Log in

goodpods headphones icon

To access all our features

Open the Goodpods app
Close icon
headphones
The So Strangely Podcast

The So Strangely Podcast

Finn Upham

1 Creator

1 Creator

A podcast on new research in Music Science
Share icon

All episodes

Best episodes

Top 10 The So Strangely Podcast Episodes

Goodpods has curated a list of the 10 best The So Strangely Podcast episodes, ranked by the number of listens and likes each episode have garnered from our listeners. If you are listening to The So Strangely Podcast for the first time, there's no better place to start than with one of these standout episodes. If you are a fan of the show, vote for your favorite The So Strangely Podcast episode by adding your comments to the episode page.

The So Strangely Podcast - ISMIR 2019 Conference sampler

ISMIR 2019 Conference sampler

The So Strangely Podcast

play

11/20/19 • 40 min

This episode brings recommendations from the 2019 ISMIR conference at TUDelft in the Netherlands. A number of contributors, old and new, highlighted papers that had caught their attention.

Note: At ISMIR, all accepted papers were presented via a short 4 minute talk and a poster. This arrangement made it possible to keep all presentations in a single track. All papers and permited talks are posted on the ISMIR site.

Time Stamps
  • [0:01:51] Matan’s rec
  • [0:07:27] Rachel’s rec
  • [0:10:51] Andrew’s rec
  • [0:15:20] Ashley and Felicia’s rec
  • [0:19:59] Néstor’s rec
  • [0:26:55] Tejaswinee’s rec
  • [0:31:13] Brian’s rec
  • [0:36:06] Finn’s recs
Show notes
  • Matan Gover recommends [A13] Conditioned-U-Net: Introducing a Control Mechanism in the U-Net for Multiple Source Separations by Gabriel Meseguer Brocal and Geoffroy Peeters (paper, presentation)
  • Andrew Demetriou recommends [F10] Tunes Together: Perception and Experience of Collaborative Playlists by So Yeon Park; Audrey Laplante; Jin Ha Lee; Blair Kaneshiro (paper, presentation)
  • Tejaswinee Kelkar recommends [B03] Estimating Unobserved Audio Features for Target-Based Orchestration by Jon Gillick; Carmine-Emanuele Cella; David Bamman (paper, presentation)
  • Ashley Burgoyne and Felicia Villalobos recommend [E13] SAMBASET: A Dataset of Historical Samba de Enredo Recordings for Computational Music Analysis by Lucas Maia; Magdalena Fuentes; Luiz Biscainho; Martín Rocamora; Slim Essid (paper, presentation)
  • Néstor Nápoles López recommends the anniversary paper [E-00] 20 Years of Automatic Chord Recognition from Audio by Johan Pauwels; Ken O’Hanlon; Emilia Gomez; Mark B. Sandler (paper, presentation)
  • Rachel Bittner recommends [A06] Cover Detection with Dominant Melody Embeddings by Guillaume Doras; Geoffroy Peeters (paper, presentation)
  • Brian McFee recommends [E-06] FMP Notebooks: Educational Material for Teaching and Learning Fundamentals of Music Processing by Meinard Müller; Frank Zalkow (paper, presentation, webpage)
  • And Finn’s rec:
bookmark
plus icon
share episode
The So Strangely Podcast - Episode 0: Introducing The So Strangely Podcast
play

05/22/18 • 3 min

A short introduction to The So Strangely Podcast on recent research in Music Science. **** Follow the podcast on Twitter @sostrangelypod Get in touch with the producer, finn @ sostrangely.com **** The So Strangely Podcast is produced by Finn Upham, 2018. Closing music includes a sample of Diana Deutsch’s speech-song illusion sound demo 1.
bookmark
plus icon
share episode

Host Finn Upham recommends “How Music Moves Us: Entraining to Musicians’ Movements” by Alexander Demos and Roger Chaffin, published in Music Perception, 2017. They interview Dr Demos about this study and adjacent issues.

Note: This interview goes fairly deep into the challenges of time series data analysis. Feel free to use the time stamps listed in the show notes to skip ahead if this is not your cup of tea.

