Direct democracy's dark side
02/01/21 • 37 min
From gerrymandering to ranked-choice voting to expanding voting rights, the ballot initiative has been essential to expanding and reforming democracy in recent years. However, the initiative has also been used to constrain minority rights and push the public to act on polarizing issues like the death penalty and immigration.
Ted Lascher and Joshua Dyck are the authors of Initiatives Without Engagement: A Realistic Appraisal of Direct Democracy's Secondary Effects. In the book, they develop and test a theory that can explain the evidence that the ballot initiative process fails to provide the civic benefits commonly claimed for it, and the evidence that it increases political participation. Ultimately, they argue that the basic function of direct democracy is to create more conflict in society — something that runs counter to the way initiatives are often framed by scholars and democracy reformers.
Lascher is Professor of Public Policy and Administration at California State University, Sacramento. Dyck is Associate Professor of Political Science and Co-Director of the Center for Public Opinion at the University of Massachusetts Lowell.
Additional Information
Initiatives Without Engagement: A Realistic Appraisal of Direct Democracy's Secondary Effects
Related Episodes
The democracy rebellion happening in states across the U.S.
From gerrymandering to ranked-choice voting to expanding voting rights, the ballot initiative has been essential to expanding and reforming democracy in recent years. However, the initiative has also been used to constrain minority rights and push the public to act on polarizing issues like the death penalty and immigration.
Ted Lascher and Joshua Dyck are the authors of Initiatives Without Engagement: A Realistic Appraisal of Direct Democracy's Secondary Effects. In the book, they develop and test a theory that can explain the evidence that the ballot initiative process fails to provide the civic benefits commonly claimed for it, and the evidence that it increases political participation. Ultimately, they argue that the basic function of direct democracy is to create more conflict in society — something that runs counter to the way initiatives are often framed by scholars and democracy reformers.
Lascher is Professor of Public Policy and Administration at California State University, Sacramento. Dyck is Associate Professor of Political Science and Co-Director of the Center for Public Opinion at the University of Massachusetts Lowell.
Additional Information
Initiatives Without Engagement: A Realistic Appraisal of Direct Democracy's Secondary Effects
Related Episodes
The democracy rebellion happening in states across the U.S.
Previous Episode
Check out our partners in The Democracy Group
We'll be back with a new episode of Democracy Works next week. In the meantime, we invite you to check out our partner podcasts in The Democracy Group podcast network. Here's a small sampling of what the network's shows have covered recently:
- Politics in Question examines the future of the Republican Party with the author of a new book on the Tea Party and insurgent factions in American policies.
- How Do We Fix It? explores free speech and big tech with former ACLU president Nadine Strossen.
- Future Hindsight discusses the link between Christianity and white supremacy in United States history.
- Another Way by Lawrence Lessig shines a light on what political reform lessons the United States can draw from Alaska.
- Democracy Matters from James Madison University explores the history of insurrection and section in the United States with a panel of faculty experts.
- 70 Million explores the push for criminal justice reform in jails throughout the United States
- The Science of Politics from the Niskanen Center explores the politics of homeschooling
- Out of Order from the German Marshall Fund of the United States takes stock of Germany’s Presidency of the Council of the European Union, which recently ended.
Learn more about the network and subscribe to its newsletter for updates at democracygroup.org.
Next Episode
Will Alexei Navalny make Russia more democratic?
Alexei Navalny has been a figure in Russian opposition for years, but garnered international attention recently though social media and what's widely believed to be an assassination attempt by the Russian government in the fall. This week, we unpack the complicated nature of Russian democracy and how the U.S. and other countries should respond — or not — to what's happening there now.
Michael Kimmage is a professor of history at the Catholic University of America and a non-resident allow at the German Marshall Fund of the United States. From 2014 to 2016, he served on the Secretary's Policy Planning Staff at the U.S. Department of State, where he held the Russia/Ukraine portfolio. He is the author of two books on American history and culture, and he has published articles and essays on the transatlantic relationship, on U.S.–Russian relations, and on international affairs in The New Republic, The New York Times, and the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung.
Additional Information
Kimmage's New Republic article on Russian democracy
Kimmage at the German Marshall Fund
Related Episodes
If you like this episode you’ll love
Episode Comments
Generate a badge
Get a badge for your website that links back to this episode
<a href="https://goodpods.com/podcasts/democracy-works-35243/direct-democracys-dark-side-11724320"> <img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/goodpods-images-bucket/badges/generic-badge-1.svg" alt="listen to direct democracy's dark side on goodpods" style="width: 225px" /> </a>
Copy