Opinion Science
Andy Luttrell
1 Creator
1 Creator
1 Listener
All episodes
Best episodes
Seasons
Top 10 Opinion Science Episodes
Goodpods has curated a list of the 10 best Opinion Science episodes, ranked by the number of listens and likes each episode have garnered from our listeners. If you are listening to Opinion Science for the first time, there's no better place to start than with one of these standout episodes. If you are a fan of the show, vote for your favorite Opinion Science episode by adding your comments to the episode page.
07/04/22 • 52 min
Taylor Scott is an assistant research professor at Penn State, she's the director of research translation in the Evidence-to-Impact Collaborative, and she's co-director of the Research-to-Policy Collaboration. In this episode, we talk about the relationship between scientists and policymakers, how to facilitate those interactions, and ultimately what social science research might have to contribute to policy initiatives.
If you're a researcher and you're interested in getting involved with the Research-to-Policy Collaboration, you can enter your information here: https://research2policy.org/participating-researchers/
You can read more about the Research-to-Policy Collaboration model and their empirical work in several journal publications, including papers in PNAS (Crowley et al., 2021), American Psychologist (Crowley et al., 2021), and American Journal of Public Health (Long et al., 2021).
This episode is part of a special podcast series on science communication. You can find more info and episodes here: http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/hot-scicomm-summer/
Learn more about Opinion Science at http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/ and follow @OpinionSciPod on Twitter.
For a transcript of this episode, visit this episode's page at: http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/episodes/
Learn more about Opinion Science at http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/ and follow @OpinionSciPod on Twitter.
1 Listener
#40: Explaining Brains with Alie and Micah Caldwell
Opinion Science
06/21/21 • 53 min
Alie and Micah Caldwell produce the YouTube channel, Neuro Transmissions. Their videos present the basics of neuroscience and psychology in an accessible, engaging way. Alie is a neuroscientist and senior science writer at the University of Chicago Medicine. Micah is a licensed professional clinical counselor. In our conversation, we talk about the origins of Neuro Transmissions, their philosophy of science communication, and their new book.
Check your local bookstores for their upcoming book: Brains Explained: How They Work and Why They Work That Way .
Some science communication resources that came up in our conversation:
- ComSciCon: A free science communication workshop for graduate students
- Alan Alda Center for Communicating Science
- COMPASS Science Communication Trainings
- Alan Alda’s book, If I Understood You, Would I Have This Look on My Face?
- The Union of Concerned Scientists
Check out my new audio course on Knowable: "The Science of Persuasion."
For a transcript of this episode, visit: http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/episode/neuro-transmissions-with-alie-&-micah-caldwell/
Learn more about Opinion Science at http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/ and follow @OpinionSciPod on Twitter.
For a transcript of this episode, visit this episode's page at: http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/episodes/
Learn more about Opinion Science at http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/ and follow @OpinionSciPod on Twitter.
#17: How We Think About Animals with Kristof Dhont
Opinion Science
08/03/20 • 41 min
Kristof Dhont studies the psychology behind humans’ complicated feelings about animals. In particular, his research looks at how the existence of “speciesism” can stem from the same psychological factors that also produce other social prejudices. In this episode, Kristof and I talk about how people avoid connecting meat to the animals it comes from, how a social dominance worldview gives rise to speciesism, and what psychology can (and can’t) tell us about effective advocacy.
Check out Dr. Dhont’s new book: Why We Love and Exploit Animals: Bridging Insights from Academia and AdvocacyAnd as I mention at the end of the episode, a few years ago, I wrote my own vegan cookbook: Vegan Spanish Cooking.
Some of the things that come up in this episode:
- How people disconnect “meat” from the animals it comes from (Kunst & Hohle, 2016)
- Why people still eat meat even when they object to its production (“the meat-paradox”; Bastian & Loughnan, 2016)
- Denying animals’ “minds” to justify meat-eating (Bastian, Loughnan, Haslamn, & Radke, 2011)
- “Social dominance orientation” (see this helpful summary)
- Connecting social dominance and speciesism (Dhont et al., 2014; 2016)
- How dehumanization reflects treating animals as lesser beings (Costello & Hodson, 2010)
For a transcript of this show, visit the episode's webpage: http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/episode/how-we-think-about-animals-with-kristof-dhont/
Learn more about Opinion Science at http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/ and follow @OpinionSciPod on Twitter.
For a transcript of this episode, visit this episode's page at: http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/episodes/
Learn more about Opinion Science at http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/ and follow @OpinionSciPod on Twitter.
#18: Health Communication with Allison Earl
Opinion Science
08/10/20 • 39 min
Allison Earl studies the challenges of getting health information to people who need it. Her research looks at how people react defensively to information about their health and how to improve it. In this episode, she shares her research on people's tendency to avoid threatening health information and how simple meditation exercises can make people more open to these kinds of messages.
