Indie only
Top 7 Supreme Court Podcasts
Jan 6, 2025
The Best Supreme Court Podcasts from millions of podcasts available on the Goodpods platform and ranked by listens, ratings, comments, subscriptions and shares.
Two comedians look at a small town, what makes it tick, and a murder that took place there. In depth research, horrible tragedy, and the hosts' comedic spin on the whole thing. New episodes every Thursday!!
Each Monday, the Immigration Review podcast reviews the latest published opinions from the U.S. Supreme Court, the Board of Immigration Appeals, and all U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals—discussing some in depth, providing holdings for others, and always giving practical insights, rummaging through the week’s decisions so you don’t have to.
*Read about your host and the KKTP law firm here: https://www.kktplaw.com/attorney/gregg-kevin-a/
Check out these Supreme Court Podcasts
454 Episodes
|
Avg Length 9m
|
Latest episode 20 days ago
Share
The Supreme Court decision syllabus, read without personal commentary. See: Wheaton and Donaldson v. Peters and Grigg, 33 U.S. 591 (1834) and United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U.S. 321, 337. Photo by: Davi Kelly. Founded by RJ Dieken. Now hosted by Jake Leahy. Frequent guest host Jeff Barnum.
*Note this podcast is for informational and educational purposes only.
44 Episodes
|
Avg Length 32m
|
Latest episode 1 year ago
Share
331 Episodes
|
Avg Length 79m
|
Latest episode 20 days ago
Share
22 Episodes
|
Avg Length 37m
|
Latest episode 19 days ago
Share
Underhandedness. Trickery. Unscrupulous behavior. Skullduggery breaks down the conduct of Washington's political class, tracks the latest in conspiracy theories and disinformation campaigns coursing through social media — and who is pushing them — and keeps you up to date on the latest investigations into misbehavior by members of Congress as well as current and former government officials. Yahoo News’ veteran investigative journalists Michael Isikoff, Editor in Chief Daniel Klaidman, and Senior Council at States United Victoria Bassetti, break news, offer authoritative analysis on sensitive national security and law enforcement issues and draw intriguing historical parallels from decades of covering D.C. scandals. Come prepared to learn something every week.
451 Episodes
|
Avg Length 2m
|
Latest episode 10 months ago
Share
11 Episodes
|
Avg Length 40m
|
Latest episode 2 years ago
Share
106 Episodes
|
Avg Length 31m
|
Latest episode 5 months ago
Share
Welcome to "The Walt Blackman Show"! Join us as we dive into captivating conversations and insightful explorations on a wide range of topics. Hosted by the one and only Walt Blackman, this podcast is your go-to source for thought-provoking discussions, expert interviews, and stories that matter. From current events and politics to personal growth and cultural insights, we're here to spark your curiosity and expand your perspective. Get ready to be engaged, enlightened, and entertained in every episode. Tune in and join the conversation with Walt Blackman!
Hidden Verdicts uncovers forgotten legal cases that shaped history, presented in an engagingly unforgettable way. Hosted by Jeff Brown, a lawyer and proud Actors' Equity member, this podcast offers a fresh perspective on the law, making complex topics accessible and fun for all ages and educational levels. Join us as we explore the stories behind the cases that changed America.
2 Episodes
|
Avg Length 37m
|
Latest episode 1 year ago
Share
Defining Our Roots/Routes: Asian American in Higher Education aims to amplify the erased voices of Asian American students and faculty in higher education as a form of resistance and consciousness-raising by exploring interrelated themes—histories and legacies of Asian America, pan-Asian American identity, and Asian American transnationalism & diaspora. Join us for insights into the lived experiences of Asian American students and scholars in higher education spaces and learn what may be at stake for the larger Asian American community in the wake of Supreme Court cases and recent anti-Asian hate incidents.
Extended Podcast Info:
In late October 2022, the Supreme Court of the United States deliberated the Students for Fair Admissions v. President & Fellows of Harvard College as well as Students for Fair Admissions v. University of Northern Carolina cases, challenging race-conscious admissions practices and potentially developing larger ramifications for the current Affirmative Action policies in the United States.
Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) claims race-conscious admissions practices are racially discriminatory because Black and Latinx students are valued higher at the expense of Asian Americans. They further argue Asian Americans should be “admitted at a higher rate” as they are “substantially stronger” than their non-Asian counterparts. In doing so, the SFFA and conservative Asian American groups, such as the Asian American Legal Foundation (AALF), not only adopt the model minority myth to further pit Asian American students against Black and Latinx students but also calls into question what Asian American means and what are at stake for Asian America in the context of these Supreme Court cases.
