The Supreme Court has taken up three cases that arise out of litigants seeking accountability for the violent events of January 6th. This month, the Court will hear arguments on former president Trump's presidential immunity claim and take a look at whether the law used to prosecute many January 6th participants was validly applied in one such prosecution. Lindsay Langholz speaks with Donald Sherman of CREW about what the Court's decision in Trump v. Anderson, the ballot disqualification case, means for this ongoing pursuit of accountability.
Join the Progressive Legal Movement Today: ACSLaw.org
Today's Host: Lindsay Langholz, ACS Sr Director of Policy and Program
Guest: Donald Sherman, Executive Vice President and Chief Counsel, CREW
Link: American Historians' Brief
Link: Childrens' Rights Legal Scholars and Advocates Brief
Link: Colorado lawsuit enforcing Donald Trump's unconstitutional disqualification, CREW
Visit the Podcast Website: Broken Law Podcast
Email the Show: [email protected]
Follow ACS on Social Media: Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | LinkedIn | YouTube
-----------------
Broken Law: About the law, who it serves, and who it doesn’t.
-----------------
Production House: Flint Stone Media
Copyright of American Constitution Society 2024.
04/02/24 • 36 min
Generate a badge
Get a badge for your website that links back to this episode
<a href="https://goodpods.com/podcasts/broken-law-183419/episode-145-insurrection-on-the-docket-47999276"> <img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/goodpods-images-bucket/badges/generic-badge-1.svg" alt="listen to episode 145: insurrection on the docket on goodpods" style="width: 225px" /> </a>
Copy