
Conformity Summary From the 2019 Legislative Session With Ryan DeMenna
06/17/19 • 9 min
You can also see more details, including a table with tax brackets and deductions at www.ascpa.com/conformity.
On the morning of May 31, 2019, Governor Doug Ducey signed Arizona's 2020 state budget into law. The state's budget is crafted every session and is comprised of a package of roughly nine or ten bills. This year's budget package included the highly anticipated income tax conformity legislation, HB 2757 (tax provisions; omnibus).
As Society members are well aware, Arizona requires taxpayers to use their Federally Adjusted Gross Income as the starting point for state income tax assessment. The state has conformed to the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) each year since 1978 to include federal provisions that became effective in the previous year.
But the political challenges associated with conforming to the changes made by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 stalled legislative efforts to address conformity in a timely manner, leaving taxpayers and tax practitioners with more questions than answers as tax returns are prepared.
This year the Society worked tirelessly to educate legislators, many of whom were newly elected, of the importance of full conformity. Legislative budget analysts produced highly speculative estimates ranging from $50 million to $250 million, and the issue quickly became highly politicized.
Some Republican legislators viewed conforming to the IRC as a tax increase, and an unintended consequence of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which was intended to put money back into the pockets of taxpayers, not state government. Meanwhile most Democrats, and a fair number of Republicans, wanted to use the potential revenue from full conformity as a way to fund budget priorities.
Early in the session Sen. J.D. Mesnard (R – Chandler) introduced SB 1143 (conformity; internal revenue code; rates), which conformed to the IRC as of January 1, 2018, and reduced the state income tax rates by 0.11%, which would have applied retroactively to tax years beginning with 2018. The legislation passed the Senate and House along a party-line vote. Governor Ducey, however, vetoed the measure on February 1, 2019. In his veto message the Governor stated that he vetoed SB 1143 because it was "the wrong policy, and any bill with a fiscal impact should be considered as part of budget discussions agreed to by the Legislature and Executive, just as every budget bill is considered, every session."
The fiscal impact associated with conformity, coupled with the governor's veto message, meant that the conformity negotiations were effectively tied to the state budget negotiations from that point forward. After months of discussions, Governor Ducey and legislative leadership reached a tentative budget deal over the weekend of May 18.
The House began debating the budget package in earnest on Thursday, May 23. After a marathon session of debating, amending, and voting on the proposal, the House adjourned at roughly 4:30 AM on Friday, May 24. The Senate, however, didn't' have the votes necessary to pass the deal, as a handful of Senators were refusing to vote on the budget until their individual priorities were addressed.
The Senate met on Friday and Saturday of Memorial Day weekend, a move that was highly unusual as the legislative workweek is typically Monday through Thursday. Senate President Fann, however, was firm in her resolve to negotiate a budget deal that her members could support and send to the governor.
President Fann was eventually successful in negotiating a budget that her caucus could support, but Sen. Mesnard remained opposed to the conformity-related provisions, and voted against a majority of the budget bills.
HB 2757 (tax provisions; omnibus) ultimately passed the House by a party-line vote of 31-29 and the Senate by a vote of 16-13, with Sen. Mesnard joining the Democrats in opposition.
Governor Ducey signed the legislation on May 31, 2019.
You can also see more details, including a table with tax brackets and deductions at www.ascpa.com/conformity.
On the morning of May 31, 2019, Governor Doug Ducey signed Arizona's 2020 state budget into law. The state's budget is crafted every session and is comprised of a package of roughly nine or ten bills. This year's budget package included the highly anticipated income tax conformity legislation, HB 2757 (tax provisions; omnibus).
As Society members are well aware, Arizona requires taxpayers to use their Federally Adjusted Gross Income as the starting point for state income tax assessment. The state has conformed to the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) each year since 1978 to include federal provisions that became effective in the previous year.
But the political challenges associated with conforming to the changes made by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 stalled legislative efforts to address conformity in a timely manner, leaving taxpayers and tax practitioners with more questions than answers as tax returns are prepared.
This year the Society worked tirelessly to educate legislators, many of whom were newly elected, of the importance of full conformity. Legislative budget analysts produced highly speculative estimates ranging from $50 million to $250 million, and the issue quickly became highly politicized.
Some Republican legislators viewed conforming to the IRC as a tax increase, and an unintended consequence of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which was intended to put money back into the pockets of taxpayers, not state government. Meanwhile most Democrats, and a fair number of Republicans, wanted to use the potential revenue from full conformity as a way to fund budget priorities.
Early in the session Sen. J.D. Mesnard (R – Chandler) introduced SB 1143 (conformity; internal revenue code; rates), which conformed to the IRC as of January 1, 2018, and reduced the state income tax rates by 0.11%, which would have applied retroactively to tax years beginning with 2018. The legislation passed the Senate and House along a party-line vote. Governor Ducey, however, vetoed the measure on February 1, 2019. In his veto message the Governor stated that he vetoed SB 1143 because it was "the wrong policy, and any bill with a fiscal impact should be considered as part of budget discussions agreed to by the Legislature and Executive, just as every budget bill is considered, every session."
The fiscal impact associated with conformity, coupled with the governor's veto message, meant that the conformity negotiations were effectively tied to the state budget negotiations from that point forward. After months of discussions, Governor Ducey and legislative leadership reached a tentative budget deal over the weekend of May 18.
The House began debating the budget package in earnest on Thursday, May 23. After a marathon session of debating, amending, and voting on the proposal, the House adjourned at roughly 4:30 AM on Friday, May 24. The Senate, however, didn't' have the votes necessary to pass the deal, as a handful of Senators were refusing to vote on the budget until their individual priorities were addressed.
