Log in

goodpods headphones icon

To access all our features

Open the Goodpods app
Close icon
headphones
Marketing Science Lab

Marketing Science Lab

Decoding the science of digital persuasion.

Welcome to the Marketing Science Lab, where data meets strategy. Join us as we dissect the latest marketing research, uncovering the science behind consumer behavior and effective campaigns. We translate complex studies into actionable insights, empowering you to make informed decisions and achieve measurable results.
www.marketingsciencelab.org
profile image

1 Listener

bookmark
Share icon

All episodes

Best episodes

Top 10 Marketing Science Lab Episodes

Goodpods has curated a list of the 10 best Marketing Science Lab episodes, ranked by the number of listens and likes each episode have garnered from our listeners. If you are listening to Marketing Science Lab for the first time, there's no better place to start than with one of these standout episodes. If you are a fan of the show, vote for your favorite Marketing Science Lab episode by adding your comments to the episode page.

Discover how loneliness affects our attachment to possessions and learn practical decluttering strategies for the holiday season. Full Episode Show Notes: https://www.marketingsciencelab.org/p/loneliness-clutter-connection-holiday-decluttering-tips

Source:

Hu, B., Cole, C., & Wang, J. (2024). How loneliness affects consumers' reluctance to let go of used possessions. Psychology & Marketing, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.22117

The Loneliness-Clutter Connection As the holiday season approaches, many of us find ourselves surrounded by an ever-growing collection of possessions. The global explosion in self-storage units over the last decade is a testament to our struggle with letting go. But what if there's more to our attachment to stuff than meets the eye? Recent research published in Psychology & Marketing (2024) sheds light on a surprising connection between loneliness and our reluctance to part with possessions. Let's dive into these findings and explore how they can inform our approach to decluttering and gift-giving this holiday season.

The study reveals a counterintuitive truth: lonely individuals are less willing to dispose of items they no longer use, even if these items could benefit others. This reluctance stems from a heightened attachment to material possessions, which lonely people may use as a substitute for interpersonal relationships. It's as if our belongings become silent companions, filling the void left by a lack of social connection.

profile image

1 Listener

bookmark
plus icon
share episode

Take the Decision-Making Styles Test: https://mralexgarrido.github.io/dmsi/dmsiform.html

In the latest episode of Marketing Science Lab, we take a deep dive into groundbreaking research on decision-making styles in creative agencies. This comprehensive literature review reveals how understanding and leveraging different decision-making approaches can significantly enhance job satisfaction, team dynamics, and overall creative output in marketing organizations.

The Four Pillars of Decision-Making in Creative Agencies

Our exploration unveils four primary decision-making styles that play crucial roles in creative agencies: behavioral, conceptual, directive, and analytical. Each style brings unique strengths and potential drawbacks that can significantly impact the success of creative projects.

Behavioral Decision-Making: The People-Centric Approach

The behavioral style focuses on people-oriented decision-making, emphasizing collaboration and team dynamics. This approach is particularly effective in managing team relationships and ensuring that all voices are heard.

Key benefits:

Enhances job satisfaction by fostering a supportive and inclusive work environment

Crucial for creative professionals who thrive on interpersonal interactions and feedback

Encourages open communication and cooperation

Reduces conflict and promotes a positive workplace culture

However, it's important to note that this style may lead to slower decision-making processes due to the emphasis on consensus and consideration of multiple perspectives.

Pros: Focuses on the well-being of team members and stakeholders, fostering a collaborative and supportive environment. This style is particularly effective in managing team dynamics and ensuring that all voices are heard (Sofo et al., 2013)

Cons: May lead to slower decision-making processes due to the emphasis on consensus and consideration of multiple perspectives (Basadur et al., 2014)

Contribution: Behavioral decision-makers can facilitate team cohesion and ensure that creative projects are inclusive and considerate of diverse viewpoints (Na et al., 2009)

Conceptual Decision-Making: Nurturing Innovation

The conceptual style involves a broad, long-term perspective, encouraging innovative thinking and creative problem-solving. This approach is particularly valuable for driving the creative vision of a project and inspiring teams to think outside the box.

Key aspects:

Aligns with intrinsic motivators of creative professionals (e.g., recognition, challenging projects)

Supports a culture of creativity by valuing diverse ideas

Fosters an environment where new concepts can be explored

While this style excels at identifying long-term opportunities, it may sometimes overlook practical constraints, leading to unrealistic project goals.

