![Admissible: Shreds of Evidence - Ch. 6 - "Bad Documentation"](https://storage.googleapis.com/goodpods-images-bucket/episode_images/300ef0c763a79f37f59ffc76d4e944298f4e8e99f6039c4d073963467be52faa.avif)
Whistleblower Gina Demas wasn’t the only one with concerns about Mary Jane Burton. Tessa Kramer sits down with two former lab employees whose careers soared following Gina’s fight with the lab. What do they remember about Mary Jane’s work? And what kept them from speaking up?
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Explicit content warning
03/07/23 • 35 min
Admissible: Shreds of Evidence - Ch. 6 - "Bad Documentation"
Transcript
Those story mechanics and VPU previously on admissible. They should have retired her when we found that one case. They didn't have to fire or I didn't care about that, but she needed to go away. They did bring Pete around in and he told me that I shouldn't be worried because he was checking all of Mary Jane's work.
Speaker 1Think of all the important disappointing people. Think about all the people tha
Generate a badge
Get a badge for your website that links back to this episode
<a href="https://goodpods.com/podcasts/admissible-shreds-of-evidence-249555/ch-6-bad-documentation-28645020"> <img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/goodpods-images-bucket/badges/generic-badge-1.svg" alt="listen to ch. 6 - "bad documentation" on goodpods" style="width: 225px" /> </a>
Copy