Log in

goodpods headphones icon

To access all our features

Open the Goodpods app
Close icon
headphones
PeerView Oncology & Hematology CME/CNE/CPE Audio Podcast

PeerView Oncology & Hematology CME/CNE/CPE Audio Podcast

PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education

PeerView (PVI) is a leading provider of high-quality, innovative continuing education (CME/CE/CPE and MOC) for clinicians and their interprofessional teams. Combining evidence-based medicine and instructional expertise, PeerView activities improve the knowledge, skills, and strategies that support clinical performance and patient outcomes. PeerView makes its educational programming and expert-led presentations and symposia available through its network of popular podcast channels to support specific specialties and conditions. Each episode includes a link to request CME/CE credit for participation. PeerView is solely responsible for the selection of topics, the preparation of editorial content, and the distribution of all materials it publishes.
bookmark
Share icon

All episodes

Best episodes

Top 10 PeerView Oncology & Hematology CME/CNE/CPE Audio Podcast Episodes

Goodpods has curated a list of the 10 best PeerView Oncology & Hematology CME/CNE/CPE Audio Podcast episodes, ranked by the number of listens and likes each episode have garnered from our listeners. If you are listening to PeerView Oncology & Hematology CME/CNE/CPE Audio Podcast for the first time, there's no better place to start than with one of these standout episodes. If you are a fan of the show, vote for your favorite PeerView Oncology & Hematology CME/CNE/CPE Audio Podcast episode by adding your comments to the episode page.

This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.

For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/MQE865. CME credit will be available until December 31, 2024.

Achieving Next-Level Care in AML: Conversations on Targeted Platforms, Emerging Immunotherapies, and Implications for Precision Medicine

Penn State College of Medicine is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians.

This activity is developed in collaboration with our educational partners, PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, and the HealthTree Foundation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Support
This activity is supported by independent educational grants from AbbVie, Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Astellas, Kura Oncology, Inc., and Syndax.

Disclosures
Sergio A. Giralt, MD, FACP, has a financial interest/relationship or affiliation in the form of:
Consultant and/or Advisor for Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Amgen Inc.; Celgene Corporation; Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Johnson & Johnson, Inc.; Kite Pharma; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Sanofi; and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited.
Grant/Research Support from Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Amgen Inc.; Celgene Corporation; Johnson & Johnson, Inc.; Miltenyi Biotec; Sanofi; and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited.

Selina Luger, MD, FRCPC, has a financial interest/relationship or affiliation in the form of:
Consultant and/or Advisor for AbbVie; Amgen Inc.; Bristol Myers Squibb; and Marker Therapeutics, Inc.
Grant/Research Support from Onconova Therapeutics, Inc.
Speaker for Amgen Inc.

Pinkal Desai, MD, MPH, has a financial interest/relationship or affiliation in the form of:
Consultant and/or Advisor for AbbVie; Bristol Myers Squibb; Kura Oncology, Inc.; Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and Servier Laboratories.

Ghayas Issa, MD, has a financial interest/relationship or affiliation in the form of:
Consultant and/or Advisor for Kura Oncology, Inc. and Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.
Grant/Research Support from Cullinan Oncology, Inc; Kura Oncology, Inc.; Merck & Co., Inc.; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; and Syndax.

Tapan Kadia, MD, has a financial interest/relationship or affiliation in the form of:
Consultant and/or Advisor for AbbVie; Agios Pharmaceuticals Inc.; Daiichi Sankyo Inc.; Genentech, Inc.; Genzyme Corporation; Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Liberum Capital Limited; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Pfizer; PinotBio, Inc.; Pulmotect, Inc.; Sanofi; Servier Laboratories.
Grant/Research Support from AbbVie; Amgen Inc.; Ascentage Pharma Group; Astellas Pharma US, Inc.; Astex Pharmaceuticals; AstraZeneca; Bristol Myers Squibb; Celgene Corporation; Cellenkos Inc.; Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Delta-Fly Pharma, Inc.; Genentech, Inc.; GenFleet Therapeutics; GlycoMimetics; Iterion Therapeutics; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Pfizer; Pulmotect, Inc.; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.; and SELLAS Life Sciences Group. Grant/Research Support Paid to Institution.
Speakers Bureau participant with Biologix USA, Inc.; CURE Pharmaceutical; and Hikma Pharmaceuticals.
Honorarium from Genzyme Corporation.

