Stanford Legal
Stanford Law School
2 Listeners
All episodes
Best episodes
Top 10 Stanford Legal Episodes
Goodpods has curated a list of the 10 best Stanford Legal episodes, ranked by the number of listens and likes each episode have garnered from our listeners. If you are listening to Stanford Legal for the first time, there's no better place to start than with one of these standout episodes. If you are a fan of the show, vote for your favorite Stanford Legal episode by adding your comments to the episode page.
Is the president above the law? Is the Electoral College democratic? In this episode, historian Jonathan Gienapp critiques the mainstream use of originalism, arguing that it often neglects crucial historical context, overlooking the complexities of original public understanding. The conversation dives into recent court cases, highlighting tensions between historical interpretation and contemporary judicial practices. This is clearly illustrated in Gienapp’s discussion of the Electoral College—a uniquely American invention. He explains the historical roots of the Electoral College, the Framers' intentions, and the criticisms it faces today. He also sheds light on how the Electoral College emerged as a compromise among less desirable options and the historical context surrounding its establishment, including issues of accountability and regional interests. The conversation also touches on ongoing debates about potential reforms, public sentiment toward a national popular vote, and the challenges of amending the Constitution in today's contentious political landscape. Join us for an enlightening discussion that bridges history with contemporary constitutional debates.
Connect:
- Episode Transcripts >>> Stanford Legal Podcast Website
- Stanford Legal Podcast >>> LinkedIn Page
- Rich Ford >>> Twitter/X
- Pam Karlan >>> Stanford Law School Page
- Stanford Law School >>> Twitter/X
- Stanford Law Magazine >>> Twitter/X
Links:
- Jonathan Gienapp >>> Stanford Law School Page
(00:00:00) Chapter 1: Introduction and the Flaws of Originalism
Hosts Pam Karlan and Rich Ford discuss the key issues with modern originalism, focusing on how originalists often overlook the historical context necessary to truly capture the Constitution’s original meaning with historian Jonathan Gienapp. Gienapp critiques the flexibility of originalist interpretations, especially when applied to complex constitutional concepts like freedom of speech and executive power.
(00:04:33) Chapter 2: Public Meaning vs. Original Intent
Rich Ford explores the tension between public meaning and original intent in originalist theory. Gienapp explains how, despite attempts to distinguish them, the two often overlap in practice. The discussion highlights the inconsistency in how originalists pick and choose historical evidence to support their interpretations.
(00:07:47) Chapter 3: Judicial Interpretation in Practice: Rahimi and Trump Cases
Pam Karlan brings up recent court cases, including United States v. Rahimi and Trump v. United States, where originalist judges either struggled with historical evidence or avoided it altogether. Gienapp notes the irony of originalists relying on minimal historical analysis when it contradicts their desired outcomes.
(00:12:04) Chapter 4: The Framers' Vision of the Presidency
Jonathan Gienapp discusses the historical foundations of the American presidency, emphasizing the founding generation's rejection of monarchy and the importance of presidential accountability. He highlights the debate at the Constitutional Convention regarding the balance between a strong executive and ensuring that executive power remains accountable to the people.
(00:17:06) Chapter 5: Originalism and Constitutional Interpretation
Jonathan Gienapp delves into the complexities of originalism as a judicial philosophy. He explains the tension between the rhetoric of originalism and its inconsistent application in Supreme Court decisions. He argues for either a more serious commitment to originalism or a recognition of constitutional pluralism, where history is used alongside other interpretative methods.
(00:21:39) Chapter 6: The Origins and Challenges of the Electoral College
Exploration of the creation of the Electoral College, discussing how it emerged not as a perfect solution but as a compromise to address competing concerns about legislative selection, popular votes, and regional interests. Gienapp examines past and present efforts to reform the Electoral College and explains why it persists despite criticism.
1 Listener
When does life begin? In this episode of Stanford Legal, co-hosts Rich Ford and Pam Karlan dig into the recent decision by the Alabama Supreme Court that has sent shockwaves through the fertility treatment community. The ruling, which considers frozen embryos as children under state law, has wide-ranging implications for in vitro fertilization (IVF) practices. Bioethics and law expert Hank Greely joins the discussion, providing insights into the background of the case, its legal implications, and the potential ramifications for IVF clinics and patients in Alabama—and throughout the country. The conversation highlights the intersection of law, medicine, and ethics, revealing the complex challenges surrounding embryo rights and reproductive freedoms.
