Redlines

In this episode of Redlines, we hear the sobering story of Joan, an experienced but unlicensed architecture professional who faced a devastating lawsuit that threatened her career and livelihood. Joan shares her journey of running a successful design practice for years, only to have it come crashing down due to a dispute with foreign investors on a challenging hillside project.

As Joan recounts the details of the case, we gain insight into the precarious position many unlicensed designers find themselves in, despite years of experience and expertise. Her story highlights the complex interplay between licensure, legal liability, and industry norms, especially in residential architecture.

Through Joan's experience, listeners will gain a deeper understanding of the risks unlicensed professionals face, the barriers to licensure that persist in the field, and the lack of protections available when legal challenges arise. This episode serves as a stark wake-up call about the importance of licensure while also questioning whether current systems adequately support the realities of architectural practice.

Join us as we unpack the nuances of this dramatic story and explore the broader implications for the architecture and design community. Redlines once again gives voice to the rarely discussed challenges that plague the industry, offering valuable insights on navigating these treacherous waters.

5 key takeaways:

1. The prevalence of unlicensed professionals in residential architecture and the risks this can pose
2. Barriers to licensure including complex requirements, rolling clocks, and accessibility issues
3. The lack of legal protections for unlicensed professionals, even with liability insurance
4. How foreign investors and aggressive litigation can exploit vulnerabilities in the system
5. The long-lasting personal and professional consequences of facing a major lawsuit

Quotes:

"My client just said they’re being so demanding [and] problematic, so stop responding. I was like, ‘okay.’ Then I got served. And I was very confused because the company suing me didn’t just sue my company. They sued my company and me as a person. And then the company that filed the lawsuit—I didn’t even know their name.
I’m like, who’s this company? Who’s this suing me for a million dollars?"

"I really want to share my story because I want people to know that sometimes, especially people in our field, no matter how careful you are with every step you take, there's always that unknown that could hit you hard.
Now, looking back, it seems that licensure was more important than I really gave it credit for. And if that's not in your cards at the moment, I want you to know how bad it could get. That's why I'm willing to share. "

Relevant Links:

• Out of Architecture website: https://www.outofarchitecture.com
• Information on becoming an Out of Architecture Patreon supporter: https://www.patreon.com/outofarchitecture
  
  

If you have resources to share that you think may be helpful to what was discussed in this episode, please email us at: [email protected]

The Turbulent Journey of an Accomplished Architect

This episode of Redlines tells the story of Natasha (a pseudonym), an architect with over 14 years of experience who faced discrimination and career roadblocks at the hands of her employer. Despite her expertise and external recognition, Natasha was excluded from opportunities and advancement.

Three major incidents:

• Natasha was invited to speak at a prestigious conference about her work in computational design.
• Her firm and professor plagiarized her work when she had the chance to pursue a PhD with a prominent university.
• Even after 14 years as an architect, Natasha faced more roadblocks when applying for promotion to senior architect.

Key Takeaways:

• Talented employees can face resentment and exclusion when their skills outshine others, especially when they don't fit expected demographic norms.
• Firms may prioritize maintaining power dynamics over equitable advancement, even at the expense of utilizing talent.
• Academia is not immune to unethical behavior when prestige and connections are at stake.
• Persist in developing your skills and pursuing your passion, even if your current environment doesn't value you.

Quotes:

“At the end I felt that because they had blocked my career, I can't do the work I enjoy the most and I also can't further develop."

Relevant Links:

• Out of Architecture website: https://www.outofarchitecture.com
• Information on becoming an Out of Architecture Patreon supporter: https://www.patreon.com/outofarchitecture

If you have resources to share that you think may be helpful to what was discussed in this episode, please email us at: [email protected]

In this episode of Redlines, hosts Jake and Erin speak with Cecilia and Elif, two architecture students who took an unpaid summer internship abroad at a famous firm in Spain at the recommendation of their professor.

However, instead of gaining valuable experience in an architecture office, they were treated as expendable labor.

Cecilia and Elif recount the harrowing details of this exploitative internship and the fear they felt in speaking up due to the power dynamics at play with famous architects and professors. They explain why they and other students stayed despite the conditions and discuss how this experience impacted their career paths and beliefs around what is acceptable treatment in the architecture industry.

Ultimately, Cecilia and Elif hope that by speaking openly about these abusive practices, the next generation of architects can help break the perpetuating cycle of poor labor conditions in the name of becoming a “great architect.”

