
Ajay Dahiya of The Pollination Project on funding grassroots animal advocacy and inner transformation
01/21/21 • 103 min
“Why inner transformation, why these practices are also built into model: unless we root out the root cause of the issue, which is disconnection, which is a lack of understanding that we are interrelated, and therefore I have an inherent responsibility to show up in the world with kindness and compassion and to reduce the harm and the suffering that I cause in the world. Unless we’re able to do that, these problems are still going to exist. The issues of race relations still exist. How many years have people been fighting for this? The issue of homophobia, of racism, whatever it is, they still exist; why do they still exist after so much work, after so much money has been poured into it, after so many lives have been lost, so many people have been beaten and spilled their blood? They’ve shed their tears for these issues. Because unless we address the underlying schisms within human consciousness, within us as individuals, it’s still going to exist; it’s still going to be there. Direct impact, indirect impact, I just want to see impact and if you’re someone who wants to make an impact, I want to hear from you.
- Ajay Dahiya
Animals are harmed in all continents in the world. But how can we support the advocates seeking to help them? And what sort of support is most needed?
Ajay Dahiya is the executive director of The Pollination Project, an organisation which funds and supports grassroots advocates and organizations working towards positive social change, such as to help animals.
Topics discussed in the episode:
- How the Pollination Project helps grassroots animal advocates (1:20)
- How we can support grassroots animal advocacy in India and build a robust movement (12:48)
- How the grants and support offered concretely benefit the grantees (19:22)
- The application and review process for The Pollination Project’s grant-making (24:00)
- What makes good grantees? And how does The Pollination Project evaluate them? (27:34)
- How does The Pollination Project identify and evaluate grantees? (35:14)
- How important is the non-financial support that the Pollination Project offers relative to the financial support? (44:54)
- What similarities and differences does The Pollination Project have to other grant-makers that support effective animal advocacy? (55:23)
- What are the difficulties of making grants in lots of different countries? (1:02:00)
- To what extent are grassroots animal advocates constrained by a lack of funding? (1:06:26)
- Why doesn’t The Pollination Project’s prioritize some of the work that it does over others? Isn’t this kind of prioritization necessary in order to maximize positive impact? (1:10:00)
- What are the main challenges that The Pollination Project faces, preventing it having further impact? (1:29:05)
- What makes good grant-makers? (1:31:58)
- How Ajay’s experience as a monk came about and how it affects his work as a grant-maker (1:34:37)
Resources discussed in the episode are available at https://www.sentienceinstitute.org/podcast
“Why inner transformation, why these practices are also built into model: unless we root out the root cause of the issue, which is disconnection, which is a lack of understanding that we are interrelated, and therefore I have an inherent responsibility to show up in the world with kindness and compassion and to reduce the harm and the suffering that I cause in the world. Unless we’re able to do that, these problems are still going to exist. The issues of race relations still exist. How many years have people been fighting for this? The issue of homophobia, of racism, whatever it is, they still exist; why do they still exist after so much work, after so much money has been poured into it, after so many lives have been lost, so many people have been beaten and spilled their blood? They’ve shed their tears for these issues. Because unless we address the underlying schisms within human consciousness, within us as individuals, it’s still going to exist; it’s still going to be there. Direct impact, indirect impact, I just want to see impact and if you’re someone who wants to make an impact, I want to hear from you.
- Ajay Dahiya
Animals are harmed in all continents in the world. But how can we support the advocates seeking to help them? And what sort of support is most needed?
Ajay Dahiya is the executive director of The Pollination Project, an organisation which funds and supports grassroots advocates and organizations working towards positive social change, such as to help animals.
Topics discussed in the episode:
- How the Pollination Project helps grassroots animal advocates (1:20)
- How we can support grassroots animal advocacy in India and build a robust movement (12:48)
- How the grants and support offered concretely benefit the grantees (19:22)
- The application and review process for The Pollination Project’s grant-making (24:00)
- What makes good grantees? And how does The Pollination Project evaluate them? (27:34)
- How does The Pollination Project identify and evaluate grantees? (35:14)
- How important is the non-financial support that the Pollination Project offers relative to the financial support? (44:54)
- What similarities and differences does The Pollination Project have to other grant-makers that support effective animal advocacy? (55:23)
- What are the difficulties of making grants in lots of different countries? (1:02:00)
- To what extent are grassroots animal advocates constrained by a lack of funding? (1:06:26)
- Why doesn’t The Pollination Project’s prioritize some of the work that it does over others? Isn’t this kind of prioritization necessary in order to maximize positive impact? (1:10:00)
- What are the main challenges that The Pollination Project faces, preventing it having further impact? (1:29:05)
- What makes good grant-makers? (1:31:58)
- How Ajay’s experience as a monk came about and how it affects his work as a grant-maker (1:34:37)
Resources discussed in the episode are available at https://www.sentienceinstitute.org/podcast
Previous Episode

Oscar Horta of the University of Santiago de Compostela on how we can best help wild animals
“The main work that really needs to be carried out here is work in the intersection of animal welfare science and the science of ecology and other fields in life science... You could also build a career, not as a scientist, but say, in public administration or government. And you can reach a position in policy-making that can be relevant for the field, so there are plenty of different options there... Getting other interventions accepted and implemented would require significant lobby work. And that’s why having people, for instance, if you have people who are sympathetic to reducing wild animal suffering, and they are working in, say, national parks administration or working with the agricultural authorities, forest authorities, or whatever, these people could really make a significant difference.”
