
Two Psychologists Four Beers
Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett
1 Listener
All episodes
Best episodes
Top 10 Two Psychologists Four Beers Episodes
Goodpods has curated a list of the 10 best Two Psychologists Four Beers episodes, ranked by the number of listens and likes each episode have garnered from our listeners. If you are listening to Two Psychologists Four Beers for the first time, there's no better place to start than with one of these standout episodes. If you are a fan of the show, vote for your favorite Two Psychologists Four Beers episode by adding your comments to the episode page.

Episode 63: Legalize It (with Carl Hart)
Two Psychologists Four Beers
03/24/21 • 82 min
Neuroscientist and addiction researcher Carl Hart joins the show to talk drug legalization. Why does he think all drugs should be legal? What are some common myths about drug use and addiction? And how has his personal experience as a regular drug user influenced his views?
Bonus: What drugs should we try next?
Special Guest: Carl Hart.
Links:
- Frisch - Collective Arts Brewing
- 6ix Days in Dade | J Wakefield Brewing
- Drug Use for Grown-Ups: Chasing Liberty in the Land of Fear: Hart, Carl L. Dr.: 9781101981641: Amazon.com: Books
- Effects of Acute Smoked Marijuana on Complex Cognitive Performance | Neuropsychopharmacology
- Inappropriate interpretations of prenatal drug use data can be worse than the drugs themselves - ScienceDirect
- Carl Hart Interview: Imagining a World Where All Drugs Are Legal | GQ
- Sylvan Esso - Free - YouTube
1 Listener

Episode 2: You're Not Wrong Walter, You're Just an A$$hole
Two Psychologists Four Beers
06/05/18 • 61 min
In this episode, Yoel and Mickey tackle problems of tone and incivility in online discussions of the scientific literature. What constitutes bullying and is the term abused to derail legitimate criticism? What is an ad hominem attack and when is it a fallacy? Finally, who's our favorite member of the Black Goat podcast?
Links:
- When the Revolution Came for Amy Cuddy - The New York Times
- Here’s How Cornell Scientist Brian Wansink Turned Shoddy Data Into Viral Studies About How We Eat
- Some Points On Bullying, Attacks and Criticism
- Simone Schnall's replication response
- Issues with data and analyses: Errors, underlying themes, and potential solutions | PNAS — Scientists are often protected by academic freedom, and in the United States, individuals are afforded First Amendment rights for free speech. However, freedoms are not immune to legal or social recourse, as in the case where a biotech chief executive officer was convicted of wire fraud for a misleading press release about a product (88). Individuals engaging in ad hominem attacks in scientific discourse should be subject to censure.
- No, we can't censure people for ad hominem attacks in scientific discourse. |
- Stop accusing me of ad hominem fallacies you stupid idiots | The Logic of Science
- PsychMAP
- PsychMAD
- Sanjay's blog
- Simine's blog
- The Black Goat – A podcast about doing science
- Wheat — Side Launch Brewing Company
- Great Lakes Brewery - Octopus Wants to Fight IPA

Episode 102: Destigmatizing Mental Health (with Andrew Devendorf)
Two Psychologists Four Beers
02/08/23 • 79 min
Andrew Devendorf joins Alexa and Yoel to discuss his work on "me-search" (or self-relevant research) within clinical psychology. He talks about the prevalence of mental health difficulties within the field, and the harmful taboos against speaking openly about them. And, he shares his own reasons for studying depression and suicide, and how he has been discouraged from citing personal experience as a motivation for his work. Their conversation also explores common misconceptions about mental illness, strengths of self-relevant research, and ways to be more supportive to those facing mental health challenges. In the end, Yoel and Alexa fail to resolve their debate about the existence of the "unbiased researcher."
Special Guest: Andrew Devendorf.
Links:
- Two Psychologists Four Beers on Untappd
- Andrew Devendorf, M.A.
- PsyArXiv Preprints | Stigmatizing our own: Self-relevant research (Me-search) is common but frowned upon in clinical psychological science
- PsyArXiv Preprints | Is "me-search" a Kiss of Death in mental health research
- Only Human: Mental-Health Difficulties Among Clinical, Counseling, and School Psychology Faculty and Trainees
- My Brother Went Missing, And The Search For Him Turned My World Upside Down | HuffPost HuffPost Personal
- NADA SURF - where is my mind? (Official Video) - YouTube

