Log in

goodpods headphones icon

To access all our features

Open the Goodpods app
Close icon
headphones
May the Record Reflect

May the Record Reflect

National Institute for Trial Advocacy

If you’re a litigator or trial lawyer, your life is full—in and out of the courtroom. May the Record Reflect is the podcast of the National Institute for Trial Advocacy, and we know that if something related to lawyering is interesting to us, chances are it’s interesting to you, too. Trial skills, office life, personal development, and more—it’s all fair game on May the Record Reflect.

1 Listener

bookmark
Share icon

All episodes

Best episodes

Top 10 May the Record Reflect Episodes

Goodpods has curated a list of the 10 best May the Record Reflect episodes, ranked by the number of listens and likes each episode have garnered from our listeners. If you are listening to May the Record Reflect for the first time, there's no better place to start than with one of these standout episodes. If you are a fan of the show, vote for your favorite May the Record Reflect episode by adding your comments to the episode page.

May the Record Reflect - 37. Explicit Bias and the Jury Box, with Raam Wong
play

12/14/22 • 46 min

Something that concerns trial lawyers more than ever is seating a juror with intractable explicit biases or who believes in conspiracy theories. King County Senior Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Raam Wong experienced this situation when he prosecuted a high-profile, near-fatal shooting of an antifascist protester during a demonstration in Seattle in 2017. Raam joins the podcast to talk about voir dire and deselection tactics, experts and evidence, and checking your own biases at the courtroom door.

Topics
5:25 Political violence and Hokoana case
9:57 Factors that contributed to mistrial
14:38 Juror “tells” during voir dire
16:50 Conspiracy theories about a witness
20:17 Digging into social media
20:30 Questions for deselecting jurors
24:36 Willful disregard of evidence, civil versus criminal cases
27:30 Addressing juror attitudes
32:50 Remedying attention span issues
37:50 Believing in or rejecting expert opinion
40:50 Concerns about physical safety at trial
45:01 Signoff question

Quote
“As trial lawyers, we really have to grapple with [. . .] stereotypes every day in court—the assumptions we have about people and the assumptions that the jury might hold. And at times it can be really effective, as advocates, if our good facts kind of match up, or reinforce, the jury’s preexisting beliefs. But at the same time, as a prosecutor, I’m trying to do justice, and doing justice, in my mind, means ensuring that our courtrooms are open to everyone, and that means not making assumptions about people based on demographics or other characteristics.” Raam Wong

Resources
Raam Wong (bio)
State v. Hodgman (case file)
Alt-Right Event in Seattle Devolves into Chaos and Violence, Outside, Truth-Twisting Inside (SPLC Hatewatch)
Righteous or reckless? Trial under way for couple accused in UW shooting during Milo Yiannopoulos speech (Seattle Times)

1 Listener

bookmark
plus icon
share episode

This month’s episode features advice and observations from some of NITA’s top judges, who serve as faculty, presenters, and board members. They share their reflections on what they’ve seen from their unique vantage point on the bench and dispense helpful tips for the next time you’re in court.
Topics
2:13 What counsel should know before setting foot in my courtroom
10:30 Most common mistake I see lawyers make in my courtroom
17:55 Impressive or memorable things a lawyer has done during trial
22:50 Nuttiest things I’ve seen during jury selection

Resources
50 Tips for 50 Years, Part 1 and 50 Tips for 50 Years, Part 2
Judge Mark Drummond (podcast) (webcast) (webcast)
Justice Lee Edmon (bio)
Judge Marian Gaston (bio) (webcast)
Judge Nancy Gertner (bio) (podcast) (webcast)
Judge Amy Hanley (bio) (podcast) (podcast) (webcast) (webcast) (webcast)
Judge Ruth Rocker McMillan (bio) (podcast)
Judge Sam Sheldon (bio) (webcast)
Judge Mindy Solomon (bio) (webcast)
Judge Christopher Whitten (bio) (webcast) (webcast)

bookmark
plus icon
share episode
May the Record Reflect - 6. Serenity Now: Carol Sowers Being Poised in the Courtroom
play

04/06/20 • 53 min

In Episode 6 of the podcast, former tv news anchor Carol Sowers shares her tips for becoming more at ease in the physical side of your courtroom performance: how to speak with confidence, project a pleasing vocal quality, connect with jurors, tame your nerves, and rebound from your mistakes. Carol spent more than thirty years as a broadcast professional for CBA/ABC Affiliate station KHQA in Quincy, Illinois, where she worked as a reporter and main anchor all the way up to vice president for public affairs—and everything in between. When she retired from the news, she began training broadcasters and law enforcement and governmental officials in public speaking. She now offers that same training to trial lawyers at NITA programs across the U.S. and abroad.