Connect:
- Episode Transcripts >>> Stanford Legal Podcast Website
- Stanford Legal Podcast >>> LinkedIn Page
- Rich Ford >>> Twitter/X
- Pam Karlan >>> Stanford Law School Page
- Stanford Law School >>> Twitter/X
- Stanford Law Magazine >>> Twitter/X
Links:
- Hank Greely >>> Stanford Law School Page | Twitter/X
(00:00:00) Chapter 1: Introduction & The Alabama Supreme Court Ruling
- Hank Greely, discussing the recent Alabama Supreme Court decision regarding frozen embryos. He provides background on the Alabama Supreme Court decision and the implications for fertility treatment in the state along with explaining the legal basis of the ruling and the claims brought forth by the plaintiffs.
(00:03:43) Chapter 2: Wrongful Death Act & Implications of the Decision
- Discussion on the Alabama Wrongful Death Act and its application to unborn children, including frozen embryos. Exploration of the broader implications of the decision, including ethical and legal concerns.
(00:08:21) Chapter 3: Understanding Frozen Embryos
- Hank Greely explains the process of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and the concept of frozen embryos, including the harvesting of eggs and the reasons for freezing embryos.
(00:14:05) Chapter 4: Legal and Ethical Concerns
- Analysis of the legal and ethical implications of the Alabama decision for IVF clinics and patients. Greely, Karlan, and Ford then discuss the political and legislative responses to the Alabama decision, including potential future actions
(00:26:49) Chapter 5: Gender and Control Over Reproduction
- Show Notes: Discussion on the gender dynamics and control over reproduction highlighted by the Alabama Supreme Court ruling.
(00:33:29) Chapter 6: Political Ramifications and Predictions
- Hank Greely offers his perspective on potential legislative responses and the broader implications for reproductive rights. From congressional bills to grassroots activism, we explore the evolving landscape of reproductive justice. They also explore the political ramifications and the future outlook for fertility treatment.
1 Listener
Mishandling of Top-Secret Government Documents and the Mounting Legal Challenges Facing Donald J. Trump with David Sklansky
Stanford Legal
08/29/22 • 36 min
1 Listener
11/02/23 • 3 min
After a hiatus, Stanford Legal returns to your podcast feed. In our first episode relaunching November 9th, join hosts Pam Karlan and Rich Ford as they sit down with criminal law expert David Sklansky to unpack the numerous indictments against Donald Trump. But that's not all: our upcoming episodes will explore a range of pressing legal topics from AI to the Supreme Court’s latest decisions.
Make sure you're following Stanford Legal, so you don't miss an episode!
Episode Transcripts >>> Stanford Legal Podcast Website
Connect:
- Stanford Legal Podcast >>> LinkedIn Page
- Rich Ford >>> Twitter/X
- Stanford Law School >>> Twitter/X
- Stanford Law Magazine >>> Twitter/X
1 Listener
This Thursday: Stanford Legal Returns with Expert Insights on Trump Indictments from David Sklansky
Stanford Legal
11/06/23 • 1 min
Join us this Thursday for the return of Stanford Legal, with a new episode featuring criminal law expert David Sklansky, who will break down some of the most serious charges against former president--and 2024 presidential hopeful-- Donald Trump. Sklansky, a former prosecutor and co-director of the Stanford Criminal Justice Center, lends his expertise to help us understand the complexities of these unprecedented legal proceedings. Be sure to subscribe for a front-row seat to this enlightening legal discourse.
Make sure you're following Stanford Legal, so you don't miss an episode!
Episode Transcripts >>> Stanford Legal Podcast Website
Connect:
- Stanford Legal Podcast >>> LinkedIn Page
- Rich Ford >>> Twitter/X
- Stanford Law School >>> Twitter/X
- Stanford Law Magazine >>> Twitter/X
1 Listener
1 Comment
1
Expert Insights on Trump Indictments from David Sklansky
Stanford Legal
11/09/23 • 28 min
The many indictments against Donald Trump, former president and current Republican frontrunner for the 2024 presidential contest, have left many scratching their heads. Is the Florida documents case more important than the Georgia election interference one? Is it all just political theatre, or is this serious? Here to help make sense of it is former prosecutor and criminal law expert David Alan Sklansky, who joins Pam and Rich for this episode about the criminal cases against Trump and how they might play out in this critical campaign year. From the intricacies of witness testimonies to the strategic implications for co-defendants, this episode touches on the unprecedented challenges faced by judges, lawyers, and the American legal system.
This is the first episode of the newly-relaunched Stanford Legal podcast; make sure you're following so you don't miss an episode!
