
The Woman In Black
10/20/15 • 29 min
We were less-than-impressed with Daniel Radcliffe’s first film after the Harry Potter series, but it may be good for those who prefer the gothic and predictable.
Expand to read episode transcript Automatic TranscriptThe Woman In Black (2012)
Episode 5, 2 Guys and a Chainsaw
Todd: Welcome to another edition of Two Guys and a Chainsaw. I’m Todd. I’m Craig. And today we are on our third week of a Halloween horror and we kicked it off with a woman in black. Let’s say 2012, Daniel
Craig: Craig film, Daniel Radcliffe. Get your Daniels straight.
Todd: That’d be a whole different movie. I think that’s a good point. All right, this is a 2012 Daniel Radcliffe movie. Um, the first one that he did since Harry Potter. So this was kind of a, an interesting choice, a foray out of, uh, sort of the kid soup. Well, I guess from one type of supernatural fantasy into another kind of supernatural horror, I’m still taking place in Britain, still taking place in the Misty Moore’s of, uh, of castles or houses up on Hills and things like that.
So I guess it’s not too far out of his, uh, Ballywick after
Craig: all at that point, you know, there’s a lot going on that is actually really reminiscent of Harry Potter. Uh, you’ve got, uh, a train ride in the beginning to a remote location. You’ve got a, a big mansion covered in old timey portraits that I expected to start talking or moving about at any moment.
Um, so not too big of a leap, really, as far as. Tone is concerned, I guess,
Todd: I guess you got to play it safe when you’re taking your step out into the, into the real world. Again, it’s, it’s interesting. And, you know, um, when the credits came up, I didn’t know much about this film beforehand. When the credits came up, I noticed that it was a hammer horror production, right.
You know, hammer being the sort of quintessential British horror production studio that started out in the sixties, maybe even late fifties and then brought us. Great classics of Dracula with, with, with Christopher Lee, Peter Cushing. Um, some of actually my favorite movies, just because they would come on on Saturday afternoons, you know, after the, during MUN cartoons were done or something like that.
And that was really how I got my horror
Craig: fix. Yeah. And you can see, I mean, I can see similarities between those kind of old-school films and this, I mean, it’s, it’s. Uh, very Gothic, a little bit slow paced. Uh, it’s a slow build. It focuses more on the suspense. You can see that in some of the earlier humor pictures
Todd: too.
Yeah. The slow pace of it was definitely something. Again, one of those things you don’t find as much there often. It’s not, it’s not really a modern movie. Uh, this movie. Reminded me a lot of the movies. My wife really likes the Vincent Price films, like the ed ground Poe movies that Roger Corman did, uh, the fall of the house of the usher, the pit and the pendulum especially reminded me of the terror.
Craig: I’m not familiar with it.
Todd: The terror was one that he shot after they had shot another one. You know, Roger Corman was really good about delivering movies under budget and under time. And he would often slap together a script real quick and take the actors that he already had under contract and the sets that he already had built and the crew that was still under contract and, and, and could be paid for another few weeks and he quickly whipped together another movie.
And sometimes that second movie would actually do better than the movie they were shooting before. Interesting. The terror was one that was actually Jack Nicholson. It was one of his first large film roles, um, that he cast him in. And it started out very much like this, uh, where this guy leaves his family and goes to this far off.
A place where there’s by the ocean, a large mansion of sorts that nobody goes up to. And whatever, of course, in his case, I think there actually was somebody living there in this case, Daniel Radcliffe’s character is coming in and there’s nobody living there. He’s actually settling the estate of a woman.
But you know, it was, it was with, with the water surrounding it, it just had the feel of about 15 either hammer, horror films or, um, AIP pictures. Roger Corman, AIP,
Craig: pictures that I’ve seen. Well, yeah, no. It’s as far as set pieces go, I mean, you were talking about, uh, the marshlands and whatnot. The film is beautiful to look at in that respect, the set pieces are gorgeous.
You know, you’ve got this big Goth...
We were less-than-impressed with Daniel Radcliffe’s first film after the Harry Potter series, but it may be good for those who prefer the gothic and predictable.