Episode 32: Measurement Schmeasurement (with Jessica Flake)
Two Psychologists Four Beers
10/16/19 • 80 min
Jessica Flake joins Mickey and Yoel to talk measurement. What is it, how do you do it well, and do social psychologists care about it? What does measurement theory tell us about the validity of standardized tests like the GRE? Jessica also talks about how she went from high-school dropout to professor at McGill.
Bonus: what the hell is Kentucky Gentleman?
Special Guest: Jessica Flake.
Links:
- Brasserie Harricana, Montréal, Quebec, Canada | RateBeer
- JK Flake 📈📏 on Twitter: "What? The GRE is not a face valid measure of quantitative + verbal reasoning? These discussions are off the rails."
- Construct Validation in Social and Personality Research: Current Practice and Recommendations - Jessica K. Flake, Jolynn Pek, Eric Hehman, 2017
- PsyArXiv Preprints | Measurement Schmeasurement: Questionable Measurement Practices and How to Avoid Them
- Psychological Science Accelerator – a distributed laboratory network
- Kentucky Gentleman - Wikipedia
- Warpaint - 'Billie Holiday (Rough Trade Sessions)' - YouTube

Episode 22: Blend of Darkness (with Brent Roberts)
Two Psychologists Four Beers
05/22/19 • 89 min
Yoel and Mickey welcome Professor of Psychology Brent Roberts from the University of Illinois to the podcast. One of the most influential personality psychologists of our day, Brent unleashes his thoughts on broad range of topics: candidate gene studies, personality, conscientiousness, coddling of the American mind, screen-time, senior colleagues, and the replication crisis in psychology. What is personality and how does it change? Why do people love the Myers-Briggs personality test? How would conscientiousness have helped us in our ancestral past? Has helicopter-parenting made American kids fragile and easily debilitated? Has the smartphone actually destroyed a generation? Should we be optimistic about the gains made by the reform movement in psychology?
Bonus: Mickey gives Yoel a surprise gift.
Special Guest: Brent Roberts.
Links:
- White Pony Microbrewery — Blend of Darkness is a blend and is made up of "Black Sheep" and "Zumbi" which has then been variously matured in Speyside, whisky, brandy, tequila and Jack Daniel's Bourbon casks. Finally, this oak aged beer has been blended again, this time with "Sheep doesn't get sheep", White Pony's new imperial stout.
- Live Transmission Milkshake IPA — Grab me a beer, too!
- Naughty Neighbour Pale Ale — Nickel Brook Brewing co. — The Naughty Neighbour is ready to knock your socks (and skates) off! Practically born with her skates on, Naughty Neighbour quickly rose through the ranks to become an undefeated Roller Derby Champ. Just like her, our American Pale Ale is bold, smooth and in-your-face!
- Whiskey Barrel Stout | Boulevard Brewing Company — Over-the-top but surprisingly approachable, this twist on the classic style starts with several types of malted barley, rye, oats and wheat.
- Brent W Roberts | Psychology at Illinois
- 5-HTTLPR: A Pointed Review | Slate Star Codex
- No Support for Historical Candidate Gene or Candidate Gene-by-Interaction Hypotheses for Major Depression Across Multiple Large Samples. - PubMed - NCBI
- The surprise guest
- Brent W. Roberts on Twitter: "Progress implies you had a place to move from. There has never been any place to move from than "the association of screen time to well-being in teens is minuscule". Are you claiming that the effect sizes were large and are now small? 1/... https://t.co/4WFOz7shHK"
- The New Rules of Research | pigee
- Social media’s enduring effect on adolescent life satisfaction | PNAS — In this study, we used large-scale representative panel data to disentangle the between-person and within-person relations linking adolescent social media use and well-being. We found that social media use is not, in and of itself, a strong predictor of life satisfaction across the adolescent population. Instead, social media effects are nuanced, small at best, reciprocal over time, gender specific, and contingent on analytic methods.