Other PVI staff who may potentially review content for this activity have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
Penn State College of Medicine staff and faculty involved in the development and review of this activity have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
All of the relevant financial relationships listed for these individuals have been mitigated.

bookmark
plus icon
share episode
This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.

For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/AAPA information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/XJV865. CME/MOC/AAPA credit will be available until December 28, 2024.

Pioneering Precision Medicine in Bladder Cancer: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Personalizing Patient Care

In support of improving patient care, this activity has been planned and implemented by PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, and Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network. PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.

Support
This activity is supported by independent educational grants from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen Biotech, Inc., administered by Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, and Merck & Co., Inc.

Disclosure Policy
All relevant conflicts of interest have been mitigated prior to the commencement of the activity.

Faculty/Planner Disclosures
Chair/Planner
Neal D. Shore, MD, FACS, has a financial interest/relationship or affiliation in the form of:
Consultant and/or Advisor for AbbVie; Accord Healthcare; Alessa Therapeutics; Amgen Inc.; Arquer Diagnostics; Asieris Pharmaceuticals; Astellas Pharma Inc.; AstraZeneca; Aurora Biosciences; Bayer Corporation; BioProtect Ltd.; Boston Scientific Corporation; Bristol Myers Squibb; CG Oncology; Clarity Pharmaceuticals Ltd; Dendreon Pharmaceuticals LLC; Exact Images; Ferring Pharmaceuticals; FIZE Medical; Foundation Medicine, Inc.; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd./Genentech Inc.; GenesisCare; ImmunityBio; Incyte Corporation; Invitae Corporation; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Lantheus; Lilly; MDX; Merck & Co., Inc.; Minomic International Ltd; Myovant Sciences Ltd; Myriad Genetics, Inc.; Nonagen Bioscience; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation; Pacific Edge; Palette Life Sciences, Inc.; Pfizer; Photocure; PlatformQ; ProFound Therapeutics; Promaxo; Propella Therapeutics, Inc.; Protara Therapeutics Inc.; Sanofi/Genzyme; Specialty Networks; Telix Pharmaceuticals; Tolmar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and UroGen Pharma, Inc.

Faculty/Planner
Sia Daneshmand, MD, has a financial interest/relationship or affiliation in the form of:
Consultant and/or Advisor for Ferring Pharmaceuticals; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Pacific Edge; Pfizer; Photocure; Protara Therapeutics, Inc.; Sesen Bio (Carisma Therapeutics); TARIS Biomedical; and UroGen.
Grant/Research Support from Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Faculty/Planner
Guru P. Sonpavde, MD, has a financial interest/relationship or affiliation in the form of:
Consultant and/or Advisor for AstraZeneca; Bicycle Therapeutics; Bristol Myers Squibb; EMD Serono Inc.; Ellipses Pharma; Exelixis, Inc.; G1 Therapeutics, Inc.; Genentech, Inc.; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; IMV Inc.; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Lilly/Loxo Oncology, Inc.; Lucence Health Inc.; Merck & Co., Inc.; Pfizer; PRECISCA; Sanofi; Scholar Rock; Seattle Genetics (Seagen Inc.)/Astellas Pharma Inc.; Servier Laboratories; SUBA THERAPEUTICS, INC.; Syapse; Syncorp Health; Tempus; and Vial.
Grant/Research Support from AstraZeneca; Bristol Myers Squibb; EMD Serono Inc.; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Helsinn Healthcare SA; Jazz Pharmaceuticals; Lucence; and Sanofi. Research support to institution.
Speaker for AVEO Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Bayer Corporation; BIO Brazilian Information Oncology; Exelixis, Inc.; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Natera, Inc.; OLE Forum (Mexico); and Seagen Inc.

Planning Committee and Reviewer Disclosures
Planners, independent reviewers, and staff of PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, do not have any relevant financial relationships related to this CE activity unless listed below.