Expand to read episode transcript Automatic TranscriptThe Woman In Black (2012)
Episode 5, 2 Guys and a Chainsaw
Todd: Welcome to another edition of Two Guys and a Chainsaw. I’m Todd. I’m Craig. And today we are on our third week of a Halloween horror and we kicked it off with a woman in black. Let’s say 2012, Daniel
Craig: Craig film, Daniel Radcliffe. Get your Daniels straight.
Todd: That’d be a whole different movie. I think that’s a good point. All right, this is a 2012 Daniel Radcliffe movie. Um, the first one that he did since Harry Potter. So this was kind of a, an interesting choice, a foray out of, uh, sort of the kid soup. Well, I guess from one type of supernatural fantasy into another kind of supernatural horror, I’m still taking place in Britain, still taking place in the Misty Moore’s of, uh, of castles or houses up on Hills and things like that.
So I guess it’s not too far out of his, uh, Ballywick after
Craig: all at that point, you know, there’s a lot going on that is actually really reminiscent of Harry Potter. Uh, you’ve got, uh, a train ride in the beginning to a remote location. You’ve got a, a big mansion covered in old timey portraits that I expected to start talking or moving about at any moment.
Um, so not too big of a leap, really, as far as. Tone is concerned, I guess,
Todd: I guess you got to play it safe when you’re taking your step out into the, into the real world. Again, it’s, it’s interesting. And, you know, um, when the credits came up, I didn’t know much about this film beforehand. When the credits came up, I noticed that it was a hammer horror production, right.
You know, hammer being the sort of quintessential British horror production studio that started out in the sixties, maybe even late fifties and then brought us. Great classics of Dracula with, with, with Christopher Lee, Peter Cushing. Um, some of actually my favorite movies, just because they would come on on Saturday afternoons, you know, after the, during MUN cartoons were done or something like that.
And that was really how I got my horror
Craig: fix. Yeah. And you can see, I mean, I can see similarities between those kind of old-school films and this, I mean, it’s, it’s. Uh, very Gothic, a little bit slow paced. Uh, it’s a slow build. It focuses more on the suspense. You can see that in some of the earlier humor pictures
Todd: too.
Yeah. The slow pace of it was definitely something. Again, one of those things you don’t find as much there often. It’s not, it’s not really a modern movie. Uh, this movie. Reminded me a lot of the movies. My wife really likes the Vincent Price films, like the ed ground Poe movies that Roger Corman did, uh, the fall of the house of the usher, the pit and the pendulum especially reminded me of the terror.
Craig: I’m not familiar with it.
Todd: The terror was one that he shot after they had shot another one. You know, Roger Corman was really good about delivering movies under budget and under time. And he would often slap together a script real quick and take the actors that he already had under contract and the sets that he already had built and the crew that was still under contract and, and, and could be paid for another few weeks and he quickly whipped together another movie.
And sometimes that second movie would actually do better than the movie they were shooting before. Interesting. The terror was one that was actually Jack Nicholson. It was one of his first large film roles, um, that he cast him in. And it started out very much like this, uh, where this guy leaves his family and goes to this far off.
A place where there’s by the ocean, a large mansion of sorts that nobody goes up to. And whatever, of course, in his case, I think there actually was somebody living there in this case, Daniel Radcliffe’s character is coming in and there’s nobody living there. He’s actually settling the estate of a woman.
But you know, it was, it was with, with the water surrounding it, it just had the feel of about 15 either hammer, horror films or, um, AIP pictures. Roger Corman, AIP,
Craig: pictures that I’ve seen. Well, yeah, no. It’s as far as set pieces go, I mean, you were talking about, uh, the marshlands and whatnot. The film is beautiful to look at in that respect, the set pieces are gorgeous.
You know, you’ve got this big Goth...
Previous Episode

Trick R Treat
Trick or Treat is the Halloween movie to end all Halloween movies, and we had a ball discussing it this month.