Three major incidents:

1. Cecilia and Elif arrive at the internship and are forced to work manual labor on a construction site instead of in an office, with no safety protections (6:00)

2. Famous architects visit the construction site, gather the students around for a demonstration, and have them running around doing tasks, yelling when they make mistakes (19:00)

3. After Cecilia takes two days off, the architects gather everyone and lecture them that leaving for even one day is unacceptable and detail the punishments (38:00)

Four key takeaways

• Architect students worldwide are often exploited as manual laborers during their internships, working long hours in dangerous working conditions with no safety equipment, training, contracts, or labor protections.
• Speaking up about famous architects and professors was scary due to fear of retaliation and harm to future career prospects.
• Some student interns feel compelled to stay to get required credits or due to visa dependency, despite the conditions.
• Sharing stories openly can help prevent ongoing exploitation so the next generation of architects doesn't have to suffer the same way.

Quotes:

Relevant Links:

• Out of Architecture website: https://www.outofarchitecture.com
• Information on becoming an Out of Architecture Patreon supporter: https://www.patreon.com/outofarchitecture

If you have resources to share that you think may be helpful to what was discussed in this episode, please email us at: [email protected]

This episode shines a light on the withholding of critical information by architecture firms to create an uneven power dynamic as firms hold visa sponsorship over young, foreign workers.

Our storyteller this week is Cat - a pseudonym - who shares their personal experience with the H1B visa process in the United States and the challenges they faced while working at a reputable architecture firm.

Cat discusses the lack of transparency, exploitation, and the difficulty of seeking a life in the US versus other countries.

“I asked my employer, can I have my receipt number so I can go into USCIS system to look up whether or not I got selected this time. They told me that there is no longer such a thing as a receipt number. But this contradict with the official statement that USC has put out on their own website, this number obviously exists. It's just my employer decided not to disclose it.”

Key takeaways:

1. The path to sponsorship can take years with uncertain results
2. Lack of transparency in the H1B visa selection process
3. Employers can legally withhold sponsorship information from workers
4. Risk in the visa process creates opportunities to take advantage of sponsored workers
5. There are many countries that provide better options for young architects

Join our Patreon for Free

Connect with us:

Instagram

LinkedIn

Out Of Architecture Website

In this episode of Redlines, we delve into a captivating story of one architect's struggle to defend her intellectual property and creative work. Maya, a rising talent in the design world, shares a harrowing tale of a mentor-like figure who exploited her unique methods and teachings, using them for their own gain without permission or credit.

As Maya navigates the complex legal waters, she confronts not only the blatant theft of her ideas but also the emotional turmoil of broken trust and self-doubt. Her journey sheds light on the often-overlooked issues of ownership, attribution, and the delicate balance between sharing knowledge and protecting one's own craft.

Through Maya's experience, listeners will gain a deeper understanding of the importance of safeguarding one's intellectual property, even within the seemingly collaborative environment of the architecture profession. This episode serves as a wake-up call, urging architects and designers to become more aware of their rights and the potential pitfalls that can arise when creative work is misused or appropriated without consent.

Join us as we unpack the nuances of this dramatic story and explore the broader implications for the design community. Redlines once again gives voice to the rarely discussed challenges that plague the industry, offering valuable insights and strategies for navigating these murky waters.

5 key takeaways:

1. How an architect's unique teaching methods and workshop content can be exploited by a trusted mentor without permission or credit
2. The emotional toll and internal struggle faced in deciding whether to assert your rights, including feelings of guilt, shame, and self-doubt
3. The legal complexities around intellectual property rights, copyright, and ownership in the architecture/design field that many practitioners are unaware of
4. The proactive measures the an architect's firm can take to protect their intellectual property when working with clients
5. The effort to raise awareness and inspire others in the design community to speak up about similar challenges of creative work being misappropriated

Quotes

“I think the main thing that I want to gain from this episode is to raise awareness because a lot of creatives and a lot of architects don't really know, or they're not aware about their rights over their own work."

“ So there was all this negativity that was kind of building up and that kind of broke my veneer of trust that I had in him, otherwise I would have never Googled. That's when I got to know that,, it's been going on for years, putting his name on it."

"I think it was really important to understand these certain nuanced rights. And I learned that from first doing my own research that steps that are usually taken. First you need to reach out to this person because you have a relationship with them and they're your contact and you want to talk to them in a very positive way."

Relevant Links:

• Copyright for Academics in the Digital Age: https://www.aaup.org/article/copyright-academics-digital-age
• Understanding copyright protection for architects: https://www.aia.org/resource-center/understanding-copyright-protection-architects
• Out of Architecture website: https://www.outofarchitecture.com
• Information on becoming an Out of Architecture Patreon supporter: https://www.patreon.com/outofarchitecture

If you have resources to share that you think may be helpful to what was discussed in this episode, please email us at: [email protected]