Time Stamps
  • [0:00:10] Intro to article and Alex
  • [0:03:20] Design of Air Conducting experiment
  • [0:11:15] Capturing movements of performers and listeners
  • [0:15:40] Assessing alignment between motion time series
  • [0:25:26] Non-linearity in these time series
  • [0:31:18] False negatives and intermittent alignment
  • [0:38:32] Theories of Music and Ancillary motion
  • [0:45:04] Closing Summary and Implications
Show notes
  • Recommended article:
  • Interviewee: Dr. Alexander Demos, Clinical assistant professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago (website)
  • Some publications cited in the discussion:
    • Schreiber, T., & Schmitz, A. (1996). Improved surrogate data for nonlinearity tests. Physical Review Letters, 77(4), 635–638.
    • Cook, N. (2013). Beyond the score: Music as performance. Oxford University Press.
    • Theiler, J., Eubank, S., Longtin, A., Galdrikian, B. & Farmer, J. D. (1992). Testing for nonlinearity in time series: The method of surrogate data. Physica D, 58, 77–94.
    • Dean, R. T., Bailes, F., & Dunsmuir, W. T. (2014). Time series analysis of real-time music perception: Approaches to the assessment of individual and expertise differences in perception of expressed affect. Journal of Mathematics and Music, 8(3), 183-205.
    • Wanderley, M. M., Vines, B. W., Middleton, N., Mckay, C., & Hatch, W. (2005). The musical significance of clarinetists’ ancillary gestures: An exploration of the field. Journal of New Music Research, 34(1), 97–113. DOI: 10.1080/092982105 00124208
Credits

The So Strangely Podcast is produced by Finn Upham, 2019. The closing music includes a sample of Diana Deutsch’s Speech-Song Illusion sound demo 1.

bookmark
plus icon
share episode

Music tech and data science professor Brian McFee recommends Vocals in Music Matter: The Relevance of Vocals in the Minds of Listeners by Andrew Demetriou, Andreas Jansson, Aparna Kumar, and Rachel M. Bittner, published in the 2018 ISMIR proceedings. Brian and Finn interview Andrew Demetriou about this research combining descriptions of music on Spotify and survey responses on what users pay attention to, like, and dislike in music generally and vocals specifically.

Time Stamps
  • [0:00:00] Introduction with Brian
  • [0:10:05] Interview: Introduction: Origins of paper and Survey 1 analysis
  • [0:20:15] Interview: Results of survey 1 and ethical research practices at Spotify
  • [0:27:03] Interview: Second Survey construction, analysis, and results
  • [0:34:37] Interview: Problems of terminology and labeling
  • [0:43:27] Interview: Overall results and absence of vocals terms in music descriptions
  • [0:53:30] Interview: Implications for everyday music listening
  • [0:58:40] Closing with Brian (12/10 for efficient summary)
Show notes

And here is the action shot of the research team card sorting participants’ text responses to Survey 1.

Spotify researchers (left to right) Rachel Bittner, Andreas Jansson, Andrew Demetriou, and Aparna Kumar working through the text responses to Survey 1. Credits

The So Strangely Podcast is produced by Finn Upham, 2018. The closing music includes a sample of Diana Deutsch’s Speech-Song Illusion sound demo 1.

bookmark
plus icon
share episode
Music Theorist Bryn Hughes recommends Chris White's "Relationships Between Tonal Stability and Metrical Accent in Monophonic Contexts", published in the Empirical Musicology Review (2017). Bryn and Finn interview Prof. White about his sequence of perceptual studies on how tonal stability may inform metrical hierarchy and vis versa, and together they discuss implications for music theory and some common issues in music cognition studies. Show notes Recommended article: White, C. (2017). Relationships Between Tonal Stability and Metrical Accent in Monophonic Contexts. Empirical Musicology Review, 12(1-2), 19-37. Interviewee: Prof. Chris White, Department of Music and Dance at the University of Massachusetts Amherst twitter: @chriswmwhite Co-host: Prof. Bryn Hughes, in the Faculty of Fine Arts at the University of Lethbridge twitter: @brynmdhughes Papers cited in the discussion: Krumhansl, C. L., & Kessler, E. J. (1982). Tracing the dynamic changes in perceived tonal organization in a spatial representation of musical keys. Psychological Review, 89, 334–368. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033- 295X.89.4.334 Lerdahl, F., & Jackendoff, R. (1983). A Generative Theory of Tonal Music. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Time Stamps [0:00:10] Intro with Prof. Bryn Hughes [0:11:48] Interview: Corpus studies inspiration and Study format [0:23:31] Interview: Effect Size and Gender as a factor [0:36:00] Interview: Experiment 4 and more design questions [0:43:34] Interview: Follow up and future work [0:53:33] Closing summary and surprises with Prof. Bryn Hughes Credits The So Strangely Podcast is produced by Finn Upham, 2018. The closing music includes a sample of Diana Deutsch’s Speech-Song Illusion Sound Demo 1.
bookmark
plus icon
share episode

Finn interviews Composer and Machine Learning specialist Dr. Cheng-Zhi Anna Huang about the Music Transformer project at Google’s Magenta Labs. They discuss representations of music for machine learning, algorithmic music generation as a compositional aid, the JS Bach Google Doodle, how self-reference defines structure in music, and compare the musicality of different systems with example outputs.

