Oncology On The Go

As part of CancerNetwork’s Between the Lines video series, Brian Helfand, MD, PhD, Chief of the Division of Urology and the Ronald L. Chez Family and Richard Melman Family Endowed Chair at NorthShore University HealthSystem, and Steven Finkelstein, MD, FACRO, a radiation oncologist with Florida Cancer Affiliates US Oncology Network in Panama City, Florida, examined the results and clinical implications of the phase 2/3 EMPIRE-1 trial in prostate cancer. The trial compares 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT imaging versus conventional imaging to guide postprostatectomy salvage radiotherapy.
To watch more videos in CancerNetwork’s Between the Lines series, visit cancernetwork.com.

CancerNetwork spoke with Quita Highsmith, Vice President and Chief Diversity Officer for Genentech, and Monica Baskin, PhD, a professor of preventive medicine and associate director for Community Outreach and Engagement for the O’Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center in Birmingham, Alabama. The conversation focused on the Advancing Inclusive Research Site Alliance, which is a coalition of clinical research sites partnering with Genentech to advance representation of diverse patient populations in oncology clinical trials.
Results from clinical trials without diverse patient cohorts are rarely generalizable to the entire population, and this initiative works to educate and inform the clinicians and researchers to ultimately make clinical trials more accessible and eliminate these disparities.
Don’t forget to subscribe to the "Oncology Peer Review On-The-Go" podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or anywhere podcasts are available.

For the final installment of a 3-part relapsed/refractory DLBCL series, CancerNetwork heard from Gilles Salles, MD, PhD, Chief of the Lymphoma Service at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, and Kami Maddocks, MD, an associate professor of clinical internal medicine in the Division of Hematology at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center.
These lymphoma experts spoke about their thoughts on data from the L-MIND trial, when to implement CAR-T cell therapies for patients, the role of Selinexor in treating patients, and a host of other important ideas.
Don’t forget to subscribe to the Oncology Peer Review On-The-Go podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or anywhere podcasts are available. Be sure to check out the 2 other installments of this 3-part DLBCL series on rituximab rechallenging and different treatment regimens.

As part of its OncViewTM video series, CancerNetwork® spoke with Javier Munoz, MD, MS, FACP, from the Mayo Clinic in Phoenix, Arizona, about updates in therapies of relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma.
In the video series, Javier Munoz, MD, MS, FACP, discussed the following:
· Current Treatment Options for Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma · Factors in Choosing R/R FL Treatments · Treatment Options for Third-Line R/R FL · Use of Tazemetostat for R/R FL · Changes in Sequencing of R/R FL Therapies
To watch more videos in CancerNetwork®’s OncViewTM series, visit cancernetwork.com/oncview.

As part of a CancerNetwork® Frontline Forum program, Alexander I. Spira, MD, PhD, FACP; Millie Das, MD; Joshua K. Sabari, MD; and Misako Nagasaka, MD, PhD, reviewed updates in the management of EGFR exon 20 non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and how these findings may apply to clinical practice.

Spira, codirector of the Virginia Cancer Specialists Research Institute and director of the Thoracic and Phase I Program, and Das, a clinical associate professor of Medicine and Oncology at Stanford Health, led one part of the discussion regarding the evolution of molecular profiling and next-generation sequencing in the NSCLC space. Moreover, they spoke to clinical and non-clinical factors informing treatment decision-making in the second-line setting. Additionally, they reviewed data from the phase 1 CHRYSALIS trial (NCT02609776) assessing amivantamab as a treatment for patients with disease progression following chemotherapy.

According to data from the CHRYSALIS trial, amivantamab elicited an objective response rate of 40% (95% CI, 29%-51%), and a median duration of response of 11.1 months (95% CI, 6.9-not reached). Additionally, the clinical benefit rate was 74% (95% CI, 63%-83%). Common any-grade adverse effects (AEs) in the study’s safety population that were associated with EGFR inhibition included rash (86%), paronychia (45%), stomatitis (21%), pruritus (17%), and diarrhea (12%).

Sabari, a thoracic medical oncologist at Perlmutter Cancer Center of NYU Langone Health, and Nagasaka, a thoracic oncologist at the University of California, Irvine, also discussed clinical updates in the EGFR exon 20 NSCLC population. They spoke about potential novel treatment options including mobocertinib (Exkivity), as well as potential next steps in research such as moving drugs to earlier lines of treatment and obtaining a better understanding of mechanisms of acquired resistance to treatment.

According to findings from a phase 1/2 trial (NCT02716116), mobocertinib produced an ORR of 28% (95% CI, 20%-37%) by independent-review committee assessment and 35% (95% CI, 26%-45%) per investigator assessment in a cohort of platinum-pretreated patients with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations. Common AEs reported in the trial included diarrhea and rash.

Don’t forget to subscribe to the “Oncology On-The-Go” podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or anywhere podcasts are available.