Log in

goodpods headphones icon

To access all our features

Open the Goodpods app
Close icon
Fixing Healthcare Podcast - FHC #74: The tangled mess of medicine and politics

FHC #74: The tangled mess of medicine and politics

12/06/22 • 40 min

Fixing Healthcare Podcast

As a college freshman, Fixing Healthcare cohost Dr. Robert Pearl decided that rather than becoming a university professor as he had planned, he’d go into a field without politics: medicine. He laughs about how naïve he was as a 17-year-old.

“Healthcare is about life and death,” said Pearl, recalling his decision, “How could there be politics entwined inside that esteemed world?” Of course, Pearl soon learned that politics and medicine are a tangled mess.

In this episode of Unfiltered, Pearl and his cohost Jeremy Corr join ZDoggMD to look at the relationship between medicine and politics and if there’s any opportunity for logic to prevail.

To find out, press play or keep reading.

* *

Fixing Healthcare is a co-production of Dr. Robert Pearl and Jeremy Corr. Subscribe to the show via Apple Podcasts or wherever you find podcasts. Join the conversation or suggest a guest by following the show on Twitter and LinkedIn.

UNFILTERED TRANSCRIPT

Jeremy Corr:

Hello, and welcome to Unfiltered, our newest program in our weekly healthcare podcast series. Joining us each month is Dr. Zubin Damania, known to many as ZDoggMD. For 25 minutes, he and Robbie will engage in unscripted and hard-hitting conversation about art, politics, entertainment, and much more. As nationally recognized physicians and healthcare policy experts, they’ll apply the lessons they extract to medical practice, then I’ll pose a question to the two of them based on what I’ve heard. Robbie, why don’t you kick it off?

Robert Pearl:

Hey, Zubin, how was your Thanksgiving?

Zubin Damania:

It was thankful. I really enjoyed it. My wife was on call, which meant we didn’t have to go through the full production of the meal. We went to a half meal, which was absolutely great. I had 70% less bloat and 100% more gratitude. How about you?

Robert Pearl:

I had a great time. I was over at my sisters and had a bunch of folks there. Did you do anything special to communicate your gratitude to others?

Zubin Damania:

I texted a lot of people that I had been a little out of touch with, and just to convey how important they are in my whole life and journey.

Robert Pearl:

Excellent. That sounds great. So I don’t know if I ever told you that I became a doctor to avoid politics.

Zubin Damania:

I didn’t know that.

Robert Pearl:

Yeah. So I was in college. I was a philosophy major, and my hero, who was a philosophy professor, quite an excellent one, he went on to become the chairman at Reed College, didn’t get tenure because of his political views, and I decided then that I wanted to do something that would have no politics. I mean, healthcare is about life and death. How could there be politics entwined inside that esteemed world? And so that’s truly why at the age of 17 I decided that I’d become a doctor, and I learned stuff later on. Any thoughts on that observation, and what we can do to minimize the politics in medicine?

Zubin Damania:

Well, you had me at philosophy major. I don’t remember you... You must have told me that, but that’s impressive. If I could go back in time and do it again, I would do philosophy instead of music and molecular biology, although that’s kind of philosophy in a way. Yeah, politics and medicine have been to some degree dance partners for a long time, but I think right now it actually just reflects how politicized everything is, and how everything is so kind of divided. Although, I’ll say this, Robbie, I’m sensing something in the air, and I might have said this at our last conversation, but I really think something is shifting. I feel like people are starting to wake up to the fact that we are really divided over nothing substantial in the sense that we’re all trying to find truth and goodness, and we just have a slightly different spin on it, and medicine maybe will wake up, but as usual, we’re about a decade or two behind the rest of the culture.

Robert Pearl:

Actually...

plus icon
bookmark

As a college freshman, Fixing Healthcare cohost Dr. Robert Pearl decided that rather than becoming a university professor as he had planned, he’d go into a field without politics: medicine. He laughs about how naïve he was as a 17-year-old.

“Healthcare is about life and death,” said Pearl, recalling his decision, “How could there be politics entwined inside that esteemed world?” Of course, Pearl soon learned that politics and medicine are a tangled mess.

In this episode of Unfiltered, Pearl and his cohost Jeremy Corr join ZDoggMD to look at the relationship between medicine and politics and if there’s any opportunity for logic to prevail.

To find out, press play or keep reading.

* *

Fixing Healthcare is a co-production of Dr. Robert Pearl and Jeremy Corr. Subscribe to the show via Apple Podcasts or wherever you find podcasts. Join the conversation or suggest a guest by following the show on Twitter and LinkedIn.

