Log in

goodpods headphones icon

To access all our features

Open the Goodpods app
Close icon
My History Can Beat Up Your Politics - NIXON AND IMPOUNDMENT, NOT SPENDING FUNDS, CONGRESS AND COURTS
plus icon
bookmark

NIXON AND IMPOUNDMENT, NOT SPENDING FUNDS, CONGRESS AND COURTS

01/29/25 • 24 min

2 Listeners

My History Can Beat Up Your Politics

In the 1970's a President, seeking to reduce inflation, tried a new tactic. Simply not spending the money that congress appropriated. OK, it wasn't entirely new, but it had been used in defense spending after the war where demand was needed or in very small amounts. This was billions of collars.

As we discuss impoundment could be considered unfair - because a President could technically pass nice sounding bills and then later, kill the funding, thus getting credit for the good image of legislation without having to execute.

As President Trump is using a similar technique, we look at impoundment and what Congress did in reaction (myriad steps from creating a new Budget Office to legislation to monitoring like hawks, to going to the press). We also look at the Supreme Court.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

plus icon
bookmark

In the 1970's a President, seeking to reduce inflation, tried a new tactic. Simply not spending the money that congress appropriated. OK, it wasn't entirely new, but it had been used in defense spending after the war where demand was needed or in very small amounts. This was billions of collars.

As we discuss impoundment could be considered unfair - because a President could technically pass nice sounding bills and then later, kill the funding, thus getting credit for the good image of legislation without having to execute.

As President Trump is using a similar technique, we look at impoundment and what Congress did in reaction (myriad steps from creating a new Budget Office to legislation to monitoring like hawks, to going to the press). We also look at the Supreme Court.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Previous Episode

undefined - WONG KIM ARK, BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP, THE CHARMING BETSEY AND THE SAND LOT PROTESTS

WONG KIM ARK, BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP, THE CHARMING BETSEY AND THE SAND LOT PROTESTS

1 Recommendations

When it comes to citizenship decided by birth, the story of Wong Kim Ark, a young man born in the US of Chinese descent who was denied entry to his country, should be on a few minds. We tell that story in this episode, along with the Sand Lot protests that led to his change in status, and the 1804 about a ship that helped reinforce their thinking. This and thoughts about early Trump Presidency.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Next Episode

undefined - MAKE IT STOP (Stopping Commerce with Embargoes, Takeovers and Other Methods)-  THE ARK OF COMMERCE

MAKE IT STOP (Stopping Commerce with Embargoes, Takeovers and Other Methods)- THE ARK OF COMMERCE

In our series on American commerce, a look at three instances of when U.S. commerce was stopped, for a variety of reasons. The embargo of 1807 is an important part of the Presidency of Thomas Jefferson, not often examined in detailed compared to other events. It brought serious economic problems, but was held up by Jefferson as an experiment by a peaceful power. We also examine his Treasury Secretary Gallatin, who had to implement the plan.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Episode Comments

Generate a badge

Get a badge for your website that links back to this episode

Select type & size
Open dropdown icon
share badge image

<a href="https://goodpods.com/podcasts/my-history-can-beat-up-your-politics-1148/nixon-and-impoundment-not-spending-funds-congress-and-courts-83151380"> <img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/goodpods-images-bucket/badges/generic-badge-1.svg" alt="listen to nixon and impoundment, not spending funds, congress and courts on goodpods" style="width: 225px" /> </a>

Copy