
Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. Hewitt
09/01/23 • 47 min
This episode of MACREADS.COM covers the United States Supreme Court's February 22, 2023, opinion in Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. Hewitt.
Summary: Plaintiff, an offshore oil rig worker who earned more than $200,000 per year as a daily-rate employee with no overtime compensation, argued that he was a non-exempt employee and thus entitled to overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). SCOTUS agreed and held that daily-rate workers, regardless of their income level, qualify as non-exempt and are entitled to overtime compensation if the conditions for exempt status in the relevant regulations are not met.
MACREADS.COM: MAKING JUSTICE AUDIBLE
http://www.macreads.com
Narrated by Mac McCoy ([email protected])
MACREADS.COM is a podcast that promotes access to justice by transforming curated United States Supreme Court opinions into immersive, on-demand audio experiences for lawyers and non-lawyers. In each episode, your narrator reads the primary text of a recent Supreme Court opinion, leaving out any technical components that distract from the main story and analysis. Find us wherever you access your favorite podcasts.
Visit us at https://www.macreads.com
Music licensed from PremiumBeat.com
Join the free MACREADS.COM Subscribers Group on LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/groups/12877576/
Connect with the producer on LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/in/macreads/
This episode of MACREADS.COM covers the United States Supreme Court's February 22, 2023, opinion in Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. Hewitt.
Summary: Plaintiff, an offshore oil rig worker who earned more than $200,000 per year as a daily-rate employee with no overtime compensation, argued that he was a non-exempt employee and thus entitled to overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). SCOTUS agreed and held that daily-rate workers, regardless of their income level, qualify as non-exempt and are entitled to overtime compensation if the conditions for exempt status in the relevant regulations are not met.
MACREADS.COM: MAKING JUSTICE AUDIBLE
http://www.macreads.com
Narrated by Mac McCoy ([email protected])
MACREADS.COM is a podcast that promotes access to justice by transforming curated United States Supreme Court opinions into immersive, on-demand audio experiences for lawyers and non-lawyers. In each episode, your narrator reads the primary text of a recent Supreme Court opinion, leaving out any technical components that distract from the main story and analysis. Find us wherever you access your favorite podcasts.
Visit us at https://www.macreads.com
Music licensed from PremiumBeat.com
Join the free MACREADS.COM Subscribers Group on LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/groups/12877576/
Connect with the producer on LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/in/macreads/
Previous Episode

Cruz v. Arizona
This episode of MACREADS.COM covers the United States Supreme Court's February 22, 2023, opinion in Cruz v. Arizona.
Summary: Criminal defendant found guilty of capital murder argued that he should have been allowed to inform the jury that, under Arizona law, a life sentence would be without parole. SCOTUS reversed and remanded, holding that the Arizona Supreme Court's determination that a state rule of criminal procedure prevented post-conviction relief was not a valid and separate state-law basis for the judgment against the defendant sufficient to foreclose a federal claim.
MACREADS.COM: MAKING JUSTICE AUDIBLE
http://www.macreads.com
Narrated by Mac McCoy ([email protected])
MACREADS.COM is a podcast that promotes access to justice by transforming curated United States Supreme Court opinions into immersive, on-demand audio experiences for lawyers and non-lawyers. In each episode, your narrator reads the primary text of a recent Supreme Court opinion, leaving out any technical components that distract from the main story and analysis. Find us wherever you access your favorite podcasts.
Visit us at https://www.macreads.com
Music licensed from PremiumBeat.com
Join the free MACREADS.COM Subscribers Group on LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/groups/12877576/
Connect with the producer on LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/in/macreads/
Next Episode

Bartenwerfer v. Buckley
This episode of MACREADS.COM covers the United States Supreme Court's February 22, 2023, opinion in Bartenwerfer v. Buckley.
Summary: Homebuyer obtained a judgment against sellers for failing to disclose material defect in the home. One of the sellers sought to discharge the judgment in Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceedings because she did not know about the defect. SCOTUS held that the judgment could not be discharged because a bankruptcy debtor can be held liable for a third party's fraud regardless of her own culpability.
MACREADS.COM: MAKING JUSTICE AUDIBLE
Narrated by Mac McCoy ([email protected])
MACREADS.COM is a podcast that promotes access to justice by transforming curated United States Supreme Court opinions into immersive, on-demand audio experiences for lawyers and non-lawyers. In each episode, your narrator reads the primary text of a recent Supreme Court opinion, leaving out any technical components that distract from the main story and analysis. Find us wherever you access your favorite podcasts.
Visit us at https://www.macreads.com
Music licensed from PremiumBeat.com
Join the free MACREADS.COM Subscribers Group on LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/groups/12877576/
Connect with the producer on LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/in/macreads/
If you like this episode you’ll love
Episode Comments
Generate a badge
Get a badge for your website that links back to this episode
<a href="https://goodpods.com/podcasts/macreadscom-275132/helix-energy-solutions-group-inc-v-hewitt-33342274"> <img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/goodpods-images-bucket/badges/generic-badge-1.svg" alt="listen to helix energy solutions group, inc. v. hewitt on goodpods" style="width: 225px" /> </a>
Copy