UNFILTERED TRANSCRIPT

Jeremy Corr:

Hello, and welcome to Unfiltered, our newest program in our weekly healthcare podcast series. Joining us each month is Dr. Zubin Damania, known to many as ZDoggMD. For 25 minutes, he and Robbie will engage in unscripted and hard-hitting conversation about art, politics, entertainment, and much more. As nationally recognized physicians and healthcare policy experts, they’ll apply the lessons they extract to medical practice, then I’ll pose a question to the two of them based on what I’ve heard. Robbie, why don’t you kick it off?

Robert Pearl:

Hey, Zubin, how was your Thanksgiving?

Zubin Damania:

It was thankful. I really enjoyed it. My wife was on call, which meant we didn’t have to go through the full production of the meal. We went to a half meal, which was absolutely great. I had 70% less bloat and 100% more gratitude. How about you?

Robert Pearl:

I had a great time. I was over at my sisters and had a bunch of folks there. Did you do anything special to communicate your gratitude to others?

Zubin Damania:

I texted a lot of people that I had been a little out of touch with, and just to convey how important they are in my whole life and journey.

Robert Pearl:

Excellent. That sounds great. So I don’t know if I ever told you that I became a doctor to avoid politics.

Zubin Damania:

I didn’t know that.

Robert Pearl:

Yeah. So I was in college. I was a philosophy major, and my hero, who was a philosophy professor, quite an excellent one, he went on to become the chairman at Reed College, didn’t get tenure because of his political views, and I decided then that I wanted to do something that would have no politics. I mean, healthcare is about life and death. How could there be politics entwined inside that esteemed world? And so that’s truly why at the age of 17 I decided that I’d become a doctor, and I learned stuff later on. Any thoughts on that observation, and what we can do to minimize the politics in medicine?

Zubin Damania:

Well, you had me at philosophy major. I don’t remember you... You must have told me that, but that’s impressive. If I could go back in time and do it again, I would do philosophy instead of music and molecular biology, although that’s kind of philosophy in a way. Yeah, politics and medicine have been to some degree dance partners for a long time, but I think right now it actually just reflects how politicized everything is, and how everything is so kind of divided. Although, I’ll say this, Robbie, I’m sensing something in the air, and I might have said this at our last conversation, but I really think something is shifting. I feel like people are starting to wake up to the fact that we are really divided over nothing substantial in the sense that we’re all trying to find truth and goodness, and we just have a slightly different spin on it, and medicine maybe will wake up, but as usual, we’re about a decade or two behind the rest of the culture.

Robert Pearl:

Actually...

Previous Episode

undefined - FHC #73: The ‘rules of healthcare’ that cause burnout

FHC #73: The ‘rules of healthcare’ that cause burnout

Dr. Jonathan Fisher was practically born into medicine. All six of his siblings became doctors, following in their father’s professional footsteps. Jonathan, himself, became a Harvard-trained cardiologist, working in some of the nation’s leading medical institutions.

But, in the process of making his family proud, he was becoming anxious, depressed and burned out. He was losing an important part of himself. To make matters worse, when Jonathan finally sought the help of a therapist, he experienced profound shame and felt like a failure.

Nowadays, in addition to being a practicing physician, Jonathan is an advocate. He has devoted much of his career to solving clinician burnout. He is a mindfulness and resiliency expert who runs the Ending Clinician Burnout Global Community and co-hosts the annual summit of same name.

In this interview, hosts Jeremy Corr and Dr. Robert Pearl ask Dr. Fisher about the rules of American medicine that must be broken in order to free clinicians from the shame, anger, frustration and dissatisfaction that cause rampant burnout.

Interview Highlights

On learning the ‘unwritten rules’ of medicine

“I remember my surgery rotation in third year. We had a very well respected general surgeon, resident and a fellow, and I felt like I was in the military, which was a very bizarre thing ... I found myself having to walk quite erect, almost like a group of ducklings following this senior surgical resident. [We had] to speak in exactly the way that he spoke, to present in a way that was expected. This was the first time I remember this jarring sense that there were certain rules that were established, rules of behavior if we were to fit in and to excel.”

On seeking professional help for the first time

“I was a resident at the Brigham and I called [the therapist’s office] and I tried not to over-identify myself. And when I first went, I wore a coat so that I could cover part of my neck, and I wore a hat so that nobody in the neighborhood, other residents, would know that I was going to see a therapist. There was a lot of secrecy and there was a lot of shame that was there. I knew very little about the impacts of shame, which really literally means to cover up. That’s the origin of the word. There was so much covering up that I was doing that, eventually, I was unable to feel positive feelings.”

On burnout vs. depression

“There’s an overlap between burnout and depression, but one is a workplace phenomenon, often driven by a certain set of known factors that Tait Shanafelt and others have described beautifully, whereas depression is more of a psychological diagnosis. What I find interesting is ... there are overlaps there with the clinical spectrum of depression as well as anxiety ... If you look at Medscape’s poll from last year ... 70 to 80% of all doctors across 29 sub-specialties reported depression at some point in the last few years.”