Some things that come up in this episode:
- Targeting health information to specific groups makes people feel judged (Derricks & Earl, 2019)
- Rejecting information about stimatized health issues (Earl, Nisson, & Albarracín, 2015)
- Race disparities in attention to HIV-prevention information (Earl et al., 2016)
- Trigger warnings as a way to get people ready for emotional information (Gainsburg & Earl, 2018)
- Meditation makes people more open to threatening health information (Takahashi & Earl, 2020)
For a transcript of this show, visit the episode's webpage: http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/episode/health-communication-with-allison-earl
Learn more about Opinion Science at http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/ and follow @OpinionSciPod on Twitter.
For a transcript of this episode, visit this episode's page at: http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/episodes/
Learn more about Opinion Science at http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/ and follow @OpinionSciPod on Twitter.
#38: American Islamophobia with Nazita Lajevardi
Opinion Science
05/24/21 • 46 min
Nazita Lajevardi studies public opinion relating to Muslim Americans. She’s a political scientist and attorney at Michigan State University. In 2020, she published Outsiders at Home: The Politics of American Islamophobia. The book is an extension of her research on public opinion about Muslims in the United States, discrimination faced by Muslim Americans in politics, and the experience of facing these biases. In our conversation, we talk about all these questions and what makes Muslim American identity so tricky to pin down.
Note. The brief clip at the top of the show is from Episode 4 ("Strawberries") of the Hulu show Ramy and is presented for purposes of commentary and education.
---------------
Check out my new audio course on Knowable: "The Science of Persuasion."
For a transcript of this episode, visit: http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/episode/american-islamophobia-with-nazita-lajevardi/
Learn more about Opinion Science at http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/ and follow @OpinionSciPod on Twitter.
For a transcript of this episode, visit this episode's page at: http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/episodes/
Learn more about Opinion Science at http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/ and follow @OpinionSciPod on Twitter.
#37: Influence with Robert Cialdini
Opinion Science
05/10/21 • 58 min
Dr. Robert Cialdini is an internationally recognized expert on the science of influence. His book Influence is one of the most influential business and psychology books of all time, selling over five-million copies worldwide. As a social psychologist, Cialdini has conducted foundational research on compliance, social norms, and helping behavior. But he is perhaps best known for boiling influence down to several key principles.
He just released an updated and expanded edition of Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion, and it’s well worth checking out! I was excited to talk with him about the new book, how he started studying influence, what made him write a book for the public at a time when academics stayed within their university walls, and how we can be effective communicators of social science findings.
Things we mention in this episode:
- “Basking in reflected glory” (Cialdini et al., 1976)
- The “full cycle” approach to social psychology (Cialdini, 1980; Mortensen & Cialdini, 2010)
- Observing littering in a natural environment to study psychological questions (Cialdini & Baumann, 1981)
- Belonging to a group feels personal when your personal identity and group identity are fused (Swann & Buhrmester, 2015)
- People who are highly identified with a political party are more willing to hide evidence of tax fraud by a politician from their party (Ashokkumar, Galaif, & Swann, 2019)
---------------
Check out my new audio course on Knowable: "The Science of Persuasion."
For a transcript of this episode, visit: http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/episode/influence-with-robert-cialdini/
Learn more about Opinion Science at http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/ and follow @OpinionSciPod on Twitter.
For a transcript of this episode, visit this episode's page at: http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/episodes/
Learn more about Opinion Science at http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/ and follow @OpinionSciPod on Twitter.
#39: Social Media Polarization with Chris Bail
Opinion Science
06/07/21 • 49 min
Chris Bail is a computational social scientist. He wrangles the data that our social interactions leave behind to better understand how ideas spread. He is Professor of Sociology and Public Policy at Duke University, where he directs the Polarization Lab. A Guggenheim and Carnegie Fellow, he studies political extremism on social media using tools from the emerging field of computational social science.
He is the author of Breaking the Social Media Prism: How to Make our Platforms Less Polarizing.
Things we mention in this episode:
- Internet bots for good and evil
- @simscreens: A Twitter bot tweeting out frames from The Simpsons
- Using Twitter bots to understand polarization (Bail et al., 2018)
- Many people just don’t care about politics (check out my interview with Nathan Kalmoe)
- Dr. Bail’s earlier work on how anti-Muslim sentiment spreads (Bail, 2016)
- Tools developed by the Polarization Lab to fight back against polarization
---------------
Check out my new audio course on Knowable: "The Science of Persuasion."