Time Stamps
  • [0:01:05] Introducing Dr. Anna Huang
  • [0:03:43] JS Bach Google Doodle
  • [0:12:52] Representations of musical information for machine learning
  • [0:16:26] Music Transformer project
    • [0:25:15] RNN algorithm music sample
  • [0:25:45] ABA structure challenge for generative systems
    • [0:30:30] Vanilla Transformer algorithm music sample
    • [0:32:07] Music Transformer algorithm music sample
  • [0:36:30] Self Reference Visualisation (see blog post)
  • [0:43:27] Everyday music implications
  • [0:48:10] What this work says about music
    • [0:50:01] Music Transformer trained on Jazz Piano
Show notes Credits

The So Strangely Podcast is produced by Finn Upham, 2018. Algorithmic music samples from the blog post Music Transformer: Generating Music with Long-Term Structure, and included under the principles of fair dealing. The closing music includes a sample of Diana Deutsch’s Speech-Song Illusion sound demo 1.

bookmark
plus icon
share episode

Postdoctoral fellow Sarah Sauvé recommends “Individual differences in rhythmic cortical entrainment correlate with predictive behavior in sensorimotor synchronization” by Sylvie Nozaradan, Isabelle Peret, and Peter E. Keller, published in Nature Scientific Reports in 2016. Sarah and Finn interview Dr. Nozaradan about the measures of metrical perception and rhythm production, entrainment to difficult stimuli, and what these results imply for a replication study conducted with older participants.

Time Stamps
  • [0:00:10] Intro with Sarah
  • [0:09:41] Interview: Where this study comes from
  • [0:14:25] Interview: Challenging stimuli
  • [0:22:09] Interview: Older listeners replication
  • [0:26:43] Interview: Task 3, metrical prediction
  • [0:38:25] Interview: Implications for everyday musical experiences
  • [0:44:43] Closing debrief
Show notes Contact

Questions, comments, and article recommendations are always welcome! Get in touch here, through the contact page, or on twitter, or email the producer directly: finn at sostrangely.com

Credits

The So Strangely Podcast is produced by Finn Upham, 2019. The closing music includes a sample of Diana Deutsch’s Speech-Song Illusion sound demo 1.

bookmark
plus icon
share episode

Music technology PhD Candidate Tim de Reuse recommends “Unmixer: An Interface for Extracting and Remixing Loops” by Jordan Smith,Yuta Kawasaki, and Masataka Goto, published in the proceedings of ISMIR 2019. Tim and Finn interview Jordan about the origins of this project, the algorithm behind the loop extraction, the importance of repetition in music, and the creative and playful applications of Unmixer.

Note: This conversation was recorded in December 2019. Techically issues with some tracks contributed to delays. Apologies for the choppy audio quality.

Time Stamps
  • [0:01:40] Project Summary
  • [0:05:05] Demonstration of Unmixer
  • [0:14:27] Origins of the UnMixer project
  • [0:19:44] Factorisation algorithm
  • [0:28:37] Computational and musical objectives for factorisation
  • [0:36:15] The Unmixer web interface
  • [0:41:30] 2nd Demonstration, parameters and track selection
  • [0:49:13] What Unmixer tells us about music
Show notes Credits

The So Strangely Podcast is produced by Finn Upham, 2020. The closing music includes a sample of Diana Deutsch’s Speech-Song Illusion sound demo 1.

bookmark
plus icon
share episode

Music Education doctoral candidate Ethan Hein recommends “Equity and Music Education: Euphemisms, Terminal Naivety, and Whiteness” by Juliet Hess, published in Action, Criticism & Theory for Music Education, 2017. Ethan and Finn interview Dr. Juliet Hess about this study and whiteness in music education, and addressing systemic racism from within our areas of academia.

