
The age of meaninglessness
11/01/24 • 10 min
Hello everyone, and welcome to another episode of the podcast. This is being recorded on Diwali night, so if you hear some background noise, that’s the neighborhood celebrating.
Tonight, I want to talk about a shift in how we think of misinformation. Traditionally, we imagine someone actively keeping the truth from us or replacing it with lies. In this scenario, we picture essential information—critical for making informed decisions—not reaching us. Instead, we’re fed propaganda, and as a result, our choices get skewed by falsehoods.
But today, I think we’re in an age of meaninglessness, which has a few layers. Our issue isn’t the lack of information; it’s that we have too much of it. We’re drowning in multiple versions of the same event, endless claims, and interpretations, making it difficult to discern the truth. Picture a fantasy scene where an evil sorcerer multiplies themselves, creating countless versions. Which one is the real sorcerer? By the time you figure it out, the opportunity to act has slipped away.
In this age, meaning isn’t withheld; instead, we're overwhelmed with so many interpretations that identifying the truth becomes nearly impossible. For instance, fact-checkers like Alt News have noted that misinformation has grown so vast, it’s impossible to debunk it all. To bury one truth, you need twenty lies, each similar enough to confuse. In this haze of half-truths and close-but-not-quite-facts, the moment to recognize the truth often vanishes.
This information overload forces us to sift endlessly through a vast pool of misleading narratives. Even with the world at our fingertips, the clarity we once dreamed of has turned into a nightmare. Today, our devices, rather than providing answers, often contribute to our confusion. This issue has grown so pervasive that chatbots like ChatGPT and others even include disclaimers—they might be providing inaccurate information, not out of malice, but because the system itself reflects our fractured landscape of truth and misinformation.
I mention this because I'm currently writing a story that touches on these themes. It’s a sequel to an earlier science fiction piece, and it examines how the dream of an “information superhighway” turned into a trap of misinformation. Once, we thought we’d gain clear access to the world’s knowledge, but now, every search leaves us questioning if what we found is real.
On a side note, I recently explored AI art generators, and I started wondering whether it’s the tool creating art or my imagination filling in the gaps. The generator produces something close to my vision but not quite there. It's a thought I’ll leave you with this weekend.
If you’d like to support the podcast, you can join on patreon at patreon.com/vimoh. Patreon supporters get early access to episodes. This one, recorded tonight, will go live tomorrow morning. As for social media, I’ve officially left Instagram as of today, which I might discuss in an upcoming episode.
Thank you for listening, and see you next time.
The podcast episode was recorded in one take without any script. The transcript was generated by Substack and cleaned up using ChatGPT.
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.fathomdaily.com Thanks to our monthly supporters
- anirao
- Maulik Thakkar
- Tilottama Biswas
- Gaurab Sundar Dutta
- OneOfMany
- Aliasour
- Samir Raut
- Suchi Mohan
- Anchal Bangar
- Pradeep Chandran
- Darshana Malusare
- Rohit Saxena
- Onika S
- Nishant Panda
- Manushya
- Aniruddha Chakraborty
- Anand
- Milind Sonone
- For the Love of Comics
- Animesh Topno
- Devika Salunke
- Ritika Rai
- Meena Ravi
- Venky V Ranjan
- Sandip Bhattacharya
- Lalit Patnaik
Hello everyone, and welcome to another episode of the podcast. This is being recorded on Diwali night, so if you hear some background noise, that’s the neighborhood celebrating.
Tonight, I want to talk about a shift in how we think of misinformation. Traditionally, we imagine someone actively keeping the truth from us or replacing it with lies. In this scenario, we picture essential information—critical for making informed decisions—not reaching us. Instead, we’re fed propaganda, and as a result, our choices get skewed by falsehoods.
But today, I think we’re in an age of meaninglessness, which has a few layers. Our issue isn’t the lack of information; it’s that we have too much of it. We’re drowning in multiple versions of the same event, endless claims, and interpretations, making it difficult to discern the truth. Picture a fantasy scene where an evil sorcerer multiplies themselves, creating countless versions. Which one is the real sorcerer? By the time you figure it out, the opportunity to act has slipped away.
