Log in

goodpods headphones icon

To access all our features

Open the Goodpods app
Close icon
headphones
Philosophical Trials

Philosophical Trials

Tedy Nenu

My name is Tedy Nenu and I am the host of the 'Philosophical Trials' podcast. This is a place where philosophers, mathematicians, linguists and other bright individuals share with us fascinating aspects of their work. Whether you are interested in the nature of mathematical reality or how language works, there will be an episode here that caters to your interests.
bookmark
Share icon

All episodes

Best episodes

Seasons

Top 10 Philosophical Trials Episodes

Goodpods has curated a list of the 10 best Philosophical Trials episodes, ranked by the number of listens and likes each episode have garnered from our listeners. If you are listening to Philosophical Trials for the first time, there's no better place to start than with one of these standout episodes. If you are a fan of the show, vote for your favorite Philosophical Trials episode by adding your comments to the episode page.

Joel David Hamkins is an American Mathematician who is currently Professor of Logic at the University of Oxford. He is well known for his important contributions in the fields of Mathematical Logic, Set Theory and Philosophy of Mathematics. Moreover, he is very popular in the mathematical community for being the highest rated user on MathOverflow.
Outline of the conversation:
00:00 Podcast Introduction
00:50 MathOverflow and books in progress
04:08 Mathphobia
05:58 What is mathematics and what sets it apart?
08:06 Is mathematics invented or discovered (more at 54:28)
09:24 How is it the case that Mathematics can be applied so successfully to the physical world?
12:37 Infinity in Mathematics
16:58 Cantor's Theorem: the real numbers cannot be enumerated
24:22 Russell's Paradox and the Cumulative Hierarchy of Sets
29:20 Hilbert's Program and Godel's Results
35:05 The First Incompleteness Theorem, formal and informal proofs and the connection between mathematical truths and mathematical proofs
40:50 Computer Assisted Proofs and mathematical insight
44:11 Do automated proofs kill the artistic side of Mathematics?
48:50 Infinite Time Turing Machines can settle Goldbach's Conjecture or the Riemann Hypothesis
54:28 Nonstandard models of arithmetic: different conceptions of the natural numbers
1:00:02 The Continuum Hypothesis and related undecidable questions, the Set-Theoretic Multiverse and the quest for new axioms
1:10:31 Minds and computers: Sir Roger Penrose's argument concerning consciousness
Twitter: https://twitter.com/tedynenu

bookmark
plus icon
share episode

Professor Robert Sapolsky is a Professor of Biology, Neurology, and Surgery at Stanford University. He is the author of multiple books, including A Primate’s Memoir, Why Zebras Don’t Get Ulcers, Behave, and Determined. Professor Kevin Mitchell is a Professor of Genetics and Neuroscience at Trinity College Dublin, whose research concerns the relationship between the wiring of the brain and the human faculties. His books include Innate and Free Agents. Today’s debate was about whether the empirical literature in the biological sciences allows us to make progress on the free will debate.
Conversation Outline:
00:00 Introduction
02:28 Opening Statement: Kevin Mitchell
16:26 Opening Statement: Robert Sapolsky
27:32 First Round of Questioning
45:56 Second Round of Questioning
1:04:56 How can we make evolutionary sense of illusory agency?
1:06:13 How can we make sense of our accomplishments if we have no free will?
1:08:21 Comparisons with Dennett and Hofstadter
1:12:28 Closing thoughts
Enjoy!
https://www.twitter.com/tedynenu
https://www.instagram.com/tedynenu

