanding in LLMs

Ruis et al.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.14986