Log in

goodpods headphones icon

To access all our features

Open the Goodpods app
Close icon
Diagnosing Health Care Podcast - Post-Dobbs: Considerations for Clinical Trials and Research

Post-Dobbs: Considerations for Clinical Trials and Research

01/26/23 • 24 min

Diagnosing Health Care Podcast

The Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision, which effectively removed the federal constitutional protections for abortion, triggered a series of changes for health care providers and patients alike across the nation with respect to abortion services. What additional implications are there for certain aspects of clinical trials and research? On this episode, Epstein Becker Green attorneys Kate Heffernan, Marylana Helou, and Megan Robertson discuss how the changing state laws and regulations post-Dobbs may impact clinical research in different ways for different stakeholders.

Visit our site for related resources and email contact information: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc55.

Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.

Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.

The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

plus icon
bookmark

The Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision, which effectively removed the federal constitutional protections for abortion, triggered a series of changes for health care providers and patients alike across the nation with respect to abortion services. What additional implications are there for certain aspects of clinical trials and research? On this episode, Epstein Becker Green attorneys Kate Heffernan, Marylana Helou, and Megan Robertson discuss how the changing state laws and regulations post-Dobbs may impact clinical research in different ways for different stakeholders.

Visit our site for related resources and email contact information: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc55.

Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.

Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.

The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Previous Episode

undefined - 2023 Health Policy Outlook

2023 Health Policy Outlook

With the recent midterm elections changing the composition of Congress, and the Biden administration's first opportunities to advance its policy priorities from the very beginning of the rulemaking process, what are the key health care developments to watch out for in 2023? On this episode, Epstein Becker Green attorneys Ted Kennedy, Jr., Alexis Boaz, and Philo Hall discuss the current landscape of health care policy from both the legislative and regulatory perspectives and analyze which key health care issues may arise.

Visit our site for related resources and email contact information: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc54.

Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.

Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.

The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Next Episode

undefined - The PACE Program: What Changes May Be Coming Soon?

The PACE Program: What Changes May Be Coming Soon?

Changes are on the horizon for provisions of the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) that haven't been updated in over a decade. What exactly is PACE and how will new proposed rule modifications affect PACE plans moving forward? On this episode, special guest Wendy Edwards, Director of Internal Operations at BluePeak Advisors, and Epstein Becker Green attorneys Lynn Shapiro Snyder, Kevin Malone, and Helaine Fingold explore the ins and outs of PACE, the changes in recent years that have made PACE available to for-profit companies, and the specifics of the provisions in the pending federal proposed rule.

Visit our site for related resources and email contact information: https://www.ebglaw.com/dhc56.

Subscribe for email notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe.

Visit: http://diagnosinghealthcare.com.

The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and DIAGNOSING HEALTH CARE podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Episode Comments

Generate a badge

Get a badge for your website that links back to this episode

Select type & size
Open dropdown icon
share badge image

<a href="https://goodpods.com/podcasts/diagnosing-health-care-podcast-372884/post-dobbs-considerations-for-clinical-trials-and-research-53410145"> <img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/goodpods-images-bucket/badges/generic-badge-1.svg" alt="listen to post-dobbs: considerations for clinical trials and research on goodpods" style="width: 225px" /> </a>

Copy