Ep 38 // The one thing everyone on social media agrees on? Hating the New York Times.

>>> Watch this episode on YouTube.

Matt Ruby dives into the ever-controversial world of media bias, particularly focusing on the New York Times and its critics from both the left and the right. This widespread disdain raises a crucial question: is the Times doing its job effectively if it is equally reviled by both sides?

Matt tackles the notion that the New York Times, despite its critics, when both sides of the political spectrum find common ground in their disdain, it could signal that the publication is operating in a realm that prioritizes journalism over partisan narratives. This leads to a broader commentary on what constitutes real journalism today—an essential endeavor that goes beyond opinions and relies on reporting that uncovers truths, investigates corruption, conducts tough interviews, and holds power accountable, all important traditional journalism practices that involve rigorous fact-checking and the ethical considerations of protecting sources, especially in an era where misinformation runs rampant.

He addresses the shortcomings and challenges faced by the mainstream media, including the decline of local reporting due to technological shifts, resulting in a significant disconnect between journalists and the communities they serve and leading to increased suspicion and a tendency to label media representatives as "elites" rather than as essential watchdogs. He further argues that without accessible local news, the public's perception of journalism can shift dangerously towards antipathy and distrust. He also delves into the existing climate in journalism where the distinction between opinion and factual reporting is becoming increasingly blurred. The inundation of opinions has led to a dilution of trust in the media, as audiences find it challenging to differentiate between thorough reporting and personal takes. We also explore the consequences of the conventional media's missteps, citing high-profile examples like the WMDs in Iraq and the Rolling Stone UVA assault story to illustrate the fallout and accountability mechanisms that come with traditional journalism.

In reflecting on the state of the New York Times, Matt raises concerns about the sustainability of real journalism in a landscape where many reputable outlets are closed, closing, or in decline. He makes a case for the necessity of supporting institutions like the Times while also remaining aware of their shortcomings, ultimately advocating for a journalistic landscape where the pursuit of truth takes precedence over partisan alignment and urging audiences to consider the role of fair-minded journalism in preserving democratic discourse.

===

Written and presented by Matt Ruby

Produced and edited by Jeremiah Lee McVay

===

https://www.mattrubycomedy.com/

https://stereoactivemedia.com