Defamation and Climate Science: Did the Lawsuit Send a Message

02/14/24 • 15 min

Andrew Lewin discusses a lawsuit involving Dr. Michael Mann, a prominent climate scientist. Dr. Mann sued Rand Simberg and Mark Stein for defamatory online posts made over a decade ago by the Competitive Enterprise Institute and the National Review. Lewin also explores the history of attacks on climate scientists by right-wing climate deniers and the misleading tactics used by oil companies to downplay environmental concerns.

Tune in to learn more about the case and the importance of speaking up for the ocean.

Link to article: https://www.npr.org/2024/02/08/1230236546/famous-climate-scientist-michael-mann-wins-his-defamation-case

Follow a career in conservation: https://www.conservation-careers.com/online-training/ Use the code SUFB to get 33% off courses and the careers program. Facebook Group: https://bit.ly/3NmYvsI

Connect with Speak Up For Blue: Website: https://bit.ly/3fOF3Wf Instagram: https://bit.ly/3rIaJSG TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@speakupforblue Twitter: https://bit.ly/3rHZxpc

Dr. Michael Mann, a prominent climate scientist, filed a lawsuit against individuals who defamed him online by comparing him to a child molester and calling his work fraudulent. The defendants in the case were Rand Simberg, a policy analyst, and Mark Stein, a right-wing author. The defamatory statements were made in online posts published over a decade ago by the Competitive Enterprise Institute and the National Review, respectively.

The lawsuit brought attention to the issue of attacks on climate scientists, particularly those who advocate for action on climate change. Dr. Mann is well-known for creating the famous "hockey stick" graph, which visually represents the increase in global temperatures since the Industrial Revolution. The graph gained widespread recognition after being featured in former Vice President Al Gore's documentary on climate change.

The defamatory comments made by Simberg and Stein were not only false but also highly offensive. Simberg compared Dr. Mann to Jerry Sandusky, a former football coach at Penn State University who was convicted of child sexual abuse. Simberg accused Dr. Mann of "molesting and torturing the data," equating his scientific work with the heinous actions of a child abuser.

The lawsuit resulted in a mixed verdict. While Dr. Mann was awarded compensatory damages of only $1 from each defendant, the jury ordered Simberg to pay $1,000 in punitive damages and Stein to pay $1,000,000 in punitive damages. The relatively low compensatory damages raised some controversy, but the verdict still sent a message that falsely attacking climate scientists is not protected speech.

The case highlighted the increasing attacks on climate scientists and the need to protect their credibility and careers. Organizations like the Climate Science Legal Defense Fund have been working to support scientists who face harassment and defamation for their work on climate change. The verdict in Dr. Mann's case may serve as a deterrent for public figures, including politicians and CEOs, who engage in attacks on climate scientists.

However, it is important to note that the ruling may not have a significant impact on anonymous online attackers. The liability verdict and the relatively low damages may not deter individuals who hide behind anonymity to spread false information and defame scientists. Nonetheless, the case sets a precedent and emphasizes the importance of evidence-based discourse when discussing climate change.

Overall, Dr. Mann's lawsuit against those who defamed him online sheds light on the challenges faced by climate scientists and the need to protect their integrity and reputation. It serves as a reminder that freedom of speech does not give individuals the right to spread false information or engage in personal attacks. By standing up for himself and other scientists, Dr. Mann has taken a step towards ensuring that climate scientists can continue their important work without fear of harassment or defamation.

The verdict in the case of Dr. Michael Mann suing Rand Simberg and Mark Stein sends a clear message that falsely attacking climate scientists is not protected speech. While the damages awarded may not have been substantial, the ruling has the potential to deter public figures and others from launching similar attacks on climate scientists.

The case highlights the increasing attacks on climate scientists and the need to protect their credibility and careers. Climate scientists, like Dr. Mann, face pressure and harassme...

Tune in to learn more about the case and the importance of speaking up for the ocean.

Link to article: https://www.npr.org/2024/02/08/1230236546/famous-climate-scientist-michael-mann-wins-his-defamation-case

Follow a career in conservation: https://www.conservation-careers.com/online-training/ Use the code SUFB to get 33% off courses and the careers program. Facebook Group: https://bit.ly/3NmYvsI

Connect with Speak Up For Blue: Website: https://bit.ly/3fOF3Wf Instagram: https://bit.ly/3rIaJSG TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@speakupforblue Twitter: https://bit.ly/3rHZxpc

The case highlights the increasing attacks on climate scientists and the need to protect their credibility and careers. Climate scientists, like Dr. Mann, face pressure and harassme...

Previous Episode

Trawling Bans and Illegal Fishing: A Growing Problem in India

Andrew Lewin discusses the issue of trawling and the challenges it poses for the government of India. Despite growing concerns about the negative impact of trawling on the environment, the Indian government has been slow to enforce bans on the practice. This is especially problematic as more countries are implementing bans within their exclusive economic zones, leading to Indian fishermen being caught for illegal fishing. The episode explores the historical push towards trawling in India and the need to transition away from this harmful practice.

Tune in to learn more about the impact of trawling and what can be done to protect the ocean.