See the short Craig mentions during the podcast here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=7&v=czlSc6kYegg
Expand to read episode transcript Automatic TranscriptTrick R Treat (2007)
Episode 4, 2 Guys and a Chainsaw Horror Movie Review Podcast
Todd: Hello, and welcome to another edition of two guys and a chainsaw. Todd I’m Craig, and it is Halloween time. We’re in the middle of the month. And, uh, starting off with another Halloween movie again.
Craig: Yeah. We, uh, decided in the spirit of this. We would give a watch to Trick R Treat.
Todd: Now I saw Trick R Treat last year or the year before on this time during my 31 days of horror where I review,
Craig: I think, yeah, I think it was the year before because I went and looked for your review and I couldn’t find it right away.
So I think it must’ve been a couple of years
Todd: ago. It must’ve been a couple of years ago, but I do remember the one I watched it. It was the highlight of my year and I think. He might’ve even been you who recommended
Craig: it to me? It wouldn’t surprise me. I stumbled upon this movie. I don’t remember where I don’t remember if I rented it from a video store or if it happened, maybe be on Netflix for a little while.
I don’t remember, but I loved it from the first viewing. I mean, this is just such a fun. Movie.
Todd: Oh my gosh. Like as a Halloween film, this is the quintessential Halloween
Craig: film. Great. And you know, I just love, you know, uh, well, horror in general, uh, Halloween themed movies are always fun. It’s, it’s great to pop them in this time of year.
And, and this one just delivers on pretty much every front. I mean, it’s. Uh, got it’s darkly comedic moments. It’s a, it’s got your adequate amount of Gore for those who are, uh, the Gore hounds out there. Um, it’s genuinely frightening in places, but it’s not the kind of scary that you’re probably gonna lose.
The sleepover. It’s fun. I mean, it’s, uh, I can imagine, unfortunately, nobody got to do this. Um, but I can imagine, uh, you know, sitting in a crowded theater with a lot of pumped up people who are really just in for a ride. Um, so this wasn’t a big
Todd: movie
Craig: when it came out. No, I read a little bit about the production history and it was kind of troubled, I think, uh, on IMDBs.
It says that this is a 2007 film, but I think it was actually supposed to come out at least a year before. Uh, and it was scheduled for a Halloween release. And I guess just without any explanation for why. It got pulled from, uh, its release date and, and no new release date was ever scheduled. Uh, there was, I read some speculation.
Uh, Bryan singer was Brian singer, the director here, who was the producer producer. He had, uh, also, uh, his production team had also worked on the Superman reboot that did not perform well in theaters at all. Um, and so there’s some speculation that maybe they were worried about. It’s a, this having a similar, uh, reception also, it was initially slated to come out against a soft four.
And those movies were huge Halloween draws at the time, and they may not have wanted to compete, but the sad part of the story is it just never ended up getting released and it ended up just going straight to video and, you know, based on the quality. This is definitely, you know, a theater worthy film.
This is, this isn’t a low budget, uh,
Todd: hack job, no, by any stretch of the imagination, I mean, it is beautifully shot. Uh, it is colorful. Um, it is well acted, actually a whole bunch of unknowns in here. Although some people work, some character actors, you kind of recognize, but you’re not sure from where, um, and widescreen total widescreen, um, it’s not 16 by nine it’s anamorphic wide screen.
Right. It’s gorgeous. It’s beautifully shot the transitions. Well, it’s an anthology. Yeah.
Craig: And I feel like we’ve talked about this before we, that maybe we should do spoiler alerts. Um, if you haven’t seen this movie, I don’t know if I would listen to this, if you plan to, because part of the fun of this movie is it is an anthology film.
Kind of in the same vein as like creep show or something, you know, like that from the dark side. Right, exactly. But, uh, it’s a little bit atypical in the way that the stories are all woven together. ...
Next Episode

Saw
We revisit Saw with our first guest, Kristin Sorhus-Hafen – who doesn’t normally do horror, and is watching it for the first time. Wheee!
