It was a busy week for the court with a number of high-profile orders, three oral arguments, and three unanimous opinions. In orders this week, the Justices announced that they will take up an abortion case but only to resolve a procedural issue, and they also delivered a very predictable rebuke to the Sixth Circuit in a habeas case. Zack and GianCarlo discuss oral arguments with a special focus on the antitrust case that will decide whether the NCAA’s student-athlete compensation rules are lawful. The hosts also discuss the three opinions issued, which involve spam text messages, media conglomerates, and a water-rights fight between Florida and Georgia. GianCarlo interviews Judge Ada E. Brown of the Northern District of Texas and quizzes Zack with trivia about the Justices' extracurricular activities.
Follow us on Twitter and Instagram @scotus101 and send questions, comments, or ideas for future episodes to [email protected].
Don't forget to leave a 5-star rating!
Stay caffeinated and opinionated with a SCOTUS 101 mug.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
04/02/21 • 48 min
Generate a badge
Get a badge for your website that links back to this episode
<a href="https://goodpods.com/podcasts/case-in-point-the-legal-show-for-regular-people-203226/march-madness-at-the-court-20722499"> <img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/goodpods-images-bucket/badges/generic-badge-1.svg" alt="listen to march madness at the court on goodpods" style="width: 225px" /> </a>
Copy