bookmark
plus icon
share episode

Dr Vicky Neale is the Whitehead Lecturer at the Mathematical Institute and Balliol College at the University of Oxford. She is also a Supernumerary Fellow at Balliol and the author of two great books aimed at general audiences, namely ‘Closing the Gap’ and ‘Why Study Mathematics?’.
Vicky Neale is a great communicator of Mathematics. She was given an MPLS Teaching Award in 2016 and she also won an award for being the Most Acclaimed Lecturer in MPLS in the student-led Oxford University Student Union Teaching Awards 2015.
Follow her on Twitter: @VickyMaths1729
For some clear proofs of a selection of mathematical theorems, check out her YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBGhXXBCAzbzQV65JZoGhjw and her blog https://theoremoftheweek.wordpress.com/
Conversation Outline:
00:00 Guest Introduction
01:05 Vicky’s mathematical background
04:13 Motivations for writing a book on reasons to study mathematics
07:11 Are good reasons for studying Mathematics timeless? Would this book have more or less the same contents, had it been written many years ago?
10:10 Is the job of pure mathematicians safe from AI developments?
12:13 What are the benefits (for the non-mathematician) of knowing about mathematical notions such as integrals, derivatives, matrices and so on?
15:39 Are some people more mathematically talented than others?
18:45 Does the discussion of talent change when we are talking about research-level Mathematics? Douglas Hofstadter’s experience.
22:45 Aesthetics of Mathematics
25:00 Is Number Theory more beautiful than other mathematical subfields?
25:52 A mathematician’s view of the metaphysics of numbers
27:58 Fermat’s Last Theorem, Andrew Wiles and finding meaning in Mathematics
29:26 FLT and the Twin Prime Conjecture
32:27 Should graduate students tackle famous open problems?
33:41 Closing the Gap: significant progress towards solving the Twin Prime Conjecture
35:10 Polymath: an example of collaborative Mathematics
39:40 Do we have reasons to believe that the Twin Prime Conjecture is actually true?
Enjoy!
Apple Podcasts:
https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/philosophical-trials/id1513707135
Spotify:
https://open.spotify.com/show/3Sz88leU8tmeKe3MAZ9i10
Google Podcasts:
https://podcasts.google.com/?q=philosophical%20trials
Instagram:
https://www.instagram.com/tedynenu/

bookmark
plus icon
share episode

Professor Kai von Fintel is a world-leading linguist (Section Head at MIT) who is well known for his contributions to Semantics, an academic fields which sits at the intersection of many disciplines which is typically concerned with the meaning of linguistic expressions. He is the co-founder of the open access journal Semantics & Pragmatics. You can find more about his work on his website: https://www.kaivonfintel.org
Conversation Outline:
00:00 Introduction
00:18 What is special about language?
03:31 How did we (as a species) get linguistic abilities?
05:24 What do people who work in Semantics do?
09:19 How can babies pick up language?
15:07 What is the meaning of words? Aren’t they just dictionary entries?
19:03 On idiolects
27:00 The meanings of sentences
33:43 What are possible worlds? Are they the same as the many-worlds of quantum theory?
39:52 Differences between ‘school’ grammar, syntax and formal logic
49:07 What is the meaning of ‘if’?
01:04:54 Does the research of Semanticists impact the field of Computational Linguistics?
01:07:39 The relationship between thought and language
Twitter:
https://twitter.com/tedynenu
Apple Podcasts:
https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/philosophical-trials/id1513707135
Spotify:
https://open.spotify.com/show/3Sz88leU8tmeKe3MAZ9i10
Google Podcasts:
https://podcasts.google.com/?q=philosophical%20trials
Instagram:
https://www.instagram.com/tedynenu/

bookmark
plus icon
share episode

Professor A.C. Grayling is one of the most prolific philosophers and public intellectuals. He is a Fellow of the Royal Society of Arts, the Master of the New College of the Humanities and a Supernumerary Fellow of St. Anne’s College, Oxford. He made important contributions to Analytic Philosophy, primarily in Epistemology, Metaphysics and Philosophical Logic. Prof. Grayling wrote more than 40 books, including The God Argument, The History of Philosophy and The Frontiers of Knowledge.
Conversation Outline:
00:00 Introduction
00:46 How did you get into Philosophy?
03:23 What was your PhD Thesis on? Thoughts on Skepticism and Knowledge
08:11 What are the interesting epistemological advancements (and problems) of our time?
12:27 On interdisciplinarity and higher education
15:10 Different models of education and advice for high-school students that want to go to university
19:04 STEM, Arts and public perception
21:45 Traditional epistemology and why certainty and absolute truth are not essential
27:44 Is the situation different for Mathematics? What about Theology?
35:02 Why do people take Religion to be a source of certain truths?
41:00 New Atheism
46:50 Discussing some of the main theistic arguments
59:30 God and Morality
Enjoy!
Instagram:
https://www.instagram.com/tedynenu/
Twitter:
https://twitter.com/tedynenu
Apple Podcasts:
https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/philosophical-trials/id1513707135
Spotify:
https://open.spotify.com/show/3Sz88leU8tmeKe3MAZ9i10
Google Podcasts:
https://podcasts.google.com/search/philosophical%20trials

