QUESTION: Should I split tomorrow's 45 minute episode into two parts?
01/31/19 • 1 min
If you remember, I was invited to be a guest on the podcast of the law firm TuckerEllis LLP in which we discussed, above all, the standard of care to which autonomous cars should be held in an autonomous future. That episode ended up clocking in at a whopping 45 minutes in length, so I'm running a poll on Twitter to get a sense for whether you'd like me to release it as one large episode tomorrow (Friday, Feb 1) or to split it into two parts, with Part II airing next Tuesday (Feb 5). Let me know by casting your vote now on Twitter @AutonomousHoag!
If you remember, I was invited to be a guest on the podcast of the law firm TuckerEllis LLP in which we discussed, above all, the standard of care to which autonomous cars should be held in an autonomous future. That episode ended up clocking in at a whopping 45 minutes in length, so I'm running a poll on Twitter to get a sense for whether you'd like me to release it as one large episode tomorrow (Friday, Feb 1) or to split it into two parts, with Part II airing next Tuesday (Feb 5). Let me know by casting your vote now on Twitter @AutonomousHoag!
Previous Episode
Ep 78: Florida to test AVs without test drivers; 905nm vs 1550nm lidar; Tesla driver falls asleep
Today, Episode 78! Florida mulls autonomous vehicle testing without test drivers; we do a mini deep dive into the different flavors of lidar -- 950nm vs 1550nm -- and another idiot sleeps in their Tesla.
Read, listen, and discuss this episode at MarcHoag.com
Follow us on Twitter at twitter.com/AutonomousHoag
Follow us on Instagram at instagram.com/autonomoushoag
Like us on Facebook: fb.com/autonomoushoag
Subscribe to our new YouTube channel at youtube.com/channel/UCzDAWTzwkA_MgmqoOKhHYzQ
adoTeasily monthly contributions at anchor.fm/autonomous-cars-with-marc-hoag !Toda
Next Episode
Ep 79, SPECIAL: I join two other attorneys on their podcast to discuss legal standards for AVs
I was invited by TuckerEllis, LLP (@TuckerEllis) to join two of their attorneys on their podcast "Driverless" (@_Driverless), in which we deep dive into a broad discussion on various legal issues surrounding autonomous vehicles, including a fascinating focus on the legal standards to which autonomous cars should be held when things inevitably go wrong.
Read, listen, and discuss this episode at MarcHoag.comFollow us on Twitter at twitter.com/AutonomousHoagFollow us on Instagram at instagram.com/autonomoushoagLike us on Facebook: fb.com/autonomoushoagSubscribe to our new YouTube channel at youtube.com/channel/UCzDAWTzwkA_MgmqoOKhHYzQ
If you like this episode you’ll love
Episode Comments
Generate a badge
Get a badge for your website that links back to this episode
<a href="https://goodpods.com/podcasts/marc-hoag-ai-law-pod-formerly-autonomous-cars-with-marc-hoag-48664/question-should-i-split-tomorrows-45-minute-episode-into-two-parts-9316749"> <img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/goodpods-images-bucket/badges/generic-badge-1.svg" alt="listen to question: should i split tomorrow's 45 minute episode into two parts? on goodpods" style="width: 225px" /> </a>
Copy