Make it Work

Alex Sims, Solutions Architect & Sr. Software Engineer at James and James Fulfilment, talks about their journey to 80ms response SLO with PHP & React.

Alex shares how they optimised API performance, specifically highlighting improvements made by altering interactions with Amazon S3 and Redis. Key points include the transition from synchronous to asynchronous S3 processes, the impact of Amazon's SLO on write speed, and the significant runtime reduction achieved through JIT compilation in PHP 8.

We conclude with insights into decision-making in technology architecture, emphasising the balance between choosing cutting-edge technology and the existing skill set of the team.

🎬 View the video part of this episode at 80ms response SLO with PHP & React

🎁 Access the audio & video as a single conversation at makeitwork.gerhard.io

EPISODE CHAPTERS

• (00:00) - Introduction
• (00:50) - 2023: A Year of Productive Chaos at James & James
• (02:43) - Alex's Journey throughout our Conversations
• (03:33) - What does James & James do?
• (04:29) - What does Alex do at James & James?
• (05:33) - Technical Challenges in 2023
• (06:37) - Who is James?
• (08:21) - Why do you - Alex - do what you do?
• (10:52) - 2023 Highlights
• (16:22) - Where does Kubernetes fit?
• (18:03) - LESSON 1: Be aware of the different EC2 node type behaviour
• (21:05) - instances.vantage.sh
• (22:46) - LESSON 2: Understand the time cost of AWS S3 writes
• (24:19) - LESSON 3: Connecting to Redis is expensive
• (25:58) - Be careful when mixing persistent connections and transactions in Redis
• (26:41) - LESSON 4: Always check for SELECT *
• (28:15) - Lessons recap
• (29:35) - OODA
• (30:24) - SCREEN SHARING
• (31:02) - Wrap-up
• (35:58) - Planning for the next conversation

Today we delve into BuildKit and Dagger, focusing on their significance in the development and deployment of containerized applications, as well as Kubernetes integration.

• BuildKit's Role: Essential for anyone using Docker Build, facilitating efficient, dependency-aware container builds with advanced caching mechanisms. It's not just for Docker but serves as a versatile execution engine across various projects, including Dagger.
• Eric's Attraction to BuildKit: The power of BuildKit's DAG (Directed Acyclic Graph) execution model and its parallelization and deduplication capabilities drew Eric to maintain and contribute to the project.
• First BuildKit Project: Eric's initial project, bincastle, aimed to build a development environment from source, highlighting BuildKit's ability to handle complex builds.
• Introduction of Dagger: Dagger builds on top of BuildKit, enhances automation by allowing developers to use familiar programming languages without being confined to a specific domain-specific language (DSL). It aims to simplify and optimize automation tasks, particularly in CI/CD environments.
• Dagger's Enhancements over BuildKit: Dagger introduces a language-agnostic layer, making automation more accessible and scalable. It incorporates features like remote caching and a services layer, potentially positioning it as a simpler alternative to Kubernetes for certain use cases.
• Future Directions: The podcast touches on ongoing developments, such as modules for sharing automation code within Dagger, aiming to foster an ecosystem where developers can easily reuse and contribute to collective automation solutions.

The conversation highlights the evolving landscape of development tools, where BuildKit and Dagger play pivotal roles in making containerized development and deployment more efficient and user-friendly. Eric and Gerhard discuss the potential for these tools to simplify and enhance automation, reflecting on past projects and future possibilities.

🎬 View the video part of this episode: Deploying and Experimenting with Dagger 0.9 on Kubernetes 1.28

🎁 Access the audio & video as a single conversation at makeitwork.gerhard.io

LINKS

• sipsma/bincastle
• moby/buildkit
• dagger/dagger

dagger --mod github.com/sipsma/daggerverse/yamlinvaders@8071646e5831d7c93ebcd8cca46444250bf25b8c shell play

EPISODE CHAPTERS

• (00:00) - Intro
• (01:43) - What attracted you to BuildKit?
• (03:23) - What was the first project that you used BuildKit for?
• (06:03) - Four years later, do you still want to see that idea through?
• (06:44) - What is Dagger?
• (08:18) - How much does Dagger add on top of BuildKit?
• (10:42) - How does Gerhard think of Dagger in relation to BuildKit?
• (12:48) - Dagger Modules - a way to share automation code
• (14:01) - If someone installs Dagger today, what happens under the hood?
• (14:47) - Why is the Engine distributed as a container image?
• (16:02) - If the Dagger Engine was a single binary, how would you run it?
• (17:05) - Thoughts on BuildKit caching?
• (18:15) - What about remote caching?
• (20:53) - Let's run Dagger on K8s on this Latte Panda Sigma
• (21:43) - SCREEN SHARE
• (22:06) - As we approach KubeCon, what is on your list?
• (23:19) - An idea for next time when we get together

This episode looks into the observability tool Parca & Polar Signals Cloud with Frederic Branczyk and Thor Hansen. We discuss experiences and discoveries using Parca for detailed system-wide performance analysis, which transcends programming languages.

We highlight a significant discovery related to kube-prometheus and the unnecessary CPU usage caused by Prometheus exporter's attempts to access BTRFS stats, leading to a beneficial configuration change for Kubernetes users globally.

We also explore Parca Agent's installation on Kubernetes 1.28 running on Talos 1.5, the process of capturing memory profiles with Parca, and the efficiency of the Parca Agent in terms of memory and CPU usage.

We touch upon the continuous operation of the Parca Agent, the importance of profiling for debugging and optimization, and the potential of profile-guided optimizations in Go 1.22 for enhancing software efficiency.

