Secular Left

Ohio’s recent legislative developments have sparked significant controversy. The state’s governor signed a "Don't Say Gay" bill into law, which not only limits discussions on LGBTQ+ topics in schools but also permits a Christian Nationalist group to remove children to bible study in the middle of the school day. Meanwhile, a federal judge ruled that using preferred pronouns constitutes a violation of the First Amendment, deepening the national debate on LGBTQ+ rights. Professor Jerry Coyne has come under fire for his use of biological arguments to justify discrimination, while in a positive turn, a Trans woman has been appointed to a city council, offering a glimmer of hope amid these challenges. These events reflect the growing cultural and legal tensions surrounding LGBTQ+ issues, free speech, and the role of religion in public education.
We start with the contentious signing of a "Don't Say Gay" bill into law by Ohio’s governor, which has drawn sharp criticism for not only silencing conversations around sexual orientation in schools, especially for younger students, but also for enabling a Christian Nationalist group to indoctrinate public school children during school hours. The bill, now formalized under House Bill 8, imposes significant restrictions on discussing sexuality and mandates that educators inform parents of any changes in a student’s wellness services, particularly concerning their gender identity. The legislation aims to erase LGBTQ+ visibility while perpetuating a culture of fear and secrecy among students questioning their identities.
A federal judge's recent decision, which declared that requiring teachers to use transgender students' preferred pronouns violates First Amendment rights, characterized such requirements as coercive. We emphasizes the chilling effect this ruling has on educators and students alike, reinforcing stigma and hostility against transgender individuals. We also critique the rationale used by the judge, criticizing the failure to recognize the basic dignity and rights of individuals as a cornerstone of this democracy.
In a more hopeful turn, we celebrate a victory for representation as Arienne Childry, a trans woman, was appointed to the city council for St. Mary’s, Ohio. This appointment marks a significant milestone as it reflects the progress being made at local levels despite the oppressive legislative environment. We underscore the importance of having representatives who genuinely embody the values of inclusion and secular humanism within governmental structures, marking Childry's presence as a beacon of hope in a state riddled with anti-LGBTQ+ sentiment.
Full Show Notes & Links Used

Send us a text

Support the show

Subscribe to our free newsletter
Check out our MerchFollow us on BlueskyFind us on Twitter(for now)
Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

We Don't Want Empty Promises, Party Manipulations, Or Politcal Bridge Burning
We look into the ongoing political landscape in Ohio, dissecting the implications of a proposed constitutional amendment aimed at curbing gerrymandering that could potentially end the Republican supermajority in the state. The Ohio Ballot Board's recent attempt to manipulate the ballot summary for this measure raises serious concerns about transparency and fairness. We examine the political maneuvering behind this effort and discuss how it fits into the larger narrative of electoral integrity.
We reflect on Senator Chuck Schumer's remarks to reporters during the 2024 Democratic National Convention. Schumer's bold assertion that voting Democrat in November will lead to significant changes in the filibuster deserves scrutiny. We explore the skepticism that surrounds these promises, given past experiences where similar assertions did not materialize into action once the Democrats had power. The question remains: can we trust the Democratic leadership to follow through on commitments that can reshape legislative processes critical to our democracy?
Then we unpack the disappointing political ad from Rep. Marcy Kaptur, a longtime House Democrat facing re-election. The ad's attempt to appeal to conservative constituents while alienating progressives highlights a troubling trend within the party. Kaptur's rhetorical decisions, particularly her invocation of "the far left," indicate a strategy that sacrifices progressive values in a bid for political survival. We analyze the implications of such messaging and question whether it will succeed in winning over voters who are fundamentally opposed to her party's principles.
Throughout the episode, we engage with the underlying themes of accountability, representation, and the challenges facing candidates in a polarized political environment. As Ohioans prepare for a pivotal election, the conversations surrounding these issues become increasingly crucial. How can we encourage a more inclusive political discourse that genuinely represents the diversity of opinions and needs within our communities?
Full Show Notes

Send us a text

Support the show

Subscribe to our free newsletter
Check out our MerchFollow us on BlueskyFind us on Twitter(for now)
Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

In this spicy episode, we give you many reasons why voting for Donald Trump in the upcoming election is not a wise choice. We look into the history of the 2024 presidential election, highlighting the lack of merit in considering Trump as a viable candidate due to his questionable character and numerous controversies during his previous presidency. We call out the absurdity in Trump's behavior, highlighting his divisive rhetoric and lack of concern for the well-being of the American people.
We look at the potential implications of a Trump presidency, drawing parallels to historical events and emphasizing the dangers of embracing divisive ideologies. We urge listeners to critically analyze the information presented to them, especially in the age of social media where misinformation can easily spread. Additionally, we touch on the importance of understanding the motives behind political posts and the responsibility of individuals to engage in meaningful conversations based on facts and context.
We then highlight the potential scenarios surrounding the upcoming election, expressing concerns about possible election interference and the need for vigilance in protecting democracy. We emphasize the importance of making informed choices and not falling prey to divisive tactics or fear-mongering strategies employed by certain political factions. Consider the long-term implications of your voting decisions and prioritize the well-being of the country and future generations by making informed and thoughtful choices at the ballot box.
Full Show Notes