How do Asian Americans define our roots and our routes going forward? By analyzing the histories, stories, and lived experiences of Asian American racial formation and transnational processes in relation to US policies and practices, we can better map the multiple ways Asian Americans navigated the routes they took to articulate and formulate their identities. This framework challenges the limited boundaries that harmful stereotypes and tropes such as the model minority myth produce and reveals how such stereotypes incite violence and erasure toward the Asian diaspora.
Join us as “Defining Our Roots/Routes” explores the lived experiences of Asian American students and scholars in higher education spaces and considers what is at stake for the larger Asian American community in the wake of the Supreme Court cases and anti-Asian hate incidents.
Sponsored by The LCLO Group, a higher education and workforce of the future consulting group that collaborates with public-private partners (higher education experts, corporate leaders, and public & non-profit agencies) to develop and implement solutions to more equitable global workforce development, talent cultivation, and training opportunities & resources. Learn more at LCLOGroup.com
202 Episodes
|
Avg Length 7m
|
Latest episode 1 year ago
Share
43 Episodes
|
Avg Length 54m
|
Latest episode 19 days ago
Share
58 Episodes
|
Avg Length 33m
|
Latest episode 27 days ago
Share
Sidebar by Courthouse News tackles the stories you need to know from the legal world. Join reporters Hillel Aaron, Kirk McDaniel, Amanda Pampuro, Kelsey Reichmann and Josh Russell as they take you in and out of courtrooms in the U.S. and beyond and break down all the developments that had them talking.
9 Episodes
|
Avg Length 38m
|
Latest episode 3 years ago
Share
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
2 Episodes
|
Avg Length 37m
|
Latest episode 1 year ago
Share
Defining Our Roots/Routes: Asian American in Higher Education aims to amplify the erased voices of Asian American students and faculty in higher education as a form of resistance and consciousness-raising by exploring interrelated themes—histories and legacies of Asian America, pan-Asian American identity, and Asian American transnationalism & diaspora. Join us for insights into the lived experiences of Asian American students and scholars in higher education spaces and learn what may be at stake for the larger Asian American community in the wake of Supreme Court cases and recent anti-Asian hate incidents.
Extended Podcast Info:
In late October 2022, the Supreme Court of the United States deliberated the Students for Fair Admissions v. President & Fellows of Harvard College as well as Students for Fair Admissions v. University of Northern Carolina cases, challenging race-conscious admissions practices and potentially developing larger ramifications for the current Affirmative Action policies in the United States.
Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) claims race-conscious admissions practices are racially discriminatory because Black and Latinx students are valued higher at the expense of Asian Americans. They further argue Asian Americans should be “admitted at a higher rate” as they are “substantially stronger” than their non-Asian counterparts. In doing so, the SFFA and conservative Asian American groups, such as the Asian American Legal Foundation (AALF), not only adopt the model minority myth to further pit Asian American students against Black and Latinx students but also calls into question what Asian American means and what are at stake for Asian America in the context of these Supreme Court cases.
How do Asian Americans define our roots and our routes going forward? By analyzing the histories, stories, and lived experiences of Asian American racial formation and transnational processes in relation to US policies and practices, we can better map the multiple ways Asian Americans navigated the routes they took to articulate and formulate their identities. This framework challenges the limited boundaries that harmful stereotypes and tropes such as the model minority myth produce and reveals how such stereotypes incite violence and erasure toward the Asian diaspora.
Join us as “Defining Our Roots/Routes” explores the lived experiences of Asian American students and scholars in higher education spaces and considers what is at stake for the larger Asian American community in the wake of the Supreme Court cases and anti-Asian hate incidents.
Sponsored by The LCLO Group, a higher education and workforce of the future consulting group that collaborates with public-private partners (higher education experts, corporate leaders, and public & non-profit agencies) to develop and implement solutions to more equitable global workforce development, talent cultivation, and training opportunities & resources. Learn more at LCLOGroup.com
Supreme Court dissents have it all: brilliant writing, surprising reasoning, shade, puns, and sometimes historic impact. Although they are necessarily written by the "losing" side, they’re still important: they can provide a roadmap for future challenges or persuade other justices. Sometimes they're just cathartic.
In Dissed, attorneys Anastasia Boden and Elizabeth Slattery dig deep into important dissents, both past and present, and reveal the stories behind them.
Twitter: @EHSlattery @Anastasia_Esq @PacificLegal
Email us at [email protected]
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
154 Episodes
|
Avg Length 43m
|
Latest episode 19 days ago
Share
MACREADS.COM promotes access to justice by transforming curated United States Supreme Court opinions into immersive, on-demand audio experiences for lawyers and non-lawyers.