
Why we’re changing how we calculate metrics
01/14/16 • 9 min
We just rolled out a change to Buffer’s very public revenue dashboard that resulted in a $25,000 increase in MRR. This article provides some backstory in to how we originally calculated metrics and the transition to a greatly improved version of metric calculation we’ve been building over the past year._
Very few things in life are black & white, but we so desperately want them to be. Life’s just easier when the choices are obvious. And that certainly holds true with entrepreneurship.
Every day you’re faced with hundreds, if not thousands, of choices to make, most of which lack obvious answers. You make an educated guess, you move on, and you address any potential problems that arise from said guess.
I wanted to build a service that removed a lot of those decisions you had to make when it came to your business data. Constantly making decisions about how to calculate this, which formula made the most sense for that or figuring out how to get all the data in one place...it can be incredibly overwhelming.
So, in 2013, I started Baremetrics to address that very thing. The premise being that you shouldn’t need to make so many decisions. You should just be able to get the information you need to grow your business and carry on with actually growing your business.
If only it had been that easy...
Endless options
As a founder, you’ve likely spent an inordinate amount of time learning How to BusinessTM. You may even have a degree saying you’re a Master at Businessing. But it turns out all that research and reading doesn’t replace just getting in there and doing it.
In fact, I’d argue that spending too much time learning the minutia actually hinders your ability to grow and build a company.
For example, there are endless articles on how to calculate X metric, why this formula is better than that formula and what the “right” way to calculate it is. After you’ve read all of those things you’re essentially back at square one with a burning heap of conflicting information. Take the Pacific Crest SaaS Company Survey: it outlines nearly 50 different ways that companies calculate retention rates. 50! That’s nearly 50 different formulas for a single metric.
For 99% of founders, it’s an epically terrible use of time to sift through all that information to learn the detailed intricacies of metric reporting and the pros/cons of each calculation formula. There are just a thousand more profitable uses of your time.
I’m on a tangent now, so let’s get back to my original goal with Baremetrics: How do we make decisions so founders don’t have to?
It’s Complicated
I knocked out the first version of Baremetrics in a month, based primarily on my own needs building a couple of SaaS products. Within a few weeks, as more and more businesses started using the service, I started realizing just how different businesses can be.
When you read “SaaS company” you likely think of the traditional set of 3-5 monthly plans with customers that regularly and reliably pay. In practice though, that’s just not how it works. It’s never that clean. For any company. Ever.
Business is messy and subscriptions are insanely complicated to address properly. Customers change their minds, they grow, they shrink, their payments fail, they demand refunds, they want coupons, etc. We currently cover over 30 different possible subscription “states” to address this. Who knew simple subscriptions could vary so much?!?!
All of these things (and thousands of other scenarios) need to be accounted for. But how do you account for them appropriately and usefully? That’s the real question. What’s most useful from a decision-making perspective?
Changes
Over the past 2+ years of serving thousands of businesses, we’ve seen a lot of use cases. And over those years we’ve learned an immense amount about what’s useful and what’s actually needed to run a business and make decisions.
When we initially launched, we based most of our metrics off the idea of a “charge”. If there was a charge and that charge was tied back to a subscription plan, then we’d consider it “Monthly Recurring Revenue”. That worked pretty great initially, and covered a lot of use cases.
But over time we found that method was a bit too volatile for a metric as important as MRR and it was hard to make the connection between “charges” and “subscription activity”. That’s what most founders are actually after because the subscription conveys what their customers were actually doing.
It was during this time that we had a bit of an epiphany:...
We just rolled out a change to Buffer’s very public revenue dashboard that resulted in a $25,000 increase in MRR. This article provides some backstory in to how we originally calculated metrics and the transition to a greatly improved version of metric calculation we’ve been building over the past year._
Very few things in life are black & white, but we so desperately want them to be. Life’s just easier when the choices are obvious. And that certainly holds true with entrepreneurship.
Every day you’re faced with hundreds, if not thousands, of choices to make, most of which lack obvious answers. You make an educated guess, you move on, and you address any potential problems that arise from said guess.
I wanted to build a service that removed a lot of those decisions you had to make when it came to your business data. Constantly making decisions about how to calculate this, which formula made the most sense for that or figuring out how to get all the data in one place...it can be incredibly overwhelming.
So, in 2013, I started Baremetrics to address that very thing. The premise being that you shouldn’t need to make so many decisions. You should just be able to get the information you need to grow your business and carry on with actually growing your business.
If only it had been that easy...
Endless options
As a founder, you’ve likely spent an inordinate amount of time learning How to BusinessTM. You may even have a degree saying you’re a Master at Businessing. But it turns out all that research and reading doesn’t replace just getting in there and doing it.