Episode 86: A Face For Podcasting
Two Psychologists Four Beers
05/01/22 • 65 min
Yoel and Alexa discuss a recent study that examines the facial features that people perceive as "smart," "dorky," "trustworthy," or a number of other traits. The study quickly captured a lot of attention, eliciting both fascination and anger. The cohosts turn to Twitter, and to Alexa's undergraduate students, to attempt to gain a deeper understanding of the criticisms and suspicions expressed about the work. In the process, they consider whether glasses make you look smart, and whether babies can be trusted.
Sponsored By:
- FindingFive: Link and promo code for users in the European Union Promo Code: FF-EU-2P4B
- FindingFive: FindingFive is a non-profit web platform where academic researchers can create and run online behavioral research studies in the cloud. Promo Code: FF-US-2P4B
Links:
- Two Psychologists F. on Untappd
- Deep models of superficial face judgments | PNAS
- Abeba Birhane on Twitter: ""trustworthy", "smart" & "privilege" are not things that can be read off faces. this is nothing but a form of machine aided phsygnomy that will be used for insidious purposes which will end up harming those that don't fit social and historical stereotypes" / Twitter
- Tim Maughan on Twitter: "fuck you and fuck your digital calliper skull measuring snake oil bullshit" / Twitter
- Yoel Inbar on Twitter: "I'd be very interested in the strong argument against this kind of research (ideally including readings). I see a lot of moral outrage in the replies/quote tweets but I would like to know more about why. As an outsider it seems sort of baffling." / Twitter
- joseph osmundson (all pronouns) on Twitter: "@yorl There are literally entire libraries on this, Jesus." / Twitter
- The Data Therapist on Twitter: "I like this question. Baffled by all the outrage around AI ethics? Would like to form your own opinion but not sure how to start thinking about it? Here’s my 3 minute tweetorial / lay of the land: #ethnlp #AIEthics #EthicalAI" / Twitter
- The ethical questions that haunt facial-recognition research
- Physiognomy’s New Clothes. by Blaise Agüera y Arcas, Margaret... | by Blaise Aguera y Arcas | Medium
- Black racial phenotypicality shapes social pain and support judgments
- I've Just Seen a Face - The Beatles (Cover) - YouTube

Episode 17: Why Trump Won
Two Psychologists Four Beers
01/02/19 • 65 min
Yoel and Mickey discuss Identity Crisis, a new book about the 2016 US presidential election written by the political scientists John Sides, Michael Tesler, and Lynn Vavreck. But first, they talk about the recent controversy over Patreon's ban of a provocative internet personality and what, if any, implications this has for free speech.
Bonus: who is Mickey's favorite Sex and the City character?
Links:
- Michael Inzlicht on Twitter: Toilet paper roll — "My departmental rival, @gmacdonalduoft, had this made for our area secret Santa party last night. Now I'm struggling to decide whether I should make it my twitter profile pic.... https://t.co/HYrtwJ4hQu"
- Delirium Tremens
- Crowdfunding platform Patreon defends itself amid boycott - Business Insider
- Stars of ‘Intellectual Dark Web’ Scramble to Save Their Cash Cows
- How Kim Cattrall got a date with Pierre Trudeau
- Identity Crisis: The 2016 Presidential Campaign and the Battle for the Meaning of America: John Sides, Michael Tesler, Lynn Vavreck: 9780691174198: Amazon.com: Books

Episode 105: Patchwork Politics
Two Psychologists Four Beers
05/17/23 • 58 min
In heated political debates, people are often accused of being hypocrites, lacking consistent foundational values. Today, Yoel and Alexa discuss a recent paper by David Pinsof, David Sears, and Martie Haselton, that challenges the commonsense notion that political belief systems stem from our core values. Instead, the authors propose that people form alliances with others, and develop political beliefs that serve to maintain those alliances. The cohosts discuss how these alliances might form, the various biases used to defend them, and whether values are truly absent from the process. They also tackle the deeper question of whether the alliance model means that neither side is right or wrong.
Links:

Episode 106: We Need to Talk About Fraud Again
Two Psychologists Four Beers
06/23/23 • 68 min
Harkening back to episode 73, Alexa and Yoel discuss recent evidence of fraud documented in the Data Colada blog post "Clusterfake." The post is the first in a series of four, which will collectively detail evidence of fraud in four papers co-authored by Harvard Business School Professor Francesca Gino. First, the co-hosts dive into the details, with Alexa soberly (in both senses of the word) explaining the revelations of calcChain. They go on to discuss the potential impact of these findings for collaborators, some of whom have begun conducting audits of work co-authored with Gino. In addition, they speculate about ways to reduce fraud that could relieve some of the burden from those who currently do this time-consuming and often thankless work. Finally, they consider what this means for a field still struggling to build a more trustworthy foundation.
Links:
- Two Psychologists Four Beers on Untappd
- [109] Data Falsificada (Part 1): "Clusterfake" - Data Colada
- Sci-Hub | Signing at the beginning makes ethics salient and decreases dishonest self-reports in comparison to signing at the end. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(38), 15197–15200 | 10.1073/pnas.1209746109
- Two Psychologists Four Beers Episode 73: We Need to Talk About Fraud (with Joe Simmons)
- Juliana Schroeder on Twitter: "I am waiting to learn more about this case. It is extremely concerning. My coauthors and I are auditing our papers with Francesca, and identifying the raw data files. I think (hope) other co-authors are doing likewise. We will announce the results of the audit when they are ready" / Twitter
- Fleetwood Mac - Little Lies (Official Music Video) - YouTube