Pros: Encourages innovative thinking and the exploration of new ideas, which is essential in creative settings. This style is adept at identifying long-term opportunities and potential impacts (Čereška & Vasiliauskaitė, 2005)

Cons: Can be overly optimistic and may overlook practical constraints, leading to unrealistic project goals (Allwood & Selart, 2001)

Contribution: Conceptual decision-makers can drive the creative vision of a project, inspiring teams to think outside the box and explore novel solutions (Proctor, 2018)

Directive Decision-Making: Efficiency in Action

The directive style is characterized by a focus on efficiency and quick decision-making. This approach is beneficial in fast-paced creative environments, providing clear guidance and structure.

Notable features:

Enhances job satisfaction by reducing uncertainty

Helps in setting clear goals and expectations

Ensures projects stay on track and meet deadlines

However, this style may potentially stifle creativity and discourage input from team members if not balanced with other approaches.

Pros: Provides clear guidance and quick decision-making, which is beneficial in fast-paced environments. This style is effective in situations requiring decisive action and strong leadership (Allwood & Selart, 2010)

Cons: May stifle creativity and discourage input from team members, leading to a lack of diverse ideas (Brinkers, 1972)

Contribution: Directive decision-makers can ensure that projects stay on track and meet deadlines, providing the necessary structure and direction for creative endeavors (Na et al., 2009)

Analytical Decision-Making: Data-Driven Creativity

The analytical style emphasizes data-driven decision-making and thorough analysis. T...

bookmark
plus icon
share episode

Source:

Lee, J., Walter, N., Hayes, J. L., & Golan, G. J. (2024). Do Influencers Influence? A Meta-Analytic Comparison of Celebrities and Social Media Influencers Effects. Social Media + Society, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051241269269

In the latest episode of Marketing Science Lab, we take a deep dive into groundbreaking research on influencer marketing effectiveness. The study, published in Social Media + Society, offers crucial insights for marketers navigating the evolving landscape of social media influence.

Influencers vs. Traditional Advertising: A Clear Winner

The study reveals that social media influencers (SMIs) outperform brand-only advertising in driving persuasion-related outcomes. While the effect is weak (d = 0.16, p = .004), it's positive and significant, suggesting that partnering with SMIs can provide a measurable boost to brand messaging. This finding validates the growing trend of influencer marketing and offers a compelling argument for brands still on the fence about incorporating influencers into their marketing mix.

The Celebrity Comparison: Size Matters, But It's Complicated

One of the most intriguing findings from the research is the comparison between SMIs and celebrity endorsers. Contrary to what many might expect, there's no significant difference in overall effectiveness between the two. However, this seemingly simple conclusion masks a more complex reality.

We found that the size of an influencer's following plays a crucial role in their effectiveness:

Mega-influencers (>1 million followers) are significantly more persuasive than celebrity endorsers.

Nano-influencers (<10k followers) are less effective compared to celebrities.

This suggests there's a "sweet spot" where influencers balance reach and relatability, potentially offering the best of both worlds. It challenges the notion that bigger is always better, while also cautioning against assuming that micro-influencers are universally more effective.

Credibility: The Currency of Influence

Perhaps the most valuable insight from the study is the critical role of perceived credibility. SMIs are more effective than celebrity endorsers when they're perceived as more credible, with a linear relationship between perceived credibility and persuasive effects.

This finding highlights the importance of authenticity and trust in influencer partnerships. It suggests that marketers should prioritize an influencer's perceived credibility over their follower count when making selection decisions.

Actionable Strategies for Marketers

Based on these insights, we recommend the following strategies for marketers looking to optimize their influencer campaigns:

Leverage SMIs for Enhanced Brand Messaging: Consider incorporating SMIs into your marketing mix, as they outperform brand-only advertising.

Focus on the "Sweet Spot" Influencers: Target influencers with substantial followings but who haven't reached mega-influencer status. These influencers may offer the best balance of reach and relatability.

Prioritize Credibility Over Follower Count: When choosing between influencers, prioritize those perceived as highly credible by their audience. Develop strategies to help influencers maintain and enhance their credibility.

Tailor Strategies Based on Influencer Type: For broad reach and impact similar to celebrities, consider mega-influencers. For niche markets or more personalized campaigns, micro-influencers might be more effective.

