Log in

goodpods headphones icon

To access all our features

Open the Goodpods app
Close icon
headphones
PeerView Internal Medicine CME/CNE/CPE Audio Podcast

PeerView Internal Medicine CME/CNE/CPE Audio Podcast

PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education

PeerView (PVI) is a leading provider of high-quality, innovative continuing education (CME/CE/CPE and MOC) for clinicians and their interprofessional teams. Combining evidence-based medicine and instructional expertise, PeerView activities improve the knowledge, skills, and strategies that support clinical performance and patient outcomes. PeerView makes its educational programming and expert-led presentations and symposia available through its network of popular podcast channels to support specific specialties and conditions. Each episode includes a link to request CME/CE credit for participation. PeerView is solely responsible for the selection of topics, the preparation of editorial content, and the distribution of all materials it publishes.
bookmark
Share icon

All episodes

Best episodes

Top 10 PeerView Internal Medicine CME/CNE/CPE Audio Podcast Episodes

Goodpods has curated a list of the 10 best PeerView Internal Medicine CME/CNE/CPE Audio Podcast episodes, ranked by the number of listens and likes each episode have garnered from our listeners. If you are listening to PeerView Internal Medicine CME/CNE/CPE Audio Podcast for the first time, there's no better place to start than with one of these standout episodes. If you are a fan of the show, vote for your favorite PeerView Internal Medicine CME/CNE/CPE Audio Podcast episode by adding your comments to the episode page.