For a transcript of this episode, visit: http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/episode/social-media-polarization-with-chris-bail/
Learn more about Opinion Science at http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/ and follow @OpinionSciPod on Twitter.
For a transcript of this episode, visit this episode's page at: http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/episodes/
Learn more about Opinion Science at http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/ and follow @OpinionSciPod on Twitter.
#15: Political Campaigning with Joe Fuld (ft. Pavan Parikh)
Opinion Science
07/20/20 • 39 min
Joe Fuld founded the political consulting firm, The Campaign Workshop, and he also co-hosts the podcast, "How to Win a Campaign." In this episode, he shares his background in political and advocacy campaigns and what you need to consider if you're thinking of running for office yourself.
At the top of the show, I also talked to Pavan Parikh. He's currently running for Probate Court Judge in Hamilton County, Ohio. You can learn more about Pavan at https://www.pavanforjudge.com/ or follow his campaign on Facebook or Twitter.
A few articles related to topics that Joe Fuld mentions:
For a transcript of this show, visit the episode's webpage: http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/episode/political-campaigning-with-joe-fuld/
Learn more about Opinion Science at http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/ and follow @OpinionSciPod on Twitter.
Additional music this week: Firefly by Podington Bear, licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 International License.
For a transcript of this episode, visit this episode's page at: http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/episodes/
Learn more about Opinion Science at http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/ and follow @OpinionSciPod on Twitter.
#14: Certainty with Zakary Tormala
Opinion Science
07/13/20 • 47 min
Dr. Zakary Tormala is a professor of behavioral science and marketing at Stanford University’s business school. He studies how people can become certain of an opinion and what that means for their willingness to share their views. We talk about what certainty is, how it affects people's choices and resistance to change, and how the research about certainty can inform best practices in persuasion.
Some of the things that come up in this episode:
- Robert Burton's article, "The Certainty Epidemic" (also see his book, On Being Certain)
- The difference between "clarity" and "correctness" (Petrocelli, Tormala, & Rucker, 2007)
- The relationship between certainty and advocacy (Cheatham & Tormala, 2015; 2017)
- How successfully resisting persuasion can boost certainty (Tormala & Petty, 2002)
- How apparent social consensus increases certainty (Clarkson, Tormala, Rucker, & Dugan, 2013)
- Why uncertainty can get people to pay attention (Karmarkar & Tormala, 2010)
- For an overview of some of the ideas in this episode, check out Dr. Tormala's brief article in Current Opinion in Psychology: "The role of certainty (and uncertainty) in attitudes and persuasion" or his article in Harvard Business Review: "How certainty transforms persuasion."
For a transcript of this show, visit the episode's webpage: http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/episode/certainty-with-zakary-tormala
Learn more about Opinion Science at http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/ and follow @OpinionSciPod on Twitter.
For a transcript of this episode, visit this episode's page at: http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/episodes/
Learn more about Opinion Science at http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/ and follow @OpinionSciPod on Twitter.
#19: Political Humor as Persuasion with Danna Young
Opinion Science
08/17/20 • 58 min
Dr. Dannagal Young studies political humor. She pulls together psychology, communications, and political science, to understand how political satire works to change minds and expand political knowledge. She also has a new book: Irony and Outrage: The Polarized Landscape of Rage, Fear, and Laughter in the United States, which explores how satire became a tool of political left and outrage media because a tool of the political right.
Some things that come up on this episode:
- Daily Show viewers were particularly well-informed about the 2004 election (Young, 2004)
- Jon Stewart defending the Daily Show on Crossfire (2006)
- Jokes lead people to suspend critical thinking about a message (Polk, Young, & Holbert, 2009; Young, 2008)
For a transcript of this show, visit the episode's webpage: http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/episode/political-humor-as-persuasion-with-danna-young
Learn more about Opinion Science at http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/ and follow @OpinionSciPod on Twitter.
For a transcript of this episode, visit this episode's page at: http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/episodes/
Learn more about Opinion Science at http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/ and follow @OpinionSciPod on Twitter.
Show more best episodes
Show more best episodes
FAQ
How many episodes does Opinion Science have?
Opinion Science currently has 142 episodes available.
What topics does Opinion Science cover?
The podcast is about Persuasion, Psychology, Podcasts, Education, Social Sciences, Science, Opinion and Communication.
What is the most popular episode on Opinion Science?
The episode title 'SciComm Summer #5: Taylor Scott - Bridging Research and Policy' is the most popular.
What is the average episode length on Opinion Science?
The average episode length on Opinion Science is 51 minutes.
How often are episodes of Opinion Science released?
Episodes of Opinion Science are typically released every 14 days.
When was the first episode of Opinion Science?
The first episode of Opinion Science was released on Apr 3, 2020.
Show more FAQ
Show more FAQ