Connect:
- Episode Transcripts >>> Stanford Legal Podcast Website
- Stanford Legal Podcast >>> LinkedIn Page
- Rich Ford >>> Twitter/X
- Stanford Law School >>> Twitter/X
- Stanford Law Magazine >>> Twitter/X
- David Sklansky >>> Twitter/X
Chapters:
(00:00:00) Introduction
Rich Ford and Pam Karlan reintroduce the Stanford Legal podcast after a hiatus, as well as guest David Alan Sklansky. Overview of the four major criminal indictments against Trump.
(00:05:02) Severity and Strength of Charges
Analysis of the seriousness of charges & assessment of the legal strengths of different cases, highlighting the Florida case as particularly challenging for Trump.
(00:07:25) Trump's Trial Strategies
Prediction of strategies to delay the trials, including attempts to change judges, create discovery disputes & Trump's courtroom absence during the trials.
(00:12:05) The Judges Navigate Trump’s Cases
Sklansky discusses the particular challenges the judges are facing presiding over these trials.
(00:15:04) Ensuring an Unbiased Jury
Discussion on the difficulty of finding jurors unafraid to participate due to potential threats or intimidation. Insight into the legal system's approach to selecting jurors and the importance of reasoned deliberation.
(00:18:12) Trump’s Codefendants
Analysis of co-defendants in the cases, highlighting the New York and Georgia indictments.
(00:22:24) Strategic Implications of Conviction
Discussion on how trial outcomes may influence co-defendants' decisions & their repeated testimonies and its impact on legal proceedings.
(00:24:18) Legal Representation Challenges
Examination of co-defendants' legal representation, including lawyers paid by the Trump campaign, as well as the intersection of cases, and unprecedented consequences.
(00:26:30) March to Trial and Democracy's Future
Discussion on the anticipation of the D.C. election fraud trial in March and its historical significance.
Trade Wars with guest Alan Sykes
Stanford Legal
04/14/18 • 28 min
Stanford Legal with Pam Karlan & Joe Bankman: "Trade wars with guest Alan Sykes" Stanford Law professor and Director of the Masters Program in International Economic Law, Business and Policy Alan Sykes discusses the benefits and drawbacks of a trade war and what it would look like if President Trump decides to engage in one. Originally aired on SiriusXM on April 14, 2018. Recorded at Stanford Video.
Women and minorities continue to be underrepresented in patent issuing and less often are granted credit for their innovations. We examine why this is, the impacts it has, and what can be done about it. Patents, and the protection of inventor rights, was deemed important enough that when the U.S. Constitution was ratified in 1788 it included what is now known as the intellectual property clause: Article I, Section 8, Clause 8, which reads “[The Congress shall have Power . . . ] To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.” Our guest in this episode is Lisa Larrimore Ouellette, whose latest research looks at inequality in the patent system and how that impacts innovation. Her paper “Improving Equity in Patent Inventorship” was recently published in Science.
Connect:
- Episode Transcripts >>> Stanford Legal Podcast Website
- Stanford Legal Podcast >>> LinkedIn Page
- Rich Ford >>> Twitter/X
- Stanford Law School >>> Twitter/X
- Stanford Law Magazine >>> Twitter/X
- Lisa Ouellette >>> Twitter/X
Chapters:
(00:00:00) Introduction and Patent System Overview
The significance of patents and their historical context. Intro of guest Lisa Ouellette’s research on inequity in the patent system
(00:01:47) Understanding Patents and their Benefits
The purpose of patents, their duration, and their impact on inventors' rights. Discussion on how patents apply across various industries like pharmaceuticals, software, and AI.
(00:04:10) Inequities in the Patent System
Disparities within the patent system, and discussion on the lower representation of women and minorities in obtaining patents.
(00:07:15) The Innovator-Inventor Gap
Exploring the gap between authorship on scientific papers and recognition as patent inventors & potential mechanisms causing it.
(00:11:15) Impact of Patent Recognition
The significance of being listed as a patent inventor: impact on career, earnings, and professional reputation.
(00:13:33) Innovation Type with Diverse Inventorship
Insights into the potential shift in innovation focus due to diversity within inventor teams.
(00:14:54) Addressing Inequity: Policy Reforms
Challenges faced by underrepresented groups in persisting through the patent application process, suggestions for change and the impact of real-world programs to address these challenges
(00:18:37) AI's Influence and Challenges
Speculations on AI's impact on patent accessibility and equity. Challenges and potential exacerbation of disparities due to AI-generated patent claims.