Go online to PeerView.com/AMC860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. It’s well known that the BTK inhibitor agent class is highly effective across several B-cell malignancies, including chronic lymphocytic leukemia and mantle cell lymphoma. Less well understood are the factors that can limit the effectiveness of covalent BTK inhibitors and the emerging strategies that can overcome therapeutic resistance and intolerance, which provide a new option for managing relapsed disease. In this animated, visually enhanced activity, a hematology-oncology expert outlines the clinically relevant mechanistic aspects of covalent and noncovalent BTK inhibitors, mechanisms and patterns of resistance to covalent agents, and rationale for integrating novel approaches to combatting resistance and intolerance. Upon completion of this CE activity, participants will be able to: Summarize the mechanistic and selectivity differences among covalent and noncovalent BTK inhibitors, including their implications for off-target effects, agent safety profiles, and therapeutic intolerance, Describe the mechanisms of BTK inhibitor resistance, including core mechanisms of acquired resistance to covalent agents and how noncovalent inhibitors can overcome resistance mutations.
bookmark
plus icon
share episode
Go online to PeerView.com/DJX860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. In this activity, experts in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and follicular lymphoma (FL) provide learners with a clinical grounding on how new science is changing FL and DLBCL management. The panel explores important factors in the selection and use of newer therapeutics and provides a concise take on the evidence that has led to the regulatory approval and use of several novel agent classes in indolent and aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Cite molecular-, disease-, or patient-related factors that can guide therapeutic selection and prognosis in patients with FL or DLBCL, Summarize current safety and efficacy evidence surrounding novel therapeutic classes, including targeted/epigenetic agents, IMiDs, antibodies, and CAR-T cell therapy, used to treat FL or DLBCL, Integrate novel agent classes into treatment plans for newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory FL or DLBCL with consideration of baseline risk factors and patient/disease characteristics, Develop a management plan for the unique adverse events associated with the use of novel therapies in patients with FL or DLBCL.
bookmark
plus icon
share episode
Go online to PeerView.com/ZEX860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Tremendous advances have been made in the treatment of many other subtypes of breast cancer, but treatment of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has remained challenging. However, recent developments suggest that we are on the brink of a new era in TNBC therapy that now brings the novel class of cancer immunotherapies to this population of patients. In this activity, based on a recent live satellite symposium held in Dallas, Texas during the 20th Annual Meeting of The American Society of Breast Surgeons, our expert panel discusses the biologic rationale for the use of cancer immunotherapies in breast cancer in general and TNBC specifically, as well as the evolving evidence supporting the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced/metastatic and early-stage resectable TNBC. Additionally, the panel focuses on patient/tumor evaluation and candidate selection for immunotherapy, using current and novel biomarkers to guide clinical decisions in early-stage and advanced disease, the importance of being aware of potential immune-related adverse events and how to diagnose/manage them, and the need for close collaboration among breast surgeons, oncologists, pathologists, and other professionals involved in the management of patients with breast cancer. Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to: Describe the biologic rationale and rational strategies for harnessing the immune system in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) specifically, and in breast cancer more broadly, including combinatorial or sequential approaches with immune checkpoint inhibitors and other effective therapies (eg, chemotherapies, other immunotherapies, PARP inhibitors and other targeted agents, surgery, radiation, etc.) that may enhance immunogenicity and improve outcomes, Discuss biomarkers that may have utility in guiding and refining clinical decisions regarding the selection of appropriate candidates for immune-based and other therapies in TNBC, and the nuances of testing for these biomarkers in practice, Analyze efficacy, safety, and other key data from clinical trials assessing immunotherapy and immune-based combinations or sequential strategies with other effective treatment modalities throughout the continuum of TNBC, including metastatic, locally advanced, and early-stage resectable disease, Integrate immune checkpoint inhibitors and/or other effective treatment modalities into management plans of patients with TNBC based on the latest evidence, indications, recommendations, disease stage, patient and tumor characteristics, biomarker testing results, and patient needs/preferences.
bookmark
plus icon
share episode
Go online to PeerView.com/XAC860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. In this activity, based on a recent live symposium held during the Oncology Nursing Society’s (ONS) 44th Annual Congress, a panel of expert nurse faculty use a MasterClass/case-forum design to offer an in-depth review of BTK inhibitors, their therapeutic applications in B-cell malignancies, and the core nurse-focused practice issues that are central to the further integration of BTK inhibitors into treatment plans for patients with cancers such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), among other B-cell disorders. Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to: Summarize updated safety and efficacy evidence about first- and second-generation BTK inhibitors in the management of B-cell cancer, Cite dosing considerations, administration strategies, and treatment schedules of BTK inhibitors for the management of newly diagnosed or refractory/relapsed B-cell cancer, Educate patients about the varying side effect profiles, efficacy outcomes, and potential for treatment resistance associated with the use of BTK inhibitors for B-cell cancer, Manage side effect and adherence considerations in patients with B-cell cancer treated with BTK inhibitors.
bookmark
plus icon
share episode
Go online to PeerView.com/APK860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have firmly established their role as a major component of the lung cancer treatment arsenal. In the first-line setting of advanced NSCLC, there are a number of monotherapy and combinatorial strategies (such as combining immune checkpoint inhibitors with chemotherapy regimens, antiangiogenic therapies, and other immunotherapies with non-redundant mechanisms of action) that have FDA-approved indications and are recommended in various best practice guidelines. In addition, increasing evidence is supporting the use of immunotherapies in locally advanced and earlier disease settings, including as neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments in patients with resectable NSCLC. More recently, the immunotherapy era arrived in SCLC, with new approvals in different settings. Other novel therapies have also improved patient outcomes in extensive-stage SCLC, such as transcription inhibitors. This educational on-demand activity based on a recent live webcast features a panel of leading experts who engage in candid conversations about the modern management of lung cancer. In addition to reviewing the essential established and new clinical data and approvals/indications of immunotherapies, combinations, and other novel treatment options for NSCLC and SCLC, they discuss insightful registry and survey findings regarding patient perspectives, experiences, and needs, as well as the increasing importance of individualizing treatment selection and patient engagement in care planning. Evidence reviews are framed with case scenarios to illustrate the nuances of clinical decision-making in the context of a complex treatment landscape and a variety of tumor-, patient-, and treatment-related factors that should inform these decisions. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Assess the efficacy/safety profiles and clinical roles of approved and investigational immunotherapies, combinations, and other novel therapies in lung cancer, including NSCLC and SCLC, Evaluate the roles of predictive biomarkers (PD-L1, TMB) and other relevant disease-, and treatment-related factors as well as patient needs and preferences that should be taken into consideration as part of individualized treatment planning and selection for patients with lung cancer, Describe key new research directions and clinical trials evaluating cancer immunotherapy biomarkers, rational immunotherapy-based treatment strategies, and other emerging therapies in different subtypes and settings of NSCLC and SCLC to refine, expand, and maximize the use of optimal therapies throughout the disease continuum, Educate patients with lung cancer and their caregivers about cancer immunotherapies and other treatment options to help them become well-informed participants in their care, Implement individualized, evidence-based, patient-centric treatment plans for patients with lung cancer.
bookmark
plus icon
share episode
