
Bartenwerfer v. Buckley
09/03/23 • 20 min
This episode of MACREADS.COM covers the United States Supreme Court's February 22, 2023, opinion in Bartenwerfer v. Buckley.
Summary: Homebuyer obtained a judgment against sellers for failing to disclose material defect in the home. One of the sellers sought to discharge the judgment in Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceedings because she did not know about the defect. SCOTUS held that the judgment could not be discharged because a bankruptcy debtor can be held liable for a third party's fraud regardless of her own culpability.
MACREADS.COM: MAKING JUSTICE AUDIBLE
Narrated by Mac McCoy ([email protected])
MACREADS.COM is a podcast that promotes access to justice by transforming curated United States Supreme Court opinions into immersive, on-demand audio experiences for lawyers and non-lawyers. In each episode, your narrator reads the primary text of a recent Supreme Court opinion, leaving out any technical components that distract from the main story and analysis. Find us wherever you access your favorite podcasts.
Visit us at https://www.macreads.com
Music licensed from PremiumBeat.com
Join the free MACREADS.COM Subscribers Group on LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/groups/12877576/
Connect with the producer on LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/in/macreads/
This episode of MACREADS.COM covers the United States Supreme Court's February 22, 2023, opinion in Bartenwerfer v. Buckley.
Summary: Homebuyer obtained a judgment against sellers for failing to disclose material defect in the home. One of the sellers sought to discharge the judgment in Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceedings because she did not know about the defect. SCOTUS held that the judgment could not be discharged because a bankruptcy debtor can be held liable for a third party's fraud regardless of her own culpability.
MACREADS.COM: MAKING JUSTICE AUDIBLE
Narrated by Mac McCoy ([email protected])
MACREADS.COM is a podcast that promotes access to justice by transforming curated United States Supreme Court opinions into immersive, on-demand audio experiences for lawyers and non-lawyers. In each episode, your narrator reads the primary text of a recent Supreme Court opinion, leaving out any technical components that distract from the main story and analysis. Find us wherever you access your favorite podcasts.
Visit us at https://www.macreads.com
Music licensed from PremiumBeat.com
Join the free MACREADS.COM Subscribers Group on LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/groups/12877576/
Connect with the producer on LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/in/macreads/
Previous Episode

Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. Hewitt
This episode of MACREADS.COM covers the United States Supreme Court's February 22, 2023, opinion in Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. Hewitt.
Summary: Plaintiff, an offshore oil rig worker who earned more than $200,000 per year as a daily-rate employee with no overtime compensation, argued that he was a non-exempt employee and thus entitled to overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). SCOTUS agreed and held that daily-rate workers, regardless of their income level, qualify as non-exempt and are entitled to overtime compensation if the conditions for exempt status in the relevant regulations are not met.
MACREADS.COM: MAKING JUSTICE AUDIBLE
http://www.macreads.com
Narrated by Mac McCoy ([email protected])
MACREADS.COM is a podcast that promotes access to justice by transforming curated United States Supreme Court opinions into immersive, on-demand audio experiences for lawyers and non-lawyers. In each episode, your narrator reads the primary text of a recent Supreme Court opinion, leaving out any technical components that distract from the main story and analysis. Find us wherever you access your favorite podcasts.
Visit us at https://www.macreads.com
Music licensed from PremiumBeat.com
Join the free MACREADS.COM Subscribers Group on LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/groups/12877576/
Connect with the producer on LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/in/macreads/
Next Episode

Bittner v. United States
This episode of MACREADS.COM covers the United States Supreme Court's February 28, 2023, opinion in Bittner v. United States.
Summary: The Government fined an individual $2.72 million for failing to file timely reports disclosing 272 foreign accounts as required by the Bank Secrecy Act. The individual challenged the fine, arguing that it should have been calculated based on the number of untimely reports, not the number of accounts involved. SCOTUS held that under the Act, the maximum penalty for a nonwillful failure to file a report accrues on a per-report, not a per-account, basis.
MACREADS.COM: MAKING JUSTICE AUDIBLE
Narrated by Mac McCoy ([email protected])
MACREADS.COM is a podcast that promotes access to justice by transforming curated United States Supreme Court opinions into immersive, on-demand audio experiences for lawyers and non-lawyers. In each episode, your narrator reads the primary text of a recent Supreme Court opinion, leaving out any technical components that distract from the main story and analysis. Find us wherever you access your favorite podcasts.
Visit us at https://www.macreads.com
Music licensed from PremiumBeat.com
Join the free MACREADS.COM Subscribers Group on LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/groups/12877576/
Connect with the producer on LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/in/macreads/
If you like this episode you’ll love
Episode Comments
Generate a badge
Get a badge for your website that links back to this episode
<a href="https://goodpods.com/podcasts/macreadscom-275132/bartenwerfer-v-buckley-33342273"> <img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/goodpods-images-bucket/badges/generic-badge-1.svg" alt="listen to bartenwerfer v. buckley on goodpods" style="width: 225px" /> </a>
Copy