No Title

To hear from the players in this Latitude News investigation, click “play” below to here our podcast. Or subscribe to our free podcast.

Ken Terpenning of Lexington, Kentucky has owned over two-dozen racehorses. But one in particular made a big impression.

“Silky Shark was everything you’d want in a racehorse,” says Terpenning. “He was vibrant, fiery, a very happy horse. On the racetrack, he was a total professional. He earned over $100,000.”

Like any athlete, there was an arc to Silky Shark’s career. But the downward slope was faster than Terpenning could have imagined. The horse had some medical problems that led to lost races, and then Terpenning fell on tough times financially. Terpenning sold the horse to a man he trusted, who continued to race him. But after a stretch of unsuccessful races, it didn’t take long for Silky Shark to wind up in the “slaughter pipeline.”

There are roughly nine million horses in the United States, and every year, people — mostly non-Americans — eat over 100,000 of them. When the U.S. banned horse slaughter five years ago, the trade didn’t stop. Horse buyers merely turned their trucks north and south to slaughterhouses in Mexico and Canada. From there, most of the meat goes to the European Union.

If you’re an American, odds are you disapprove of horse slaughter. But whatever your ethical perspective on eating horses, there are undeniable problems with American horsemeat: the trade route from the U.S. to the EU is riddled with falsified documents, shoddy record-keeping, lax enforcement and meat tainted with drugs people should never consume.

For the past two months we’ve been investigating the shady trade in American horsemeat. Here’s what we’ve found out.

First across the finish line...

In fact, the term “slaughter pipeline” is a misnomer — it gives the impression of a uniform line of horses marching toward the slaughterhouse. In reality, it’s a haphazard and disjunctive affair with no clear starting point, but one definite outcome.

Take a horse like Silky Shark: successful and loved. The health problems that ended his racing career were not life-threatening and he could have led a long life as a field horse. But multiple sales — auction after auction — devalued Silky Shark on paper. By the time he was purchased by a “kill buyer,” the horse that won over 100 grand was probably worth about 100 bucks. A “kill buyer” is what you might imagine: they specialize in buying off the cheapest horses at auctions, then selling them for slaughter. (For a gripping look at how these auctions work, read Lisa Couturier’s “Dark Horse” from Orion. Or for disturbing tales straight from the horse’s mouth, watch “Confessions of a Horse Slaughter Kill Buyer.”)

This all makes cold business sense in racing, where an un-winning horse literally has no value. But you may be surprised to learn that field horses — pets, essentially — are picked off at auctions too. The pony your child rides at the summer carnival? Sometimes it’s cheaper to sell that horse to a kill buyer than it is to feed it through the winter.

More surprising still is where these American horses are slaughtered: Canada and Mexico. Why not slaughter them in the U.S.? Because Congress effectively banned slaughter in this country five years ago, primarily because, as mentioned above, we are not a culture that eats horses, nor do we generally approve of horse slaughter.

What that has resulted in is that more American horses were slaughtered by our neighbors in 2011 than in the U.S. a decade earlier. And, to the dismay of horse lovers, a 2010 report by the Government Accountability Office found that horses destined for slaughter now travel farther and under more stressful conditions — more time in a cramped trailer, less water to drink and food to eat — than ever before. Banning horse slaughter in the U.S., in other words, has had the peculiar effect of ensuring just as many American horses are slaughtered, only under less humane conditions.

When horse slaughterhouses closed in the U.S. five years ago, kill buyers diverted the country’s cheapest horses to Canadian and Mexican slaughterho...

Marie Jeanne, one of hundreds of thousands of women who has been raped in the conflict in eastern Congo. (Credit: YouTube)

Here’s the basic plot line. Laptops, smart phones, tablets—they all need the rare minerals that Congo has in abundance. And that means that our gadgets are helping to fuel child labor—and rape—on a colossal scale. It’s a long journey from here to there, and it’s complicated. But lawmakers in the U.S. want to leverage our consumer power to bring change to the Congo. The question is: Do they stand a chance of making a difference?

When it comes to marijuana laws, the United States is a basket case.

Creator of the “War on Drugs,” the U.S. is also home to two states — Colorado and Washington — whose voters recently approved the world’s most liberal marijuana policies. In both places, under state guidelines, residents can now grow, smoke, buy, sell and traffic cannabis; that’s a few steps farther than even the Netherlands has gone.

This month’s Latitude News podcast explores the global implications of Colorado and Washington’s new laws — prepare for a sea change in relations between the U.S. and Latin America, and with no country more so than Mexico. As it turns out, the U.S. and Mexico have a shared marijuana history. We may have created the War on Drugs, but Mexico started Reefer Madness.

Listen below or click here to subscribe to the podcast for free. AND if you like what you hear, contribute to our Kickstarter campaign to help turn this podcast into a weekly show that mashes up the local and global!

The Salt Lake Temple of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Salt Lake City, Utah. (Credit: Cookiecaper)

The Mormon Church could be majority Latin American by 2015, and our newest podcast hones in on one person among the faithful. At the young age of 23, Isaac has learned more than most about watching the future slip through his fingers. The trials he has faced help shape his outlook on life. “When we let fear take over us,” he says, “we lose faith, and when we lose faith, we don’t have a future.” In some ways, this podcast is a small story about a personal journey of faith. But from other angles, it’s much bigger than that. And it touches on an issue making headlines every day—immigration—in what might be a surprising context—the Mormon Church.

Margaret Young (L) and Mohammed Mushib (R) sit down in a studio for a conversation on faith. (Credit: Jesse Ellis)

Has anyone ever told you that Salt Lake City reminds them of Baghdad?

The first time it happened we were surprised. The second time we decided to take a closer look. What exactly is it about the global headquarters of the Mormon Church that makes it a comfortable home for Iraqis?

Islam and Mormonism may be a surprise pairing, but they do have at least one thing in common: both are marginalized in American society.

Research conducted by the Pew Research Center shows that Americans see Islam and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints as on the fringe, although in recent years perceptions of Mormons have improved while perceptions of Muslims have worsened. In a global context, both faiths are mainstream. About one-fourth of the world is Muslim and that number is growing faster than any other religious group. Meanwhile, while Latter-day Saints number far fewer than Muslims, the world Mormon population has swelled in recent years, with 60 percent of the world’s 14 million Mormons now living outside of the U.S.

Latitude News asked two Utah residents, an American-born Mormon and an Iraqi-born Muslim, to sit down for a conversation on Baghdad and Salt Lake City, cultural perceptions and faith. Margaret Young and Mohammed Mushib are eloquent, funny, sharp and, frankly, a little tired of being seen as “fringy.”