Topics

2:58 Breaking up with your notes

4:27 Muscle memory and the mind-body connection

6:30 Preparation and practice

9:00 Writing “for the eye” versus “for the ear”

10:18 Cultivating a pleasing vocal quality

13:10 “Shrill”

14:33 Warming up for a presentation

17:55 Learning about public speaking from trial lawyers

19:40 Communicating while sitting versus standing

22:00 Hand gestures

24:35 Question about Broadcast News

25:25 Looking sharp

27:40 “The Three C’s”

32:08 Effective eye contact

35:15 Using emotion while speaking

38:57 Managing mistakes and anxiety

40:32 How to regroup discreetly

45:20 Communicating in high- and low-context cultures

49:32 Changes in culture

51:46 Signature “softball”

Quote
“I try to use . . . eye contact, especially at the beginning of a presentation, as a way to give myself some confidence. I automatically seek out people who look friendly or look engaged. Maybe they’re smiling at me, maybe they’re nodding their head. Because at the beginning when I’m a little bit nervous, that adrenaline rush is making me feel a little uncomfortable, I like to get that little boost of confidence from those people. So, those are the people I’m going to seek out first, and once I get that little smile or little nod of acknowledgment, then I’m going to move on to other people around the room.” Carol Sowers

Recommended Resources

10 Tips for Presenting Yourself Online—Carol Sowers
Webcast—Remote Advocacy: Representing Your Client during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Carol Sowers LinkedIn
Celebrating Carol Sowers’s Nearly 30 Years with KHQA
NITA Whitepaper: Communication Tips from NITA’s experts
Broadcast News (1987 Movie)
Broadcast News Movie Clip—Aaron Struggles on Air
High-context and low-context cultures
NITA International Programs

bookmark
plus icon
share episode

Retired federal judge Nancy Gertner and class action lawyer Reuben Guttman discuss the impact of Twombly and Iqbal, two SCOTUS decisions that precipitated critical changes in pleading, class certification, and expert standards that have affected a complaint’s capacity for making it past the motion-to-dismiss stage. In this wide-ranging interview, they talk about the challenges these decisions have on both judges and practitioners and how the landmark case of Brown v. Board might fare under post-Twiqbal standards.
Topics
4:02 Twombly/Iqbal’s impact on pleading standards
7:17 Why process and procedure matter
10:16 Changes pleading standards
12:43 Changes in class certifications
14:11 Rise of multidistrict litigation
16:20 Changes in expert standards, both criminal and civil
21:47 Experts in the civil rights arena
25:40 Applying today’s pleading and class certification standards to Brown v. Board
29:30 Rules that affect access to justice
33:04 The benefit of a losing Supreme Court case
36:04 Getting around these obstacles
44:11 Judges, lawyers, and the legacy of discrimination cases
48:35 Signoff question
Quote
“I know from having been a criminal defense lawyer and civil rights lawyer and a judge, and now sort of a litigator as well, that what I may find ‘plausible’ may be not what a jury finds ‘plausible.’ That plausibility is, in fact, a contextual analysis—in context. And when I sat on the bench there were numbers of times, in fact, that my law clerk would say to me, ‘Judge, you can get rid of this case. You can get rid of this case. The allegations are not plausible.’ And I would turn to the law clerk and say, ‘To whom? To you? To me? To some of my male colleagues on the bench?’ So essentially, plausibility enabled the judges, who are not the most diverse group in the world, to make their own decisions about whether a case should proceed.” Judge Nancy Gertner

Resources
Judge Nancy Gertner (bio)
Reuben Guttman (bio)
Representative Opinions of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (book)
From Conley to Twombly to Iqbal (article)
Brown v. Board of Education complaint (PDF)
Pretrial Advocacy (book)

bookmark
plus icon
share episode
May the Record Reflect - 25: Best of 2021

25: Best of 2021

May the Record Reflect

play

12/07/21 • 39 min

In Episode 25 of May the Record Reflect, we take a listen to the best tips we heard from each episode in 2021. To hear the full episodes from which each tip was derived, please visit our podcasts on nita.org here.

Topics

1:47 Dick Harpootlian

3:49 Alison Reagan

5:57 Dean Marc Miller

9:14 Helen Geib

11:28 BJ Moore

14:35 Alicia Aquino

16:22 Shannon Bales

17:35 Hon. Nancy Vaidik

20:15 Rebecca Diaz-Bonilla

21:59 Judith Gaton

23:29 Steve Wood

27:16 J.C. Lore

29:10 Reuben Guttman

30:36 Jo Carol (LaFleur) Nesset Sale

32:59 Angela Porter

34:10 Dan Kotin

36:13 Hon. Ann Claire Williams (Ret.)