Monitor Influencer Life Cycles: Be aware that an influencer's effectiveness may change as their following grows. Continuously evaluate the performance of your influencer partnerships.

Combine Influencer and Celebrity Strategies: Don't completely abandon celebrity endorsements; instead, consider a mixed approach. Test different combinations of celebrities and influencers for optimal results.

The Evolution of Influence

This research not only provides practical insights for marketers but also contributes to our theoretical understanding of influence in the digital age. It supports the importance of source credibility theory in the realm of social media influencers and provides evidence for the consumer-brand hybrid concept, where influencers evolve from consumers to brands themselves.

As the influencer marketing landscape continues to evolve, ongoing research and strategic adaptation will be crucial for brands looking to maximize their impact in this space. The key takeaway? In the world of influence, credibility is king, size matters but isn't everything, and finding the right balance is the ultimate g...

bookmark
plus icon
share episode

Source:

Padigar, M., Li, Y., & Manjunath, C. N. “Good” and “bad” frictions in customer experience: Conceptual foundations and implications. Psychology & Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.22111

In the latest episode of Marketing Science Lab, we take a deep dive into groundbreaking research that challenges conventional wisdom about frictionless customer experiences. The study, "Good" and "bad" frictions in customer experience: Conceptual foundations and implications" by Padigar, Li, and Manjunath, published in Psychology & Marketing, offers a nuanced perspective on the role of friction in customer journeys.

Redefining Friction in Customer Experience

For years, businesses have strived to create seamless, frictionless experiences, assuming that customers always prefer effortless interactions. However, this new research suggests that not all forms of friction are detrimental. In fact, some types of friction can enhance customer value and create more memorable brand experiences.

The study defines friction as the effort customers exert to complete tasks related to their consumption goals. Importantly, friction isn't inherently good or bad; it's a characteristic of the experience when completing a goal-related task.

Four Types of Friction: A New Typology

We explored the four distinct types of friction identified by the researchers:

Frustrating Friction: Low desirability, low value Example: Complicated checkout processes or unclear return policies

Constructive Friction: Low desirability, high value Example: Security checks for large purchases or setting up privacy settings

Preference-based Friction: High desirability, low value Example: Optional customization features or social sharing options

Rewarding Friction: High desirability, high value Example: Physical exertion at theme parks or DIY furniture assembly

Understanding these friction types allows marketers to make informed decisions about which elements of the customer journey to streamline and which to enhance for added value.

The Paradox of Effort: When Friction Adds Value

One of the most intriguing insights from the research is the concept of "good friction." We discussed how certain types of effort can actually increase customer satisfaction and perceived value. For instance:

The "IKEA effect" demonstrates how assembling furniture can increase its perceived value

Theme park experiences often benefit from the physical exertion and anticipation built through queues

Fitness apps leverage effort tracking and progress monitoring to enhance user motivation

However, it's crucial to note that even "good" friction has an optimal level. Too little effort can make an experience forgettable, while too much can lead to frustration. Finding the right balance is key to designing effective customer journeys.

Implications for Digital Marketers

This research has significant implications for how we approach customer experience design in the digital realm:

Reassess Frictionless Strategies: Don't blindly remove all friction from customer journeys. Analyze each touchpoint to determine if friction could add value.

Leverage Constructive Friction: Use necessary but low-desirability tasks as opportunities to educate customers and build trust. For example, clearly communicate the value of security measures during online transactions.

Enhance Core Experiences: For rewarding friction, find the optimal level of effort that enhances satisfaction without overwhelming customers. Consider offering different difficulty levels or customization options in digital products.

Create Optional Engagement: Implement preference-based friction as opt-in features to boost engagement without alienating time-constrained customers. Examples include loyalty programs or advanced customization options.

Monitor and Adapt: Regularly assess how customers perceive different types of friction in your digital journey. Be prepared to adjust as technologies and customer expectations evolve.

Challenges and Future Directions

We also explored some of the challenges in implementing this nuanced approach to friction:

Customer Heterogeneity: Friction tolerance varies among individuals and contexts, necessitating flexible journey designs.

Technological Advancements: AI and automation may shift which tasks customers find valuable or necessary, requiring continuous adaptation of friction strategies.

Ethical Considerations: Balancing frictionless experiences with customer welfare and informed decision-making, especially in AI-driven journeys.