Link to article: https://theprint.in/environment/whats-bottom-trawling-the-new-flashpoint-between-india-sri-lanka-and-why-its-still-rampant-in-india/1962236/

Follow a career in conservation: https://www.conservation-careers.com/online-training/ Use the code SUFB to get 33% off courses and the careers program. Magic Minds: https://www.magicmind.com/protectocean use code PROTECT20 to get up to 56% off your first subscription Facebook Group: https://bit.ly/3NmYvsI

Connect with Speak Up For Blue: Website: https://bit.ly/3fOF3Wf Instagram: https://bit.ly/3rIaJSG TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@speakupforblue Twitter: https://bit.ly/3rHZxpc

Trawling is a widely used fishing method by commercial fishermen and fishing communities, but it is also highly destructive, causing significant harm to the ocean's health and biodiversity. This practice involves dragging a large net equipped with doors and a chain along the bottom of the ocean, capturing everything in its path.

One major concern with trawling is its impact on biodiversity. The scraping of the ocean floor destroys habitats like sponge reefs and soft coral reefs, which take a long time to regenerate. These habitats provide crucial shelter and food sources for many marine species. Additionally, trawling often results in high levels of bycatch, where non-target species and juvenile fish are caught and discarded. This disrupts ecosystem balance and leads to declines in vulnerable species populations.

The negative effects of trawling extend beyond the immediate area. This practice can release large amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, contributing to climate change. It also disturbs sediment on the ocean floor, releasing stored carbon and contributing to ocean acidification.

Despite the known environmental impacts, trawling continues to be extensively practiced in many parts of the world, including India. In fact, over 52% of India's total fishing catch comes from trawl nets. While the government has implemented some measures, such as seasonal bans, enforcement of these regulations is often lacking. This is partly due to historical support for trawling as a major source of fish for the country.

To address the destructive nature of trawling, alternatives have been proposed. Increasing the mesh size of trawl nets allows juvenile fish and non-target species to escape, reducing bycatch. Efforts have also been made to transition fishermen to more sustainable fishing methods. For example, the Blue Revolution scheme in India aims to replace trawling boats with deep-sea fishing boats that use targeted methods like gill nets and tuna longlining, which do not damage the seabed.

In conclusion, trawling is a highly destructive fishing method that poses significant threats to the ocean's health and biodiversity. It destroys habitats, causes high levels of bycatch, and contributes to climate change and ocean acidification. Efforts to reduce the impact of trawling include increasing mesh sizes, implementing seasonal bans, and transitioning fishermen to more sustainable fishing methods. However, further action and enforcement are needed to protect the ocean from the harmful effects of trawling.

The government of India has historically supported trawling as a major source of fish for the country, despite increasing bans on trawling in other countries. According to the podcast episode, India has a long-standing push towards trawling as a means of bringing in fish for the country. This can be attributed to various factors, including the government's subsidies for mechanized trawlers, engines, and fuel since the 1950s. These subsidies have incentivized fishermen to engage in trawling as it is a more efficient method of fishing.

However, the episo...

Next Episode

Beware of Crocs: Why Ignoring Warning Signs Can Have Deadly Consequences

Today's episode of the How to Protect the Ocean podcast highlights the importance of heeding warning signs on beaches, particularly in areas like Cardwell, Australia, where crocodile dangers persist. Host Andrew Lewin emphasizes the need to respect such warnings and avoid risky situations for the safety of both people and marine life.

Tune in to learn more about taking action by avoiding potential threats to protect the ocean ecosystem.

Link to article: https://au.news.yahoo.com/locals-rant-about-warning-sign-triggers-fiery-debate-cant-you-read-060048534.html

Magic Minds: https://www.magicmind.com/protectocean use code PROTECT20 to get up to 56% off your first subscription

Follow a career in conservation: https://www.conservation-careers.com/online-training/ Use the code SUFB to get 33% off courses and the careers program. Facebook Group: https://bit.ly/3NmYvsI

Connect with Speak Up For Blue: Website: https://bit.ly/3fOF3Wf Instagram: https://bit.ly/3rIaJSG TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@speakupforblue Twitter: https://bit.ly/3rHZxpc

Prioritizing Safety and Respecting Warning Signs in Unfamiliar Environments

In a thought-provoking podcast episode, the host stresses the significance of prioritizing safety and respecting warning signs, especially in unfamiliar environments. The example of tourists at a beach near Cardwell, Australia, disregarding signs cautioning about crocodiles serves as a poignant reminder of the repercussions of ignoring such warnings.

The host underscores the importance of individuals educating themselves about potential dangers in their surroundings before exploring new territories. Whether it involves signs warning of crocodiles, jellyfish, or other hazards, it is vital to take these warnings seriously to safeguard personal well-being and prevent adverse impacts on the ecosystem.

The episode recounts the harrowing experience of a man who was attacked by a crocodile in far north Queensland after entering hazardous waters with his dog. Tragic incidents like this underscore the critical nature of heeding warning signs and being mindful of potential risks in natural settings.

By sharing personal anecdotes, such as encountering jellyfish stings in Miami despite being unfamiliar with the flag system indicating their presence, the host emphasizes the necessity of vigilance and awareness when venturing into new areas. Even individuals with expertise in marine biology can overlook potential dangers if they fail to heed warning signs and take necessary precautions.

Ultimately, the episode conveys a clear message: always prioritize safety by reading and respecting warning signs, researching potential hazards in unfamiliar areas, and seeking guidance from locals to ensure a secure and enjoyable experience while safeguarding oneself and the environment.