Send us a text

Support the show

Subscribe to our free newsletter
Check out our MerchFollow us on BlueskyFind us on Twitter(for now)
Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

We look at the alarming trend of Republican rhetoric surrounding immigration, particularly their attempts to vilify Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio. Drawing comparisons to the divisive strategies of Ronald Reagan in the 1980s, we explore how the GOP is leveraging fear and misinformation to distract voters from their lack of substantial policy proposals.
During the debate, Trump absurdly suggested that immigrants in Springfield were resorting to eating pets—a claim that sparked ridicule from Vice President Kamala Harris and has since been debunked by local authorities and independent fact-checkers. The persistence of such lies indicates a broader strategy by Republicans to unite their base through fear-mongering and scapegoating marginalized communities. With no concrete plans for critical issues like healthcare or the economy, the GOP resorts to these gimmicks to rally support.
Republican Vivek Ramaswamy hosted a town hall event, where local residents expressed concerns about the integration of immigrants. Notably absent from this discussion were representatives from the Haitian community, which raises questions about the inclusivity of the dialogue surrounding immigration. While Ramaswamy blamed the role of federal policies in the situation, much of the conversation was steeped in fear and blame directed at the newcomers rather than seeking solutions collaboratively.
We then expose the hollow messages underpinning the campaign of Derek Merrin, a Republican candidate for Ohio’s 9th Congressional District. Marrin focuses on immigration as a key issue while neglecting to address pressing concerns like economic development and resources for existing residents. His vague promises of returning high-paying jobs to the area are juxtaposed against a history of Republican governance that has failed to deliver tangible results.
The current immigration discourse often overlooks the positive contributions of immigrants, focusing instead on exaggerated fears. This conversation serves as a reminder of the importance of dialogue grounded in facts and compassion rather than fear and misinformation.
Full Show Notes

Send us a text

Support the show

Subscribe to our free newsletter
Check out our MerchFollow us on BlueskyFind us on Twitter(for now)
Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon

In this episode, we engage with Martin Armitage, co-author of the book "Tyrant in a Top Hat," which challenges the conventional narrative surrounding President Abraham Lincoln and the Civil War. We delve into thought-provoking questions: Did Lincoln ignite a civil war unnecessarily? Are the consequences of that conflict still reverberating through our society today? And could the United States benefit from a reevaluation, perhaps even division, based on differing cultural values?
Armitage, bringing a rich background in history and political service, aims to encourage listeners to think critically about Lincoln's decision-making in 1861. His book seeks not to indoctrinate its readers with a particular viewpoint but rather to provoke discussion and self-reflection regarding historical interpretation and its implications for modern governance. We explore the historical context in which Lincoln operated, including the possibility that alternative measures could have been taken to address rising tensions rather than resorting to war.
One of the compelling arguments in the book is the exploration of Lincoln’s suspension of habeas corpus, a controversial move that prioritized national security over individual rights during a time of crisis. Armitage explains the significance of habeas corpus as a cornerstone of civil liberties, and we discuss whether Lincoln's actions set a troubling precedent for future governance.
As our conversation evolves, we also touch upon Armitage's proposals for how modern-day America, which he describes as a "fractured nation," might navigate its profound ideological divides. He suggests the potential for regions within the U.S. to separate based on cultural lines, advocating for a new political structure that emphasizes local governance while maintaining overarching national protections for rights. While these ideas might seem radical, they stem from a desire to find practical solutions to contemporary issues of polarization and disenfranchisement.
Throughout the episode, listeners are invited to engage with these challenging concepts and to reflect on what they mean for our understanding of modern democracy. At the end of the interview, Doug provides his own perspective, critiquing Armitage’s conclusions while acknowledging the value of his inquiries. Doug emphasizes the importance of spirited debate and the necessity for a strong central government dedicated to protecting universal rights for all citizens, expressing his belief that the fight for equality and civil liberties must continue unabated.

Full Show Notes and Links

Send us a text

Support the show

Subscribe to our free newsletter
Check out our MerchFollow us on BlueskyFind us on Twitter(for now)
Find us on InstagramFind us on Counter SocialFind us on Mastadon