Expand to read episode transcript Automatic TranscriptSaw (2004)
Episode 6, 2 Guys and a Chainsaw
Todd: And welcome to another edition of 2 Guys and a Chainsaw. I’m Todd. I’m Craig. And Todd, for the very first time here in the 2 Guys in a Chainsaw Studios, we are joined by a guest, Kristin Soreshafen. Kristin, say hi to everybody. Hello. And, Kristin, you were the one who asked to be our 1st guest.
Kristin: I did. I did.
Todd: Did did you hear our previous podcasts? Or
Kristin: Nope. I just didn’t Just put it on just put it on loud. And I feel real real dumb about it. I should have.
Todd: How flattering.
Kristin: Thank you. Thank you, Kristen. We’re glad you’re
Craig: a fan.
Todd: We we are. This is this is a great choice.
Kristin: I figured it had to be great.
Todd: No. That’s good.
Kristin: I’ll tell you. Right. And it had to be great.
Todd: Great. I guess our reputation precedes us.
Kristin: Absolutely. Now, Kristen, you also chose
Todd: the movie for today, which is Saw, the 2004 film by James Wan and Lee Whannel. Why did first of all, let me ask you. Have you watched many horror movies yourself?
Kristin: No. I haven’t.
Todd: Okay. So when I came to you and I said, what movie do you wanna watch on this podcast you’ve never heard? And you said Saw, I my mouth kind of hit the floor, and I’m kinda curious why. Why did you choose Saw?
Kristin: Well, honestly, it’s because I heard Cary Elwes is in it and he was my 1st celebrity Craig, and I thought, man, I really I have to see his complete body of work.
Craig: Gooder reason as any. Sure.
Kristin: I hadn’t seen this yet, so I thought that kind of fits in horror. Right? I think.
Todd: Yeah.
Kristin: I hadn’t seen it, so I wasn’t sure.
Craig: Have you seen any horror movies? Do you have any basis for comparison?
Kristin: I have seen The Ring.
Todd: K. Oh, that’s not bad.
Kristin: I’ve seen, that want skeleton key, I think, like, can I
Todd: That was a good one? Yep. Yep. Okay. That’s it.
Kristin: That’s about it. I can’t really I can’t think of another horror film that I’ve seen.
Todd: So we go from sort of supernatural ghost thrillers right into the torture porn genre,
Kristin: don’t we? You know what? It’s been a
Todd: while since I’ve seen this. Craig, when did did you see this when it came out?
Craig: I think I did. I’m pretty sure I saw it in the theater. You know, you said torture porn, and I was, reading that when, 1 l and Juan went Todd, make this movie, they didn’t set out to make a torture porn film, but they kind of define the genre. I don’t recall hearing those words before this movie came out. And, I think I saw it in the theater because at the time, it seems somewhat unique, a different spin on things. Now we’ve been so inundated not only with the sequels, but also the crappy copycats that, it’s it’s getting a little bit old. But
Todd: It almost seems quaint, doesn’t it? Yeah. I mean
Craig: I it wasn’t nearly as gory as I remember.
Todd: No. Now I first saw this. I have a bit of a storied history with this one because I first saw it in the theater. I went my wife doesn’t like horror films. I couldn’t really get anybody to go with me, so I watched in the theater and I was really blown away. I was blown away because, you know, you’re right. The torture porn thing really started getting attached to films like Saw after Saw. Mhmm. Saw came, then Saw 2, then sort of hostile, and and but Saw really sort of kicked it off. But up to that point, I never really seen a movie like this that was so grimy Mhmm. And so dirty and just so kind of unrelentlessly at the time brutal. Yeah. Almost nihilistic, you know? And it’s not that those movies haven’t existed or that I probably hadn’t seen them, but just this whole sort of everything at once Mhmm. With the modern style really hit me. On top of that, the puzzle aspect of it. Yeah...
If you like this episode you’ll love
Episode Comments
Generate a badge
Get a badge for your website that links back to this episode
<a href="https://goodpods.com/podcasts/2-guys-and-a-chainsaw-a-horror-movie-review-podcast-147329/the-woman-in-black-7283693"> <img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/goodpods-images-bucket/badges/generic-badge-1.svg" alt="listen to the woman in black on goodpods" style="width: 225px" /> </a>
Copy