Do we need nuclear power to solve climate change? Amory Lovins says no

07/25/22 • 26 min

In 2017, the V.C. Summer Nuclear Plant expansion - meant to hail the renaissance of nuclear power in the US - came screeching to a halt. The project, to build two new reactors at an existing South Carolina facility, was canceled after being delayed more than a year, costing $9 billion USD, and still being only 40% complete. Now, the only new nuclear project in the works in the U.S. is the Vogtle Plant expansion in Georgia; a project also more than a year behind schedule, and billions of dollars over budget. Still, nuclear projects remain a focus of government and think tank decarbonization strategies. Why?

Dr. Amory Lovins, adjunct professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Stanford University, and international authority on the clean energy transition, joins Climate Now to explain why he thinks nuclear should no longer be considered as a source of energy. For Amory, it's not just the chance of environmental catastrophe or nuclear proliferation that make it a non-starter, it's the economics.
00:00 - Introducing Climate Now
00:32 - Introducing Amory Lovins
01:12 - How much energy is supplied from nuclear power
02:02 - Amory explains why he believes that nuclear has no business case
16:25 - If nuclear has no business case, why do governments continue to invest in it?

Follow us on Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook, and Instagram.
Contact us at [email protected]
Visit our website for all of our content and sources for each episode.

Follow us on Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook, and Instagram.
Contact us at [email protected]
Visit our website for all of our content and sources for each episode.

Previous Episode

How can you save money while decarbonizing your building?

Heating, cooling and electrifying buildings produces nearly one fifth of global greenhouse gas emissions, but by employing existing energy efficient technologies and switching to renewables, we could cut 87% of building-related emissions by 2050. So, how do we get there?

Climate Now speaks with two companies working to eliminate the barriers to decarbonizing buildings. Andy Frank, founder of Sealed, explains how Sealed makes it easier for homeowners to implement energy efficiency improvements by reducing upfront costs and managing the improvement project. Jeff Hendler and Zohra Roy of Logical Buildings share how their company empowers real estate managers and building owners with the data they need to optimize their energy usage.

00:00 Andy Frank, Sealed
15:58 Jeff Hendler and Zohra Roy, Logical Buildings

Follow us on Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook, and Instagram.
Contact us at [email protected]
Visit our website for all of our content and sources for each episode.

Next Episode

Understanding EPA v. West Virginia: How will the Supreme Court’s ruling impact GHG regulation?

On June 30, 2022, the United States Supreme Court handed down a decision on the case “EPA v. West Virginia,” ruling in a 6-3 vote that the EPA exceeded its statutory authority by setting greenhouse gas emissions standards that would effectively require utilities to shift away from fossil fuel-sourced power generation to renewables.

At the time of the decision, it was met with a raft of alarmist headlines, forecasting that it would be a disaster for climate change mitigation, and that it threatens the future regulatory authority of all federal agencies. Is it really that bad?

In this episode, Michael Gerrard, professor of professional practice in climate change law and policy at Columbia University, helps us understand exactly what the EPA v. West Virginia decision said, and what its impact is likely to be.

Follow us on Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook, and Instagram.
Contact us at [email protected]
Visit our website for all of our content and sources for each episode.