bookmark
plus icon
share episode
Go online to PeerView.com/XEJ860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Multiple new drug approvals and positive clinical trial outcomes have set the stage for the wider integration of novel therapeutics across the treatment spectrum of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). These developments have established multiple targeted and immunotherapy agents as options in advanced disease while also mapping potential future applications in intermediate stage HCC and beyond. Future care will depend on the successful integration of newer tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-based approaches with established and emerging immune checkpoint inhibitors across patient populations and lines of therapy. This PeerView “How I Think, How I Treat” activity, based on a symposium held during the 2019 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting in Chicago, offers an inside look at how experts translate important new data and navigate the current HCC landscape in order to provide the most benefit for their patients. This activity also features important insights on how to utilize newly approved TKIs and checkpoint inhibitors across disease and treatment settings, as well as provides expert thoughts on the next wave of emerging solutions that leverage the power of novel therapies across the continuum of HCC. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Summarize emerging clinical evidence on the use of novel systemic treatments, including targeted and immunotherapeutic agents, in a range of HCC treatment settings and populations, Apply recent safety and efficacy data on targeted therapies into clinical practice to enhance aspects of HCC care, including treatment sequencing and managing treatment-related adverse events, Integrate immunotherapeutic strategies for the management of patients with advanced HCC, including through optimal treatment selection and via management of immune-related adverse events, Identify innovative treatment strategies currently being assessed in clinical trials across the spectrum of HCC, such as immunotherapy combinations, combinations of novel agents with locoregional therapies, and early transition to systemic treatment, among others.
bookmark
plus icon
share episode
Go online to PeerView.com/MHD860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. How have the best practices for multidisciplinary management of patients with stage I-III lung cancer changed now that adjuvant EGFR-targeted therapy has become the new standard of care in resected early-stage EGFR-mutated NSCLC, and what are the implications for thoracic surgeons and other key members of the lung cancer care team? This PeerView Live Candid Conversations & Clinical Consults, based on a recent web broadcast, answers these and other burning questions. Experts in thoracic surgery and medical oncology come together to discuss recent advances, as well as provide practical, case-based guidance on the importance of biomarker testing in early-stage settings. In addition, they provide direction on how to determine which patients are appropriate candidates for adjuvant EGFR-targeted therapy, if adjuvant chemotherapy is still needed, which considerations should be discussed with patients, and how thoracic surgeons, medical oncologists, pathologists, and other relevant specialists can effectively work together to determine the best multimodal treatment approach for each patient with stage I-III NSCLC. Upon completion of this CE activity, participants will be able to: Discuss the role of EGFR mutations in NSCLC, the importance of identifying patients with EGFR mutations in earlier disease settings, and the role of thoracic surgeons in biomarker testing and treatment selection in the era of precision oncology, Optimize sample collection and EGFR testing in early-stage NSCLC to identify patients with EGFR mutations who might benefit from EGFR-targeted therapy, Apply the latest evidence and guidelines on EGFR-targeted therapies to select optimal therapy for patients with early-stage EGFR-mutated NSCLC, Implement multidisciplinary strategies and shared decision-making to optimize biomarker testing and safely integrate adjuvant EGFR-targeted therapy into multimodal treatment plans for eligible patients with early-stage NSCLC in clinical practice or through clinical trial enrollment.
bookmark
plus icon
share episode
Go online to PeerView.com/DRW860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Do you know the best practices for integrating chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy into the management of patients with hematologic malignancies? Within the past few years, the indications for CAR-T therapy in leukemic and lymphoid malignancies have expanded significantly and now include acute lymphoblastic leukemia and multiple types of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. These advances, driven by the use of CD19-directed cell therapy constructs, have spurred numerous ongoing investigations of existing CAR-T therapies in additional CD19-expressing leukemias and lymphomas (eg, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, small lymphocytic lymphoma). Unfortunately, many hematology-oncology and bone marrow transplant BMT professionals have not adapted their practice to reflect the reality of cellular therapy in 2022—from the availability of new constructs with recent regulatory approvals to the management of practical considerations, such as referrals to specialized centers, appropriate follow-up, and toxicity management. This video-based activity from PeerView will deliver expert guidance on the latest safety and efficacy data regarding the use of CAR-T therapy in a variety of settings. The panelists will draw on personal anecdotes and intra-institutional experiences to illustrate best practices for effectively incorporating cellular therapies into treatment plans while addressing practicalities of care, including enrollment of eligible patients in clinical trials testing the next steps with CAR-T therapy. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Identify patients with leukemia or lymphoma who are eligible for and may benefit from CAR-T therapy based on current indications, clinical evidence, guideline recommendations, and clinical trial opportunities, Implement best practices for integrating CAR-T therapy into the care of patients with leukemia or lymphoma, including referral to specialized treatment centers, clinical trial enrollment, and provision of post-treatment follow-up care, Utilize appropriate AE management strategies for patients with relapsed/refractory leukemia or lymphoma who are experiencing toxicity while receiving CAR-T therapy, including cytokine release syndrome or neurotoxicity.
bookmark
plus icon
share episode