Time Stamps
  • [0:00:10] Intro with Ethan Hein
  • [0:08:29] Interview: Dr. Juliet Hess, Background and Case Studies
  • [0:18:50] Interview: Multiculturalism and Music
  • [0:29:31] Interview: Whiteness in the Conservatory
  • [0:36:19] Interview: Context and Implications
  • [0:44:06] Interview: Future work
  • [0:51:50] Closing with Ethan Hein
Show notes
  • Recommended article:
    • Hess, J. (2017). Equity and Music Education: Euphemisms, Terminal Naivety, and Whiteness. Action, Criticism & Theory for Music Education, 16(3). (HTML, PDF)
  • Interviewee: Dr. Juliet Hess, Assistant Professor of Music Education at Michigan State University
  • Co-host: Ethan Hein, Doctoral Candidate in Music Education at New York University (website, twitter)
  • Sources cited in the discussion:
    • Kendrick Lamar’s Alright (youtube)
    • Chris Thile’s performance on Prairie Home companion is no longer available
    • Emma Stevens – Blackbird by The Beatles sung in Mi’kmaq (youtube)
      • Correction: this performance is from Cape Breton, Nova Scotia, not Newfoundland where there has been controversy around seal hunting. Both provinces are within the ancestral territory of Mi’kmaq People.
    • Bonilla-Silva, Eduardo. 2006. Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States. 2nd edition. Toronto, ON: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. (Publisher page)
    • Juliet Hess (2018) Interrupting the symphony: unpacking the importance placed on classical concert experiences, Music Education Research, 20:1, 11-21, DOI: 10.1080/14613808.2016.1202224 (HTML)
    • Juliet Hess’ new book:
      • Hess, Juliet. (2019) Music Education for Social Change: Constructing an Activist Music Education, Routledge (Publisher page)
Credits

The So Strangely Podcast is produced by Finn Upham, 2019. The closing music includes a sample of Diana Deutsch’s Speech-Song Illusion sound demo 1.

bookmark
plus icon
share episode
The So Strangely Podcast - Episode 7: Society for Neuroscience 2018 Music Science Review
play

12/22/18 • 81 min

Four Music Science attendees of the 2018 meeting of the Society for Neuroscience join Finn to discuss their experience of the conference, their own projects, and other interesting research presented. PhD Candidates Avital Sternin, Andrew Chang, Dr. Keith Doelling, and Prof. Amy Belfi get into the neural processing of song, emotion and alzheimer’s, leadership in small ensembles, onset prediction in the auditory cortex and more. Get an inside view of how Music Science fits into the biggest Neuroscience conference according to the young scientists on the ground.

Time Stamps
  • [0:01:06] Introduction of panelists
  • [0:03:12] Introduction of Society for Neuroscience Conference
  • [0:07:11] Music Science at SfN and in Neuroscience
  • [0:10:48] Avital’s project (introduced by Amy)
  • [0:21:50] Andrew’s project (introduced by Keith)
  • [0:33:18] Amy’s project (introduced by Avital)
  • [0:44:04] Keith’s project (introduced by Andrew)
Show notes
  • SfN18 website and program
  • Avital Sternin, PhD Candidate at The Brain and Mind Institute of The University of Western Ontario
    • Abstract, Poster for Identifying the neural correlates of Music Familiarity using a strict training paradigm by A. Sternin, A. M. Owen, J. A. Grahn.
  • Andrew Chang, Ph.D. Candidate in Department of Psychology, Neuroscience & Behaviour at McMaster University
    • Abstract, Poster for Neural oscillatory mechanisms for interpersonal entrainment in music ensembles by A. Chang, P. Chrapka, D. Bosnyak, L. J. Trainor.
    • Associated paper: A. Chang, S.R. Livingstone, D. Bosnyak, and L. J. Trainor. Body sway reflects leadership in joint music performance. PNAS May 23, 2017 114 (21) E4134-E4141
  • Prof. Amy Belfi, Department of Psychological Science at Missouri University of Science and Technology
    • Abstract, Poster for Music and emotion in Alzheimer’s disease by A. M. Belfi, A. Resche-Hernandez, E. Guzman-Velez, D. Tranel.
  • Dr. Keith Doelling, Dept. of Psychology, Centre for Neural Science, New York University
    • Abstract, Poster for Assessing evoked and oscillatory components in cortical synchronization to music using computational models by K. Doelling, M.F. Assaneo, J. Rowland, D. Bevilacqua, B. Pesaran, D. Poeppel.
    • Associated paper: K. B. Doelling and D. Poeppel. Cortical entrainment to music and its modulation by expertise. PNAS November 10, 2015 112 (45) E6233-E6242
  • Other SfN 2018 posters mentioned