🎬 Screensharing videos that go with this episode:

1. First impressions: Parca Agent on K8s 1.28 running as Talos 1.5
2. See where your Go code allocates memory
3. How to debug a memory issue with Parca?
4. See which line of your Go code allocates the most memory

🎁 Access the audio & all videos as a single conversation at makeitwork.gerhard.io

LINKS

• Go Profile-guided optimization
• View Profiling Data within Code
• Announcing Continuous Memory Profiling for Rust

EPISODE CHAPTERS

• (00:00) - Intro
• (02:21) - kube-prometheus discovery & fix
• (06:29) - Parca Agent on K8s 1.28 running as Talos 1.5
• (06:49) - How to capture memory profiles with Parca?
• (08:42) - pprof.me
• (10:42) - Data retention in Parca
• (11:42) - A real-world memory issue debugging example
• (16:05) - How much memory is Parca Server expected to use?
• (17:39) - How much memory is the Parca Agent expected to use?
• (19:42) - What about Parca Agent CPU usage?
• (21:57) - Is Parca Agent meant to run continously?
• (23:03) - Other Parca stories worth sharing
• (25:19) - What are the things that you are looking forward to in 2024?
• (27:23) - Golang Profile Guided Optimisations with Parca
• (30:22) - Frederic's surprise screen share
• (34:02) - Wrap-up

For our 4th episode, we have four conversations from KubeCon EU 2024.

We talk to Jesse Suen about Argo CD & Kargo, Solomon Hykes shares the next evolution of Dagger, and Justin Cormack dives into Docker & AI. We also catch up with Frederic Branczyk & Thor Hansen on the latest Parca & Polar Signals Cloud updates since our last conversation.

Each conversation has a video version too:

1. Jesse Suen: 🎬 GitOps & ClickOps beyond Kubernetes
2. Solomon Hykes: 🎬 Pipelines as Functions
3. Justin Cormack: 🎬 Works on my Computer
4. Frederic Branczyk & Thor Hansen: 🎬 always BPF

LINKS

1. Jesse Suen

What's New in Kargo v0.5.0

🎬 Navigating Multi-stage Deployment Pipelines via the GitOps Approach

2. Solomon Hykes

Introducing Dagger Functions

A Keynote heard around the world - KubeCon EU 2024 Recap

🎬 Local & open-source AI Developer Meetup

3. Justin Cormack

AI Trends Report 2024: AI’s Growing Role in Software Development

Building a Video Analysis and Transcription Chatbot with the GenAI Stack

4. Frederic Branczyk & Thor Hansen

Correlating Tracing with Profiling using eBPF

LET'S MAKE IT BETTER

If you enjoyed this episode, I will appreciate your feedback on Apple Podcasts or Spotify.

If there is something that would have made it better for you, let me know: [email protected]

• (00:00) - Intro
• (00:39) - Jesse Suen (JS)
• (00:56) - JS: Hardest ArgoCD question that you got today
• (01:54) - JS: Rendered YAML branches
• (04:06) - JS: What is top of your mind?
• (06:12) - JS: Kargo beyond Kubernetes
• (08:20) - JS: Trusting Kargo with production
• (09:49) - JS: GitOps for leadership, UIs for app devs
• (12:11) - JS: How is this KubeCon different?
• (12:55) - JS: Anything that you will do different after this KubeCon?
• (14:58) - Solomon Hykes (SH)
• (15:10) - SH: What are you most excited about?
• (16:12) - SH: What is different about functions this time?
• (16:40) - SH: What makes functions fun for you?
• (18:01) - SH: Anything significant that happened at this KubeCon?
• (19:38) - SH: Thoughts on Dagger in production
• (20:21) - SH: What does Dagger 1.0 mean?
• (21:28) - SH: Asks for the Dagger Community
• (23:04) - SH: How do Dagger SDKs work with Modules?
• (25:02) - SH: Thoughts on the tech industry
• (27:19) - Justin Cormack (JC)
• (27:35) - JC: Docker & AI
• (32:14) - JC: Docker Build Cloud
• (35:30) - JC: Web Assembly & WASM
• (39:37) - JC: KubeCon Community
• (42:01) - Frederic Branczyk (FB) & Thor Hansen (TH)
• (42:23) - TH: Excited to announce Polar Signals Cloud
• (42:47) - FB & TH: Most exciting feature since launch
• (45:24) - FB & TH: How is this KubeCon different?
• (47:14) - TH & FB: What are you going to do different after this KubeCon?
• (49:06) - FB & TH: Plans for next KubeCon?
• (50:24) - FB & TH: Anything apart from AI that is exciting?
• (51:25) - TH & FB: Any hot takes?
• (52:12) - Outro

This is the audio version version of 🎬 Ninjastructure - Move fast & break nothing

Matias Pan, a professional maté drinker & Senior Software Engineer at Dagger, is showing us an approach to Infrastructure as Code built with Pulumi.

We look at Go code, discuss procedural (imperative) vs. declarative, spend some time on state management & introduce the concept of Ninjas in the context of infrastructure: move fast & break nothing.

In the second half, Matias uses diagrams to talk through different ideas of rolling this out into production. Which of the two approaches would you choose?

LINKS

• Testing Pulumi programs

EPISODE CHAPTERS

• (00:00) - Why Pulumi instead of Terraform?
• (02:40) - Procedural or declarative?
• (07:19) - What is Ninjastructure?
• (08:47) - First thing that gets provisioned in an AWS account
• (11:18) - How does the network module work?
• (14:29) - Biggest advantage to using Pulumi over Terraform
• (17:02) - Stacks = different environments
• (18:20) - Where is state stored?
• (20:18) - Where did you choose to store the state?
• (21:46) - How to use this in production?
• (24:32) - The GitOps approach
• (29:17) - Outro