Elon's Exit from Trump Administration + Amanda Litman on Recruiting the Next Democratic Leaders
06/02/25 • 78 min
1 Listener
Chuck Todd reacts to Elon Musk leaving the Trump Administration and discusses the valuable lessons to be learned from Elon’s tenure. Chuck also reacts to the recent pardons by Donald Trump and explains why they are bad for the country. Then he discusses the problems with the “big, beautiful bill”.
Then, Chuck is joined by Amanda Litman, co-founder and president of Run For Something, to discuss the future of Democratic leadership and the urgent need to recruit a new generation of candidates. They examine how Republicans, following the lead of Newt Gingrich’s GoPAC, have outpaced Democrats in preparing talent for public office — and why the Democratic bench remains so thin.
Litman shares insights into the challenges young progressives face, from lack of institutional support to financial and family pressures. They discuss the messy but well-intentioned efforts like David Hogg’s DNC initiative, the communication gap with younger voters, and why the information ecosystem is reshaping political engagement.
Together, they explore the mechanics of candidate recruitment, debates over ideological litmus tests, and how Run For Something navigates hot-button issues like trans rights and independent candidacies. From socioeconomic diversity in elected office to the underrepresentation of renters and working-class Americans, this conversation is a candid look at how Democrats can rebuild from the ground up — and what success might look like in the 2026 midterms.
Finally, in “Ask Chuck,” Chuck digs into the mailbag to answer one of the biggest questions about the state of politics.
00:00 - Chuck recaps his weekend
06:26 - Elon’s Exit from Trump Administration
14:43 - Reaction to Trump’s pardons
21:49 – Amanda Litman joins the Chuck Toddcast!
22:19 – What is “Run For Something”?
24:19 – Newt Gingrich started GoPAC to prep candidates on the right
25:19 – The DNC dropped the ball on prepping candidates
27:34 – Emily’s List was good for candidate training, but only for women
29:04 – There are very few young elected Democrats
30:04 – David Hogg’s DNC effort is a noble one, but messy for the DNC
32:19 – The generational divide in the Democratic party
33:49 – Democrats need younger leaders to speak to younger voters
34:49 – The Republican party changed drastically in ten years
35:49 – Voters under 35 have seen a lot of government failure
37:49 – Voters receive their information so differently now
39:04 – What is the process for recruiting and training candidates?
42:49 – Is there an ideological litmus test for prospective candidates?
44:04 – Trans issues have been very challenging for progressives
45:49 – What if a candidate's passion issue isn’t a voting issue?
47:04 – Will “Run For Something” recruit and run independent candidates?
49:49 – Could we see a lot of former federal employees run for office?
51:49 – Will Run For Something get involved in debates about updating the democracy
53:19 – Legislators should be paid more
55:19 – Lack of money and kids are a huge impediment to candidates under 40
57:19 – We need more socioeconomic diversity in elected office*
59:19 – Renters aren’t represented in Congress*
61:04 – The Democrats have become the “presidency or bust” party*
63:04 – If you want to improve the Democratic brand, you have to change the politicians
65:19 – What does success look like in 2026 midterms?
67:22 – “Ask Chuck”
Chuck Todd reacts to Elon Musk leaving the Trump Administration and discusses the valuable lessons to be learned from Elon’s tenure. Chuck also reacts to the recent pardons by Donald Trump and explains why they are bad for the country. Then he discusses the problems with the “big, beautiful bill”.
Then, Chuck is joined by Amanda Litman, co-founder and president of Run For Something, to discuss the future of Democratic leadership and the urgent need to recruit a new generation of candidates. They examine how Republicans, following the lead of Newt Gingrich’s GoPAC, have outpaced Democrats in preparing talent for public office — and why the Democratic bench remains so thin.
Litman shares insights into the challenges young progressives face, from lack of institutional support to financial and family pressures. They discuss the messy but well-intentioned efforts like David Hogg’s DNC initiative, the communication gap with younger voters, and why the information ecosystem is reshaping political engagement.
Together, they explore the mechanics of candidate recruitment, debates over ideological litmus tests, and how Run For Something navigates hot-button issues like trans rights and independent candidacies. From socioeconomic diversity in elected office to the underrepresentation of renters and working-class Americans, this conversation is a candid look at how Democrats can rebuild from the ground up — and what success might look like in the 2026 midterms.
Finally, in “Ask Chuck,” Chuck digs into the mailbag to answer one of the biggest questions about the state of politics.
00:00 - Chuck recaps his weekend
06:26 - Elon’s Exit from Trump Administration
14:43 - Reaction to Trump’s pardons
21:49 – Amanda Litman joins the Chuck Toddcast!
22:19 – What is “Run For Something”?
24:19 – Newt Gingrich started GoPAC to prep candidates on the right
25:19 – The DNC dropped the ball on prepping candidates
27:34 – Emily’s List was good for candidate training, but only for women
29:04 – There are very few young elected Democrats
30:04 – David Hogg’s DNC effort is a noble one, but messy for the DNC
32:19 – The generational divide in the Democratic party
33:49 – Democrats need younger leaders to speak to younger voters
34:49 – The Republican party changed drastically in ten years
35:49 – Voters under 35 have seen a lot of government failure
37:49 – Voters receive their information so differently now
39:04 – What is the process for recruiting and training candidates?
42:49 – Is there an ideological litmus test for prospective candidates?