bookmark
plus icon
share episode

Professor William Lane Craig is a world-renowned theologian and philosopher of religion. He authored dozens of books on these topics, including The Kalām Cosmological Argument (1979), God Over All (2016), The Atonement (2018), In Quest of the Historical Adam (2021) and many others. Besides his academic scholarship, Professor Craig is internationally known for his debates with various academic and popular atheists such as Christopher Hitchens, Lawrence Krauss, Sam Harris, Peter Millican, Arif Ahmed and many others.
You can find more details about Prof. Craig’s works on his public website: https://www.reasonablefaith.org/
Conversation Outline:
00:00 Guest Introduction
01:19 William Lane Craig’s Debating Career
03:03 Best opponent
05:26 How is the winner usually determined?
06:15 Having a PhD in both Theology and Philosophy
07:56 Who has the burden of proof: theists or atheists?
10:30 Species of atheism
15:50 Theology versus Philosophy of Religion
20:14 Why is theism not so popular amongst mainstream philosophers?
22:40 What is the view that you defend?
24:26 Do arguments for the existence of God distract attention from God?
26:40 What about divine hiddenness?
30:48 The Kalam Cosmological Argument
32:58 Why does the Cosmological Argument prove that a personal creator?
34:38 Why does the Cosmological Argument point towards an unembodied mind?
42:42 The universe began to exist: an argument based on Infinity
45:55 Hilbert’s Hotel
51:23 Proving that the Christian God exists after proving that the God of the Philosophers exists
Enjoy!
You can find me here:
Instagram:
https://www.instagram.com/tedynenu/
Apple Podcasts:
https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/philosophical-trials/id1513707135
Spotify:
https://open.spotify.com/show/3Sz88leU8tmeKe3MAZ9i10
Google Podcasts:
https://podcasts.google.com/?q=philosophical%20trials

bookmark
plus icon
share episode

Professor Peter Koellner is a leading Logician and Philosopher based at Harvard University. He has made very important contributions to areas surrounding Mathematical Logic and today he was kind enough to join me for a discussion on Penrose's arguments against the prospects of mechanizing the mind (given Kurt Gödel's work on Incompleteness).
Note: I am sorry for the occasional internet connection problems. I hope the relevant parts can still be understood!
Conversation Outline:
00:00 What are the Incompleteness Theorems?
01:59 Why are Gödel’s results relevant for discussions concerning the mind?
03:28 Connections between Turing Machines and Formal Systems
04:20 When we talk about whether the mind can be mechanized or not, what do we mean?
06:56 Should Cognitive Scientists (or Philosophers of Mind) be interested in this discussion?
09:45 The First Generation of Arguments against The Prospects of Mechanizing the Mind
19:52 Three Versions of The Mechanistic Thesis
21:55 What makes Penrose’s New Argument harder to evaluate in theory EA+T?
22:56 Penrose’s Formulation of The Argument (Quote from his Book)
27:49 What are the explicit assumptions behind Penrose’s New Argument?
32:14 What are the indeterminate statements that Penrose uses in the argument?
36:10 Do you think we’ll ever have an adequate formal theory of type-free truth which settles Gödel’s First Disjunct (the one targeted by Penrose)?
37:18 Do you think your opponent would accept bringing the key notions of relative provability, absolute provability and truth in the setting of effectively formalized theories?
42:25 Why do you think Penrose does not abandon his New Argument, despite resistance from mathematical logicians?
44:35 Unlike Lucas or Penrose, some authors such as Hofstadter use Gödel’s results to illuminate the workings of the mind. Do you think the Incompleteness Theorems have anything worthwhile to say here?
Enjoy!
Apple Podcasts:
https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/philosophical-trials/id1513707135
Spotify:
https://open.spotify.com/show/3Sz88leU8tmeKe3MAZ9i10
Google Podcasts:
https://podcasts.google.com/?q=philosophical%20trials
Instagram:
https://www.instagram.com/tedynenu/

bookmark
plus icon
share episode

Dr Sara L. Uckelman is an Assistant Professor of Philosophy at the University of Durham. She earned her PhD in Logic at the University of Amsterdam and her research interests cover many interesting areas including Medieval Logic, Onomastics, Philosophy of Fiction (among others). Today she kindly joined me for a fun discussion on many logic-related topics: I hope you’ll enjoy it!
Conversation Outline:
00:00 Introduction
01:43 University teaching during the pandemic
04:15 “What is Logic?” YouTube series
06:00 So, what is Logic?
09:18 Should all University undergraduates have some logical training?
13:50 Some History of Logic
16:35 What was missing from Aristotle’s Logic?
20:32 How was Logic being taught back then?
24:16 Research in Medieval Logic
27:10 Women in the History of Logic
32:03 Onomastics
37:34 Does studying Logic improve one’s life?
45:35 Book recommendations
Enjoy!

