Are Grand Juries that Grand? When They Get it Wrong...
12/05/22 • 28 min
Imagine a bar fight. Imagine someone getting killed and someone getting indicted for the crime by a Grand Jury. Imagine now, that one vital piece of evidence – a clear cut self defense argument – is never presented to the Grand Jury by the prosecutor...Is That Even Legal? A trial court said it was. The Arizona Supreme Court said...no!
Grand Juries are in the news every day. They are impaneled against politicians, business titans and others suspected of crimes. Their job is to determine whether a crime was committed and whether the person being investigated likely committed the crime.
The word indicted can end your career, your professional and even your private life. How does the Grand Jury process work? What happens when it doesn’t?
The all too common saying that you can “indict a ham sandwich,” has a very distasteful meaning when you consider the impacts of being indicted.
Your amazing host, Bob became very curious about this process...and particularly the story of the bar fight. Attorney Jesse Smith, who won the appeal before the AZ Supreme Court – earning his client a new Grand Jury – is Bob’s guest.
Here is more on the underlying case... WILLIS v. BERNINI
From the AZ Supreme Court:
"In this case, we clarify the due process rights of a person under investigation before a grand jury, the duties of a prosecutor to present evidence for the grand jury’s consideration in determining whether to issue an indictment, and the standard for what constitutes “clearly exculpatory” evidence, especially with regard to a justification defense.
¶2We hold that the Arizona Constitution guarantees a person under grand jury investigation a due process right to a fair and impartial presentation of clearly exculpatory evidence and that a prosecutor has a duty, even in the absence of a specific request, to present such evidence to a grand jury. We also affirm that evidence is clearly exculpatory if it would deter a grand jury from finding probable cause to issue an indictment as initially stated in State v. Superior Court(Mauro), 139 Ariz. 422, 425 (1984).
Finally, we hold that clearly exculpatory evidence includes evidence relevant to a justification defense that would deter a finding of probable cause."
Read more: https://www.azcourts.gov/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=-q-5mzI4S0k%3D&portalid=45
Imagine a bar fight. Imagine someone getting killed and someone getting indicted for the crime by a Grand Jury. Imagine now, that one vital piece of evidence – a clear cut self defense argument – is never presented to the Grand Jury by the prosecutor...Is That Even Legal? A trial court said it was. The Arizona Supreme Court said...no!
Grand Juries are in the news every day. They are impaneled against politicians, business titans and others suspected of crimes. Their job is to determine whether a crime was committed and whether the person being investigated likely committed the crime.
The word indicted can end your career, your professional and even your private life. How does the Grand Jury process work? What happens when it doesn’t?
The all too common saying that you can “indict a ham sandwich,” has a very distasteful meaning when you consider the impacts of being indicted.
Your amazing host, Bob became very curious about this process...and particularly the story of the bar fight. Attorney Jesse Smith, who won the appeal before the AZ Supreme Court – earning his client a new Grand Jury – is Bob’s guest.
Here is more on the underlying case... WILLIS v. BERNINI
From the AZ Supreme Court:
"In this case, we clarify the due process rights of a person under investigation before a grand jury, the duties of a prosecutor to present evidence for the grand jury’s consideration in determining whether to issue an indictment, and the standard for what constitutes “clearly exculpatory” evidence, especially with regard to a justification defense.
¶2We hold that the Arizona Constitution guarantees a person under grand jury investigation a due process right to a fair and impartial presentation of clearly exculpatory evidence and that a prosecutor has a duty, even in the absence of a specific request, to present such evidence to a grand jury. We also affirm that evidence is clearly exculpatory if it would deter a grand jury from finding probable cause to issue an indictment as initially stated in State v. Superior Court(Mauro), 139 Ariz. 422, 425 (1984).
Finally, we hold that clearly exculpatory evidence includes evidence relevant to a justification defense that would deter a finding of probable cause."
Read more: https://www.azcourts.gov/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=-q-5mzI4S0k%3D&portalid=45
Previous Episode
Dirty Deeds and Title Theft...Can Someone Actually Steal Your House?
Maybe you have never heard of home title fraud or deed fraud? In today's crazy real estate market, you should be aware...and be prepared.
You’ve probably heard about it through commercials in the media trying to get you to buy products to protect yourself from title fraud.
Should you be scared?
In this first episode of Season 3, Bob visits with real estate lawyer and title guru Jesi Wolnik to get the real facts about title fraud...something she has dealt with a lot as a lawyer.
What are we talking about here? (hat tip The Better Business Bureau):
Home title fraud happens when someone obtains the title to your property and changes ownership from your information to theirs. The scary part is, you may not even realize it has happened until it’s too late.
How the Scam Works:
Scammers will choose a house, sometimes a second home, rental or vacant house. They then gather your personal information from the internet or elsewhere, and take over your identity to assume the role of property owner or claim to represent you. They file the necessary paperwork to transfer ownership of your property to themselves, using forged signatures and fake identification. They then sell the home or borrow against the equity. You might not even know this has happened until a lender starts to send letters of foreclosure on your home due to failure to make payments.
Next Episode
Can You "Fix" That Traffic Ticket?
It's the holiday season and you're flying your "slay" down the freeway at lightening speed to deliver your gifts...but GRINCH pulls you over...and in a flash of non-holiday red and blue light, your life is no longer merry! What next?
Let's listen in as Bob talks with one of the best traffic lawyers on this topic. Welcome Julie O'Connor!
Can you get a traffic ticket "fixed?"
What should you do when you are pulled over?
Do the police actually have quotas?
If you like this episode you’ll love
Episode Comments
Generate a badge
Get a badge for your website that links back to this episode
<a href="https://goodpods.com/podcasts/is-that-even-legal-125383/are-grand-juries-that-grand-when-they-get-it-wrong-25677275"> <img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/goodpods-images-bucket/badges/generic-badge-1.svg" alt="listen to are grand juries that grand? when they get it wrong... on goodpods" style="width: 225px" /> </a>
Copy