Go online to PeerView.com/JBG860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. In this PeerView webcast, an expert panel consisting of a hematologist-oncologist, pharmacist, oncology nurse, and ophthalmologist use a “center of excellence” model to illustrate how the real-world, intra-institutional management of challenging multiple myeloma (MM) cases has changed in the wake of advances based on CD38 and BCMA-targeting antibody options. This unique "Seminars and Tumor Board” video will provide a window into how an interprofessional team works together to select antibody-based treatment, address dose optimization, and manage adverse events to ultimately improve care for their patients with MM. Upon completion of this accredited CE activity, participants should be better able to: Summarize current evidence about the use of novel antibody platforms targeting CD38 and BCMA in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), including in heavily pretreated disease, Integrate antibody-based therapies into team treatment plans for the management of patients with RRMM, Develop team-based strategies addressing practical aspects of antibody therapy in RRMM, including issues related to dosing/scheduling, unique safety considerations such as neutropenia, infection, and ocular toxicity, and patient and staff education on drug safety/delivery.
bookmark
plus icon
share episode
Go online to PeerView.com/PPF860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Central nervous system (CNS) metastases occur commonly in patients with lung cancer, and those patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are particularly prone to their development. Treatment of brain metastases is challenging, and there are varied perspectives among different specialists about the best approach—if, when, and how to use local therapies, systemic therapies, or different treatment modalities in combination or sequence, etc. Clinical trials are underway to try to answer some of these critical questions about which treatment strategies yield the best results for these patients. This PeerView Live MasterClass and Practicum on-demand educational activity features a panel of multidisciplinary experts in EGFR-mutant lung cancer and CNS metastases who discuss the evolving evidence, clinical challenges, and practicalities of patient care. Real cases are debated from multiple perspectives, with an emphasis on information and guidance relevant for radiation oncologists. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Describe molecular pathways that drive malignancy in lung cancer and the oncogenic activation of tyrosine kinases, such as mutations in EGFR, and the epidemiology and presentation of CNS metastases in EGFR-mutant lung cancer, Discuss the mechanisms of action, characteristics, and safety/efficacy profiles of the various EGFR TKIs available for the treatment of EGFR-mutant NSCLC throughout the continuum of advanced disease, including in patients with CNS metastases, Summarize the efficacy and safety data of available and emerging treatment strategies used in the management of brain or leptomeningeal metastases in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC, including the use of local therapies such as radiation, systemic therapies such as EGFR TKIs, and sequential/combination treatment approaches, Implement individualized treatment plans for patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancer with CNS metastases, including in the context of clinical practice or clinical trials, based on the latest evidence, recommendations, and effective multidisciplinary collaboration and coordination of care
bookmark
plus icon
share episode
Go online to PeerView.com/UJT860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Cancer immunotherapies are demonstrating remarkable clinical activity in an increasing number of malignancies, and as the immunotherapy arsenal has continued to expand, it has become clear that reliable biomarkers are needed to guide clinical decisions regarding treatment selection and identification of patients who are most likely to benefit from specific agents or immune-based combinations. A number of proven and putative biomarkers have been and continue to be evaluated, including PD-L1 expression, MSI/MMR, TMB, and others. Testing for these biomarkers has significant implications for clinical practice. This activity provides participating professionals with updates on current and emerging immunotherapies and biomarkers as well as practical guidance for immuno-oncology biomarker testing in pathology practice. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Describe the mechanistic underpinnings and current evidence supporting the use of current and emerging cancer immunotherapies, including single-agent and combination approaches, across a spectrum of different malignancies, including thoracic, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, dermatologic, and other cancers, Evaluate the rationale for use and current/emerging roles of established and new cancer immunotherapy biomarkers (including PD-L1, MSI/MMR, TMB, LAG-3, and composite biomarkers) as predictors of benefit from cancer immunotherapies to guide precision treatment decisions, Discuss the practical aspects of immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation, including benefits/limitations of different testing methodologies/platforms/assays, cut-points, and other nuances, Establish best practices for cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing in community and academic settings based on the latest evidence and recommendations, Implement effective strategies for interdisciplinary collaboration and coordination among pathologists, oncologists, and other key professionals regarding cancer biomarker testing and interpretation of results to guide clinical decisions in the precision immuno-oncology era
bookmark
plus icon
share episode
Go online to PeerView.com/JKS860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. The therapeutic landscape of bladder cancer has undergone a significant transformation with the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors to the treatment armamentarium. In addition, the research on actionable targets has led to regulatory approval of the FGFR-targeted therapy, erdafitinib, for FGFR mutation–positive bladder tumors, as well as the antibody–drug conjugates enfortumab vedotin and sacituzumab govitecan. Further, novel bladder preservation opportunities and important combination approaches expand the therapeutic capacity across the disease spectrum available to patients with bladder cancer. In this PeerView activity, developed in collaboration with the Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network, a panel of leading bladder cancer experts will pair important analyses of the latest evidence on a new generation of therapeutics with practical insights that can be used to guide therapeutic decision-making in the clinic. This CME/MOC-certified activity highlights strategies for optimal care of patients with bladder cancer in light of current evidence on and indications for use of immune, targeted, and antibody-based therapies and guidance on safely integrating these agents into treatment plans. Upon completion of this CE activity, participants will be able to: Incorporate the latest clinical evidence, describe the current therapeutic roles and mechanistic rationales of novel systemic therapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, targeted therapies, and antibody–drug conjugates, across bladder cancer settings and patient populations (eg, localized or metastatic), Develop personalized treatment plans for patients with localized or metastatic bladder cancer that incorporate novel agents, updated guideline recommendations, and patient-, disease-, and treatment-specific factors, Employ evidence-based, collaborative strategies to mitigate and manage treatment-related AEs in patients receiving novel systemic therapies for bladder cancer.
bookmark
plus icon
share episode
This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.