On ‘the healthcare system’ and its role in burnout

“People say, ‘Well, you have to change the system.’ I point out that a system is nothing more than a collection of individuals. If our individuals don’t have the presence of mind and the ability to impact change and influence the thoughts, feelings, and actions of other people, then we won’t have a generation of leaders who can make the changes that people so desperately want.”

On the role of clinicians in ending burnout

“I think part of the problem we’re facing in healthcare is that we’re all siloed. We may be siloed in our own institution thinking that we’re doing it best. We may be siloed in our own specialty thinking that we’re better than others. And we know the jokes that the orthopedists tell about the internists and the cardiologists tell about the neurologists, and it’s funny. At the same time, these silos are what are going to keep us from healing our healthcare system. All of these divides need to be bridged. We need to begin the bridging. And so, that’s really the motivation for my work.”

On the problem with ‘moral injury’

“If we use a narrow term like moral injury, it’s a focus on one person, which is the healthcare provider who is injured. I would say that there’s a connotation there, that there is an injurer. Once we have that connotation, there are elements of blame, of blaming the system. I’ve watched this for 10 years. Well-meaning doctors who have no recourse, spend hours of their time talking about us versus them, us versus the system ... I think the popularity [of the term] comes from a sense of hopelessness and, frankly, bitterness, which oftentimes is appropriate, but after a while becomes dysf...

Next Episode

undefined - FHC #75: Diving deep into healthcare technology and capitation

FHC #75: Diving deep into healthcare technology and capitation

This Fixing Healthcare podcast series “Diving Deep” probes some of healthcare’s most complex topics and deep-seated problems.

On today’s episode, hosts Dr. Robert Pearl and Jeremy Corr discuss two imperatives for healthcare leadership in the 21st century: changing the way docs use technology and changing the way we pay for medical care.

For more information on healthcare leadership, check out Dr. Pearl’s latest columns on Forbes and LinkedIn. For listeners interested in show notes, here’s a discussion guide:

LEADERSHIP + TECHNOLOGY
  • What does the metaphor of the iron triangle represent in medicine?
  • Why is U.S. healthcare lacking effective leadership?
  • What is the “anatomy of healthcare leadership”?
  • How might a leader begin to change healthcare, locally?
  • What would leaders most like to change about the care patients receive today?
  • How do we make the ideal real in healthcare today?
  • What are some technologies that could transform medical care?
  • How could technologies change care for patients with chronic disease?
  • Once clinicians agree with the logic of new tech, how can leaders appeal to them on an emotional level?
  • How can real patient stories help persuade docs to embrace change?
  • In addition to the brain and heart, what is the role of the spine for leaders?
  • How did cohost Dr. Pearl use his spine to push technology forward at Kaiser?
  • What are the biggest problems a leader might experience when implementing new technological solutions?
LEADERSHIP + MONEY
  • Do Americans get what they pay for from healthcare today?
  • What are the biggest cost barriers to reforming healthcare?
  • What’s the problem with fee-for-service?
  • What is the alternative to fee for service?
  • How does “capitation” change the incentives for physicians?
  • Doesn’t capitation lead to delayed and denied care?
  • Why aren’t doctors jumping at pay-for-value models?
  • How do leaders use their brain, heart and spine differently to reform healthcare payments?
  • Can leaders make a case for capitation on an emotional level?
  • Why do leaders need a strong spine to advance capitation?
  • What else is needed to move away from fee-for-service as the method of reimbursement?

* *

Dr. Robert Pearl is the author of a book about medicine’s invisible yet highly influential physician culture. Check out “Uncaring: How Physician Culture Is Killing Doctors & Patients.” All profits from the book go to Doctors Without Borders.

Fixing Healthcare is a co-production of Dr. Robert Pearl and Jeremy Corr. Subscribe to the show via Apple, Spotify, Stitcher or wherever you find podcasts. Join the conversation or suggest a guest by following the show on Twitter and LinkedIn.

The post FHC #75: Diving deep into healthcare technology and capitation appeared first on Fixing Healthcare.

Episode Comments

Generate a badge

Get a badge for your website that links back to this episode

Select type & size
Open dropdown icon
share badge image

<a href="https://goodpods.com/podcasts/fixing-healthcare-podcast-89193/fhc-74-the-tangled-mess-of-medicine-and-politics-25778170"> <img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/goodpods-images-bucket/badges/generic-badge-1.svg" alt="listen to fhc #74: the tangled mess of medicine and politics on goodpods" style="width: 225px" /> </a>

Copy