
Story Time for Fed Court Nerds
11/28/23 • 72 min
1 Listener
Sarah and David return from their Thanksgiving feasts to serve up a very nerdy episode on fed court law. Enjoy:
-David giving a lowdown of the Voting Rights Act
-Hacking minority districts
-Laws created by court precedents versus laws created by statutes
-Any standing experts out there?
-Undoing the Warren Court
-Section Two Rights vindicated in civil court
-Reporters: Don’t go to activists for legal analysis
-Elon versus Media Matters
-Match maker Sarah, make me a match
Show Notes:
-Eight Circuit two to one opinion
-Section Two of the Voting Rights Act
-Video: Hostage reunites with family
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Sarah and David return from their Thanksgiving feasts to serve up a very nerdy episode on fed court law. Enjoy:
-David giving a lowdown of the Voting Rights Act
-Hacking minority districts
-Laws created by court precedents versus laws created by statutes
-Any standing experts out there?
-Undoing the Warren Court
-Section Two Rights vindicated in civil court
-Reporters: Don’t go to activists for legal analysis
-Elon versus Media Matters
-Match maker Sarah, make me a match
Show Notes:
-Eight Circuit two to one opinion
-Section Two of the Voting Rights Act
-Video: Hostage reunites with family
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Previous Episode

Hamburger Mary's Risqué Drag Show
Sarah and David have a big ol' pod today, wherein they discuss a First Amendment case involving risqué drag shows at a burger joint, hunter harassment laws, and challenges to Donald Trump's ballot access. Spoiler: Sarah was right. Also:
-Masked protesters and Anti-Klan laws
-Bad facts make bad laws
-Lawyers and Non-germaine activities
-David's window-dressing ignorance
-Trump's ballot access in Colorado
Show notes:
-Hunter Harassment laws challenge
-Trump's ballot access challenge in Colorado
-The Meaning and Ambiguity of Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Next Episode

Inconsistent and Repugnant
On today’s episode, David and Sarah break down the most interesting Supreme Court argument of this term and what it means for the future of double jeopardy law. But first, they have to shout out the dating site that is the AO comment section. Also on the docket:
-Mistrials vs. double jeopardy
-Federal rights and state interpretations
-The coolest word you've never used
-David calls for thoughtful comments
-How to lose with valor at SCOTUS
-Fifth circuit on the brain
-A second bite of the Rahimi apple
-Revealing AO's next long-awaited guest
Show notes:
-SNL: Weights and Measures with Nate Bargatze
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
If you like this episode you’ll love
Episode Comments
Generate a badge
Get a badge for your website that links back to this episode
<a href="https://goodpods.com/podcasts/advisory-opinions-219014/story-time-for-fed-court-nerds-37888947"> <img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/goodpods-images-bucket/badges/generic-badge-1.svg" alt="listen to story time for fed court nerds on goodpods" style="width: 225px" /> </a>
Copy