
COVID Relief Funding Distribution (September 2022)
09/14/22 • 24 min
In response to the COVID pandemic, the federal government enacted six major relief bills totaling over $5 trillion. The federal government allocated about $34 billion to the state of Kansas. Out of that, the state had discretion on how to spend about $2.6 billion. In May 2020, the governor established the Office of Recovery and created a taskforce to distribute and administer certain COVID relief funds. The state distributed CARES Act discretionary funding through a 3 round proess that involved the SPARK taskforce and the State Finance Council. About $1.6 billion in ARPA funds are currently being distributed thorugh legislative appropriation and the SPARK taskforce.
The state's distribution of CARES Act funding appeared appropriate and reasonable. Most of the CARES Act expenditures we reviewed were likey allowable under federal spending rules. However, some expenditures appeared wasteful or raised other concerns even though the expenditure may be allowable under federal rules. Federal rules likely contibuted to the problems we encountered.
In response to the COVID pandemic, the federal government enacted six major relief bills totaling over $5 trillion. The federal government allocated about $34 billion to the state of Kansas. Out of that, the state had discretion on how to spend about $2.6 billion. In May 2020, the governor established the Office of Recovery and created a taskforce to distribute and administer certain COVID relief funds. The state distributed CARES Act discretionary funding through a 3 round proess that involved the SPARK taskforce and the State Finance Council. About $1.6 billion in ARPA funds are currently being distributed thorugh legislative appropriation and the SPARK taskforce.
The state's distribution of CARES Act funding appeared appropriate and reasonable. Most of the CARES Act expenditures we reviewed were likey allowable under federal spending rules. However, some expenditures appeared wasteful or raised other concerns even though the expenditure may be allowable under federal rules. Federal rules likely contibuted to the problems we encountered.
Previous Episode
![undefined - Reviewing Issues Related to State Cryptocurrency Tax Policies [July 2022]](https://storage.googleapis.com/goodpods-images-bucket/episode_images/dd98e1069c069ce7f9f11f81922d75f0ed8b72c4af8ef80c9f68f3a91249d897.avif)
Reviewing Issues Related to State Cryptocurrency Tax Policies [July 2022]
Kansas’s cryptocurrency tax policies generally aligned with federal policies, but some of those policies have been difficult to enforce in recent years. Federal tax policy is set up to tax cryptocurrency in several ways. Kansas’s income tax code mirrors federal tax policy. As a result, the state should receive income tax revenue from cryptocurrency transactions. However, it’s unlikely Kansas receives all income tax revenue from cryptocurrency transactions because of a lack of federal reporting guidelines. Finally, state governments have yet to agree on a set of best practices regarding the taxation of cryptocurrencies.
Next Episode
![undefined - 3 Year Summary of Security Controls in Selected State and Local Entities (2020-2022) [December 2022]](https://storage.googleapis.com/goodpods-images-bucket/episode_images/dd98e1069c069ce7f9f11f81922d75f0ed8b72c4af8ef80c9f68f3a91249d897.avif)
3 Year Summary of Security Controls in Selected State and Local Entities (2020-2022) [December 2022]
We completed 21 audits on 16 agencies and 4 school districts between CY 2020 and 2022 (1 entity was audited twice during this time period). This summary report shows 10 of the 21 entities did not substantially comply with applicable IT security standards and best practices. Entities struggled with properly scanning and patching their computers. Entities also had compliance problems because they did not create, maintain, or test incident response plans or continuity of operations plans. Other significant issues included poor security awareness training or failed social engineering tests. Almost half the entities had significant management, contract, or policy-related weaknesses. Additional security weaknesses included inadequate account security controls, poor encryption, back up, or destruction processes of sensitive data. We also noted several entities had inadequate network boundary protection or had poor access or environmental controls for their data centers. Lastly, we identified significant security issues within agencies’ specific IT systems. The findings in this report are similar to those in previous summary IT reports. The main reasons for compliance problems across the 20 entities included insufficient top management attention and inadequate resources.
The Rundown with Kansas Legislative Division of Post Audit - COVID Relief Funding Distribution (September 2022)
Transcript
Welcome to the rundown, your source for the latest news and updates from the Kansas legislative division of post audit , featuring LPA staff talking about recently released audit reports and discussing their main findings key takeaways and why it matters. I'm Andy Brizo
Speaker 1in September, 2022, legislative post audit released a performance audit that evaluated COVID relief, funding and distribution
If you like this episode you’ll love
Episode Comments
Generate a badge
Get a badge for your website that links back to this episode
<a href="https://goodpods.com/podcasts/the-rundown-with-kansas-legislative-division-of-post-audit-264932/covid-relief-funding-distribution-september-2022-31422485"> <img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/goodpods-images-bucket/badges/generic-badge-1.svg" alt="listen to covid relief funding distribution (september 2022) on goodpods" style="width: 225px" /> </a>
Copy