Episode 14: Vices (with Elizabeth Page-Gould)
Two Psychologists Four Beers
11/21/18 • 74 min
Yoel and Mickey have their first repeat guest as Liz Page-Gould joins them to talk vices. Weed, booze and porn are all on the table (well, not literally) as we take on some popular vices. Why do you get paranoid when you smoke? Was alcohol really the impetus for agriculture? Is watching porn bad for your relationship? Bonus: learn who's watched porn in the last week.
Special Guest: Elizabeth Page-Gould.
Links:
- Rouge River Brewery
- Adverse effects of cannabis - The Lancet — Cannabis is the most widely used illicit drug in many developed societies. Its health and psychological effects are not well understood and remain the subject of much debate, with opinions on its risks polarised along the lines of proponents' views on what its legal status should be. An unfortunate consequence of this polarisation of opinion has been the absence of any consensus on what health information the medical profession should give to patients who are users or potential users of cannabis.
- CANNABIS AND SCHIZOPHRENIA A Longitudinal Study of Swedish Conscripts - The Lancet — The association between level of cannabis consumption and development of schizophrenia during a 15-year follow-up was studied in a cohort of 45 570 Swedish conscripts.
- GWAS of lifetime cannabis use reveals new risk loci, genetic overlap with psychiatric traits, and a causal influence of schizophrenia | Nature Neuroscience
- Prevalence of Marijuana Use Disorders in the United States Between 2001-2002 and 2012-2013 | Adolescent Medicine | JAMA Psychiatry | JAMA Network — Laws and attitudes toward marijuana in the United States are becoming more permissive but little is known about whether the prevalence rates of marijuana use and marijuana use disorders have changed in the 21st century.
- Long-term effects of exposure to cannabis - ScienceDirect — The long-term use of cannabis, particularly at high intake levels, is associated with several adverse psychosocial features, including lower educational achievement and, in some instances, psychiatric illness. There is little evidence, however, that long-term cannabis use causes permanent cognitive impairment, nor is there is any clear cause and effect relationship to explain the psychosocial associations.
- Neuropsychological Performance in Long-term Cannabis Users | Adolescent Medicine | JAMA Psychiatry | JAMA Network — Although cannabis is the most widely used illicit drug in the United States, its long-term cognitive effects remain inadequately studied.
- How Alcohol and Caffeine Helped Create Civilization | HumanProgress — On the other hand, research suggests that alcohol may have helped create civilization itself. Alcohol consumption could have given early homo sapiens a survival edge. Before we could properly purify water or prepare food, the risk of ingesting hazardous microbes was so great that the antiseptic qualities of alcohol made it safer to consume than non-alcoholic alternatives — despite alcohol’s own risks.
- Trying Not to Try | Edward Slingerland — Trying Not to Try: Ancient China, Modern Science and the Power of Spontaneity
Show more best episodes

Show more best episodes
FAQ
How many episodes does Two Psychologists Four Beers have?
Two Psychologists Four Beers currently has 119 episodes available.
What topics does Two Psychologists Four Beers cover?
The podcast is about Beer, Society & Culture, Psychology, Podcasts, Social Sciences and Science.
What is the most popular episode on Two Psychologists Four Beers?
The episode title 'Episode 63: Legalize It (with Carl Hart)' is the most popular.
What is the average episode length on Two Psychologists Four Beers?
The average episode length on Two Psychologists Four Beers is 73 minutes.
How often are episodes of Two Psychologists Four Beers released?
Episodes of Two Psychologists Four Beers are typically released every 14 days.
When was the first episode of Two Psychologists Four Beers?
The first episode of Two Psychologists Four Beers was released on May 19, 2018.
Show more FAQ

Show more FAQ