37:00 Clay Taylor

bookmark
plus icon
share episode
May the Record Reflect - 23. My Landmark SCOTUS Case with Jo Carol LaFleur Nesset-Sale
play

10/11/21 • 48 min

In Episode 23 of the podcast, we’re joined by Jo Carol Nesset-Sale, who as a young woman brought forth a pregnancy discrimination lawsuit that found its way to the United States Supreme Court. Her case, Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur, was part of the societal sea change that resulted in women being able to remain in the workforce as their families grew. Jo Carol’s experience lit a fire in her to become a lawyer herself and transform the lives of her clients she serves.

Topics

2:09 The story behind the SCOTUS case
9:47 How pregnant women faced discrimination
11:49 Maternity leave, benefits in the 1970s
13:05 The lawsuit begins
15:07 Why Jo Carol fought back
19:15 Equal rights movements
22:28 Legal team’s strategy for SCOTUS
24:25 What the Court ruled on
26:25 Impact of ruling
30:45 Becoming a lawyer
34:18 Jo Carol’s other 15 minutes of fame
36:05 Pathways in law
41:00 Guidance for law students, new lawyers
43:21 Bias in the courtroom
44:15 Career advice
46:11 Signature sign-off question

Quote

“I certainly saw that, at a moment in time, if you can have the intersection of an aggrieved person who’s been unfairly treated and a lawyer who’s willing to take the case and charge no fee, that wonderful things can happen, that change can be made.” Jo Carol (LaFleur) Nesset-Sale

Recommended Resources

Jo Carol Nesset-Sale

Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur

From Sideline to Frontline: The Making of a Civil Rights Plaintiff

She Was a Teacher. She Got Pregnant. Her Case Ended Up at the Supreme Court

bookmark
plus icon
share episode
May the Record Reflect - 20: Trial Style and Courtroom Confidence, with Judith Gaton
play

07/06/21 • 40 min

In Episode 20 of May the Record Reflect, trial lawyer and wardrobe consultation Judith Gaton joins us to explain why style matters in the courtroom and how to dress for post-pandemic office life at a time when the expected corporate culture—and maybe our bodies—have changed.

Topics

3:05 Why your clothes matter

5:36 But isn’t style frivolous?

13:18 Work clothes that no longer “fit”

16:22 Evaluating your wardrobe after covid

18:45 What pieces to invest in, and what to save on

21:48 Pandemic’s impact on dressing for the law office

25:15 Menswear options for a more casual office environment

27:29 Stanley Tucci’s refined casual style and sprezzatura

30:54 Sleek footwear options

32:40 Style inspo and options for lawyers and other professionals

38:07 Signature signoff question

Quote

“We have to sort of make room to be amused by each other as we find our footing and find out what it’s going to look like for all of us as we re-enter society, as we sort of spend more time with each other, as we come back to the office. It doesn’t have to go back to the way it always was. There’s no requirement. This is a beautiful moment for all of us to rethink ‘Did we even like the way it always was? Did we enjoy wearing suits? Did we enjoy being dressed up all the time?’ or would we all collectively prefer to be a little more on the smart-casual side of things, or business casual of things, than to be so dressed up all the time. Each office culture’s going to have to figure that out for itself. I think every courtroom, almost, is going to decide that for itself.” (Judith Gaton)

Recommended Resources
Judith Gaton (bio)

How COVID-19 has changed what we wear and how we feel about clothing (Seattle Times)

Schedule an Appointment with Those Clothes You Haven’t Worn in a Year (New York Times)

Sprezzatura Do’s and Don’ts

In Praise of Stanley Tucci’s TV Travel Uniform (GQ)

Berluti wingtip sneakers

Berluti double monkstrap sneakers

Next Level Wardrobe (Instagram)

Read NITA’s statement on the important of in-person advocacy in courts, here.

bookmark
plus icon
share episode
May the Record Reflect - 3. Here Comes the Judge—Robert McGahey
play

10/17/19 • 9 min

In Episode 3, Judge Robert McGahey chats with us about the importance of public service during this week’s National Celebration of Pro Bono. Judge McGahey presides over a civil docket in the Denver District Court. In his almost 20 years on the bench, he has also served in the criminal and domestic relations divisions. In his 25-year civil trial practice before becoming a judge, he tried over one hundred jury trials. Judge McGahey is a familiar face at NITA trial skills programs and is the four-time recipient of NITA’s Volunteer of the Year award. Outside the courtroom, he loves to travel and is a film buff, to which his many law-setting movie reviews for our Legal Advocate blog will attest.

