
Axon Enterprise, Inc. v. FTC
09/20/23 • 60 min
This episode of MACREADS.COM covers the United States Supreme Court's April 14, 2023, opinion in Axon Enterprise, Inc. v. FTC.
Summary: An accountant regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and a company regulated by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) filed suit in federal district court alleging that the Commissions were unconstitutional as structured. The Commissions challenged the plaintiffs' ability to file suits in federal district court because federal statutes prescribed an initial agency review process followed by appeal directly to a federal Court of Appeals. SCOTUS held that the plaintiffs could file suit in the district court based on the type of claims asserted.
MACREADS.COM is a podcast that promotes access to justice by transforming curated United States Supreme Court opinions into immersive, on-demand audio experiences for lawyers and non-lawyers. In each episode, your narrator reads the primary text of a recent Supreme Court opinion, leaving out any technical components that distract from the main story and analysis. Find us wherever you access your favorite podcasts.
Visit us at https://www.macreads.com
Music licensed from PremiumBeat.com
Join the free MACREADS.COM Subscribers Group on LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/groups/12877576/
Connect with the producer on LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/in/macreads/
This episode of MACREADS.COM covers the United States Supreme Court's April 14, 2023, opinion in Axon Enterprise, Inc. v. FTC.
Summary: An accountant regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and a company regulated by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) filed suit in federal district court alleging that the Commissions were unconstitutional as structured. The Commissions challenged the plaintiffs' ability to file suits in federal district court because federal statutes prescribed an initial agency review process followed by appeal directly to a federal Court of Appeals. SCOTUS held that the plaintiffs could file suit in the district court based on the type of claims asserted.
MACREADS.COM is a podcast that promotes access to justice by transforming curated United States Supreme Court opinions into immersive, on-demand audio experiences for lawyers and non-lawyers. In each episode, your narrator reads the primary text of a recent Supreme Court opinion, leaving out any technical components that distract from the main story and analysis. Find us wherever you access your favorite podcasts.
Visit us at https://www.macreads.com
Music licensed from PremiumBeat.com
Join the free MACREADS.COM Subscribers Group on LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/groups/12877576/
Connect with the producer on LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/in/macreads/
Previous Episode

Wilkins v. United States
This episode of MACREADS.COM covers the United States Supreme Court's March 28, 2023, opinion in Wilkins v. United States.
Summary: Montana property owners sued the United States under the Quiet Title Act, alleging that the Government's 1962 road easement on their property did not permit public access. The Government successfully moved to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, arguing that the property owners' claim was barred by the Act's 12-year time bar. The intermediate appellate court affirmed. SCOTUS held that the Act's 12-year provision was a nonjurisdictional claims-processing rule and, thus, reversed and remanded.
MACREADS.COM is a podcast that promotes access to justice by transforming curated United States Supreme Court opinions into immersive, on-demand audio experiences for lawyers and non-lawyers. In each episode, your narrator reads the primary text of a recent Supreme Court opinion, leaving out any technical components that distract from the main story and analysis. Find us wherever you access your favorite podcasts.
Visit us at https://www.macreads.com
Music licensed from PremiumBeat.com
Join the free MACREADS.COM Subscribers Group on LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/groups/12877576/
Connect with the producer on LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/in/macreads/
Next Episode

New York v. New Jersey
This episode of MACREADS.COM covers the United States Supreme Court's April 18, 2023, opinion in New York v. New Jersey.
Summary: The States of New York and New Jersey disputed whether New Jersey could unilaterally withdraw from an interstate compact between them regarding a port when the compact contained no provision that addressed withdrawal. SCOTUS held that New Jersey could unilaterally withdraw over New York's objection.
MACREADS.COM is a podcast that promotes access to justice by transforming curated United States Supreme Court opinions into immersive, on-demand audio experiences for lawyers and non-lawyers. In each episode, your narrator reads the primary text of a recent Supreme Court opinion, leaving out any technical components that distract from the main story and analysis. Find us wherever you access your favorite podcasts.
Visit us at https://www.macreads.com
Music licensed from PremiumBeat.com
Join the free MACREADS.COM Subscribers Group on LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/groups/12877576/
Connect with the producer on LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/in/macreads/
If you like this episode you’ll love
Episode Comments
Generate a badge
Get a badge for your website that links back to this episode
<a href="https://goodpods.com/podcasts/macreadscom-275132/axon-enterprise-inc-v-ftc-33757962"> <img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/goodpods-images-bucket/badges/generic-badge-1.svg" alt="listen to axon enterprise, inc. v. ftc on goodpods" style="width: 225px" /> </a>
Copy