As we navigate an increasingly digital and automated world, this research reminds us of the importance of hum...

bookmark
plus icon
share episode

Source:

Shen, P., Nie, X. and Tong, C. (2024), "Does disclosing commercial intention benefit brands? Mediating role of perceived manipulative intent and perceived authenticity in influencer hidden advertising", Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-01-2024-0052

In the latest episode of Marketing Science Lab, we delve into groundbreaking research on the hidden influences of influencer marketing disclosures. This study, published in the Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, uncovers surprising insights that challenge conventional wisdom about transparency in sponsored content.

The Authenticity-Skepticism Tightrope: Understanding Disclosure Effects

The research reveals a fascinating paradox in influencer marketing: sponsorship disclosures simultaneously enhance perceived authenticity and trigger skepticism about manipulative intent. This dual effect creates a complex landscape for marketers to navigate.

Key findings include:

Positive Impact: Disclosures can boost an influencer's perceived authenticity, positively influencing brand attitudes.

Negative Consequence: The same disclosures may increase perceptions of manipulative intent, potentially harming brand perception.

Bidirectional Relationship: Perceived authenticity and manipulative intent continuously influence each other, creating a delicate balance.

Decoding Consumer Responses: The Role of Thinking Styles

Our discussion highlights how individual differences in consumer thinking styles significantly moderate the effects of sponsorship disclosure:

Experiential Thinkers: These consumers focus more on the authenticity boost from disclosure, leading to more positive brand attitudes.

Rational Thinkers: They are more likely to scrutinize the motives behind disclosures, potentially developing negative brand perceptions.

This distinction emphasizes the importance of tailoring influencer marketing strategies to align with the dominant thinking style of the target audience.

Crafting Effective Disclosure Strategies: Balancing Transparency and Engagement

Based on the research findings, we explore several actionable strategies for marketers:

Embrace Strategic Transparency: Be open about sponsorships to enhance authenticity, but carefully consider the presentation to minimize perceptions of manipulation.

Personalize Disclosure Approaches: Tailor your disclosure methods based on your audience's thinking style. For example, use more prominent disclosures for experiential thinkers and subtler integrations for rational thinkers.

Enhance Influencer Authenticity: Encourage influencers to share genuine, long-term product experiences and integrate sponsored content naturally into their overall content strategy.

Leverage Technology for Optimization: Use consumer data and AI to personalize disclosure methods and timing for different audience segments.

Focus on Trust-Building: Develop campaigns that demonstrate honesty and sincerity beyond mere disclosure, considering the overall influencer-brand relationship perception.

The research underscores the complexity of modern influencer marketing. While transparency through sponsorship disclosure is crucial for ethical marketing and trust-building, its effects on consumer perceptions are nuanced and sometimes contradictory. The key for marketers is to find the right balance – embracing transparency while carefully considering how disclosures are presented and integrated into content.

By understanding the interplay between perceived authenticity and manipulative intent, and how different consumers process this information, brands can craft more effective, trusted influencer partnerships. Remember, in the world of influencer marketing, it's not just about what you say, but how you say it. The goal is to create authentic connections that resonate with your audience while maintaining transparency and trust.

Interactive Quizlet: https://quizlet.com/study-guides/influencer-marketing-disclosures-authenticity-vs-skepticism-...

bookmark
plus icon
share episode

Source:

Pai, C.-Y., Young, K.-Y., Liska, L.I. and Laverie, D. (2024), I Know I Am Ugly, but Please Listen to My Story First: An Examination of How Storytelling Can Impact Consumers' Valuation of Unattractive Produce. Journal of Consumer Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2414

| Full episode notes: https://www.marketingsciencelab.org/p/ugly-produce-storytelling-reduce-food-waste-holidays

As we approach the holiday season, a time of abundance and celebration, it's easy to overlook a growing problem: food waste. Did you know that during the holidays, food waste in the United States increases by a staggering 25%? This shocking statistic highlights the need for innovative solutions to combat this issue. At the Marketing Science Lab, we've uncovered a fascinating approach that could help address this problem: using storytelling to change consumer perceptions of "ugly" or unattractive produce.

The Ugly Truth About Food Waste

Before we dive into the solution, let's consider the scale of the problem. According to the United Nations, around 30% of global food is lost or wasted at farms, retail stores, or households. During the holidays, this issue becomes even more pronounced. Think about all those slightly bruised apples or oddly shaped potatoes that might get passed over for the picture-perfect produce in our holiday meals.

