Log in

goodpods headphones icon

To access all our features

Open the Goodpods app
Close icon
The Blockchain Debate Podcast - Motion: Corporate bailouts and capital market rescues make sense, II (Jonathan Padilla vs. Nick White)

Motion: Corporate bailouts and capital market rescues make sense, II (Jonathan Padilla vs. Nick White)

06/03/20 • 74 min

The Blockchain Debate Podcast

Guests:
Jonathan "JP" Padilla (@JPadillaCA)
Nick White (@nickwh8te)
Host:
Richard Yan (@gentso09)

Today’s motion is “I largely approve the US government’s fiscal and monetary response to the ongoing economic crisis.”

We recently had another debate on a similar topic, between Qiao Wang and Jimmy Song.

While Qiao argued for the pro-establishment view, he still saw lots of issues with the government’s intervention in the markets. In the debate, Qiao was playing the role of a devil’s advocate, to help the crypto community understand the pro-intervention perspective.

In today’s debate, however, the pro-intervention guest (Jonathan "JP" Padilla) is a Kenseyan, has worked for the Whitehouse, and is very supportive of the government actions during the ongoing crisis.

The anti-intervention guest (Nick White) today is also not a hard-core libertarian like Jimmy from the previous debate. So today’s debate is more consensus-building than that previous debate.

Be sure to also check out our previous episodes too. We’ve featured some of the best known thinkers in the crypto space.

If you would like to debate or want to nominate someone, please DM me at @blockdebate on Twitter.

If you like the show, please give us five stars on iTunes or wherever you listen to this.

Please note that nothing in our podcast should be construed as financial advice.

Source of select items discussed in the debate:

plus icon
bookmark

Guests:
Jonathan "JP" Padilla (@JPadillaCA)
Nick White (@nickwh8te)
Host:
Richard Yan (@gentso09)

Today’s motion is “I largely approve the US government’s fiscal and monetary response to the ongoing economic crisis.”

We recently had another debate on a similar topic, between Qiao Wang and Jimmy Song.

While Qiao argued for the pro-establishment view, he still saw lots of issues with the government’s intervention in the markets. In the debate, Qiao was playing the role of a devil’s advocate, to help the crypto community understand the pro-intervention perspective.

In today’s debate, however, the pro-intervention guest (Jonathan "JP" Padilla) is a Kenseyan, has worked for the Whitehouse, and is very supportive of the government actions during the ongoing crisis.

The anti-intervention guest (Nick White) today is also not a hard-core libertarian like Jimmy from the previous debate. So today’s debate is more consensus-building than that previous debate.

Be sure to also check out our previous episodes too. We’ve featured some of the best known thinkers in the crypto space.

If you would like to debate or want to nominate someone, please DM me at @blockdebate on Twitter.

If you like the show, please give us five stars on iTunes or wherever you listen to this.

Please note that nothing in our podcast should be construed as financial advice.

Source of select items discussed in the debate:

Previous Episode

undefined - Motion: Corporate bailouts and capital market rescues make sense (Qiao Wang vs. Jimmy Song)

Motion: Corporate bailouts and capital market rescues make sense (Qiao Wang vs. Jimmy Song)

Guests:
Qiao Wang (@qwqiao)
Jimmy Song (@jimmysong)
Host:
Richard Yan (@gentso09)

We all know the dominant crypto-native perspective on corporate/Wall Street bailouts — as generally anti-intervention, both fiscally and monetarily. But it’s important to hear the other side, if only to kick the tires of your own beliefs. After all, many smart people embrace a statist, big government view, in how to run an economy.

In this debate, we covered many topics, including the following:

  • A way to think about corporate bailouts as claims on a social insurance policy, with an analogy in social security and Medicare
  • How the monetary policies are worsening the wealth gap by giving a disproportionate advantage to the rich not enjoyed by the poor
  • Whether FDR’s intervention policies were instrumental in lifting the nation out of the Great Depression, or this was just revisionist economic history, with these policies accomplishing the opposite or having tepid effects at best

Our two knowledgeable guests are both in the crypto circle, but come from very different backgrounds. One used to be a Wall Street trader and is a finance buff. The other is a bitcoin maximalist and an unapologetic libertarian.

Be sure to also check out our previous episodes too. We’ve featured some of the best known thinkers in the crypto space. And it was great to have a few no-coiners on. I always appreciate their agreeing to do the show, and adding perspectives to what sometimes seem like an echo chamber.

If you would like to debate or want to nominate someone, please DM me at @blockdebate on Twitter.

Please note that nothing in our podcast should be construed as financial advice.

Source of select items discussed in the debate:

Next Episode

undefined - Motion: Nation-state attack on Bitcoin is an unresolved ticking time-bomb (Mike Kelly vs. Hasu)

Motion: Nation-state attack on Bitcoin is an unresolved ticking time-bomb (Mike Kelly vs. Hasu)

Guests:
Mike Kelly (@mikekelly85)
Hasu (@hasufl)
Host:
Richard Yan (@gentso09)

Today’s motion is “Nation-state attack on the bitcoin network is an unresolved ticking time bomb.”
In this thorough and fascinating debate, we covered these topics:

  • The motivations of nationstate attacks
  • The mechanisms of nationstate attacks
  • The aftermath of nationstate attacks
  • The preventive mechanism of nationstate attacks

The idea for this debate was born out of a twitter discussion, where someone posted a video of Andreas Antonopoulos dismissing the threat on bitcoin from nationstates.
Now, while you’re here, be sure to also check out our previous episodes too. We’ve featured some of the best known thinkers in the crypto space. And it was great to have a few no-coiners on. I always appreciate their agreeing to do the show, and adding perspectives to what sometimes seem like an echo chamber.
If you would like to debate or want to nominate someone, please DM me at @blockdebate on Twitter.
Please note that nothing in our podcast should be construed as financial advice.

Source of select items discussed in the debate:

The Blockchain Debate Podcast - Motion: Corporate bailouts and capital market rescues make sense, II (Jonathan Padilla vs. Nick White)

Transcript

Richard

Welcome to another episode of The Blockchain Debate Podcast, where consensus is optional, but proof of thought is required. I'm your host, Richard Yan. Today's motion is: "I largely approve the U.S. Government's fiscal and monetary response to the ongoing economic crisis." We recently had another debate on a similar topic between Qiao Wang and Jimmy Song. While

Richard

Qiao argued for the pro-establishmen

Episode Comments

Generate a badge

Get a badge for your website that links back to this episode

Select type & size
Open dropdown icon
share badge image

<a href="https://goodpods.com/podcasts/the-blockchain-debate-podcast-31921/motion-corporate-bailouts-and-capital-market-rescues-make-sense-ii-jon-5741707"> <img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/goodpods-images-bucket/badges/generic-badge-1.svg" alt="listen to motion: corporate bailouts and capital market rescues make sense, ii (jonathan padilla vs. nick white) on goodpods" style="width: 225px" /> </a>

Copy