Topics
1:49 Why public service matters
2:42 Choosing a career in public service
4:48 Why I volunteer for NITA
6:18 How I found NITA
7:20 Signature “softball”

Quote
“If the rule of law means anything, it means that everyone who’s touched by the legal system should be treated fairly and with dignity—and that means everyone, not just the people that can afford lawyers. That’s why my favorite programs are public service programs—public service lawyers, immigration programs, tribal programs—and by teaching at those programs, I hopefully do my part to level the legal playing field by making sure there are well-trained advocates available to everyone who needs one.” Robert McGahey

Recommended Resources
Robert McGahey court bio
Asked and Answered: Judge Robert McGahey
Bill deMoulin obituary
Perry Mason
Erin Brokovich movie review
Chicago movie review
Upcoming Teaching Engagements
Deposition Skills: Rocky Mountain

bookmark
plus icon
share episode
May the Record Reflect - 57. 10 Things You Should Know about Trial Psychology
play

08/13/24 • 67 min

Some of the most important heads to get into are those of the jurors seated for your trial. Fortunately, figuring out what makes people tick is both interesting and fun, and Temple University Director of Advocacy Programs Jules Epstein is here to share the lowdown. Whether he’s busting common courtroom myths, revealing how the camera lies, or delving into the cognitive process of jurors (and your very own self), Jules makes the case that knowing a little trial psychology can give you a competitive edge for the good of your clients.
Topics

4:02 Curse of knowledge

10:04 Goldfish attention span

13:47 Slo-mo evidence

19:16 Problems with graphic evidence

24:43 Visuals with words

27:28 Disconnect between science and law

36:30 Camera bias

43:21 Thought processes

48:55 Mythbusting

53:46 Go slow

56:12 Bonus lessons

1:00:15 Collective Wisdom

1:03:55 Signoff questions

Quote
“A visual guarantees that all twelve, or all eight, or all six jurors will know what something looked like.” Jules Epstein

Resources
Jules Epstein (bio)
NITA’s free Collective Wisdom articles (link) (latest)
Point Well Made: Persuasive Oral Advocacy (book)

bookmark
plus icon
share episode
Maricopa County Superior Court Judges Randall Warner and Christopher Whitten team up to talk about telling stories to judges. In this episode, the judges, from their unique vantage point on the bench, reveal what they want to hear or read from counsel, what they don’t, how to write briefs that tell a compelling narrative, where they find inspired (and inspiring) storytelling, and the summer vacations they’re dreaming of.
Topics

4:11 Why storytelling matters
7:04 Judges’ versus jurors’ needs
10:35 Storytelling techniques
14:30 Finding inspiration
19:10 Great legal storytellers
21:14 Advantages for both sides of “the v”
24:09 Writing interesting briefs
28:57 Telling the same story at trial as in briefs
30:29 Judges’ pet peeves in briefs
34:40 Opposing counsel’s miscasting your client
38:42 Storytelling about unsympathetic clients
41:47 Signoff questions
Quotes

“Fundamentally, every case is about a story, whether it’s a technical legal dispute or whether it’s a fact dispute at trial, it’s a competition to see whose story resonates more with whoever’s making the decision, whether it’s a judge or jury.” Judge Randall Warner

“Even as we’ve tried cases less and less often, we’ve gotten better and better at collecting facts, and I think that’s made us worse and worse at storytelling.” Judge Christopher Whitten

Resources

Judge Randall Warner (bio) (episode)
Judge Christopher Whitten (bio) (episode)
Building Trial Skills: San Diego (course)
Dominic Gianna on MTRR (episode, episode)
James Brosnahan on MTRR (episode)

David Mann storytelling (course) (episode)

bookmark
plus icon
share episode

Show more best episodes

Toggle view more icon

FAQ

How many episodes does May the Record Reflect have?

May the Record Reflect currently has 59 episodes available.

What topics does May the Record Reflect cover?

The podcast is about Non-Profit, Lawyer, Law, Legal, Courses, Podcasts, Education and Business.

What is the most popular episode on May the Record Reflect?

The episode title '37. Explicit Bias and the Jury Box, with Raam Wong' is the most popular.

What is the average episode length on May the Record Reflect?

The average episode length on May the Record Reflect is 49 minutes.

How often are episodes of May the Record Reflect released?

Episodes of May the Record Reflect are typically released every 28 days, 23 hours.

When was the first episode of May the Record Reflect?

The first episode of May the Record Reflect was released on Oct 16, 2019.

Show more FAQ

Toggle view more icon

Comments