Go online to PeerView.com/Precision20?Promocode=860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Cancer immunotherapies are demonstrating remarkable clinical activity in an increasing number of malignancies, and as the immunotherapy arsenal has continued to expand, it has become clear that reliable biomarkers are needed to guide clinical decisions regarding treatment selection and identification of patients who are most likely to benefit from specific agents or immune-based combinations. A number of proven and putative biomarkers have been and continue to be evaluated, including PD-L1 expression, MSI/MMR, and others. Testing for these biomarkers has significant implications for pathology practice. This PeerView Live Seminars and Tumor Board symposium will provide participating pathology professionals with evidence-based and practical expert instruction on biomarker testing in the era of precision cancer immunotherapy. In the Seminars segments, our expert panel will review evidence on current and emerging immunotherapies and biomarkers, and the Tumor Board will focus on the nuances of applying this evidence to pathology practice, as well as strategies for collaborating with oncology professionals in interpreting biomarker testing results when making clinical decisions for patients with cancer. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Characterize the efficacy/safety profiles and clinical roles of current and emerging immunotherapies and combinations across different malignancies, along with relevant biomarker alignments, Evaluate the latest evidence supporting the use of PD-L1, MSI/MMR, TMB, and other emerging biomarkers and multiparametric approaches as predictors of benefit from cancer immunotherapies, Discuss the practical aspects of immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation in pathology practice, including companion diagnostic use requirements, benefits/limitations of different testing methodologies, assays, cutpoints, and other nuances, Implement best practices for cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation in collaboration with oncologists and other relevant professionals to guide and refine the use of cancer immunotherapies in current practice
bookmark
plus icon
share episode
Go online to PeerView.com/KWJ860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. The treatment armamentarium for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has undergone rapid expansion with the validation of novel multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies. More recently, the emergence of dual checkpoint blockade and immunotherapy-TKI combinations in RCC has increased the number of treatment choices in the frontline setting, allowed for greater flexibility when selecting second-line agents, and sparked additional research into TKI and immune checkpoint inhibitor options in earlier disease settings. In the wake of these advances, understanding how to effectively select and sequence newer regimens through multiple lines of therapy while ensuring safe usage is crucial to maximize beneficial patient outcomes throughout the advanced RCC continuum. This unique “How I Think, How I Treat” educational on-demand activity, based on an event held adjunct to the 18th International Kidney Cancer Symposium, features personal insights from leading kidney cancer experts on how they are adapting their own practice based on the evidence supporting optimized care in advanced RCC in the context of patient-, disease-, and treatment-specific factors, as well as how the innovations fueling modern approaches to care are improving outcomes for patients with RCC. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Assess the latest evidence and clinical implications of novel approaches, including new multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), immune checkpoint inhibitors, and combination therapies in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), Select optimal frontline treatment options among TKIs and combination approaches (dual checkpoint inhibition or targeted agents plus immune checkpoint inhibitors) for individual patients with advanced RCC based on relevant patient- and disease-related characteristics, including in the context of clinical trial enrollment, Apply validated targeted therapy and immunotherapy options effectively for patients with pretreated advanced RCC through multiple lines of therapy that reflect considerations of prior treatment history and patient comorbidities, Employ effective strategies to prevent and/or manage treatment-related complications with multitargeted TKIs and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in patients with RCC
bookmark
plus icon
share episode
Go online to PeerView.com/YNC860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Endocrine therapy, typically with an aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant plus a CDK4/6 inhibitor, is a mainstay for the management of HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer, but many questions still remain about the nuances of optimal use of these and other agents in first- and later-line settings. Furthermore, a number of investigational therapies are showing great promise in HR+/HER2- advanced disease, including novel ER-targeting agents such as oral SERDs, SERMs, SERCAs, PROTACs, and others, as well as antibody–drug conjugates such as those targeting TROP2. It is essential to learn how to best integrate these options into the current treatment arsenal. CDK4/6 inhibition with adjuvant abemaciclib has also changed the standard of care for high-risk patients with earlier-stage disease, but challenges remain, such as determining which patients benefit from this approach, and how to ensure that patients stay on therapy to reduce their risk of recurrence. This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium and produced in collaboration with GRASP and Living Beyond Breast Cancer to highlight patient perspectives, pairs compelling analyses of key evidence with practically oriented discussions focused on the evolving role of various standard, new, and emerging treatment options for HR+/HER2- advanced and early breast cancer. Leading experts show how to navigate the increasing complexity of treatment in the metastatic setting, as well as the recent expansion of new therapies into early-stage disease, and discuss implications for multidisciplinary care and patient-centric best practices. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Describe the rationale for, mechanisms of action of, and latest efficacy and safety data supporting the use of standard, new, and emerging treatment options for patients with HR+/HER2- advanced and early breast cancer, and their evolving roles in clinical practice; Develop personalized treatment plans for patients with HR+/HER2- advanced and early breast cancer that take into account all the relevant tumor-, patient-, and treatment-related factors, and include appropriately selected standard, new, or emerging treatment options in the context of clinical practice or clinical trials; Integrate a team-based, collaborative, and coordinated approach to care to educate patients with HR+/HER2- advanced and early breast cancer about new and emerging treatment options for which they may be eligible and engage patients in shared decision-making to ensure that their unique needs and preferences are taken into account when making treatment decisions.
bookmark
plus icon
share episode
Go online to PeerView.com/XMX860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Psoriasis, a chronic inflammatory disease that affects up to 1 in 20 people worldwide, can drastically impact a patient's quality of life and health. The number of therapies for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis has grown steadily over the past 2 decades. Biologic immunotherapies have been the primary agents to gain approval, while small-molecule therapies have lagged in development. Deucravacitinib is a newly approved oral small molecule that inhibits the activity of TYK2, a member of the JAK family. Deucravacitinib allosterically inhibits TYK2 activity by binding to the regulatory domain rather than the catalytic domain. Binding in this way gives deucravacitinib greater specificity for TYK2 versus the closely related JAK1/2/3. Deucravacitinib has demonstrated safety and efficacy in moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis in two phase 3 pivotal trials (POETYK PSO-1 and PSO-2). Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) 75 and static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) 0/1 response rates were significantly higher with deucravacitinib versus placebo or apremilast. In this activity, based on a recent live symposium, expert faculty discuss the clinical implications of targeting TYK2 in psoriasis, as well as strategies to identify patients for whom inhibition of TYK2 would be an appropriate treatment option based on available data. In addition, the faculty delve into the importance of shared decision-making in formulating personalized management plans for patients with psoriasis. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Describe the pathophysiology of moderate-to-severe psoriasis as it relates to selective targeting of TYK2; Identify patients with psoriasis for whom inhibition of TYK2 would be an appropriate treatment option based on available efficacy and safety data and practice guidelines; and Develop personalized management plans for patients with psoriasis using principles and tools of shared decision-making, empowering patients to participate in treatment decisions and remain adherent to therapies
bookmark
plus icon
share episode
Go online to PeerView.com/WED860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the tumor types where the novel class of cancer immunotherapies—the immune checkpoint inhibitors—has had the biggest impact and certainly become a major component of the treatment arsenal in the advanced disease setting. While the approval and availability of an increasing number and variety of immunotherapeutic agents and combinatorial options has been welcomed by clinicians and patients alike, clinical decision-making has also become quite complicated. How to identify the right candidates for immunotherapy? What biomarkers should be tested to guide candidate selection? And which agent or combination to use for individual patients? All these questions and more are explored in this engaging and entertaining educational session based on a live symposium held adjunct to the 2019 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting (ASCO 2019). Modeled after the format of a late-night talk show, this activity merges focused talks on defined topics with personal story-telling, candid interviews, and interactive debates/discussions among top experts. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Evaluate the efficacy/safety profiles and clinical roles of approved and investigational immunotherapies and combinations in the frontline setting and beyond in advanced/metastatic NSCLC, Assess the role of predictive biomarkers (PD-L1, TMB) and other tumor-, patient-, and treatment-related factors that should be taken into consideration as part of individualized treatment planning and selection for patients with NSCLC, Describe key new research directions and clinical trials with immunotherapies aiming to refine, expand, and maximize their use throughout the lung cancer continuum, including novel immune targets or combinations and biomarkers in advanced settings, as well as potentially curative approaches in earlier stages of NSCLC, Implement individualized, evidence-based, patient-centric treatment plans involving immunotherapies and/or combinations for patients with NSCLC.
bookmark
plus icon
share episode