For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/BWR865. CME/MOC credit will be available until December 31, 2024.

Exploring Unmarked Territory in MDS: Taking Command and Enhancing Care With Team-Based Diagnosis and Treatment

Penn State College of Medicine is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians.

This activity is developed in collaboration with our educational partner, PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education.

Support
This activity is supported through educational grants from Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bristol Myers Squibb, Geron, Karyopharm Therapeutics, and Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.

Disclosures
María Díez Campelo, MD, PhD, has a financial interest/relationship or affiliation in the form of:
Consultant and/or Advisor for Agios Pharmaceuticals Inc.; Blueprint Medicines; Bristol Myers Squibb; GlaxoSmithKline; Hemavant Sciences; Novartis; and Syros Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Rory M. Shallis, MD, has a financial interest/relationship or affiliation in the form of:
Consultant and/or Advisor for Bristol Myers Squibb; Curio Bioscience; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and Servier Pharmaceuticals.

Aditi Shastri, MD, has a financial interest/relationship or affiliation in the form of:
Consultant and/or Advisor for Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Kymera Therapeutics; and Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Grant/Research Support from Kymera Therapeutics.

Other PVI staff who may potentially review content for this activity have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
Penn State College of Medicine staff and faculty involved in the development and review of this activity have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
All of the relevant financial relationships listed for these individuals have been mitigated.

bookmark
plus icon
share episode

Show more best episodes

Toggle view more icon

FAQ

How many episodes does PeerView Oncology & Hematology CME/CNE/CPE Audio Podcast have?

PeerView Oncology & Hematology CME/CNE/CPE Audio Podcast currently has 716 episodes available.

What topics does PeerView Oncology & Hematology CME/CNE/CPE Audio Podcast cover?

The podcast is about Health & Fitness, Cme, Medicine, Podcasts, Science, Oncology and Medical Education.

What is the most popular episode on PeerView Oncology & Hematology CME/CNE/CPE Audio Podcast?

The episode title 'Evan J. Lipson, MD - Urgent Care of Patients Receiving Cancer Immunotherapy: Recognition and Management of Immune-Mediated Adverse Reactions in the ED' is the most popular.

What is the average episode length on PeerView Oncology & Hematology CME/CNE/CPE Audio Podcast?

The average episode length on PeerView Oncology & Hematology CME/CNE/CPE Audio Podcast is 62 minutes.

How often are episodes of PeerView Oncology & Hematology CME/CNE/CPE Audio Podcast released?

Episodes of PeerView Oncology & Hematology CME/CNE/CPE Audio Podcast are typically released every 2 days.

When was the first episode of PeerView Oncology & Hematology CME/CNE/CPE Audio Podcast?

The first episode of PeerView Oncology & Hematology CME/CNE/CPE Audio Podcast was released on Oct 15, 2018.

Show more FAQ

Toggle view more icon

Comments