
Breaking News: Responding to the case of Gonzalez v. Google
03/03/23 • 18 min
Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in cases that raise questions about liability shields afforded to tech companies under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. In this breaking news episode, Lucinda speaks with Dr. Hany Farid, Senior Advisor to CEP and professor at University of California, Berkley. Hany is CEP's in-house expert when it comes to digital forensics. Together, Lucinda and Hany take a closer look at one of the cases, Gonzalez v. Google, and discuss the Section 230 Liability Shield.
Links
- To read the amicus curiae brief, please click here.
- To read CEP's latest press release, please click here.
- To read the March 2020 study A Longitudinal Analysis Of YouTube’s Promotion Of Conspiracy Videos, co-authored by Dr. Farid and other UC Berkeley researchers, please click here.
- To watch a recording of a CEP web event, Algorithmic Amplification of Divisive Content on Tech Platforms, please click here.
Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in cases that raise questions about liability shields afforded to tech companies under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. In this breaking news episode, Lucinda speaks with Dr. Hany Farid, Senior Advisor to CEP and professor at University of California, Berkley. Hany is CEP's in-house expert when it comes to digital forensics. Together, Lucinda and Hany take a closer look at one of the cases, Gonzalez v. Google, and discuss the Section 230 Liability Shield.
Links
- To read the amicus curiae brief, please click here.
- To read CEP's latest press release, please click here.
- To read the March 2020 study A Longitudinal Analysis Of YouTube’s Promotion Of Conspiracy Videos, co-authored by Dr. Farid and other UC Berkeley researchers, please click here.
- To watch a recording of a CEP web event, Algorithmic Amplification of Divisive Content on Tech Platforms, please click here.
Previous Episode

Breaking News: Responding to the Prevent Strategy Review
Last Wednesday, the long-awaited Prevent review was published by the Home Office. Led by William Shawcross, who was appointed Independent Reviewer of Prevent in 2021, the review sets out to understand how effectively this strand of the government’s counterterrorism strategy works and how it can be improved.
But what is Prevent? Why was it created and why was last week's review commissioned in the first place ? What are the key takeaways from Shawcross' review and will Prevent make Britain safer? In this breaking news episode, Lucinda speaks with CEP experts, Ian Acheson and Liam Duffy, and explores the heated debate around the recent Prevent review.
ICYMI:
Next Episode

Manchester Arena Inquiry: Volume 3
In today’s episode, Lucinda speaks with Liam Duffy, CEP Strategic Advisor. They discuss the findings of the recent Manchester Arena Inquiry, which is the third - and final - report of the inquiry. Chaired by Sir John Saunders, this report focuses on radicalisation and preventability. Liam sheds some light on what the inquiry is all about, the tragedy that occurred back in 2017 in Manchester, the radicalisation process of the perpetrator Salman Abedi and - most importantly - whether the attack could have been prevented.
If you like this episode you’ll love
Episode Comments
Generate a badge
Get a badge for your website that links back to this episode
<a href="https://goodpods.com/podcasts/fighting-terror-266588/breaking-news-responding-to-the-case-of-gonzalez-v-google-31772817"> <img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/goodpods-images-bucket/badges/generic-badge-1.svg" alt="listen to breaking news: responding to the case of gonzalez v. google on goodpods" style="width: 225px" /> </a>
Copy