The Root of the Problem

Consumers have become accustomed to seeing only aesthetically pleasing fruits and vegetables in stores, leading to cognitive biases against "ugly" produce. We tend to associate visual perfection with quality and taste, often rejecting perfectly edible food simply because it doesn't look "pretty" enough.

The Power of Storytelling

Recent research titled "I Know I Am Ugly, but Please Listen to My Story First: An Examination of How Storytelling Can Impact Consumers' Valuation of Unattractive Produce" by Chu-Yen Pai and colleagues (2024) offers an innovative solution to this problem. The study found that combining storytelling with marketing tactics, such as coupons, significantly increased consumers' willingness to purchase and consume unattractive produce.

How Does It Work?

Imagine you're at a grocery store during the holiday season, and you see a bin of misshapen apples. Instead of just a price tag, there's a small sign that tells the story of the apple orchard. It might read:

"These unique apples are the result of an unusually warm fall at the Johnson Family Orchard. While they may look different, their flavor is just as sweet and crisp as their picture-perfect cousins. By choosing these apples, you're supporting local farmers and reducing food waste this holiday season."

This simple story changes the narrative around these "ugly" apples. It's no longer just about appearance; it's about supporting local farmers, reducing waste, and still getting a delicious product.

The Science Behind the Story

The research showed that storytelling can enhance consumers' perceived taste of unattractive produce, which in turn increases their likelihood of purchasing it. It's about changing the narrative around these foods and appealing to consumers' values and emotions.

Practical Applications for the Holiday Season

Retailers could create themed storytelling campaigns for the holiday season. For example, they could have a "12 Days of Ugly Produce" promotion, where each day features a different unattractive fruit or vegetable with its unique story. Day one could be "Rudolph's Red-Nosed Tomatoes" for a holiday salsa, or "Frosty's Misshapen Potatoes" for the perfect mashed potatoes.

Combining storytelling with other marketing tactics, like coupons, was found to be particularly effective. So retailers could offer a "buy two, get one free" deal on these featured items, making it even more appealing for consumers to try these "ugly" but delicious options.

What Can You Do?

As consumers, we have the power to make a difference. This holiday season, challenge yourself to seek out and purchase at least one piece of "ugly" produce each week. Not only will you be helping to reduce food waste, but you might also discover that those oddly shaped carrots make the best holiday side dish you've ever had!

Share your experiences and creative uses for these items on social media using #UglyProduceBeautifulStory. You might inspire others to join the movement and make a real impact on reducing food waste this holiday season.

As we celebrate the season of plenty, let's also celebrate the beauty in imperfection. By changing our perceptions and embracing "ugly" produce, we can make a significant impact on reducing food waste. Remember, every ...

bookmark
plus icon
share episode

Source

Klinke, T., Christ, M., Fadl, N., Lamerz, C., & Langner, T. (2024). The effects of letter capitalization in advertising headlines. Journal of Marketing Communications, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2024.2401393

In today's episode, we dive deep into a fascinating study that challenges conventional wisdom about typography in advertising. Many marketers believe that using all uppercase letters in headlines makes ads more visually appealing and effective. But does the research support this common practice? Let's explore the surprising findings from this groundbreaking study.

Background and Prevalence

The researchers conducted a content analysis of 700 magazine advertisements across three different publications (Cosmopolitan, Runner's World, and National Geographic) in the US and Germany.

Key finding: Letter capitalization is extremely common in modern advertising and editorial content.

88% of Cosmopolitan pages

89% of Runner's World pages

60% of National Geographic pages

This prevalence highlights the importance of understanding the true impact of capitalization on advertising effectiveness.

The Surprising Impact on Legibility

Study Design:

159 US participants viewed isolated advertising headlines

Headlines were presented in either all uppercase or standard lowercase

Reading speed was measured to assess legibility

Key Findings:

Contrary to expectations, uppercase headlines took significantly longer to read

Average reading times:

Lowercase: 2.77 seconds

Uppercase: 3.16 seconds

This difference persists despite consumers' frequent exposure to capitalized text in everyday life

Implications for Marketers:

The assumed familiarity with uppercase text does not translate to improved reading speed

Using all caps in headlines may actually slow down the reader's ability to process your message

Readability in Real-World Advertising Contexts

Study Design:

168 German students viewed magazine-style ads with manipulated headlines

Variables tested:

Headline length (short: 3-4 words vs. long: 7-8 words)

Capitalization (all uppercase vs. standard lowercase)