In this age, meaning isn’t withheld; instead, we're overwhelmed with so many interpretations that identifying the truth becomes nearly impossible. For instance, fact-checkers like Alt News have noted that misinformation has grown so vast, it’s impossible to debunk it all. To bury one truth, you need twenty lies, each similar enough to confuse. In this haze of half-truths and close-but-not-quite-facts, the moment to recognize the truth often vanishes.
This information overload forces us to sift endlessly through a vast pool of misleading narratives. Even with the world at our fingertips, the clarity we once dreamed of has turned into a nightmare. Today, our devices, rather than providing answers, often contribute to our confusion. This issue has grown so pervasive that chatbots like ChatGPT and others even include disclaimers—they might be providing inaccurate information, not out of malice, but because the system itself reflects our fractured landscape of truth and misinformation.
I mention this because I'm currently writing a story that touches on these themes. It’s a sequel to an earlier science fiction piece, and it examines how the dream of an “information superhighway” turned into a trap of misinformation. Once, we thought we’d gain clear access to the world’s knowledge, but now, every search leaves us questioning if what we found is real.
On a side note, I recently explored AI art generators, and I started wondering whether it’s the tool creating art or my imagination filling in the gaps. The generator produces something close to my vision but not quite there. It's a thought I’ll leave you with this weekend.
If you’d like to support the podcast, you can join on patreon at patreon.com/vimoh. Patreon supporters get early access to episodes. This one, recorded tonight, will go live tomorrow morning. As for social media, I’ve officially left Instagram as of today, which I might discuss in an upcoming episode.
Thank you for listening, and see you next time.
The podcast episode was recorded in one take without any script. The transcript was generated by Substack and cleaned up using ChatGPT.
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.fathomdaily.com Thanks to our monthly supporters
- anirao
- Maulik Thakkar
- Tilottama Biswas
- Gaurab Sundar Dutta
- OneOfMany
- Aliasour
- Samir Raut
- Suchi Mohan
- Anchal Bangar
- Pradeep Chandran
- Darshana Malusare
- Rohit Saxena
- Onika S
- Nishant Panda
- Manushya
- Aniruddha Chakraborty
- Anand
- Milind Sonone
- For the Love of Comics
- Animesh Topno
- Devika Salunke
- Ritika Rai
- Meena Ravi
- Venky V Ranjan
- Sandip Bhattacharya
- Lalit Patnaik
Previous Episode

5 books about tech and society
This episode is a sticthed together version of a bunch of videos I made for a short-lived channel I had some time ago. So ignore my changing appearance throughout it. The episode was recorded over several days.
Below is an AI generated (NotebookLM) summary of the episode.
The provided text is an excerpt from a podcast episode where the speaker discusses four books that explore the impact of technology, particularly the internet and social media, on human thought, behavior, and culture. The speaker begins by mentioning Digital Minimalism by Cal Newport, which advocates for a mindful approach to technology use by suggesting a digital detox to reduce the negative effects of constant online engagement. Next, the speaker highlights The Cult of the Amateur by Andrew Keen, a book published around 2007, which critiques the internet's impact on culture and quality work due to its emphasis on amateurism and the devaluation of expertise. Following that, the speaker mentions Free Ride by Robert Levine, a book that focuses on how the internet is affecting the entertainment and publishing industries. Finally, the speaker concludes by discussing The Shallows by Nicholas Carr, which examines how the internet is altering our cognitive processes, particularly our abilities to focus, read deeply, and retain information. The speaker concludes by stressing the importance of recognizing how technology shapes us and the need to remain aware of the potential negative consequences of its widespread use.
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.fathomdaily.com Thanks to our monthly supporters
- anirao
- Maulik Thakkar
- Tilottama Biswas
- Gaurab Sundar Dutta
- OneOfMany
- Aliasour
- Samir Raut
- Suchi Mohan
- Anchal Bangar
- Pradeep Chandran
- Darshana Malusare
- Rohit Saxena
- Onika S
- Nishant Panda
- Manushya
- Aniruddha Chakraborty
- Anand
- Milind Sonone
- For the Love of Comics
- Animesh Topno
- Devika Salunke
- Ritika Rai
- Meena Ravi
- Venky V Ranjan
- Sandip Bhattacharya
- Lalit Patnaik
Next Episode

How the medium shapes the message
Hello, everyone, and welcome to another episode of the podcast.