(00:21:11) Conclusion
Texas Abortion Restrictions, Medicated Abortions, and Reproduction Rights in a Post-Roe US
Stanford Legal
12/21/23 • 30 min
In June, 2022 the U.S. Supreme Court delivered an historic and far reaching decision overturning Roe v. Wade and turning abortion law to the states. Less than two years on, we are seeing just how that decision is playing out as women navigate a divided country with a patchwork of reproductive rights. The recent example of Kate Cox, a Dallas-area mother of two who sought to have a medical exemption from Texas’ strict abortion laws and was forced to leave the state to receive the care she needed when her request was denied, brought the consequences of the Court’s decision to the headlines. In this episode we hear from the show’s co-host Pam Karlan, an expert in reproductive law, about the Texas case and reproductive rights in the US after Roe was overturned.
Connect:
- Episode Transcripts >>> Stanford Legal Podcast Website
- Stanford Legal Podcast >>> LinkedIn Page
- Rich Ford >>> Twitter/X
- Stanford Law School >>> Twitter/X
- Stanford Law Magazine >>> Twitter/X
Chapters:
(00:00:00) Introduction
Rich Ford introduces the episode and highlights the significant changes in abortion laws over recent years.
(00:01:08) Current Legal Context
Pam Karlan provides an overview of the legal landscape since the Dobbs case decision and summarizes the changes and confusion it has led to.
(00:05:00) Texas Abortion Controversy: Kate Cox Case
Focus on the case of Kate Cox, a woman in Texas seeking abortion due to fetal health complications. Analysis of the legal, political, and ethical implications of the verdict.
(00:10:02) Impact of Returning Abortion Laws to States
The misconception that returning abortion decisions to states would reduce controversy. Analysis of attempts to to restrict travel for abortion services.
(00:12:20) Legal Ramifications and Political Scenarios
Discussion on potential legal consequences for aiding abortion travel and comparisons with state laws regarding child-related travel. Contemplation of federal abortion bans utilizing the Commerce Clause and the potential scenarios for imposing such bans.
(00:14:48) Medical Abortions and Legal Challenges
Insights into the rise of medical abortions and the controversy surrounding the approval and distribution of drugs, and subsequent legal battles.
(00:20:20) State Politics, Abortion Laws & State Referendum Dynamics
Exploration of the shifting dynamics in state politics, including red states' stances on protecting abortion rights, and measures in California & Ohio.
(00:22:56) Shifting Political Narratives
Discussion on the evolving focus of the abortion debate, and examination of how abortion politics are playing out in national and state elections, influencing political strategies.
(00:24:59) Federal Legislation Prospects and Responsive Activism
The potential for federal legislation protecting or banning abortion rights & insights into citizen activism both aiding and impeding abortion access.
(00:28:18) Abortion in Unlikely Arenas
Examples showcasing how abortion politics infiltrate seemingly unrelated areas, affecting military promotions and governmental functionality.
11/13/23 • 3 min
After a hiatus, Stanford Legal returns to your podcast feed. Start with our first episode back, where hosts Pam Karlan and Rich Ford sit down with criminal law expert David Sklansky to unpack the numerous indictments against Donald Trump. But that's not all: our upcoming episodes will explore a range of pressing legal topics from AI to the Supreme Court’s latest decisions.
Make sure you're following Stanford Legal, so you don't miss an episode! And "hit the bell" in Spotify.
Episode Transcripts >>> Stanford Legal Podcast Website
Connect:
- Stanford Legal Podcast >>> LinkedIn Page
- Rich Ford >>> Twitter/X
- Stanford Law School >>> Twitter/X
- Stanford Law Magazine >>> Twitter/X
Show more best episodes
Show more best episodes
FAQ
How many episodes does Stanford Legal have?
Stanford Legal currently has 161 episodes available.
What topics does Stanford Legal cover?
The podcast is about News, Elections, Supreme Court, Social Media, College Admissions, Law, Ukraine, News Commentary, Podcasts, Civil Rights, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Law School and Government.
What is the most popular episode on Stanford Legal?
The episode title 'Are Frozen Embryos Children? A Discussion of the Alabama Decision on Embryo Rights and the Future of IVF Pregnancies in the US' is the most popular.
What is the average episode length on Stanford Legal?
The average episode length on Stanford Legal is 28 minutes.
How often are episodes of Stanford Legal released?
Episodes of Stanford Legal are typically released every 14 days.
When was the first episode of Stanford Legal?
The first episode of Stanford Legal was released on Dec 9, 2017.
Show more FAQ
Show more FAQ