- Oscar Horta
Animals in the wild suffer, often to a large degree, because of natural disasters, parasites, disease, starvation, and other causes. But what can we do as individuals to help them? What are the most urgent priorities?
Oscar Horta is a Professor of philosophy at the University of Santiago de Compostela and a co-founder of the nonprofit Animal Ethics. He has published and lectured in English and other languages on topics including speciesism and wild animal welfare.
Topics discussed in the episode:
- Why should animal advocates and researchers think more carefully about the definition of speciesism? (1:40)
- Why Oscar believes framing our messaging in terms in speciesism and focusing on attitudes rather than behavior would help advocates to do more good (9:10)
- How relevant is existing research to the proposed research field of welfare biology, that would consider wild animals among other animals, and how can we integrate it? (16:40)
- What sorts of research are most urgently needed to advance the field of welfare biology and how can people go about pursuing this? (21:13)
- Careers related to helping wild animals in policy (36:10)
- What you can do if you already work at an animal advocacy organization or are interested in growing the field in other ways (39:45)
- The size of the current wild animal welfare movement in and the work of relevant nonprofits (51:40)
- How can we most effectively build support for this sort of work among other animal advocates and effective altruists? (57:33)
- How can we most effectively build a new academic field? (1:02:49)
- To what extent is public-facing advocacy desirable at this point? (1:10:09)
Resources discussed in the episode are available at https://www.sentienceinstitute.org/podcast
Next Episode

Jo Anderson of Faunalytics and Saulius Šimčikas of Rethink Priorities on research for effective animal advocacy
We [Faunalytics] put out a lot of things in 2020. Some of the favorites that I [Jo] have, probably top of the list, I’m really excited about our animal product impact scales, where we did a lot of background research to figure out and estimate the impact of replacing various animal products with plant-based or cultivated alternatives. Apart from that, we’ve also done some research on people’s beliefs about chickens and fish that’s intended as a starting point on a program of research so that we can look at the best ways to advocate for those smaller animals... [Rethink Priorities’] bigger projects within farmed animal advocacy include work on EU legislation, in particular our view of how much do countries comply with EU animal welfare laws and what we can do to increase compliance. Jason Schukraft wrote many articles about topics like how the moral value of animals differs across species. There has been a review of shrimp farming. I [Saulius] finished an article in which I estimate global captive vertebrate numbers. And Abraham Rowe posted an article about insects raised for food and feed which I think is a very important topic.
- Jo Anderson and Saulius Šimčikas
There have been many new research posts relevant to animal advocacy in 2020. But which are the most important for animal advocates to pay close attention to? And what sorts of research should we prioritize in the future?
Jo Anderson is the Research Director at Faunalytics, a nonprofit that conducts, summarizes, and disseminates research relevant to animal advocacy. Saulius Šimčikas is a Senior Staff Researcher at Rethink Priorities, a nonprofit that conducts research relevant to farmed animal advocacy, wild animals, and several other cause areas associated with the effective altruism community.
Topics discussed in the episode:
- Faunalytics and Rethink Priorities’ research in 2020 relevant to animal advocacy (1:40)
- Jo and Saulius’ work on polling about fish welfare (5:37)
- The impact of replacing different types of animal products (12:27)
- To what extent should animal advocates focus on legislative campaigns rather than corporate campaigns? (16:29)
- Experiences and turnover in the animal advocacy movement (24:33)
- New research on the difficulties of scaling up cultured meat (28:15)
- New research about the promise of lectures to reduce students’ animal product consumption (32:16)
- Charity Entrepreneurship’s (many) new intervention reports (36:54)
- How the idea of longtermism should affect animal advocacy (39:32)
- Other exciting effective animal advocacy research published in 2020 (45:51)
- How does all this research actually lead to impact for animals? What is the theory of change? (50:06)
- How do you decide or prioritize which specific research topic to pursue? (56:41)
- What are the pros and cons of working on multiple cause areas within a single research nonprofit? (1:00:11)
- What are the pros and cons of various different types of research? (1:05:21)
- What are the main bottlenecks that the farmed animal movement and its contributing research organizations face? (1:18:17)
- What routes into effective animal advocacy research roles did Jamie, Jo, and Saulius take and what is the relative importance of effective animal advocacy familiarity vs. formal research experience? (1:23:49)
Resources discussed in the episode are available at https://www.sentienceinstitute.org/podcast
The Sentience Institute Podcast - Ajay Dahiya of The Pollination Project on funding grassroots animal advocacy and inner transformation
Transcript
Welcome to the sentience Institute podcast, interview activists, entrepreneurs, and researchers about the most effective strategies to expand humanity's moral circle with a focus on expanding the circle to farmed animals.
Speaker 1I'm Jamie Harris researcher as sentences to , and to animal advocacy. Chris , welcome to our 14th episode of the podcast. I was excited to have ADA here on the podcast becaus
If you like this episode you’ll love
Episode Comments
Generate a badge
Get a badge for your website that links back to this episode
<a href="https://goodpods.com/podcasts/the-sentience-institute-podcast-467997/ajay-dahiya-of-the-pollination-project-on-funding-grassroots-animal-ad-63067802"> <img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/goodpods-images-bucket/badges/generic-badge-1.svg" alt="listen to ajay dahiya of the pollination project on funding grassroots animal advocacy and inner transformation on goodpods" style="width: 225px" /> </a>
Copy