bookmark
plus icon
share episode
Philosophical Trials - Timothy Williamson on Relativism and Vagueness | Episode 8
play

07/29/20 • 70 min

Professor Timothy Williamson is one of the most important philosophers alive. He is the Wykeham Professor of Logic at the University of Oxford, a position that he has been holding since 2000. His groundbreaking work in the areas of philosophical logic, philosophy of language, epistemology and metaphysics has shaped many of the contemporary debates. Today I’m joined by him to discuss Relativism about Truth and the Epistemic account of Vagueness. Enjoy!
Conversation outline:
00:00 Introduction: What is Philosophy?
03:11 Can Philosophy help you have a better life?
06:47 What’s the story behind your book “Tetralogue”? A discussion on relativism about truth
12:44 Relativism about matters of taste
20:21 Moral relativism
29:47 Tips for finding out the truth about various issues
35:34 Vagueness and Classical Logic
48:20 Sharp cut-offs
52:40 Epistemicism says that you cannot know these cut-offs: why is that?
56:59 Baldness is not really a function of the number of hairs. Does your account apply to situations which are “non-discrete” situations?
01:01:47 How can a colour predicate (e.g. “_ is red”) latch on to an objective property out there in the world when people may have different perceptions?
01:05:37 If the properties expressed by predicates are person independent, wouldn’t this change the ramifications and implications of the epistemic view?
Enjoy!
Apple Podcasts:
https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/philosophical-trials/id1513707135
Spotify:
https://open.spotify.com/show/3Sz88leU8tmeKe3MAZ9i10
Google Podcasts:
https://podcasts.google.com/?q=philosophical%20trials
Instagram:
https://www.instagram.com/tedynenu/

bookmark
plus icon
share episode

Thomas Cormen is a world-renowned Computer Scientist, famous for co-writing the indispensable 'Introduction to Algorithms' textbook. He is currently a professor at Dartmouth College and former Chairman of the Dartmouth College Department of Computer Science. In 2013 he wrote a wonderful algorithmic book aimed at nonexperts which is entitled 'Algorithms Unlocked'. Professor Cormen also is well-known online for being Top Writer on Quora on numerous years, most recently in 2018. He is a great communicator of Computer Science and I hope you will enjoy the following conversation!
00:00 Intro

00:16 The story of CLRS plus remarks on the 4th edition

11:39 Relationships between Competitive Programming, Software Engineering and academic Computer Science

13:16 What makes an algorithm beautiful?

16:33 Thoughts on P=NP

19:32 Algorithmic efficiency and Artificial General Intelligence

24:12 Will progress in fields such as Deep Learning make the study of classical algorithms obsolete?

27:37 Algorithms Unlocked

33:07 What should the average lay person know about algorithms?

37:46 Advice for students, both graduates and undergraduates
Enjoy!
Twitter

Apple Podcasts

Spotify

Google Podcasts

YouTube

Instagram

bookmark
plus icon
share episode

Show more best episodes

Toggle view more icon

FAQ

How many episodes does Philosophical Trials have?

Philosophical Trials currently has 15 episodes available.

What topics does Philosophical Trials cover?

The podcast is about Podcasts and Science.

What is the most popular episode on Philosophical Trials?

The episode title 'A.C. Grayling on Atheism and The Frontiers of Knowledge | Episode 13' is the most popular.

What is the average episode length on Philosophical Trials?

The average episode length on Philosophical Trials is 59 minutes.

How often are episodes of Philosophical Trials released?

Episodes of Philosophical Trials are typically released every 34 days, 22 hours.

When was the first episode of Philosophical Trials?

The first episode of Philosophical Trials was released on May 16, 2020.

Show more FAQ

Toggle view more icon

Comments