
Craig Ball On the Form of Production
05/18/14 • 48 min
Attorneys Craig Ball and Josh Gilliland discuss Anderson Living Trust v. WPX Energy Prod., LLC, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31025, 3-4 (D.N.M. Mar. 6, 2014) and go into detail on FRCP Rule 34(b)(2)(E), organizing productions, and being able to use productions in a case.
Attorneys Craig Ball and Josh Gilliland discuss Anderson Living Trust v. WPX Energy Prod., LLC, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31025, 3-4 (D.N.M. Mar. 6, 2014) and go into detail on FRCP Rule 34(b)(2)(E), organizing productions, and being able to use productions in a case.
Previous Episode

A Discussion on Judge Illston's Kwan Software Opinion
Attorneys Joshua Gilliland and Christine J. Chalstrom, CEO of Shepherd Data, discuss the requirements for recovering eDiscovery costs and examine the service provider invoices in Kwan Software Eng’G v. Foray Techs., 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63933, 10-19 (N.D. Cal. May 8, 2014), where a prevailing party sought $61,548.65 in costs and got $7,106.65. Josh and Chris offer their thoughts on how to better document eDiscovery costs.
Next Episode

Demonstrating Inadequate Productions with Analytics
Carolyn Young joined Joshua Gilliland to discuss how to set-up for discovery review, the different types of analytics that can assist in document review, and how analytics can be used to determine whether an opposing production was inadequate.
If you like this episode you’ll love
Episode Comments
Generate a badge
Get a badge for your website that links back to this episode
<a href="https://goodpods.com/podcasts/bow-tie-law-ediscovery-podcasts-234591/craig-ball-on-the-form-of-production-26273780"> <img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/goodpods-images-bucket/badges/generic-badge-1.svg" alt="listen to craig ball on the form of production on goodpods" style="width: 225px" /> </a>
Copy