Show more best episodes

Toggle view more icon

FAQ

How many episodes does PeerView Internal Medicine CME/CNE/CPE Audio Podcast have?

PeerView Internal Medicine CME/CNE/CPE Audio Podcast currently has 871 episodes available.

What topics does PeerView Internal Medicine CME/CNE/CPE Audio Podcast cover?

The podcast is about Health & Fitness, Cme, Medicine, Podcasts, Internal Medicine, Science and Medical Education.

What is the most popular episode on PeerView Internal Medicine CME/CNE/CPE Audio Podcast?

The episode title 'Leonard H. Calabrese, DO - Axial Spondyloarthritis: A Case-Based Approach to Addressing Diagnostic Challenges and Missed Opportunities in the Primary Care Setting' is the most popular.

What is the average episode length on PeerView Internal Medicine CME/CNE/CPE Audio Podcast?

The average episode length on PeerView Internal Medicine CME/CNE/CPE Audio Podcast is 55 minutes.

How often are episodes of PeerView Internal Medicine CME/CNE/CPE Audio Podcast released?

Episodes of PeerView Internal Medicine CME/CNE/CPE Audio Podcast are typically released every day.

When was the first episode of PeerView Internal Medicine CME/CNE/CPE Audio Podcast?

The first episode of PeerView Internal Medicine CME/CNE/CPE Audio Podcast was released on Aug 27, 2018.

Show more FAQ

Toggle view more icon

Comments