Participants had 2 seconds to view each ad (simulating realistic exposure)

Measured ability to accurately reproduce the headline

Key Findings:

Long Headlines:

Significant negative impact when using all uppercase letters

Readers struggled to accurately recall the content of long, capitalized headlines

Short Headlines:

No significant difference in readability between uppercase and lowercase

Ad Aesthetics and Attitude:

Capitalization did not affect perceived aesthetics or overall attitude toward the ad

Actionable Takeaways:

For long headlines (7+ words): Avoid using all caps to improve readability

For short headlines: Capitalization choice has less impact, allowing more creative flexibility

Don't rely on capitalization alone to enhance the visual appeal of your ads

The Power of Selective Capitalization

Study Design:

127 participants viewed a fictitious hamburger ad

Three capitalization conditions:

All lowercase

All uppercase

Selective uppercase (key attribute "ORGANIC INGREDIENTS" capitalized)

Multiple exposures (2, 3, and 4 seconds)

Key Findings:

Selective capitalization was most effective in conveying the key product attribute

This effect was strongest in the initial exposure but persisted across multiple views

Implications: Strategic use of capitalization can direct attention to crucial information

Real-World Application: Imagine an ad for a new running shoe:

Less Effective: "THE LIGHTEST RUNNING SHOE EVER MADE"

More Effective: "The lightest RUNNING SHOE ever made"

This approach allows you to emphasize the product category while maintaining overall readability.

Debunking the Myth of Uppercase Connotations

Study Design:

102 US participants viewed a tea advertisement

Headline: "Calmness for you" (in either all uppercase or lowercase)

Measured perceptions of the product's strength and power

Key Finding:

No significant difference in product perceptions based on capitalization

This challenges previous research suggesting uppercase conveys dominance or strength

Implications for Marketers:

Don't rely on capitalization alone to convey product attributes or brand personality

The overall ad context (imagery, copy, etc.) likely has a ...

bookmark
plus icon
share episode

Leija, M. G., Guerra, M. J., & Lewis, B. A. (2023). Día de los Muertos: Recognizing heterogeneity in Latinx cultural knowledge. NABE Journal of Research and Practice, 13(3–4), 68–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/26390043.2023.2235343Full episode notes: https://www.marketingsciencelab.org/p/cultural-competence-marketing-dia-de-los-muertos

Presentation slides: https://slides.marketingsciencelab.org/cultural-competence-in-marketing-lessons-from-dia-de-los-muertos

In an increasingly diverse marketplace, cultural competence has become a crucial skill for marketers. But what does it really mean to be culturally competent, and how can marketers develop this skill? A recent study on Día de los Muertos in education offers surprising insights that can revolutionize our approach to cultural marketing.

The Power of Cultural Heterogeneity

The study, published in the NABE Journal of Research and Practice, examined how a second-grade Mexican bilingual teacher guided his Latinx students in discussing Día de los Muertos. One of the most striking findings was the sheer diversity of responses from Latinx families to the Día de los Muertos project.

Some families were learning about the tradition for the first time, others were eagerly reclaiming cultural practices they had participated in back in their countries of origin, while a few were completely opposed to the project. This heterogeneity within a single cultural group challenges the one-size-fits-all approach often seen in cultural marketing campaigns.

Lesson for Marketers: Recognize the diversity within cultural groups. Avoid broad generalizations and instead, strive to understand the nuances and variations within your target audience.

The Role of Cultural Intuition

The teacher in the study, Mr. Aguilar, used what researchers call "cultural intuition" to create meaningful educational experiences. He drew on his own cultural background and understanding to guide students through discussions and activities related to Día de los Muertos.

In marketing, this translates to employing team members or consultants who have deep cultural understanding to help create authentic and resonant campaigns. It's about going beyond surface-level cultural representations and tapping into the nuances and lived experiences of the target audience.

Lesson for Marketers: Invest in diverse teams and cultural consultants who can provide genuine insights into your target audience's experiences and values.

Interactive Approaches: A Two-Way Conversation

Mr. Aguilar used interactive read-alouds and home inquiry assignments to engage students and their families. This approach encouraged participation and knowledge sharing, creating a two-way conversation rather than a one-way transmission of information.

In marketing, this could translate to creating campaigns that encourage audience participation and storytelling. For example, a beverage company could launch an interactive social media campaign inviting consumers to share their family traditions and stories related to Día de los Muertos.