In fact, I’d argue that spending too much time learning the minutia actually hinders your ability to grow and build a company.
For example, there are endless articles on how to calculate X metric, why this formula is better than that formula and what the “right” way to calculate it is. After you’ve read all of those things you’re essentially back at square one with a burning heap of conflicting information. Take the Pacific Crest SaaS Company Survey: it outlines nearly 50 different ways that companies calculate retention rates. 50! That’s nearly 50 different formulas for a single metric.
For 99% of founders, it’s an epically terrible use of time to sift through all that information to learn the detailed intricacies of metric reporting and the pros/cons of each calculation formula. There are just a thousand more profitable uses of your time.
I’m on a tangent now, so let’s get back to my original goal with Baremetrics: How do we make decisions so founders don’t have to?
It’s Complicated
I knocked out the first version of Baremetrics in a month, based primarily on my own needs building a couple of SaaS products. Within a few weeks, as more and more businesses started using the service, I started realizing just how different businesses can be.
When you read “SaaS company” you likely think of the traditional set of 3-5 monthly plans with customers that regularly and reliably pay. In practice though, that’s just not how it works. It’s never that clean. For any company. Ever.
Business is messy and subscriptions are insanely complicated to address properly. Customers change their minds, they grow, they shrink, their payments fail, they demand refunds, they want coupons, etc. We currently cover over 30 different possible subscription “states” to address this. Who knew simple subscriptions could vary so much?!?!
All of these things (and thousands of other scenarios) need to be accounted for. But how do you account for them appropriately and usefully? That’s the real question. What’s most useful from a decision-making perspective?
Changes
Over the past 2+ years of serving thousands of businesses, we’ve seen a lot of use cases. And over those years we’ve learned an immense amount about what’s useful and what’s actually needed to run a business and make decisions.
When we initially launched, we based most of our metrics off the idea of a “charge”. If there was a charge and that charge was tied back to a subscription plan, then we’d consider it “Monthly Recurring Revenue”. That worked pretty great initially, and covered a lot of use cases.
But over time we found that method was a bit too volatile for a metric as important as MRR and it was hard to make the connection between “charges” and “subscription activity”. That’s what most founders are actually after because the subscription conveys what their customers were actually doing.
It was during this time that we had a bit of an epiphany:...
Previous Episode

How we generated a $14,000 influx of cash in 7 days
When you’re building a business, cash is king. Cash lets you do things like hiring and customer acquisition, and the more of it you’ve got at any given time, the faster (theoretically) you can grow. We recently tried something that got us an extra $14,000 in cash in seven days. Let’s take a look at how we did it.
So, what’s great about subscription businesses is the relative stability. You get a steady-ish stream of revenue that slowly increases over time and is much less susceptible to the whims of other business models that are based on one-off payments.
But what can be slightly frustrating is the “slowly” part. Many times, those customers will be paying you every single month for years, yet you have to patiently wait for that money to trickle in. Or do you?
What if you could get the benefits of a pile of cash and the stability of knowing your customer will be around for longer than a month? Well, my friend, you can, thanks to one thing: annual subscriptions. They’re the magical unicorn of the SaaS world.
There’s a catch, though. The way most companies approach annual plans is to just slap it on their pricing page and hope the customer picks it over the monthly option, maybe enticing them with a little discount.
That’s the passive way to make yourself feel good about “doing something” but I guarantee you’re leaving money on the table.
The annual upsell
Instead of thinking of your annual plan as just a different payment option, think of it as a feature to upsell. “Sell” is the operative part of that word. It requires a little bit of work, but if you do it right, it will pay off.
For nearly two years we’ve been prompting users, via email, to switch to annual a few months in to their subscription. Unfortunately the results were always a bit dismal, with the average conversion rate to annual being around 4.75%.
On the surface that looks like it’d potentially work just fine. It highlights the benefits and makes it a quick, self-serve “click the link and be done!” switch. But it always felt a bit too salesy, so I decided to try something a bit more personal and informal.
How’d this puppy perform? The conversion rate on this email is 11%...a whopping 131% increase! It generated over $14,000 in revenue in the first seven days. That’s the stuff you write home about!
There are a number of things different about this email.
- A 3-month discount, instead of 2
- Manual process — No one-click, self-serve switch process
- Personal — Doesn’t include automated “here’s how much you’d save” info
- Urgency — “We’re testing this out and only offering it to a subset of customers” (which is true, we don’t offer this to lower paying plans)
The open rates were basically the same between the two emails, so subject line didn’t seem to matter. Ultimately, the combination of urgency, personal touch, and a bit larger discount pushed this one over the edge.