44:04 – Trans issues have been very challenging for progressives
45:49 – What if a candidate's passion issue isn’t a voting issue?
47:04 – Will “Run For Something” recruit and run independent candidates?
49:49 – Could we see a lot of former federal employees run for office?
51:49 – Will Run For Something get involved in debates about updating the democracy
53:19 – Legislators should be paid more
55:19 – Lack of money and kids are a huge impediment to candidates under 40
57:19 – We need more socioeconomic diversity in elected office*
59:19 – Renters aren’t represented in Congress*
61:04 – The Democrats have become the “presidency or bust” party*
63:04 – If you want to improve the Democratic brand, you have to change the politicians
65:19 – What does success look like in 2026 midterms?
67:22 – “Ask Chuck”
Previous Episode
The Russian SPY Factory In Brazil, Explained: New York Times BOMBSHELL Story Reaction
Chuck Todd starts with new polling showing Trump’s damaging down ballot effect on the Republican party and highlights some key races for the upcoming midterm elections.
Then, he sits down with New York Times reporters Michael Schwirtz and Jane Bradley to discuss their explosive investigation into Russia's sophisticated "spy factory" operation in Brazil. The reporters reveal how they uncovered a years-long Russian intelligence program that used Brazil as the perfect cover to create false identities for spies who would then be deployed around the world. The discussion explores how the Ukraine war may have intensified efforts to uncover these operations, and details the meticulous process Russian operatives used to obtain authentic Brazilian birth certificates and build elaborate backstories for their agents.
The conversation delves into the remarkable scope of this espionage network, including how one spy successfully infiltrated Johns Hopkins University as a student, before being caught by Brazilian authorities. Schwirtz and Bradley discuss the similarities between their real-world investigation and the plot of "The Americans," the complaints from captured spies about their Russian handlers, and how this program's roots trace back to Cold War tactics. The interview also touches on broader questions about American engagement in Latin America, Brazil's surprisingly robust rule of law, and the ongoing challenges facing international journalism, including reporting in conflict zones like Ukraine and the risks of travel to Russia.
Finally, he answers listeners’ questions in the Ask Chuck segment regarding small state primaries, whether an atheist could ever be elected president and Democratic messaging.
Timeline:
00:00 Introduction
01:30 Trump is putting the Republican party in a precarious position for midterms
03:30 Trump’s only big win is the border
04:00 Swing voters wanted lower prices and aren’t getting them
04:30 Every election is now a “change” election
06:30 Trump has become the party
08:00 Republicans won’t have anything that’s easy to sell to the public
09:30 New Texas poll shows Trump’s growing unpopularity
12:00 Shrinking the size of government is popular with voters
13:15 Bad economic approval is a warning for Republicans
16:00 Incumbency may be a big problem for John Cornyn
18:00 New Michigan poll released on senate race
19:30 Michigan poll shows anti-incumbent bias in voters
20:30 Lindsay Graham in a closer than expected race
22:15 Michael Schwirtz & Jane Bradley join the Chuck ToddCast!
23:55 What is the origin story of their story on Brazil's "Spy Factory"
24:45 Did the Ukraine war cause countries to double efforts to uncover spies?
27:15 Were the feds in Brazil aware of this spy operation?
30:25 Brazil was the perfect place to create cover identities for spies
31:45 The spy operation was years in the making
32:45 Investigations into spies' birth certificates showed they weren't doctored
34:45 Other Latin American countries are investigating as well
35:45 Was the spy ring uncovered in America in 2010 related to this program?
37:15 The goal wasn't to infiltrate Brazil specifically, but move spies abroad
38:15 The most "successful" spy was arrested by Brazilian authorities
39:30 One spy infiltrated John Hopkins university posing as a student
41:30 Has Putin punished any of the spies that were caught?
43:15 It feels like this story was a plot ripped straight from "The Americans"
44:30 The spies that talked complained about their bosses
45:30 Does America run similar "spy factories?"
48:15 Western agencies don't have the same spy budgets as the Russians
50:15 The seeds of the spy program go back to the Cold War
52:30 Are Brazilian authorities extra motivated to get to the bottom of this?
53:45 Brazil's rule of law is stronger than we give it credit for
55:15 Is this a failure of American engagement in Latin America?
58:00 What other threads are they pulling in their investigation?
1:00:00 When was Michael last in Ukraine?
1:01:30 Does the Times still have reporters in Russia?
1:02:45 Should Americans avoid travel to Russia?
1:05:00 Does the espionage reporting beat make spy TV shows less watchable?
1:05:40 Chuck’s thoughts on interview
1:06:10 Ask Chuck
1:06:55 Why is America stuck with a first, single small state primary format?
1:09:00Will America ever elect a president that’s atheist or agnostic?
1:16:15 Why are Democrats so clueless at messaging?
(Timestamps may vary based on advertisements)
If you like this episode you’ll love
Episode Comments
Featured in these lists
Generate a badge
Get a badge for your website that links back to this episode
<a href="https://goodpods.com/podcasts/the-chuck-toddcast-11600/elons-exit-from-trump-administration-amanda-litman-on-recruiting-the-n-92819513"> <img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/goodpods-images-bucket/badges/generic-badge-1.svg" alt="listen to elon's exit from trump administration + amanda litman on recruiting the next democratic leaders on goodpods" style="width: 225px" /> </a>
Copy