Lesson for Marketers: Design campaigns that invite your audience to participate and share their experiences. This not only increases engagement but also provides valuable insights into your audience's diverse perspectives.

Balancing Tradition and Innovation

The study revealed that while some families expressed a desire to reclaim cultural practices, others were reluctant. This highlights the need for marketers to be sensitive to both those who are deeply connected to traditions and those who might be exploring them for the first time or even resisting them.

Lesson for Marketers: When marketing around cultural themes, strike a balance between honoring traditions and embracing innovation. Offer a range of ways for consumers to engage with your brand, from deeply traditional to more contemporary interpretations.

Bridging Knowledge Gaps

Mr. Aguilar's approach facilitated family engagement through linguistic, cultural, and experiential knowledge sharing. In marketing, this translates to creating content that connects products or services to consumers' lived experiences and cultural knowledge.

Lesson for Marketers: Develop marketing strategies that bridge the gap between your brand and your audience's cultural experiences. Use storytelling and relatable scenarios to make these connections clear and meaningful.

The Road Ahead: Cu...

bookmark
plus icon
share episode

Source:

Demi Oba, Holly S Howe, Gavan J Fitzsimons, Brand Teasing: How Brands Build Strong Relationships by Making Fun of Their Consumers, Journal of Consumer Research, 2024;, ucae051, https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucae051

In the latest episode of Marketing Science Lab, we take a deep dive into groundbreaking research on brand teasing and its impact on consumer relationships. The study, published in the Journal of Consumer Research, challenges conventional marketing wisdom and explores how brands can build stronger connections by playfully poking fun at their consumers.

Understanding Brand Teasing

Brand teasing is an emerging marketing strategy that involves using humor and mild provocation to engage consumers. This approach, exemplified by brands like Wendy's and RyanAir, has gained traction in recent years, particularly on social media platforms. But what makes brand teasing effective, and how can marketers leverage this strategy without alienating their audience?

The research we discussed defines teasing as an intentional provocation accompanied by playful markers that comment on something relevant to the target. In the context of brand communication, teases are a subset of humorous content where the "violation" is directed at an entity, such as a person or brand.

Prosocial vs. Antisocial Teasing: Walking the Tightrope

One of the key insights from the study is the distinction between prosocial and antisocial teasing. Prosocial teases are characterized by mild provocations with numerous play markers, such as emphasis, exaggeration, or a friendly tone. These types of teases tend to strengthen consumer-brand relationships. On the other hand, antisocial teases involve stronger provocations with fewer or weaker play markers, which can potentially damage brand perception.

We found that the effectiveness of brand teasing hinges on striking the right balance between playfulness and provocation. Successful teases are perceived as more playful than provoking, activating positive human schemas in consumers' minds.

The Role of Anthropomorphism in Brand Teasing

A fascinating aspect of the research is how brand teasing influences anthropomorphism – the attribution of human characteristics to non-human entities. The study reveals that teasing leads to increased anthropomorphism because:

It's a uniquely human form of communication

It's unexpected from brands, triggering consumers to apply human schemas

This increased anthropomorphism is key to understanding why brand teasing can be so effective in building stronger consumer-brand relationships. By making brands feel more human and relatable, teasing can lead to higher self-brand connection compared to purely funny or neutral communication.

Real-World Success Stories

We explored several real-world examples of successful brand teasing campaigns:

Wendy's #NationalRoastDay: This annual Twitter campaign, where Wendy's playfully teases followers, resulted in 350,000 new Twitter followers and positive media coverage.

Postmates "We Get You" Campaign: These ads poked fun at consumer behaviors in a relatable way, increasing brand engagement and connection.

RyanAir's Social Media Strategy: Known for its "savage" social media presence, RyanAir's teasing approach has led to increased engagement and brand distinctiveness.

These examples demonstrate how, when done right, brand teasing can cut through the noise of traditional marketing messages and create memorable, engaging content that resonates with consumers.

Actionable Takeaways for Marketers

Based on the research findings, we discussed several key takeaways for marketers looking to incorporate teasing into their strategies:

Focus on prosocial teasing with mild provocations and plenty of playful markers.

Pre-test teases to ensure they're perceived as prosocial rather than antisocial.

Use teasing as a tool to make your brand feel more human and relatable.

Be cautious with sensitive topics and monitor language and tone carefully.

Consider your brand personality and audience when implementing teasing strategies.