I do think the additional discount played a role in increased conversion, but from talking with other founders, most tests point to the size of the discount actually not being that big of a deal.
Future testing
The problem with this format is that it’s not really repeatable over the life of the customer. I suppose you could send it to them once a year, but then the “urgency” factor gets lost.
Testing out a series of these emails is certainly worth our time, as is testing out the size of the discount itself (number of months, percentage discounts, etc).
What are some things you’ve tried to increase annual subscriptions? Any formats you’ve found work really well?
Next Episode

10 common mistakes founders make
https://baremetrics.com/blog/founder-mistakes
Bless our little founder hearts. We’re eternal optimists who have great intentions paired with a propensity to try things that common sense would say is a bad idea. That means we try a lot of things, most of which don’t pan out. But it’s the things that do pan out that keep us motivated.
Having talked to and seen the businesses of thousands of entrepreneurs, there are a few mistakes I’ve seen crop up regularly. You should always keep trying things that likely won’t pan out...but at least you can increase the chances that some of them will.
Building solutions in search of a problem
As part of the “eternal optimism” I mentioned, we tend to think just about every idea we have is great. An idea pops into our head of some cool thing to build and we instantly assume that OF COURSE there’s a market for it!
We build our “solution” based on the assumption that there’s an actual problem somewhere. It’s a solution in search of a problem.
Go check out Product Hunt on any day of the week and 99% of the stuff you see is this exact thing. Product Hunt is a directory of solutions in search of problems.
Focus on identifying problems and from there you’ll know what solutions actually need to be built. If the thing you’re building doesn’t save time, save money or create revenue, then there’s likely no problem in need of a solution.
Customer acquisition plan is just “Product Hunt”
Speaking of Product Hunt, if your entire customer acquisition plan at the start is just “get on Product Hunt” (replace “Product Hunt” with whatever popular site/person/publication you want), you’re in for a bucket of ice water on your head.
Even if you do manage to get some significant traffic from that source, it’ll be a flash in the pan. You’ve got a years-long slog ahead of you and your product isn’t going to sell itself.
Focus on sustainable and repeatable acquisition channels and you’ll win big in the long run.
Chasing the competition
Seems every week there’s some new tool to “monitor the competition”. But here’s a little secret for you: the competition does not matter.
If you’re genuinely building something that is solving a problem for your customers, the only people you should care about are your customers. Give yourself some credit. You’re uniquely equipped to solve the problems your customers have and that’s why they’re paying you.
Focus on solving the problems of the customers you have (or the customers you want to have) and what your competition is doing is at the bottom of the list of things you should care about.
Building internal tools
When you’re just getting started and you’re strapped for cash, you typically do all sorts of things to pinch pennies. It’s just part of surviving, and it’s a healthy thing to do when you’re not actually making any money. The danger, however, is keeping that mindset after you’ve got a steady stream of cash flowing.
Startups waste inordinate amounts of time building little internal tools just because they can. Especially early on. The value of time is grossly undervalued and the amount of time any given thing takes to build is grossly underestimated.
There are very few things that are worth building internally when an external tool will get you 80% of the way there.
But if you’re on the fence, throw your numbers into the Build vs. Buy Calculator and see for yourself.
Waiting too long to monetize
I got email last week from a B2B startup saying they were coming out of their “2 year free beta” and would be launching “pro plans” soon.
WHAT ON EARTH HAVE THEY BEEN DOING FOR THE PAST TWO YEARS?!?!?
Maybe they’ve been propped up on 12 rounds of VC funding, but my friends, that is categorically the worst idea anyone on the planet has ever had.
Waiting basically any amount of time to charge for your product is simply delaying the inevitable. Most people do this in the name of “getting feedback quickly” but the feedback they’re getting is worthless. Feedback from users who aren’t paying you is like asking for feedback on that new quadruple-stack burger from a vegetarian. Who cares what they think, they aren’t buying!
You aren’t running a charity. You’re running a business. If people won’t give you money for your product, you have an existential crisis on your hands and the longer you wait to find out, the worse it’ll hurt.
Charge something from day one.
Waiting too long to delegate
Most founders are some form of a jack-of-all-trades. ...
If you like this episode you’ll love
Episode Comments
Generate a badge
Get a badge for your website that links back to this episode
<a href="https://goodpods.com/podcasts/founders-journey-building-a-startup-from-the-ground-up-63421/why-were-changing-how-we-calculate-metrics-3329244"> <img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/goodpods-images-bucket/badges/generic-badge-1.svg" alt="listen to why we’re changing how we calculate metrics on goodpods" style="width: 225px" /> </a>
Copy