Today, I want to discuss something that's been on my mind for a while. It relates to my recent decision to leave social media. One of the reasons behind this was that I felt my way of thinking was being influenced by the need to produce content in very specific formats. I realized that, over time, this could harm my creative process. So, I want to break down my thoughts on this, hoping to make it understandable to others.
Initially, I considered putting this out as a public video, but then I realized that not everyone might resonate with it. Instead, I’m sharing it here, knowing that many of my subscribers are creators themselves and will likely understand what I’m saying.
Think of it this way: if you’re a creator—a writer, painter, filmmaker, musician, songwriter, or podcaster—you naturally think in terms of the medium you use to convey your message. For example, a filmmaker who has an idea will start thinking in cinematic terms, translating that idea into visuals before expressing it. A writer will seek the best words to convey the idea, while a painter will think about colors and painting styles. And this applies to every creative field.
In essence, the medium we’re used to can shape how we think about and express our ideas. The reason I left social media was that my mode of thinking was adapting itself to fit the formats commonly used on those platforms—like short videos on a mobile phone, often with the camera pointed at my face, cramming complex ideas into just 60 seconds.
This led to a shift: my brain was starting to force ideas into a format that wasn’t always suitable. Some ideas just don’t fit certain formats. Sometimes, a filmmaker’s idea should be written down first; sometimes, a writer's idea might be best suited for film. But social media compels us to think in constrained formats, whether or not they fit the ideas we have.
And here’s where social media adds a new layer: as creators and consumers, we’re all reacting to and thinking about the same trending topics. Social media’s nature compels us to align with popular topics, often pushing us to form "topic tribes." We’re expected to have opinions on whatever’s trending, sometimes to the extent that not participating can lead to accusations of not caring or even undermining the interests of others.
As creators on social media, our thinking gets shaped by the format. It’s affecting us in ways that were unimaginable a few years or decades ago. We’re often forced to condense our thoughts into 280-character tweets or 60-second videos, or whatever the trending format may be. Some ideas can’t be adequately expressed in these formats, and yet we try, creating distorted versions of the ideas we wanted to share.
Look at television debates, for example. The format requires antagonism and aggression, even though the topics are often public-interest issues meant to inform. The format twists these topics into something more about entertainment than genuine public enlightenment, leading audiences to anger rather than thoughtful decision-making. Issues like unemployment, healthcare, and education become polarized, and we’re encouraged to view them through a divisive lens.
I left social media because I have ideas that I’ve spent years developing—ideas that don’t fit into 60 seconds. These aren’t concepts best expressed through short-form content meant to be consumed quickly and then forgotten. These ideas need time, attention, and depth, things that social media, with its fragmented attention spans, often works against.
Perhaps some of you can juggle multiple projects simultaneously. I’m not one of those people. I tend to focus on one project at a time, maybe two at most, where one is primary, and the other is secondary. I know people who can maintain a writing routine while running a YouTube channel with regular live streams, but that’s not me. I had to make the choice to step away from social media to reclaim the part of my mind best able to engage with these deeper ideas.
I’m happy to report that this choice has already started to pay off. If you, too, find that social media affects your thinking or ability to focus, maybe take a moment to reflect on this.
Thank you for listening to this episode. If you enjoyed it, you can support my work on Patreon at patreon.com/vimoh. If you’re listening on Spotify or Apple Podcasts, please consider giving it a five-star rating. And if you’re listening on Substack, there’s a support link at the top of the page for one-time contributions. Your support helps me keep creating content that encourages deeper thinking on topics we don’t often discuss.
I’ll see you next time.
This episode was recorded without a script, transcribed by Substack, and then the transcript was edited and cleaned up by ChatGPT.
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss...
If you like this episode you’ll love
Episode Comments
Generate a badge
Get a badge for your website that links back to this episode
<a href="https://goodpods.com/podcasts/vimoh-irl-589254/the-age-of-meaninglessness-77465410"> <img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/goodpods-images-bucket/badges/generic-badge-1.svg" alt="listen to the age of meaninglessness on goodpods" style="width: 225px" /> </a>
Copy