Tailor teasing to your audience, considering individual consumer traits.

The Double-Edged Sword: Navigating the Risks

While brand teasing can be a powerful tool for engagement, it's not without risks. We emphasized the importance of understanding your brand, your audience, and the nuances of execution. Antisocial teasing can backfire, activating negative human schemas and potentially damaging consumer relationships.

Marketers must be mindful of cultural differences, sensitive topics, and the psychological distance between the brand and the teasing target. It's crucial to maintain a playful tone and avoid language that indicates strong neg...

bookmark
plus icon
share episode
Marketing Science Lab - Star Power vs. Search Power: The Spotify Playlist Showdown
play

12/08/24 • 9 min

Source: Max J. Pachali, Hannes Datta (2024) What Drives Demand for Playlists on Spotify?. Marketing Science 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2022.0273
Full Show Notes: https://www.marketingsciencelab.org/p/star-power-vs-search-power-the-spotify

In the ever-evolving landscape of music streaming, playlists have become a crucial battleground for artists, labels, and platforms alike. A groundbreaking study published in Marketing Science has revealed fascinating insights into what drives demand for playlists on Spotify, with implications that could reshape our understanding of music discovery and promotion in the digital age.

The Research: Unpacking Playlist Popularity

Researchers Max J. Pachali and Hannes Datta from Tilburg University set out to answer a critical question: What makes some playlists more successful than others on Spotify? Their study, which analyzed data from over 30,000 popular playlists across 66 music categories, compared two main drivers of playlist demand:

Being featured on Spotify's Search Page

Adding songs by exceptionally popular major label artists to playlists

The findings are nothing short of revolutionary for the music industry.

Key Discoveries: The Platform's Power Play

The Featuring Effect

The study found that being featured on Spotify's Search Page increases a playlist's daily followers by a staggering 0.95% on average. To put this into perspective, for a large playlist like "Reggaeton Classic" with 1.9 million followers, being featured could result in approximately 18,050 additional followers in a single day.

The Superstar Effect

In comparison, adding at least one track by a major label superstar artist increases daily followers by 0.45% on average. While still significant, this is less than half the impact of being featured on the Search Page.

Implications for the Music Industry

1. Platform Power

These findings underscore Spotify's significant ability to guide user attention through its Search Page. This supports concerns that the platform can potentially favor certain content producers over others, reshaping the dynamics of music discovery.

2. Value of Superstars

While not as impactful as being featured, superstar artists still play an important role in attracting followers to playlists. This suggests they remain a valuable asset for major music labels, albeit with diminished influence compared to platform featuring.

3. Shifting Dynamics

The research implies that Spotify holds significant power in driving playlist success, potentially even more than the major labels do through their superstar artists. This could shift the dynamics in negotiations between Spotify and the labels, impacting discussions around royalties and revenue sharing.

What This Means for Marketers and Musicians

Platform Optimization: For marketers and artists, understanding and leveraging Spotify's featuring mechanisms becomes crucial. Strategies to increase the likelihood of being featured on the Search Page could yield significant returns.

Superstar Collaborations: While less impactful than platform featuring, collaborations with major label superstars still provide a notable boost to playlist followers. This remains a viable strategy for playlist growth.

Diversified Approach: The most effective strategy likely combines efforts to secure platform featuring while also incorporating popular artists. This dual approach maximizes potential for playlist growth.

Data-Driven Decision Making: The study underscores the importance of data analysis in music marketing. Understanding the specific impacts of different strategies allows for more targeted and effective promotional efforts.

bookmark
plus icon
share episode

Show more best episodes

Toggle view more icon

FAQ

How many episodes does Marketing Science Lab have?

Marketing Science Lab currently has 37 episodes available.

What topics does Marketing Science Lab cover?

The podcast is about Marketing, Podcasts and Business.

What is the most popular episode on Marketing Science Lab?

The episode title 'The Hidden Link Between Loneliness and Clutter: Insights for the Holiday Season' is the most popular.

What is the average episode length on Marketing Science Lab?

The average episode length on Marketing Science Lab is 9 minutes.

How often are episodes of Marketing Science Lab released?

Episodes of Marketing Science Lab are typically released every 1 day, 17 hours.

When was the first episode of Marketing Science Lab?

The first episode of Marketing Science Lab was released on Sep 13, 2024.

Show more FAQ

Toggle view more icon

Comments