The Senate met on Friday and Saturday of Memorial Day weekend, a move that was highly unusual as the legislative workweek is typically Monday through Thursday. Senate President Fann, however, was firm in her resolve to negotiate a budget deal that her members could support and send to the governor.
President Fann was eventually successful in negotiating a budget that her caucus could support, but Sen. Mesnard remained opposed to the conformity-related provisions, and voted against a majority of the budget bills.
HB 2757 (tax provisions; omnibus) ultimately passed the House by a party-line vote of 31-29 and the Senate by a vote of 16-13, with Sen. Mesnard joining the Democrats in opposition.
Governor Ducey signed the legislation on May 31, 2019.
Previous Episode

Dr. Robert Minniti Discusses Identity Theft
Hear the latest trends on identity theft and what you can do to protect yourself and your company from Dr. Robert Minniti. Dr. Minniti will be teaching Identity Theft: Preventing, Detecting and Investigating on June 3 at the ASCPA Learning Center and via webcast. Learn more at www.ascpa.com/jun3.
1:12 - Identity theft statistics and trends
2:19 - How CPAs can assist their clients or companies with identity theft issues
3:25 - Discussion about the CCH malware attack
4:25 - Types of identity theft that people may not have heard about
5:35 - Top 3 tips for preventing identity theft
8:30 - What you can learn in Dr. Minniti’s upcoming course on June 3
Dr. Minniti will also be teaching Forensic Investigations: Key Tools to Success on June 4 both in Phoenix and via webcast. Learn more at www.ascpa.com/jun4
Dr. Minniti is the President and Owner of Minniti CPA, LLC. Dr. Minniti is a Certified Public Accountant, Certified Forensic Accountant, Certified Fraud Examiner, Certified Valuation Analyst, Certified in Financial Forensics, Master Analyst in Financial Forensics, Chartered Global Management Accountant, and is a licensed private investigator in the state of Arizona. Dr. Minniti received his doctoral degree in business administration from Walden University, received his MBA degree and Graduate Certificate in Accounting from DeVry University’s Keller Graduate School of Management, and received his Bachelor of Science in Business Administration degree from the University of Phoenix. Dr. Minniti teaches graduate and undergraduate courses in forensic accounting at Northwestern University, and the University of Phoenix. He designed graduate and undergraduate courses for Grand Canyon University, Northwestern University, and Anthem College. He is a writer and public speaker. He has experience in forensic accounting, fraud examinations, financial audits, internal audits, compliance audits, real estate valuations, business valuations, internal control development, business continuation planning, risk management, financial forecasting, and Sarbanes-Oxley compliance work. Dr. Minniti is an instructor teaching continuing professional education classes for the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Compliance Online, CPE Link/CCH . AccountingEd, Global Compliance Panel, Clear Law Institute, CPE Solutions, Canopy CPE, The Institute of Management Accountants, the National Association of Valuators and Analysts, and various state CPA Societies.
For Additional Information
LinkedIn Profile: www.linkedin.com/in/robertminniti
Company Website: www.minniticpallc.com
Next Episode

Arizona Taxation of Remote Sellers (Guest: Arizona Department of Revenue Deputy Director Dr. Grant Nülle)
Arizona Department of Revenue Deputy Director Grant Nülle, Ph.D., talks with our lobbyist, Ryan DeMenna, DeMenna Public Affairs, about the Wayfair decision and how remote sellers will be taxed in Arizona.
Please see the resources available on the AZDOR website at https://azdor.gov/transaction-privilege-tax/retail-sales-subject-tpt/out-state-sellers
You can also reach the dedicated AZDOR E-Commerce Compliance and Outreach Team, who are subject matter experts:
833-AZeSALE (833-293-7253) or [email protected]
Remote Sales Into Arizona
On May 31, 2019, Arizona Governor Doug Ducey signed House Bill (H.B.) 2757 into law. This legislation requires remote sellers and marketplace facilitators—to begin filing and paying transaction privilege tax (TPT) in Arizona starting October 1, 2019. The legislation is the result of a 2018 ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court in the South Dakota v. Wayfair case. The decision allows states to require out-of-state businesses without a physical presence to collect and remit tax on sales from transactions in their state.
Because of Arizona’s new laws, retailers selling items of tangible personal property into Arizona should carefully review the information provided on the AZDOR website to determine whether they must pay Arizona TPT.
Outline of Podcast:
5:20 Discussion on Arizona HB 2757
7:50 How litigation or congressional action could impact the legislation
8:15 Execution of the law we have in Arizona – What the AZDOR is working on to define who is a remote seller
- Defining who they believe qualifies under the Wayfair structure
- Outreach to those who qualify
- Providing resources on the AZDOR website
12:25 Dr. Nülle talks about the implementation methods
16:35 Most difficult element to implement to date – communicating the change
19:23 Liability relief that might be available to businesses who may make mistakes as they work to implement Wayfair
22:20 Major implementation dates and dedicated AZDOR team contact information
If you like this episode you’ll love
Episode Comments
Generate a badge
Get a badge for your website that links back to this episode
<a href="https://goodpods.com/podcasts/arizona-cpas-4231/conformity-summary-from-the-2019-legislative-session-with-ryan-demenna-10096671"> <img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/goodpods-images-bucket/badges/generic-badge-1.svg" alt="listen to conformity summary from the 2019 legislative session with ryan demenna on goodpods" style="width: 225px" /> </a>
Copy