Log in

goodpods headphones icon

To access all our features

Open the Goodpods app
Close icon
Reimagining Justice - Automation to augmentation: from lawyers acting as modems and machines as judges with Pia Andrews
plus icon
bookmark

Automation to augmentation: from lawyers acting as modems and machines as judges with Pia Andrews

11/18/21 • 58 min

Reimagining Justice

In episode no. 68 my guest is serial public sector transformer, Pia Andrews. We discuss:

  • how her pursuit of “truth” led her to the open-source movement and working in policy development;
  • how technological tools relate to our quality of life;
  • ‘open source’ – its philosophy and implementation and the idea of “clever hacks”;
  • how ‘rules as code’ addresses issues with enforcing regulation;
  • prescriptive and principles-based rules and when each are appropriate;
  • the connection between the cost of implementing regulation and its effectiveness;
  • how an API for prescriptive rules relating to anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism funding could have saved one bank $16M per year!;
  • how ‘rules as code’ make compliance more transparent by allowing for modelling, and how this could increase accountability of the public sector;
  • how current policy creation is insufficient and requires input from community and an example from France which incorporated co-design of policy;
  • Taiwan’s response to the introduction of Uber!
  • the importance of multidisciplinary teams in developing policy and how ‘rules as code’ facilities doing so in real time;
  • how ‘rules as code’ improves trust and compliance with administrative law and shifts the onus to government;
  • different public sector approaches to the “new normal”;
  • how the relationship between the public sector and its government drives outcomes;
  • whether a public sector should serve – the government, parliament or the people?
  • 3 things necessary to create an environment for innovation and solving wicked problems;
  • the connection between capacity and innovation, and Pia’s ideas about how to increase civic participation through a “civic gap year” and “policy difference engine”; and of course
  • Pia’s definition of legal innovation.

Proudly sponsored by Neota Logic

Links:

Andrea Perry-Petersen – LinkedIn - Twitter @winkiepp – andreaperrypetersen.com.au

Twitter - @ReimaginingJ

Facebook – Reimagining Justice group

plus icon
bookmark

In episode no. 68 my guest is serial public sector transformer, Pia Andrews. We discuss:

  • how her pursuit of “truth” led her to the open-source movement and working in policy development;
  • how technological tools relate to our quality of life;
  • ‘open source’ – its philosophy and implementation and the idea of “clever hacks”;
  • how ‘rules as code’ addresses issues with enforcing regulation;
  • prescriptive and principles-based rules and when each are appropriate;
  • the connection between the cost of implementing regulation and its effectiveness;
  • how an API for prescriptive rules relating to anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism funding could have saved one bank $16M per year!;
  • how ‘rules as code’ make compliance more transparent by allowing for modelling, and how this could increase accountability of the public sector;
  • how current policy creation is insufficient and requires input from community and an example from France which incorporated co-design of policy;
  • Taiwan’s response to the introduction of Uber!
  • the importance of multidisciplinary teams in developing policy and how ‘rules as code’ facilities doing so in real time;
  • how ‘rules as code’ improves trust and compliance with administrative law and shifts the onus to government;
  • different public sector approaches to the “new normal”;
  • how the relationship between the public sector and its government drives outcomes;
  • whether a public sector should serve – the government, parliament or the people?
  • 3 things necessary to create an environment for innovation and solving wicked problems;
  • the connection between capacity and innovation, and Pia’s ideas about how to increase civic participation through a “civic gap year” and “policy difference engine”; and of course
  • Pia’s definition of legal innovation.

Proudly sponsored by Neota Logic

Links:

Andrea Perry-Petersen – LinkedIn - Twitter @winkiepp – andreaperrypetersen.com.au

Twitter - @ReimaginingJ

Facebook – Reimagining Justice group

Previous Episode

undefined - Saving lives through the power of an online legal community with Kate Briscoe

Saving lives through the power of an online legal community with Kate Briscoe

In episode no. 67 I speak with Kate Briscoe, of LegalBeagles. The discussion covers:

  • how Kate’s inability to get a job played a part in starting LegalBeagles;
  • how LegalBeagles works today;
  • the large numbers of threads and visitors to the site;
  • the emerging areas of law covered by LegalBeagles;
  • who the volunteers are, what training they undertake to assist on the platform and why Kate thinks they contribute;
  • how LegalBeagles is filling a gap and providing assistance that isn’t being provided anywhere else including from the funded Citizens Advice Bureau;
  • LegalBeagles’ governance structure and relationship with professional legal regulation;
  • Kate’s views on how a lot of innovation initiatives put the “cart before the horse”;
  • the many reasons it may not be appropriate to go to a lawyer;
  • how machine learning is drawing on LegalBeagles’ employment law data to provide instant responses;
  • various set-backs LegalBeagles has experienced including loss of a major partner;
  • Kate’s thoughts on the role of the legal profession in addressing the justice crisis;
  • sources of monetisation and sustainability of the platform;
  • where legal consumers actually go for legal help and how they know who to trust;
  • the link between litigation, health and justice;
  • how the model is saving lives; and
  • Kate’s definition of legal innovation.

Proudly sponsored by Neota Logic

Links:

Andrea Perry-Petersen – LinkedIn - Twitter @winkiepp – andreaperrypetersen.com.au

Twitter - @ReimaginingJ

Facebook – Reimagining Justice group

Next Episode

undefined - A year in review: 3 things I learned about legal innovation with host, Andrea Perry-Petersen

A year in review: 3 things I learned about legal innovation with host, Andrea Perry-Petersen

In episode no. 69, I reflect on the podcast over the past 12 months and since it began. I share:

  • statistics about Reimagining Justice (downloads, topics, guests and listeners);
  • the most downloaded episodes this year and since the podcast began;
  • an excerpt from Episode 66 with founder Courtroom5 Sonja Ebron;
  • characteristics of (award-winning) justice innovators; and
  • 3 things I learned about legal innovation this year.

Proudly sponsored by Neota Logic.

Links:

Andrea Perry-Petersen – LinkedIn - Twitter @winkiepp – andreaperrypetersen.com.au

Twitter - @ReimaginingJ

Facebook – Reimagining Justice group

Episode Comments

Generate a badge

Get a badge for your website that links back to this episode

Select type & size
Open dropdown icon
share badge image

<a href="https://goodpods.com/podcasts/reimagining-justice-329673/automation-to-augmentation-from-lawyers-acting-as-modems-and-machines-48107924"> <img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/goodpods-images-bucket/badges/generic-badge-1.svg" alt="listen to automation to augmentation: from lawyers acting as modems and machines as judges with pia andrews on goodpods" style="width: 225px" /> </a>

Copy